Moparts

Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor?

Posted By: YO7_A66

Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/06/11 02:38 PM

I have always thought that hooking up the vacuum advance should not go to manifold vacuum. During this time, I have read where someone will suggest hooking it up to manifold vacuum and everyone seems to say that would not work.

My question would be, what are the pros and cons of hooking up a vacuum advance to manifold vacuum?

I would think that you would see more initial timing "after" the engine has started and reached a minimum vacuum setting. More initial timing is what I have leaned towards to help in tuning my carbs. I would think that this would give more initial timing but would not cause more load on the starter especially during hot restarts due to not enough vacuum while the starter is engaged to allow more timing from the can.

I know that this is being used and I want to learn more about why it is done this way.

Thanks
Posted By: Greentween

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/06/11 05:14 PM

If you have an automatic, one problem will be idle speed after you put it in gear. Vacuum will drop, once put in drive, and idle speed will then be to low. Also, I found out that when you mash the power brake hard at idle, that also uses more vacuume which in turn takes away advance, which may stall the engine, then no power brakes.
Posted By: Supercuda

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/06/11 05:36 PM

I inadvertently hooked my distributor up to manifold vacuum once and could not get idle speed to set right. as manifold vacuum went up so did my idle speed, so I'd back off the adjustment and vacuum would drop killing idle speed, took me a bit to figure out what was going on. Never could get it set right till I hooked up to ported vacuum.
Posted By: YO7_A66

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/06/11 08:22 PM

Thank you both for the replies. I did not know of this issue.
Posted By: Crazy68Dart

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/06/11 10:53 PM

For a stockish engine, it has the advantage of adding more timing at idle to help combat cooling issues. I have a '69 Mercury with an FE Ford engine that is setup this way and has always worked well. Just have to remember to pull the line and plug it when setting the base timing.
Posted By: dd340

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/06/11 11:08 PM

Before I shortened the slots on my distributor it ran my vacuum advance through the manifold. It seemed to work just fine. You can adjust out most of the idle issues by adjusting the vacuum canister with an Allen key. Another idea to get rid of idle issues is to put a single light spring in the mechanical advance plate. This will allow full advance at idle because full advance comes in at around 600 rpm, give or take. This will also take care of your hot start issue of too much advance at start up since it cranks with only a few degrees of timing.
Posted By: Wild_Hemi

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/06/11 11:52 PM

Vacuum in the manifold drops as engine demand increases. If you use ported vacuum you always have a vacuum signal. If you want to make adjustments it can be done using the advance pot on the distributor when you use ported vacuum. By taking vacuum form the manifold you do not have a reliable vacuum constant.
Posted By: dd340

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 12:30 AM

Quote:

Vacuum in the manifold drops as engine demand increases. If you use ported vacuum you always have a vacuum signal. If you want to make adjustments it can be done using the advance pot on the distributor when you use ported vacuum. By taking vacuum form the manifold you do not have a reliable vacuum constant.



This is not accurate. The only difference between ported and manifold vacuum is at closed or very nearly closed throttle position. Where do you think the vacuum signal comes from? It comes from the manifold.
Posted By: 62maxwgn

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 12:37 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Vacuum in the manifold drops as engine demand increases. If you use ported vacuum you always have a vacuum signal. If you want to make adjustments it can be done using the advance pot on the distributor when you use ported vacuum. By taking vacuum form the manifold you do not have a reliable vacuum constant.



This is not accurate. The only difference between ported and manifold vacuum is at closed or very nearly closed throttle position. Where do you think the vacuum signal comes from? It comes from the manifold.





Then why do you suppose the manufacturer used ported ?
Posted By: Lee446

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 12:42 AM

Ported vacumn is generated by flow velocity thru the venturi of the carb.
Posted By: AndyF

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 01:30 AM

Ported vacuum usually provides a more stable idle which is why the OEM's went that way. Manifold vacuum can work in certain applications such as with a really big cam.

This is a topic that gets hashed out every few months. Do a search and you'll find that the question has been answered many times before.
Posted By: 383man

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 04:26 AM

Quote:

Ported vacumn is generated by flow velocity thru the venturi of the carb.





