Posted By: tntmachine
440-1 vs B1 - 03/12/10 03:41 PM
Does the Indy -1 have a larger intake volume than a B1?
Quote:
No dought about that. But Dave Koffel told me a B1 Orig. cnc ported had a 5.625 long 320cc intake port. I ask for my engine analyzer plus program.
Quote:Quote:
No dought about that. But Dave Koffel told me a B1 Orig. cnc ported had a 5.625 long 320cc intake port. I ask for my engine analyzer plus program.
I don't think the -1 is close outta the box. The B1's are usually 385 unported. That's what my flow sheets say.
Quote:
No dought about that. But Dave Koffel told me a B1 Orig. cnc ported had a 5.625 long 320cc intake port. I ask for my engine analyzer plus program.
Quote:
I am asking about the port volume, not CFM. The reason that I ask: I've been running a 493 cid -1 motor that has intake runner volumes of 327 cc's. I'm planning on putting together a bigger motor (572) with B1 heads. I saw a set of B1MC on here that stated the intake volume is 300cc. Since I don't have any B1 heads laying around to compare; I was wondering if the B1's have a shorter runner length than the Indy stuff?
Quote:
Whats the deal on racing junk, the only set I see with T/D are Predators, do you have the Add Number of a B1 M/C set-up I may have missed.
Quote:
my indy are CNC 345s
Quote:Quote:
my indy are CNC 345s
These look bigger. B1 Orig.
Quote:
the -1s when fully worked over(like GregsDart has done to his) will give the original B1 a run for its money..but in the end the B1 will win. The -1 is a great flowing "max wedge" type head whereas the B1 was designed from a clean sheet of paper with maximum flow in mind.
Quote:Quote:
the -1s when fully worked over(like GregsDart has done to his) will give the original B1 a run for its money..but in the end the B1 will win. The -1 is a great flowing "max wedge" type head whereas the B1 was designed from a clean sheet of paper with maximum flow in mind.
My heads have 365cc after hogging out for alky. That has to be the practical limit i would think.
On power potential, "no comparison " is baloney. Look at my ET. I expect to better it by .2 this year with new head work and other engine improvements to compliment the increased flow. That is despite going back to a bias ply slick from a radial.
They will never be on par with a B1 in fully ported condition, but can be made to run well for a head strangled with the size port opening they have and other restrictions.
After putting 2.3 intakes in mine, head flow was better than B1 original ported heads up to about .500, landing at 396 cfm at .800 and 400 cfm at .900. The original porting numbers came off flow benches at three separate shops, so trying to say the numbers are bogus ain't gonna fly.
I believe the practical limit on power is going to be performance of 8.50s at 2950 lbs. Should relate to 950 hp or there abouts. The gentleman that ported them, Radar from R & R in Iowa helped develop the B1 so he has his act together. He commented that a good build is about 2.45 hp per cfm of head flow. Hope I get there. That would be 970 hp.
Quote:
whats fully ported b1's go ??? i know 8secbird on YB say baloney also as he has been 8.00 on nitrous in a big heavy roadrunner ... single plate i believe
Quote:
great post Go green! pics are worth a 1000 words. The straighter the shot the better! The B1 PSOs address that problem somewhat with much higher and rounder port. So in a nutshell, the higher the port and the longer the valve, the better!
Quote:
Just goes to show The Pred heads and TS heads can not even be put into the same category as any of the other heads just based on the port entry.
Quote:
This picture is a perfect example of why you can not just compare port volumes .
Case in point look at the port opening verses the deck height.
pred vs b1
pred vs eddy
I will take angle of entry more so than just simple port volume that why the pred kills the B1 stuff and why the b1 beats the 440-1 stuff.
Having a big volume doesn't matter as much if you have to run uphill and then dump into the chamber.
Quote:Quote:
Just goes to show The Pred heads and TS heads can not even be put into the same category as any of the other heads just based on the port entry.
There's no argueing about that. They are both very impressive. I wonder if anybody has pics of the PSO's to compare?
Quote:
This picture is a perfect example of why you can not just compare port volumes .
Quote:
preet thin inbetween ports there. what you use for a gasket?
Quote:Quote:
great post Go green! pics are worth a 1000 words. The straighter the shot the better! The B1 PSOs address that problem somewhat with much higher and rounder port. So in a nutshell, the higher the port and the longer the valve, the better!
Sounds like the old Brewer head...
Got some I'm DYING to try someday...
MAN what a shortblock they'd need... RB
Quote:Quote:Quote:
great post Go green! pics are worth a 1000 words. The straighter the shot the better! The B1 PSOs address that problem somewhat with much higher and rounder port. So in a nutshell, the higher the port and the longer the valve, the better!
Sounds like the old Brewer head...
Got some I'm DYING to try someday...
MAN what a shortblock they'd need... RB
You got some Brewer's! I'm jealous I still think those are the best inline valve BB head ever offered for mopars! They have extemely long valves and high ports like the PSO but maybe even higher and rounder. I still cant understand why someone did'nt buy Freds business and keep producing them..
I think a koleno or world block would be great with those heads.