Posted By: BradH
"Innovate LM-1/LM-2 For Dummies" Questions - 03/12/18 06:31 PM
Long story short, I've never used a wideband 02 sensor on my Challenger. However I have a low-use LM-1 that I purchased second-hand, and a new LM-2 kit, both of which I purchased years ago.
What I recall from around the when I bought the two LMs is that the LM-1 was considered the more reliable unit, although the LM-2 (if you could get it working correctly) was more sophisticated and offered more in terms of data capture download features.
At one point the Innovate Motorsports web site had their own tech forums, but IIRC IM blew 'em all away when the LM-2 forum turned into a never-ending product bash-fest.
From what people here know / remember, I was hoping to get some answers to the following questions:
1. What was the latest firmware IM distributed for the LM-1?
2. What was the latest firmware IM distributed for the LM-2?
3. Were the variety of issues that seemed to plague the LM-2 ever worked out? If so, were there any specific "fixes" or guidelines to follow when using an LM-2 that improved reliability?
4. Does anyone recall seeing side-by-side tests of both models on the same engine and how consistent the readings were between the two?
I'm not sure what else to ask, but am hoping to be better prepared to start using a wideband 02 setup on my car w/ the new engine. Help! / Thanks! - Brad
What I recall from around the when I bought the two LMs is that the LM-1 was considered the more reliable unit, although the LM-2 (if you could get it working correctly) was more sophisticated and offered more in terms of data capture download features.
At one point the Innovate Motorsports web site had their own tech forums, but IIRC IM blew 'em all away when the LM-2 forum turned into a never-ending product bash-fest.
From what people here know / remember, I was hoping to get some answers to the following questions:
1. What was the latest firmware IM distributed for the LM-1?
2. What was the latest firmware IM distributed for the LM-2?
3. Were the variety of issues that seemed to plague the LM-2 ever worked out? If so, were there any specific "fixes" or guidelines to follow when using an LM-2 that improved reliability?
4. Does anyone recall seeing side-by-side tests of both models on the same engine and how consistent the readings were between the two?
I'm not sure what else to ask, but am hoping to be better prepared to start using a wideband 02 setup on my car w/ the new engine. Help! / Thanks! - Brad