That is correct. And intake manifold vacum will be right around o at wide open throttle where ported vacum will be high. Thats why ported is used so much as it will give more advance with more throttle.
In the 70's Ford used a thermal valve with 3 vacum hoses. One to ported vacum , one to intake vacum and the other to the dist. It used ported vacum for normal advance but if it ran to hot the valve would switch it to mamifold vacum which would give it more timing at idle and speed up the eng causing the fan to pull a bit more air. Once it cooled down it switched back to ported vacum. Ron
Posted By: Magnum

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 05:05 AM

Quote:


Then why do you suppose the manufacturer used ported ?




Do you mean the same people who sent our cars out the door with negative caster and an ammeter?


Anyways Y07, manifold does indeed offer more initial timing during idle and light throttle cruise.

I've yet to see and engine idle better at 5 degrees vs 15, 20 or 30.
During such a lean condition, engines LOVE alot of timing.
I'm not saying ported is wrong but limiting your engine to less than 10 deg during idle because it's all your starter will handle is the wrong reason to run low timing at idle.
Posted By: Crazy68Dart

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 12:16 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Ported vacumn is generated by flow velocity thru the venturi of the carb.





That is correct. And intake manifold vacum will be right around o at wide open throttle where ported vacum will be high. Thats why ported is used so much as it will give more advance with more throttle.
In the 70's Ford used a thermal valve with 3 vacum hoses. One to ported vacum , one to intake vacum and the other to the dist. It used ported vacum for normal advance but if it ran to hot the valve would switch it to mamifold vacum which would give it more timing at idle and speed up the eng causing the fan to pull a bit more air. Once it cooled down it switched back to ported vacum. Ron




This is correct. The vacuum can has two ports instead of one. My car was originally setup the same way, but was changed at some point to just simply use the intake vacuum. The issue with the way it was setup originally is that the idle speed is "dynamic" based on how hot the engine is. At one point I tried setting it back up this way, it was strange, that's for sure.
Posted By: dd340

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 01:14 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Ported vacumn is generated by flow velocity thru the venturi of the carb.





That is correct. And intake manifold vacum will be right around o at wide open throttle where ported vacum will be high. Thats why ported is used so much as it will give more advance with more throttle. . Ron




Again, this is wrong information. At wide open throttle regardless if it is ported or manifold vacuum there will be no vacuum or very little vacuum. The ported vacuum is there for just idle or very close to idle conditions. Once you are on the road there is very little difference between the two. I still think that using ported vacuum is better for more situation as long as the distributor advance slots have been shortened to allow much more mechanical advance then is the norm on the stock dist.
Posted By: Supercuda

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 03:22 PM

Quote:



Do you mean the same people who sent our cars out the door with negative caster and an ammeter?




So, why did they send cars out with negative caster? Why, in Chrysler's case is it "bad"?

When you are monodimensional you can make compromises others cannot.

As for ammeters, nothing wrong with them a lack of ignorance won't cure.
Posted By: GomangoCuda

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 04:07 PM

This was written by a former GM engineer as a response to a similar question on a Camaro board:


As many of you are aware, timing and vacuum advance is one of my favorite subjects, as I was involved in the development of some of those systems in my GM days and I understand it. Many people don't, as there has been very little written about it anywhere that makes sense, and as a result, a lot of folks are under the misunderstanding that vacuum advance somehow compromises performance. Nothing could be further from the truth. I finally sat down the other day and wrote up a primer on the subject, with the objective of helping more folks to understand vacuum advance and how it works together with initial timing and centrifugal advance to optimize all-around operation and performance. I have this as a Word document if anyone wants it sent to them - I've cut-and-pasted it here; it's long, but hopefully it's also informative.

TIMING AND VACUUM ADVANCE 101

The most important concept to understand is that lean mixtures, such as at idle and steady highway cruise, take longer to burn than rich mixtures; idle in particular, as idle mixture is affected by exhaust gas dilution. This requires that lean mixtures have "the fire lit" earlier in the compression cycle (spark timing advanced), allowing more burn time so that peak cylinder pressure is reached just after TDC for peak efficiency and reduced exhaust gas temperature (wasted combustion energy). Rich mixtures, on the other hand, burn faster than lean mixtures, so they need to have "the fire lit" later in the compression cycle (spark timing retarded slightly) so maximum cylinder pressure is still achieved at the same point after TDC as with the lean mixture, for maximum efficiency.

