Moparts

440-1 vs B1

Posted By: tntmachine

440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 03:41 PM

Does the Indy -1 have a larger intake volume than a B1?
Posted By: Al_Alguire

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 03:50 PM

No....Of course maybe that would depend on level of porting. IE box B1 VS fully ported -1 even then I am not sure the -1 would be higher.
Posted By: supercomp

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 04:02 PM

Don't the 440-1 has a longer port.
Posted By: Lil Demon

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 04:11 PM

Having had my -1s next to Al's B1 - I can say absolutely not. The B1 is a huge port - especially when it is hogged out.
Posted By: Bob_Coomer

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 04:53 PM

I dont know about port sizes, but there is no comparison in power potential.
Posted By: supercomp

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 05:03 PM

No dought about that. But Dave Koffel told me a B1 Orig. cnc ported had a 5.625 long 320cc intake port. I ask for my engine analyzer plus program.
Posted By: camastomcat

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 05:07 PM

Quote:

No dought about that. But Dave Koffel told me a B1 Orig. cnc ported had a 5.625 long 320cc intake port. I ask for my engine analyzer plus program.



I don't think the -1 is close outta the box. The B1's are usually 385 unported. That's what my flow sheets say.
Posted By: supercomp

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 05:23 PM

Quote:

Quote:

No dought about that. But Dave Koffel told me a B1 Orig. cnc ported had a 5.625 long 320cc intake port. I ask for my engine analyzer plus program.



I don't think the -1 is close outta the box. The B1's are usually 385 unported. That's what my flow sheets say.





I thought he meant port volume cc's not cfm air flow.
Posted By: Al_Alguire

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 05:52 PM

Quote:

No dought about that. But Dave Koffel told me a B1 Orig. cnc ported had a 5.625 long 320cc intake port. I ask for my engine analyzer plus program.




Your results may vary. I can tell you mine are a bit bigger than that. I thought an Indy port was in the 320 range? Maybe I am mistaken.
Posted By: Bigcube

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 06:06 PM

My Intake CC after hand porting is 342cc. They are in line with the CNC 345's where it's my belief the 345 number in the head designation represents the CC of the intake after the CNC porting. I don't know what the B1's are.
Posted By: supercomp

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 06:10 PM

Your results may vary. I can tell you mine are a bit bigger than that. I thought an Indy port was in the 320 range? Maybe I am mistaken.

I'm only quoting Dave. I'll cc one when I pull one off. Jeff at mch ported these.
Posted By: B1Fish540

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 06:15 PM

the -1s when fully worked over(like GregsDart has done to his) will give the original B1 a run for its money..but in the end the B1 will win. The -1 is a great flowing "max wedge" type head whereas the B1 was designed from a clean sheet of paper with maximum flow in mind.
Posted By: tntmachine

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 06:46 PM

I am asking about the port volume, not CFM. The reason that I ask: I've been running a 493 cid -1 motor that has intake runner volumes of 327 cc's. I'm planning on putting together a bigger motor (572) with B1 heads. I saw a set of B1MC on here that stated the intake volume is 300cc. Since I don't have any B1 heads laying around to compare; I was wondering if the B1's have a shorter runner length than the Indy stuff?
Posted By: supercomp

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 07:04 PM

yes
Posted By: camastomcat

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 07:26 PM

Quote:

I am asking about the port volume, not CFM. The reason that I ask: I've been running a 493 cid -1 motor that has intake runner volumes of 327 cc's. I'm planning on putting together a bigger motor (572) with B1 heads. I saw a set of B1MC on here that stated the intake volume is 300cc. Since I don't have any B1 heads laying around to compare; I was wondering if the B1's have a shorter runner length than the Indy stuff?



Yeah, that stuff with the ti valves and T&D rocker gear is a great deal. I wish I had the money. You should meak better than 1000HP with that set up. I'm not sure about the 300cc coment, but Shady Dell should know. That's if we are talking about the same heads on racingjunk.
Posted By: moparniac

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 08:08 PM

my indy are CNC 345s

Posted By: Mopar_racer_99

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 08:14 PM

Just my 2 cents worth, my -1 fully ported and polished , support 914 hp on a 578ci motor, if I had to do over again, I would go with b1 mc.I am maxxed out with no more room to grow, which means either sell heads for pennies on dollar, or let them sit on shelf if we want to step up. John
Posted By: Gearbox

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 08:14 PM

Whats the deal on racing junk, the only set I see with T/D are Predators, do you have the Add Number of a B1 M/C set-up I may have missed.
Posted By: tntmachine

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 08:18 PM

Yes, The heads that I'm refering to are on RJ.
Posted By: camastomcat

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 08:49 PM

Quote:

Whats the deal on racing junk, the only set I see with T/D are Predators, do you have the Add Number of a B1 M/C set-up I may have missed.



