Moparts

Hooker vs. T.T.I. headers

Posted By: 1974 474 Duster

Hooker vs. T.T.I. headers - 12/31/08 12:06 AM

My Duster currently has Hooker fenderwell headers on it (2") Looking to see if anyone has gone from this style header to a T.T.I. underchassis header. I have a set of them here as well. Just curious if there would be a gain or a loss. Im thinking of going to a coil over front end as well. So getting the headers in woyuld be a ton easier. I run the T.T.I.'s in the past, but never on this car. The car is a 74 Duster w/a 474 and runs in the 10.30-50 range. Just curious of what others think. Not worried about the header capturing the starter, I always see that as a problem with the T.T.I. header. hope someone out there has some good advice for me!! See ya, Ken Michalik

Attached picture 4911331-MVC-006Sf.JPG
Posted By: 340dart4spd

Re: Hooker vs. T.T.I. headers - 12/31/08 12:29 AM

Quote:

My Duster currently has Hooker fenderwell headers on it (2") Looking to see if anyone has gone from this style header to a T.T.I. underchassis header. I have a set of them here as well. Just curious if there would be a gain or a loss. Im thinking of going to a coil over front end as well. So getting the headers in woyuld be a ton easier. I run the T.T.I.'s in the past, but never on this car. The car is a 74 Duster w/a 474 and runs in the 10.30-50 range. Just curious of what others think. Not worried about the header capturing the starter, I always see that as a problem with the T.T.I. header. hope someone out there has some good advice for me!! See ya, Ken Michalik





Headmen by far
© 2024 Moparts Forums