The centrifugal advance system in a distributor advances spark timing purely as a function of engine rpm (irrespective of engine load or operating conditions), with the amount of advance and the rate at which it comes in determined by the weights and springs on top of the autocam mechanism. The amount of advance added by the distributor, combined with initial static timing, is "total timing" (i.e., the 34-36 degrees at high rpm that most SBC's like). Vacuum advance has absolutely nothing to do with total timing or performance, as when the throttle is opened, manifold vacuum drops essentially to zero, and the vacuum advance drops out entirely; it has no part in the "total timing" equation.

At idle, the engine needs additional spark advance in order to fire that lean, diluted mixture earlier in order to develop maximum cylinder pressure at the proper point, so the vacuum advance can (connected to manifold vacuum, not "ported" vacuum - more on that aberration later) is activated by the high manifold vacuum, and adds about 15 degrees of spark advance, on top of the initial static timing setting (i.e., if your static timing is at 10 degrees, at idle it's actually around 25 degrees with the vacuum advance connected). The same thing occurs at steady-state highway cruise; the mixture is lean, takes longer to burn, the load on the engine is low, the manifold vacuum is high, so the vacuum advance is again deployed, and if you had a timing light set up so you could see the balancer as you were going down the highway, you'd see about 50 degrees advance (10 degrees initial, 20-25 degrees from the centrifugal advance, and 15 degrees from the vacuum advance) at steady-state cruise (it only takes about 40 horsepower to cruise at 50mph).

When you accelerate, the mixture is instantly enriched (by the accelerator pump, power valve, etc.), burns faster, doesn't need the additional spark advance, and when the throttle plates open, manifold vacuum drops, and the vacuum advance can returns to zero, retarding the spark timing back to what is provided by the initial static timing plus the centrifugal advance provided by the distributor at that engine rpm; the vacuum advance doesn't come back into play until you back off the gas and manifold vacuum increases again as you return to steady-state cruise, when the mixture again becomes lean.

The key difference is that centrifugal advance (in the distributor autocam via weights and springs) is purely rpm-sensitive; nothing changes it except changes in rpm. Vacuum advance, on the other hand, responds to engine load and rapidly-changing operating conditions, providing the correct degree of spark advance at any point in time based on engine load, to deal with both lean and rich mixture conditions. By today's terms, this was a relatively crude mechanical system, but it did a good job of optimizing engine efficiency, throttle response, fuel economy, and idle cooling, with absolutely ZERO effect on wide-open throttle performance, as vacuum advance is inoperative under wide-open throttle conditions. In modern cars with computerized engine controllers, all those sensors and the controller change both mixture and spark timing 50 to 100 times per second, and we don't even HAVE a distributor any more - it's all electronic.

Now, to the widely-misunderstood manifold-vs.-ported vacuum aberration. After 30-40 years of controlling vacuum advance with full manifold vacuum, along came emissions requirements, years before catalytic converter technology had been developed, and all manner of crude band-aid systems were developed to try and reduce hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen in the exhaust stream. One of these band-aids was "ported spark", which moved the vacuum pickup orifice in the carburetor venturi from below the throttle plate (where it was exposed to full manifold vacuum at idle) to above the throttle plate, where it saw no manifold vacuum at all at idle. This meant the vacuum advance was inoperative at idle (retarding spark timing from its optimum value), and these applications also had VERY low initial static timing (usually 4 degrees or less, and some actually were set at 2 degrees AFTER TDC). This was done in order to increase exhaust gas temperature (due to "lighting the fire late") to improve the effectiveness of the "afterburning" of hydrocarbons by the air injected into the exhaust manifolds by the A.I.R. system; as a result, these engines ran like crap, and an enormous amount of wasted heat energy was transferred through the exhaust port walls into the coolant, causing them to run hot at idle - cylinder pressure fell off, engine temperatures went up, combustion efficiency went down the drain, and fuel economy went down with it.

If you look at the centrifugal advance calibrations for these "ported spark, late-timed" engines, you'll see that instead of having 20 degrees of advance, they had up to 34 degrees of advance in the distributor, in order to get back to the 34-36 degrees "total timing" at high rpm wide-open throttle to get some of the performance back. The vacuum advance still worked at steady-state highway cruise (lean mixture = low emissions), but it was inoperative at idle, which caused all manner of problems - "ported vacuum" was strictly an early, pre-converter crude emissions strategy, and nothing more.

