Moparts

PROCHARGER VS. TURBO

Posted By: MIKES_DUSTER

PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/23/12 08:26 PM

Whats the real difference????

If you had to pick,which one would you do and why???

Does one make more HP than the other??
Posted By: SLOW67

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/23/12 09:53 PM

To me there are pros and cons of both. I chose turbo because it was cheaper and easier for me. My budget is very small and I was able to afford the turbo. Superchargers are expensive but packaging is easier and there is less fab work. I don't really like superchargers because of the belts. You have to worry about slippage at higher boost levels then you've got a part to buy that will have to be replaced regularly. The gentle boost application of a turbo also has alot less wear and tear on the motor in my opinion. I have made my stcok 318 live with up to 18lbs and 30 deg. of timing on avgas, and the only failure has been a stock 35yr old head gasket (and a cracked piston, but it still is living with that). I am biased because of my budget on this topic, all my turbo parts came from ebay so I can't say how much good stuff costs because I know I can't afford it
Posted By: nitrousr

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/23/12 10:50 PM

Hp levels are similiar assuming comparable equipment, but the turbo has a definite advantage in being able to control boost levels down track which is great for the small tire cars. There is a considerable amount of fabrication in a turbo setup which can be intimidating for sure. Another plus for the turbo is you can buy one piece of the puzzle at a time as budget permits instead of the one big hit for the blower. After reading what i just wrote i have to wonder why we sold the turbo setup in the sig to build a procharged setup lol
Posted By: bigtimeauto

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 03:09 AM

hmmmm, i have small tires and a blower and the same belt for 3 years and the same head gaskets and ...........

Once again choose which one you like and feel will fit what your looking to do.

For me its a procharger as i am do daym impatient to wait for a turbo to make boost. I love staging at idle and most of all i love being able to race my car without needing electronic gizmos' to get me down track. Simple is better
Posted By: Cab_Burge

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 03:26 AM

Quote:

Whats the real difference????

If you had to pick,which one would you do and why???

Does one make more HP than the other??


If your racing 1/8 mile use a crank driven EFI Procharger intercooled set up, if 1/4 the intercooled turbo, on a large budget, may be better the last three hundred feet
Posted By: 1967dartgt

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 03:47 AM

Supercharger if you want to impress your friends at a stop light. Turbo if you want to impress the people on the next block. LOL
Posted By: bigtimeauto

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 03:51 AM

Quote:

Supercharger if you want to impress your friends at a stop light. Turbo if you want to impress the people on the next block. LOL




and i still wait for a turbo street car to drive by me
Posted By: bigtimeauto

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 03:52 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Supercharger if you want to impress your friends at a stop light. Turbo if you want to impress the people on the next block. LOL




and i still wait for a turbo street car to drive by me




oh wait, or a turbo mopar TT5
Posted By: 1967dartgt

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 03:56 AM

You still have 440-1 on that killer?
Posted By: bigtimeauto

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 04:21 AM

Quote:

You still have 440-1 on that killer?




blow thru , 440-1 out of the box and 22lbs of boost , no intercooler
Posted By: bigtimeauto

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 04:24 AM

pretty simple if you ask me:

Posted By: moparniac

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 06:10 AM

Quote:

Quote:

You still have 440-1 on that killer?




blow thru , 440-1 out of the box and 22lbs of boost , no intercooler




then you post a pic of your setup with "out of the box" cnc 345's

on your pro charger though will it clear the inner fender if you still had them in?
Posted By: MoparBilly

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 07:45 AM

Great question Mike!
The technology race between these two is hard to keep up with, and I'm sure the answer probably reflects those advancements, and the individual application, as well as the persons previous experiences.
I'm just an old nitrous, carb dinasour, so all this stuff is beyond me, but having just attended both Drag Week, and the Street Car Super Nationals, it appears to me that the Turbo Cars have the upper hand. All the rides perpetuating that feeling however, are top flight, no expense spared, best tuners in the biz, so I'm not sure that's the case for the common man!