They're on here 2nd page 1/2 way down. In the race parts section.
Posted By: supercomp

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 10:26 PM

Quote:

my indy are CNC 345s






These look bigger. B1 Orig.

Posted By: camastomcat

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 10:39 PM

Quote:

Quote:

my indy are CNC 345s






These look bigger. B1 Orig.





They both look sweet, but I know which makes more power. I've run stage 6, Indy -1 (only slightly better, but made more power when fully ported) and B1's. There is no comparison in power level.
Posted By: gregsdart

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 10:56 PM

Quote:

the -1s when fully worked over(like GregsDart has done to his) will give the original B1 a run for its money..but in the end the B1 will win. The -1 is a great flowing "max wedge" type head whereas the B1 was designed from a clean sheet of paper with maximum flow in mind.



My heads have 365cc after hogging out for alky. That has to be the practical limit i would think.
On power potential, "no comparison " is baloney. Look at my ET. I expect to better it by .2 this year with new head work and other engine improvements to compliment the increased flow. That is despite going back to a bias ply slick from a radial.
They will never be on par with a B1 in fully ported condition, but can be made to run well for a head strangled with the size port opening they have and other restrictions.
After putting 2.3 intakes in mine, head flow was better than B1 original ported heads up to about .500, landing at 396 cfm at .800 and 400 cfm at .900. The original porting numbers came off flow benches at three separate shops, so trying to say the numbers are bogus ain't gonna fly.
I believe the practical limit on power is going to be performance of 8.50s at 2950 lbs. Should relate to 950 hp or there abouts. The gentleman that ported them, Radar from R & R in Iowa helped develop the B1 so he has his act together. He commented that a good build is about 2.45 hp per cfm of head flow. Hope I get there. That would be 970 hp.
Posted By: moparniac

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 11:24 PM

whats fully ported b1's go ??? i know 8secbird on YB say baloney also as he has been 8.00 on nitrous in a big heavy roadrunner ... single plate i believe

Posted By: camastomcat

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 11:28 PM

Quote:

Quote:

the -1s when fully worked over(like GregsDart has done to his) will give the original B1 a run for its money..but in the end the B1 will win. The -1 is a great flowing "max wedge" type head whereas the B1 was designed from a clean sheet of paper with maximum flow in mind.



My heads have 365cc after hogging out for alky. That has to be the practical limit i would think.
On power potential, "no comparison " is baloney. Look at my ET. I expect to better it by .2 this year with new head work and other engine improvements to compliment the increased flow. That is despite going back to a bias ply slick from a radial.
They will never be on par with a B1 in fully ported condition, but can be made to run well for a head strangled with the size port opening they have and other restrictions.
After putting 2.3 intakes in mine, head flow was better than B1 original ported heads up to about .500, landing at 396 cfm at .800 and 400 cfm at .900. The original porting numbers came off flow benches at three separate shops, so trying to say the numbers are bogus ain't gonna fly.
I believe the practical limit on power is going to be performance of 8.50s at 2950 lbs. Should relate to 950 hp or there abouts. The gentleman that ported them, Radar from R & R in Iowa helped develop the B1 so he has his act together. He commented that a good build is about 2.45 hp per cfm of head flow. Hope I get there. That would be 970 hp.



This argument could go on for days. And I know who Radar is and his reputation for making power. I also had a nice set of stage 6 heads that worked well, but the cost me alot of money to get there. The Indy -1's were only slightly better than the stage 6's. So my point is, you could spend alot on the -1's and make a decent head out of them, or but a set of B1 originals or M/C's better yet, so why would you want to???? and the number one reasonis, you don't have to deal with Indy. Because talking to the Koffels is a pleasure, and their product is smokin. And if you can get a guy like Radar to port them, even better. JMHO, but PSO's are the next step as I don't want to buy new headers and already scare myself with the current powerplant.

Attached picture 5861040-Caratdiv.jpg
Posted By: B1Fish540

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 11:32 PM

Quote:

whats fully ported b1's go ??? i know 8secbird on YB say baloney also as he has been 8.00 on nitrous in a big heavy roadrunner ... single plate i believe






Thats fine if bird wants to believe that. Maybe there is'nt a great deal of difference with both on nitrous..but races are won by .01s and .001s and, imo, B1s will always have the edge with evrything else equal.
Posted By: camastomcat

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 03:39 AM

Nobody else?
Posted By: go green

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 05:31 AM

This picture is a perfect example of why you can not just compare port volumes .

Case in point look at the port opening verses the deck height.


pred vs b1


pred vs eddy



I will take angle of entry more so than just simple port volume that why the pred kills the B1 stuff and why the b1 beats the 440-1 stuff.

Having a big volume doesn't matter as much if you have to run uphill and then dump into the chamber.