What about the Harry high-school non-vacuum advance polished billet "whizbang" distributors you see in the Summit and Jeg's catalogs? They're JUNK on a street-driven car, but some people keep buying them because they're "race car" parts, so they must be "good for my car" - they're NOT. "Race cars" run at wide-open throttle, rich mixture, full load, and high rpm all the time, so they don't need a system (vacuum advance) to deal with the full range of driving conditions encountered in street operation. Anyone driving a street-driven car without manifold-connected vacuum advance is sacrificing idle cooling, throttle response, engine efficiency, and fuel economy, probably because they don't understand what vacuum advance is, how it works, and what it's for - there are lots of long-time experienced "mechanics" who don't understand the principles and operation of vacuum advance either, so they're not alone.

Vacuum advance calibrations are different between stock engines and modified engines, especially if you have a lot of cam and have relatively low manifold vacuum at idle. Most stock vacuum advance cans aren’t fully-deployed until they see about 15” Hg. Manifold vacuum, so those cans don’t work very well on a modified engine; with less than 15” Hg. at a rough idle, the stock can will “dither” in and out in response to the rapidly-changing manifold vacuum, constantly varying the amount of vacuum advance, which creates an unstable idle. Modified engines with more cam that generate less than 15” Hg. of vacuum at idle need a vacuum advance can that’s fully-deployed at least 1”, preferably 2” of vacuum less than idle vacuum level so idle advance is solid and stable; the Echlin #VC-1810 advance can (about $10 at NAPA) provides the same amount of advance as the stock can (15 degrees), but is fully-deployed at only 8” of vacuum, so there is no variation in idle timing even with a stout cam.

For peak engine performance, driveability, idle cooling and efficiency in a street-driven car, you need vacuum advance, connected to full manifold vacuum. Absolutely. Positively. Don't ask Summit or Jeg's about it – they don’t understand it, they're on commission, and they want to sell "race car" parts.
Posted By: GomangoCuda

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 04:27 PM

Here is another good article.

Carburetor Vacuum Ports: Manifold, Ported and Venturi Vacuum Explained

by Lars Grimsrud

This tech paper will discuss the concepts of 3 different types of vacuum sources, and will briefly discuss
their potential uses and applications in tuning GM V8 engines.

Overview
The airflow through a carburetor and through an engine’s intake system creates various pressure regions
due to a variety of effects. The low pressure regions are sources for "vacuum" used for signal sources and
power sources for operating accessories.
"Vacuum" in an engine is not truly a "vacuum." Rather it defines a lower-than-atmospheric-pressure area
in the engine or in the carburetor. Lower-than-atmospheric pressure is measured in "inches of Mercury."
Mercury has the chemical symbol "Hg," so the terminology for the measurement becomes "in. Hg." To
visualize how this measurement works, imagine a U-shaped glass tube partially filled with Mercury. The
one end of the tube is exposed to the atmosphere. The other end of the tube is attached to your low
pressure source. The low pressure on the one end of the tube will cause the Mercury to rise up the tube.
The amount that it rises is "in. Hg."
A funny terminology issue arises with this: Most people would describe that the low pressure area is
"sucking" the Mercury up the U-shaped tube. To be technically correct, there is no such thing as "suction."
What is actually happening is that the low-pressure area is allowing the high pressure on the other end to
"push" the Mercury up the tube. Thus, when you "suck" on a straw in a milkshake, you are not sucking:
You are creating a low pressure region in your mouth, and atmospheric pressure is "pushing" the milkshake
up the straw and into your mouth.