Qualifying in 10.5 Outlaw at SCSN
Doug Sikora Procharged Hemi Mustang 6.350-226.54
Mike Murillo TT Mustang 6.354-235.39
Billy Glidden Nitrous Mustang 6.45-217.21

Sikora's BAE equipped Stang: The piping appears to be a bit larger than Bigtime Auto's

Attached picture 7474265-100_0538-Copy.jpg
Posted By: SLOW67

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 08:06 AM

Quote:

hmmmm, i have small tires and a blower and the same belt for 3 years and the same head gaskets and ...........






I was speaking from my 30k a year salary, Most of us don't have the cash for a 3-4k s/c head unit or 15k engine to handle it or the 4k trans or.....

Sure if I had that kind of cash I'd have a big crank driven F1X on a 540 Indy headed motor, but in reality most of us have to settle for much less. If you have a chopsaw and can weld you already have half of what you need for a turbo setup. You can start with cheap parts to get you going then upgrade to better stuff down the road, Just build your hotside with upgrades in mind. A cheapo T6 flanged turbo fits in the same spot a nice Precision 88 fits. Same for the wastegate,BOV,and intercooler. I've got $1200 total including my new fuel system in my setup. If I ever get the cash for bigger/better parts, they will bolt right on where my old stuff was. As far as lag or waiting on boost, If you do your homework when you build it you won't have that problem
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 03:23 PM

Turbos have less of a "drag" on the engine so they can create more power I guess. However unless you can do all the fab work (welding pipe) you aren't saving much over a S/C. If you do go S/C buy a SBF or SBC kit and tweak the brackets. I had a Chevy Paxton kit on my old 440. I cut the main bracket, welded to extentions and had the crank pulley drilled for BB mopar. I had maybe $2200 in the entire set-up including carb prep/ fuel system and gauges.
Posted By: Crizila

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 03:32 PM

Quote:

Whats the real difference????

If you had to pick,which one would you do and why???

Does one make more HP than the other??


If you are bracket racing and want consistancy, ProCharger. Their kits ( and blowers) have come a long ways in the last few years re; ease of installation / maintenance.

Attached picture 7474421-prochargerkit.jpg
Posted By: Crizila

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 03:34 PM

Fuel system

Attached picture 7474427-MagnaFuel.jpg
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 03:37 PM

side ote, do yourself a big fat favor, instead of cobbling togther a braded fuel system w/ blue/purple and or red fittings go to any hydrolics shope and have them make it all for you. It will look 100% better and you will save $$$. Crizilla how much is that set-up?
Posted By: HEMIFRED

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 03:45 PM

blowers take 10% of your power to turn them . turbocharger uses none
Posted By: Crizila

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 04:17 PM

Quote:

side ote, do yourself a big fat favor, instead of cobbling togther a braded fuel system w/ blue/purple and or red fittings go to any hydrolics shope and have them make it all for you. It will look 100% better and you will save $$$. Crizilla how much is that set-up?


For a small block. ProCharger kit was $6300. Fuel kit ( 1000HP pump )was $1084 ( add another $380 for lines). Had ProSystems modify my existing carb for blowthrough = $460.
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 04:43 PM

Quote:

Quote:

side ote, do yourself a big fat favor, instead of cobbling togther a braded fuel system w/ blue/purple and or red fittings go to any hydrolics shope and have them make it all for you. It will look 100% better and you will save $$$. Crizilla how much is that set-up?


For a small block. ProCharger kit was $6300. Fuel kit ( 1000HP pump )was $1084 ( add another $380 for lines). Had ProSystems modify my existing carb for blowthrough = $460.




WOW at those prices I'll be making my own system again.. that or 2 turbos
Posted By: Blusmbl

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 05:10 PM

Quote:

blowers take 10% of your power to turn them . turbocharger uses none




Turbos aren't free horsepower either (the engine's efficiency goes down with them compared to N/A because of the exhaust restriction), but you lose less with them compared to a supercharger.