Attached picture 5861786-heads003.jpg
Posted By: B1Fish540

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 06:13 AM

great post Go green! pics are worth a 1000 words. The straighter the shot the better! The B1 PSOs address that problem somewhat with much higher and rounder port. So in a nutshell, the higher the port and the longer the valve, the better!
Posted By: Bighead440

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 01:05 PM

Quote:

great post Go green! pics are worth a 1000 words. The straighter the shot the better! The B1 PSOs address that problem somewhat with much higher and rounder port. So in a nutshell, the higher the port and the longer the valve, the better!




Sounds like the old Brewer head...
Got some I'm DYING to try someday...
MAN what a shortblock they'd need... RB
Posted By: camastomcat

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 02:18 PM

Wow, those predators make my program look puny. No wonder they make 150-200 HP more! I might reconsider that my next step is the PSO. I hate to say it, but I'm not sure if I want to go that fast.
Posted By: Diablo

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 03:00 PM

Go Green do you know the width and height of the port on your preds?
Posted By: Diablo

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 03:54 PM

Just goes to show The Pred heads and TS heads can not even be put into the same category as any of the other heads just based on the port entry.

Attached picture 5862272-tsheadsresize.jpg
Posted By: camastomcat

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 04:33 PM

Quote:

Just goes to show The Pred heads and TS heads can not even be put into the same category as any of the other heads just based on the port entry.



There's no argueing about that. They are both very impressive. I wonder if anybody has pics of the PSO's to compare?
Posted By: tntmachine

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 04:44 PM

Quote:

This picture is a perfect example of why you can not just compare port volumes .

Case in point look at the port opening verses the deck height.


pred vs b1


pred vs eddy



I will take angle of entry more so than just simple port volume that why the pred kills the B1 stuff and why the b1 beats the 440-1 stuff.

Having a big volume doesn't matter as much if you have to run uphill and then dump into the chamber.




That's the answer that I was looking for... Thanks
Posted By: B1Fish540

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 05:13 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Just goes to show The Pred heads and TS heads can not even be put into the same category as any of the other heads just based on the port entry.



There's no argueing about that. They are both very impressive. I wonder if anybody has pics of the PSO's to compare?




heres the PSO intake...

Posted By: camdog440

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 06:12 PM

Just for comparison... here is a a Victor style head with a MW port by MCH. It's a bit bigger than stock MW at 1.459" by 2.714".

Posted By: moparniac

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 07:35 PM

preet thin inbetween ports there. what you use for a gasket?
Posted By: Bob_Coomer

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 07:43 PM





Quote:

This picture is a perfect example of why you can not just compare port volumes .




Exactly....
Look at the Hemi stuff, big square runners, but are fairly short...
Whats stock 220-230cc range..
Fully ported will go under 300cc 450+ cfm easy.
Posted By: camdog440

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 08:21 PM

Quote:

preet thin inbetween ports there. what you use for a gasket?




That's what I thought too. I'm not sure which gasket I'm using yet... but it shouldn't be too much of a problem I do have a lot of port matching to do on the new Super Victor intake.

Posted By: B1Fish540

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 08:54 PM

Quote:

Quote:

great post Go green! pics are worth a 1000 words. The straighter the shot the better! The B1 PSOs address that problem somewhat with much higher and rounder port. So in a nutshell, the higher the port and the longer the valve, the better!




Sounds like the old Brewer head...
Got some I'm DYING to try someday...
MAN what a shortblock they'd need... RB




You got some Brewer's! I'm jealous I still think those are the best inline valve BB head ever offered for mopars! They have extemely long valves and high ports like the PSO but maybe even higher and rounder. I still cant understand why someone did'nt buy Freds business and keep producing them..

I think a koleno or world block would be great with those heads.
Posted By: Bighead440

Re: 440-1 vs B1 - 03/13/10 09:11 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

great post Go green! pics are worth a 1000 words. The straighter the shot the better! The B1 PSOs address that problem somewhat with much higher and rounder port. So in a nutshell, the higher the port and the longer the valve, the better!




Sounds like the old Brewer head...
Got some I'm DYING to try someday...
MAN what a shortblock they'd need... RB






You got some Brewer's! I'm jealous I still think those are the best inline valve BB head ever offered for mopars! They have extemely long valves and high ports like the PSO but maybe even higher and rounder. I still cant understand why someone did'nt buy Freds business and keep producing them..

I think a koleno or world block would be great with those heads.





Don't be jealous, they're just aluminum bricks gathering dust for now! I do have the intake (low deck single Dominator), valves (2.35 X 1.78 X almost 7" LONG!!!) and spray-bar valve covers, along with one ready-to-port set and one rough/as cast set with seats and guides. It's an intimidating pile, to be sure!
Been looking at the Koleno blocks pretty hard and really longing for a LOW-DECK (supposedly in the works? ) to build a 512-517" from, otherwise a tall deck 542-572 seems in order... RB
© 2024 Moparts Forums