How Vacuum is Produced
In an engine and carburetor there are two different mechanisms (processes) for producing vacuum. The
two are interesting in their differences.
The most commonly recognized vacuum source in an engine is "manifold vacuum." Manifold vacuum is
created in the intake manifold of an engine due to the pistons’ intake downstroke on one end, and the
restriction created by the partially open carburetor throttle plates on the other end. If the throttle plates are
closed tightly and the pistons are moving quickly, a very high vacuum is created. If the throttle plates are
opened more, creating a larger "leak path," less vacuum is created. If the pistons are moving slowly and
the throttle plates are wide open, the pressure in the manifold will be very close to atmospheric pressure –
no intake vacuum. Thus, intake vacuum can be used as a signal source to determine how hard an engine is
working.
Less recognized, and more frequently misunderstood, is the term "venturi vacuum." Venturi vacuum is
produced in an entirely different manner, and it behaves completely independently of manifold vacuum.
To understand venturi vacuum, you have to think back to your high school physics class and the Bernoulli
Effect: As a fluid (liquid or gas) moves through a tube, the areas of low velocity produce high pressure,
and the areas of high velocity produce low pressure. Thus, as the tube necks down and becomes narrow,
the fluid flowing through the narrow section has to move faster, and pressure in the narrow section is lower
than the pressure in the larger section. Venturi vacuum, and the Bernoulli Effect, occurs in the venturi of
the carburetor: As air enters the carb, it passes through the "necked-down" area of the venturi. As it passes
through the venturi, the air accelerates. This fast-moving air creates a low pressure area right in the middle
of the venturi, and this low pressure area is used to discharge fuel from the float bowl of the carb into the
air stream. Remembering our discussing in the Overview of this article, the fuel is not "sucked" out into
the venturi: The low pressure area in the venturi allows atmospheric pressure on top of the fuel in the float
bowl to "push" the fuel up and out of the venturi discharge nozzles. The venturi vacuum varies only by the
total amount ("mass") of airflow passing through the venturi and its velocity: The faster the air is passing
through (more air), the higher the venturi vacuum will be. This is completely independent of the manifold
vacuum.

How Vacuum is Used
Manifold vacuum is very easy to tap and utilize: Simply drill a hole in the intake manifold and stick a hose
in it. This vacuum can then be used to power accessories (headlight doors and heater controls), or it can be
used as a signal source based on how hard the engine is working. One such signal source application is
distributor vacuum advance: When the engine is working lightly (high vacuum produced), the ignition is
advanced, and as the engine loses vacuum due to the throttle being mashed to the floor, vacuum is lost and
ignition is retarded. Pretty simple.
But what if you want to "switch" the vacuum on and off based on whether the engine is just idling or in
cruise mode? Enter the term "Ported Vacuum."
When emissions became a priority to vehicle manufacturers, a method had to be found to reduce emissions
at idle. The amount of Hydrocarbons emitted out of the tailpipe can be drastically altered by changing the
timing: Retarding the timing reduces Hydrocarbon emissions. But retarded timing adversely affects gas
mileage at cruise. So a method was needed to retard timing at idle, yet maintain it at normal levels for
cruise. The solution was seen to "turn off" the vacuum advance at idle, yet have it operate normally under
all other operating conditions. To do this, a small hole was drilled in the carburetor throttle body just above
the position of the throttle plate at idle (NOT in the venturi area), and this hole was connected to a vacuum
nipple on the carb. When the throttle plates are closed at idle, they act as an "off" switch to block the
drilled hole from manifold vacuum. As the throttle plates are opened up, the hole becomes fully exposed to
manifold vacuum, and normal manifold vacuum is realized at the nipple. Thus, you have a manifold
vacuum "on-off" switch, turning manifold vacuum "off" at idle, and restoring it to normal operation once
the throttle plate is cracked open. Vacuum advance can be eliminated at idle for good emissions, and
instantly restored to normal operation at cruise. At both cruise and Wide Open Throttle (WOT), manifold
vacuum and ported vacuum are exactly the same: There is high vacuum at cruise, and virtually no vacuum
at WOT. The difference in vacuum occurs only at idle.
So if there is no manifold vacuum or ported vacuum at WOT, how can vacuum open the secondaries on a
vacuum secondary carb at WOT? Manifold or ported vacuum is not used to open the secondaries: The
secondaries are opened by venturi vacuum. On a true vacuum secondary carb (Holley and BG are the only
real vacuum secondary carbs – Q-Jets and AFBs are not vacuum secondary carbs), there is a small hole
drilled right into the middle of the venturi wall on the passenger side primary venturi. This passage runs
over to the vacuum diaphragm, and the low pressure created in the primary venturi from very high airflow
through the venturi is used to open the secondary throttle shaft. The more air that passes through the
primary side, the more the secondary diaphragm will open. It is strictly a function of airflow through the
primary venturi and the low pressure that this creates in the venturi. Manifold vacuum can be non-existent,
yet if the airflow through the carb is high, the secondaries will be pulled open by the venturi vacuum. Note,
however, that there is no external nipple on any carb for venturi vacuum: The only source is the small
drilled hole in the venturi, and this hole only runs to the secondary diaphragm through an internal passage.
Thus, we see that we have 3 types of vacuum in the engine: Manifold Vacuum, Ported Vacuum (simply a
"switched" manifold vacuum source), and Venturi Vacuum. Of these, only Manifold Vacuum and Ported
Vacuum can be utilized for tuning purposes.