I can't fabricate for crap so I'll probably go the procharged route if I ever build another car. They both have drawbacks, but especially for a manual trans application the procharger makes more sense. Turbos are cheaper but when you get to the 6's like the cars Billy mentioned the cost advantage is thrown out the window, those things are incredibly expensive to build regardless of your choice of power adder.
Posted By: SLOW67

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 07:05 PM

There is alot of trial and error building your own setup. I used a sawzall, Hobart 140 welder, and a BFH to build this in my driveway. I made alot of mistakes (like 90 deg mounting my wastegate) but it's all part of the fun. I plan on redoing my w/g this winter but all of my hotside is 2.5 so it should handle any power level I can afford. I am by no means a fabricator I built my whole setup with a 360 or 408 in mind for the future so it does have some lag but traction isn't and issue either....

Attached picture 7474647-turbo3.jpg
Posted By: SLOW67

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 07:06 PM

Another

Attached picture 7474648-turbo4.jpg
Posted By: SLOW67

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 07:08 PM

One more in the car

Attached picture 7474652-turbo2.jpg
Posted By: MIKES_DUSTER

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 07:19 PM

WOW!!!!!!! LOTS of answers!!!!!!

So,I guess it comes down to what you really want and IF you can afford it!!!! LOL And from what ive learned,Ill be going the NOS way!!!!!! HAHA!!!
Posted By: racerx

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 07:51 PM

Bigtime any more videos on your dart?I seen a few on youtude just wondering if theres any more out there..
Posted By: 00snake530

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 07:57 PM

for me costs were similar between a twin turbo build (with quality new turbos, waste gates, bov ect) and procharger for my 512", turbos make more power, boost control is undeniable and seat of pants feel seams cooler.... procharger takes up less space, no fab work, or oil feed/return lines to mess with, still sound cool
Posted By: bigtimeauto

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 11:14 PM

Quote:

Bigtime any more videos on your dart?I seen a few on youtude just wondering if theres any more out there..




http://www.youtube.com/user/bigtimeauto
Posted By: bigtimeauto

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 11:29 PM

another i just found

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShPTKaIziBQ
Posted By: 00snake530

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 11:39 PM

Quote:

another i just found

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShPTKaIziBQ




your dart is hard core
Posted By: bigtimeauto

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/24/12 11:41 PM

Quote:

Quote:

another i just found

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShPTKaIziBQ




your dart is hard core




thanks! we try
Posted By: racerx

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/25/12 12:52 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

another i just found

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShPTKaIziBQ




your dart is hard core




thanks! we try


Nice
Posted By: JackGTX440

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/25/12 03:09 AM

Bigtime, how many cubes is your car?
Posted By: bigtimeauto

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/25/12 03:58 AM

Quote:

Bigtime, how many cubes is your car?




540
Posted By: bigtimeauto

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/25/12 04:09 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

You still have 440-1 on that killer?




blow thru , 440-1 out of the box and 22lbs of boost , no intercooler




then you post a pic of your setup with "out of the box" cnc 345's





I bought the heads and block from Best machine over 4 years ago. This is actually the engine that i had sold but put back in the car for josh's race
why do you post stuff like this? My hood was off almost all of the indy event for people to look and i was answering questions. If it will make you feel better a i will go outside and take the hood off and take a picture. you want me to go buy a newspaper to prove the date to?
Posted By: prochargedhemi

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/25/12 04:18 AM

Quote:

Quote:

side ote, do yourself a big fat favor, instead of cobbling togther a braded fuel system w/ blue/purple and or red fittings go to any hydrolics shope and have them make it all for you. It will look 100% better and you will save $$$. Crizilla how much is that set-up?


