Moparts

1972 400: internal or external balance?

Posted By: 1970RT

1972 400: internal or external balance? - 05/24/17 02:13 AM

Would a 1972 400 engine be internally or externally balanced? Thanks.
Posted By: GY3

Re: 1972 400: internal or external balance? - 05/24/17 02:20 AM

Originally Posted By 1970RT
Would a 1972 400 engine be internally or externally balanced? Thanks.


External
Posted By: chargerbr549

Re: 1972 400: internal or external balance? - 05/24/17 02:57 AM

I know they made some forged crank 400's in 72, my friends 72 400 4speed roadrunner had one but I don't remember if the damper was weighted or not.
Posted By: Twostick

Re: 1972 400: internal or external balance? - 05/24/17 03:31 AM

All manual transmission 400's have steel cranks and are internally balanced.

Kevin
Posted By: GY3

Re: 1972 400: internal or external balance? - 05/24/17 04:07 AM

Originally Posted By Twostick
All manual transmission 400's have steel cranks and are internally balanced.

Kevin


Very few of the total 400 production, though.
Posted By: 1970RT

Re: 1972 400: internal or external balance? - 05/24/17 04:09 AM

Please excuse my ignorance on the subject but I'm trying to learn as I go along on. The 400 I have was an automatic. So if I was going to have this engine built into a stroker motor, would it have to be done as an external balance or could it be built as internal balance (which if I understand correctly is better)?
Posted By: Sport440

Re: 1972 400: internal or external balance? - 05/24/17 04:20 AM

It will be done internally, I mean a machine shop who is capable of doing it can, or you can also buy a balanced combo from 440 source or others as well.
Posted By: Cab_Burge

Re: 1972 400: internal or external balance? - 05/24/17 07:43 AM

Originally Posted By Twostick
All manual transmission 400's have steel cranks and are internally balanced.

Kevin

Baloney sauce, they have the thin dampener that is full of balance holes on one side, same thing on the flywheels scope
Posted By: Cab_Burge

Re: 1972 400: internal or external balance? - 05/24/17 07:44 AM

Originally Posted By Twostick
All manual transmission 400's have steel cranks and are internally balanced.

Kevin

Baloney sauce, they have the thin dampener that is full of balance holes on one side, same thing on the flywheels scope I've seen more than one 360 stick shift truck flywheel with 3 big holes drilled in the motor side, they, all 360, are EXTERNALLY balanced shruggy
Posted By: 72sat

Re: 1972 400: internal or external balance? - 05/24/17 07:45 AM

It simply depends on which crank you are going to use. Cast cranks external,steel cranks internal.
Posted By: 73DAD

Re: 1972 400: internal or external balance? - 05/24/17 01:39 PM

ALL big block cranks, forged or cast, are steel.

So:

Cast = external balance
Forged = internal balance
Posted By: Thumperdart

Re: 1972 400: internal or external balance? - 05/24/17 04:25 PM

Originally Posted By 1970RT
Please excuse my ignorance on the subject but I'm trying to learn as I go along on. The 400 I have was an automatic. So if I was going to have this engine built into a stroker motor, would it have to be done as an external balance or could it be built as internal balance (which if I understand correctly is better)?


I run a 72 400 stroked to 470 w/a factory steel off-set ground 3.90 crank and it's internal balanced..............
Posted By: dogdays

Re: 1972 400: internal or external balance? - 05/24/17 07:01 PM

OK, now that the rest have stuffed in their "answers", here is the answer to the question you should have asked, except you aren't far enough along the learning curve to know the right question.

Any time you remove the crank, rods and pistons to build a stroker it doesn't matter what crank the engine started out with.

In nearly every case, the rods and pistons will weigh less than stock. And in most cases, the assembly will be able to be balanced internally, because the new crankshaft will have counterweights sufficiently large (heavy) to allow it.

Using an internally balanced assembly is preferable, if only for the fact that you can then bolt and unbolt neutral balanced harmonic dampers, flywheels and flexplate/torque converters without having to worry about balance. There is another consideration, but IMHO it doesn't really affect a street engine, one that is 1.5 hp/cubic inch or less. In cases wherte the engine is very high output, the rpm range is going to be quite high and in those cases an externally balanced assembly will put more bending stress on the crank and block.

This board is comprised of a bunch of old ladies, afraid of everything. The amount of external balance a 360 has is about 18 oz-inch. You'd think the engine would fly apart at first trip to redline, according to some. Yet, Ford 5.0s for years and years ran quite well with 50 oz-inch external balance. Other Fords did also. And the 5.0s or 302s did indeed split the crankcase right down the middle when they got enough over the 1.5 mark. That's with either power adder or rpm, IIRC. But that's with nearly 3 times the external balance amount as the maximum Mopar, the 360.

Now on to more mundane things. 1972 was a cusp year for Chrysler and so there are forged crank 400s and there are cast crank 400s. If it really matters to you, if you look on the Engine ID pad at top front of the engine, you should see some numbers and letters like H400Pxxxxxxx. H means 1972 model year car. IF there is also an "E" stamped on that pad, the engine came with a cast crank.

One last bit of information. Chrysler's inventory system wasn't the best, and they weren'[t building collector cars, they were building cars for people to buy and drive. So there are way too many examples to count of a part being where it really shouldn't be. One classic example is an engine with cylinder heads with different casting numbers, side to side.

Good luck with your build, and if you would like to PM me about anything, please feel free to.

R.
Posted By: LaRoy Engines

Re: 1972 400: internal or external balance? - 05/25/17 03:01 AM

Originally Posted By Cab_Burge
Originally Posted By Twostick
All manual transmission 400's have steel cranks and are internally balanced.

Kevin

Baloney sauce, they have the thin dampener that is full of balance holes on one side, same thing on the flywheels scope I've seen more than one 360 stick shift truck flywheel with 3 big holes drilled in the motor side, they, all 360, are EXTERNALLY balanced shruggy


I believe he is right Cab. Every 400 from the factory I have ever seen, in front of manual transmissions, had forged steel cranks and were internally balanced. The thin dampers, like the flywheels were drilled for balance but it was a neutral balance and not used on cast cranks.

You are correct about the 360. No 360's had forged cranks and all were externally balanced even if they had manual transmissions.

After 1973, the few 440's with manual transmissions from the factory (trucks are all I know of), had forged cranks and were internally balanced.

Am I an expert? NO! But I've pull a lot of those engines apart.
© 2024 Moparts Forums