Tuning with Vacuum
I see a lot of discussion and confusion regarding the use of Ported Vacuum versus Manifold Vacuum for
distributor vacuum advance. Once understood, the tuner can effectively utilize one source or the other,
depending on the tuning requirements of the vehicle. There is no right or wrong answer on which source to
use, but using the correct source for the tuning requirements of a given engine can have a big effect on offidle
and near-idle performance characteristics.
First, be sure to locate and read my paper titled "Distributor Vacuum Advance Control Units." This
contains a lot of technical information related to this issue that I won’t be repeating under this paper
heading.
The timing advance curve requirements for an engine will vary a bit from one engine to another depending
on cam, compression ratio and other efficiency factors. But in general terms, most GM V8s will produce
peak power at WOT with 36-38 degrees of ignition timing. Peak fuel economy and drivability at cruise is
achieved with about 52-54 degrees of advance. Best idle quality has a much wider range depending on cam
& engine, but tends to be in the 12-24 degree range. Lowest emissions usually occur with timing in the 4-8
degree range.
When tuning, it is important to realize that the upper limits on timing are determining factors for how to set
things up: You want the total WOT timing (the maximum timing the engine will see with vac advance
disconnected and with the centrifugal advance fully deployed) to be not over 38 degrees. 36 is the best
setting for most applications. Once this has been set, it automatically determines what your initial advance
ends up being unless you physically alter the length of the advance curve. In most cases, once total
advance has been set to 36, the initial advance will end up being about 12 degrees-or-so. And, since most
vacuum advance control units pull in about 16 degrees of vacuum advance at cruise speed (where the full
centrifugal advance will also be deployed), the 36-degree setting will produce 52 degrees of total combined
advance at cruise with the vac advance fully deployed.
But what if your engine/cam combination idles best at 26 degrees advance? Radical cams often require
quite a bit of advance at idle. If you simply bump the initial timing up from 16 to 26, your total WOT
advance will go from 36 to 46. The total combined timing at cruise will go from 52 to 62. This is not
acceptable, and can result in severe engine damage from detonation at WOT, and the car will chug and jerk
at cruise from the over-advanced condition. An appropriately selected vacuum advance unit, plugged into
manifold vacuum, can provide the needed extra timing at idle to allow a fair idle, while maintaining
maximum mechanical timing at 36. A tuning note on this: If you choose to run straight manifold vacuum
to your vacuum advance in order to gain the additional timing advance at idle, you must select a vacuum
advance control unit that pulls in all of the advance at a vacuum level 2 in. Hg below (numerically less
than) the manifold vacuum present at idle. If the vacuum advance control unit is not fully pulled in at idle,
it will be somewhere in its mid-range, and it will fluctuate and vary the timing while the engine is idling.
This will cause erratic timing with associated unstable idle rpm. A second tuning note on this: Advancing
the timing at idle can assist in lowering engine temperatures. If you have an overheating problem at idle,
and you have verified proper operation of your cooling system components, you can try running manifold
vacuum to an appropriately selected vacuum advance unit as noted above. This will lower engine temps,
but it will also increase hydrocarbon emissions on emission-controlled vehicles.
If, however, your engine idles best in the 12-16 degree range due to a mild cam, plug the vacuum advance
control unit to a ported vacuum source to eliminate the vacuum signal at idle. You will still obtain the 36-
degree WOT total, and you’ll still have 52 at cruise. Also, if you need to pass an emissions test, use the
ported source to reduce your hydrocarbons.
By playing with the total length of your centrifugal advance curve, selecting between ported or manifold
vacuum, and carefully selecting a matched vacuum advance control unit that meets your specification
requirements, you can achieve an optimum idle, excellent off-idle throttle response, and the best fuel
economy possible.