For a small block. ProCharger kit was $6300. Fuel kit ( 1000HP pump )was $1084 ( add another $380 for lines). Had ProSystems modify my existing carb for blowthrough = $460.




got a brand new F-2 kit for a BB that ill sell ya for 5500.00
Posted By: moparniac

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/25/12 10:09 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

You still have 440-1 on that killer?




blow thru , 440-1 out of the box and 22lbs of boost , no intercooler




then you post a pic of your setup with "out of the box" cnc 345's





I bought the heads and block from Best machine over 4 years ago. This is actually the engine that i had sold but put back in the car for josh's race
why do you post stuff like this? My hood was off almost all of the indy event for people to look and i was answering questions. If it will make you feel better a i will go outside and take the hood off and take a picture. you want me to go buy a newspaper to prove the date to?




was just razzin ya bobby not necessary I love how simple your stuff looks... but on a serious note does the run better with box stock vs the cnc? or is just depend on how much Sh!t your piling into that engine
Posted By: bigtimeauto

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/25/12 05:25 PM

the heads were the first set of mopar heads i ever bought. My goal was to make 875 NA and i was told they would work, After i decided to procharge it all i did was change the cam, pistons make a 4150 intake adapter and that was it.

Yes a engine needs to make real good power by itself or the boost won't be as big as a gain as it can be. Don't forget i don't turn this blower hard either it only see's 22lbs in the 1/8 and 24 in the 1/4.
Boost is only a measurement of restriction.
Posted By: Crizila

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/25/12 11:34 PM

Quote:

WOW!!!!!!! LOTS of answers!!!!!!

So,I guess it comes down to what you really want and IF you can afford it!!!! LOL And from what ive learned,Ill be going the NOS way!!!!!! HAHA!!!


Not much talk on this thread regarding the "supporting cast" ( and there better not be any cast parts ). I started out with a target HP # and went from there. One of my limiting factors was I wanted to use a stock block. This put me in the - not over 700HP range. I went with a stock 360 block that sonic tested on the very good side. Then 3/4 filled it and went with 4 bolt Milodon caps, forged crank and H beam rods, Icon blower pistons. I still think it is probably boarder line for 700 HP, but time will tell.
Posted By: TheOtherDodge

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/26/12 04:13 AM

IMO, the benefits of a turbo on a "street car" out weigh a supercharger.

Much more quiet since the turbo eats up some of the exh sound.

You can run a very, very numerically low gear.

You can run a very tight converter.
Posted By: dizuster

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 12:58 AM

Quote:

pretty simple if you ask me:






That's one more 90 degree bend then my turbo has on my cold side....

And I have single exhaust, so that's only half the work there too! LOL...

I know you LOVE staging at idle, but I bet you'd love you car even more if it were faster with a turbo and all you had to do is put it on a two step during staging...

But I understand... going slow is a good trade off for easy staging.



Attached picture 7477840-2012-08-05_16-07-19_297(1024x768).jpg
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 01:21 AM

Also from what I've seen at the track Superchargers are more consistant.. Seems a lot of the turbo guys have an issue here and there, one run will be fast as nutz and then for no reason it will drop a some et... Just going from what I've seen.
Posted By: Defbob

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 02:02 AM

Quote:

the heads were the first set of mopar heads i ever bought. My goal was to make 875 NA and i was told they would work, After i decided to procharge it all i did was change the cam, pistons make a 4150 intake adapter and that was it.

Yes a engine needs to make real good power by itself or the boost won't be as big as a gain as it can be. Don't forget i don't turn this blower hard either it only see's 22lbs in the 1/8 and 24 in the 1/4.
Boost is only a measurement of restriction.




The restriction are those heads
Posted By: Defbob

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 02:12 AM

superchargers build power in a very consistent manner and can/will make more torque from launch, allowing the car to '60 much quicker than a turbocharged car. That is why when you see outlaw cars that run identical e/t's, the supercharged car will tend to be down on mph. And if they run the same mph, supercharged cars tend to be quicker.
Posted By: bigtimeauto

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 02:29 AM

Quote:

Quote:

pretty simple if you ask me:





That's one more 90 degree bend then my turbo has on my cold side....

And I have single exhaust, so that's only half the work there too! LOL...

I know you LOVE staging at idle, but I bet you'd love you car even more if it were faster with a turbo and all you had to do is put it on a two step during staging...

But I understand... going slow is a good trade off for easy staging.






I do put it on the 2 step at 3500. the fact is i can do it at will without a special *Staging* procedure.

BUT whats really funny is all i hear is talk about how slow my car is from the turbo guys yet for 4 years i haven't seen one get around it?
Posted By: FASTFISH420

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 03:53 PM

Bigtime your combo is real similar to what I would like to build if I could sell my N/A stuff.I wish I had my old 572 stuff back that I ran back in 03 I would have a F2 on it blowthru deal.Ive hinted around the idea about crank driven F2 on my W8 stuff,but would rather do 540 to 572 wedge or Hemi.

Whats the best ET you have run with that thing??
Posted By: joshking440

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 04:29 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

pretty simple if you ask me:





That's one more 90 degree bend then my turbo has on my cold side....

And I have single exhaust, so that's only half the work there too! LOL...

I know you LOVE staging at idle, but I bet you'd love you car even more if it were faster with a turbo and all you had to do is put it on a two step during staging...

But I understand... going slow is a good trade off for easy staging.






I do put it on the 2 step at 3500. the fact is i can do it at will without a special *Staging* procedure.

BUT whats really funny is all i hear is talk about how slow my car is from the turbo guys yet for 4 years i haven't seen one get around it?




well only showin up to one race a year makes it hard for the Turbo cars to guess where you are or are NOT gonna show up to
Posted By: joshking440

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 04:31 PM

Quote:

Bigtime your combo is real similar to what I would like to build if I could sell my N/A stuff.I wish I had my old 572 stuff back that I ran back in 03 I would have a F2 on it blowthru deal.Ive hinted around the idea about crank driven F2 on my W8 stuff,but would rather do 540 to 572 wedge or Hemi.

Whats the best ET you have run with that thing??




He went 5.20s at indy....I think he has been a touch faster.... he is still sleepin
Posted By: W8n2DustU

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 06:15 PM

I've ran both in the Duster. Never got the turbo sorted out though. Did figure out after it was to late that my AMS 1000 had a broken internal wire that would not allow me to make boost. Anyhow I was able to run a 5.21@140 weighing in at 3263# with a 360" W8 motor. This was at an altitude of 3758' corrected.
Posted By: fishy340

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 06:39 PM

Streetcar=turbo....all out racecar= big procharger,just attend a x275 event and you'll see why.
Posted By: mopar396

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 06:39 PM

366 R3 blowthru no coolers pump E85 with procharger
Best with too tight converter on loose airport track 4.94@147

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsgqG9c23aY&feature=plcp
Posted By: BobR

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 07:37 PM

Quote:

blowers take 10% of your power to turn them . turbocharger uses none




Not quite true.
Posted By: BobR

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 07:48 PM

Quote:

Great question Mike!
The technology race between these two is hard to keep up with, and I'm sure the answer probably reflects those advancements, and the individual application, as well as the persons previous experiences.
I'm just an old nitrous, carb dinasour, so all this stuff is beyond me, but having just attended both Drag Week, and the Street Car Super Nationals, it appears to me that the Turbo Cars have the upper hand. All the rides perpetuating that feeling however, are top flight, no expense spared, best tuners in the biz, so I'm not sure that's the case for the common man!

Qualifying in 10.5 Outlaw at SCSN
Doug Sikora Procharged Hemi Mustang 6.350-226.54
Mike Murillo TT Mustang 6.354-235.39
Billy Glidden Nitrous Mustang 6.45-217.21

Sikora's BAE equipped Stang: The piping appears to be a bit larger than Bigtime Auto's




We've had this car with a SBF/nitrous, a SBF/F3 135 Procharger, SBF/ twin Precision 88's and now a BAE with a 136 Procharger. This combo is hands down the best, fastest and quickest of the 4. We were originally going with twins and the BAE but Doug and I decided it would be more fun and much more consistent with the 136. Our best runs to date were a 6.346 ET and 229.70 MPH speed. Our goal is to get the car into the 20's. I believe that's not too far down the road.
Driving a turbo car at the race track is much more challenging than driving a supercharged car but for the street the turbo is probably the better option.
Posted By: Moparnut426

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 09:25 PM

I was always told a Turbo is free HP since its fed by exhaust, but builds a lot of heat, and the chargers eithe roots or snail are crankshaft driven and in turn require hp loss to spin, but dont build nearly the heat. The charger systems have come along ways with built in intercoolers, and such, but the turbo also has had some serious upgrades like ball bearings, variable veigns, and such.

Id still LOVE to boost the Demon, but the 10.8 compression will require a lot of reworking the engine.
Posted By: joshking440

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 09:37 PM

A good tune and that 10.8:1 would not be an issue
Posted By: Moparnut426

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/27/12 11:00 PM

Stop telling me such things! I dont need to hear that kind of crap.

Posted By: bigtimeauto

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/28/12 12:38 AM

Quote:

I was always told a Turbo is free HP since its fed by exhaust, but builds a lot of heat, and the chargers eithe roots or snail are crankshaft driven and in turn require hp loss to spin, but dont build nearly the heat. The charger systems have come along ways with built in intercoolers, and such, but the turbo also has had some serious upgrades like ball bearings, variable veigns, and such.

Id still LOVE to boost the Demon, but the 10.8 compression will require a lot of reworking the engine.




Turbos block up the exhaust so they are not free either.

10.8 is no problem, intercooled gas, c 16 no intercooler or e85 would be fine.
Posted By: Crizila

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/28/12 02:52 AM

Quote:

I was always told a Turbo is free HP since its fed by exhaust, but builds a lot of heat, and the chargers eithe roots or snail are crankshaft driven and in turn require hp loss to spin, but dont build nearly the heat. The charger systems have come along ways with built in intercoolers, and such, but the turbo also has had some serious upgrades like ball bearings, variable veigns, and such.

Id still LOVE to boost the Demon, but the 10.8 compression will require a lot of reworking the engine.


A few of the things that made me go with a Procharger ( centrifugal blower ) verses a turbo are: stand alone lube system, less heat issues ( inner cooler ), exhaust plumbing, Staging issues ( reads consistancy, spool up, exhaust heat ), Lube line plumbing, oil temp issues ( I'm already running a filled block ). Generally, the centrifugal blower system appeared to be a lower maintenance system. The "kit" I bought was very close to a true "bolt on " system. I had already prepped for it though by loosing the P/S and P/B systems from my car. I also have a car with a "ballroom sized" engine compartment.
Posted By: bigtimeauto

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/28/12 03:13 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Bigtime your combo is real similar to what I would like to build if I could sell my N/A stuff.I wish I had my old 572 stuff back that I ran back in 03 I would have a F2 on it blowthru deal.Ive hinted around the idea about crank driven F2 on my W8 stuff,but would rather do 540 to 572 wedge or Hemi.

Whats the best ET you have run with that thing??




He went 5.20s at indy....I think he has been a touch faster.... he is still sleepin





went 5.15 at indy with the slow procharged street car
Posted By: MIKES_DUSTER

Re: PROCHARGER VS. TURBO - 11/28/12 11:07 PM

Quote:


went 5.15 at indy with the slow procharged street car




I dont care what ANYONE says....Thats MOVIN!!!!!
© 2024 Moparts Forums