Questions, Comments & Technical Assistance
If you have questions or comments regarding this article, or if you notice any errors that need to be
corrected (which is quite possible since I’m writing this from memory…), please feel free to drop me an email.
Also, if you need any technical assistance or advice regarding this process, or other maintenance
issues, feel free to contact me:
V8FastCars@msn.com
Posted By: Lee446

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 04:27 PM

As I said, ported vac is generated by the flow of air thru the venturi, the higher the flow, the more vac. That is exactly how the end carbs on six packs and the secondaries on Vac secondary carbs are able to open at high/full throttle. If they used manifold vac, they would never open. That GM guy gives a good explanation, it has always been a confusing subject.
Posted By: Twostick

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 04:27 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Ported vacumn is generated by flow velocity thru the venturi of the carb.





That is correct. And intake manifold vacum will be right around o at wide open throttle where ported vacum will be high. Thats why ported is used so much as it will give more advance with more throttle. . Ron




Again, this is wrong information. At wide open throttle regardless if it is ported or manifold vacuum there will be no vacuum or very little vacuum. The ported vacuum is there for just idle or very close to idle conditions. Once you are on the road there is very little difference between the two. I still think that using ported vacuum is better for more situation as long as the distributor advance slots have been shortened to allow much more mechanical advance then is the norm on the stock dist.







The ONLY difference between "ported" and manifold is the ported passage is just above the throttle blades. When the throttle is closed it closes the port = no vacuum = no vacuum advance at idle. As soon as you crack the throttle past the port it then sees manifold vacuum. This was an emissions era invention.

The manifold vacuum port passage is below the blades so it sees vacuum or the lack of it all the time.

A simple test to confirm this is get 2 vacuum gauges and hook one to each port. You will find that they will be basically the same everywhere but idle.

Kevin
Posted By: GomangoCuda

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 04:29 PM

This subject comes up often enough that both of those articles should be put in the Tech Archives.
Posted By: GomangoCuda

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 04:34 PM

Quote:

Again, this is wrong information. At wide open throttle regardless if it is ported or manifold vacuum there will be no vacuum or very little vacuum. The ported vacuum is there for just idle or very close to idle conditions. Once you are on the road there is very little difference between the two. I still think that using ported vacuum is better for more situation as long as the distributor advance slots have been shortened to allow much more mechanical advance then is the norm on the stock dist.




Ported vacuum is shut off at idle and the same as manifold vacuum as soon as the throttle plates start opening.

Quote:

As I said, ported vac is generated by the flow of air thru the venturi, the higher the flow, the more vac. That is exactly how the end carbs on six packs and the secondaries on Vac secondary carbs are able to open at high/full throttle. If they used manifold vac, they would never open. That GM guy gives a good explanation, it has always been a confusing subject.




No. Ported vacuum does not come from the venturi. It comes from right above the throttle plates so that as soon as you come off idle it is the same as manifold vacuum. You are correct about the vacuum source for opening a sixpack or for that matter any vacuum secondary Holley carb is from the venturi. Two entirely different things.

Quote:

The ONLY difference between "ported" and manifold is the ported passage is just above the throttle blades. When the throttle is closed it closes the port = no vacuum = no vacuum advance at idle. As soon as you crack the throttle past the port it then sees manifold vacuum. This was an emissions era invention.

The manifold vacuum port passage is below the blades so it sees vacuum or the lack of it all the time.





This is correct.
Posted By: 540DUSTER

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 05:45 PM

the reason the vacuum drops on ported vacuum is that as the blades of the throttle are opened the air is moved to the center of the bore;away from the drilled hole in the wall of the bore.Have you ever noticed that in a fast moving river the water on the edge of the flow will be slower or even move backwards than the water in the middle of the river?
Posted By: cogen80

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 06:17 PM

Quote:

As I said, ported vac is generated by the flow of air thru the venturi, the higher the flow, the more vac.






??? by saying that you saying that at WOT you should have the most vac. then. no? thats wrong.

vac advance only works at part throttle where you have vac. at WOT the vac advance is just along for the ride. your dist. is fully mechanical at that point.
Posted By: Spraygoon

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 06:37 PM

The vacuum that opens the secondaries on a 4 barrel or Six pack comes from a hole just below the start of the venturi, not down by the throttle plates. If you have a Holley its kind of inline with the boosters. You have to look hard to see it. Once the plates open a certain amount the ported vaccum goes away. I run my VA off manifold vacuum, the main benefeit is the advanced timing @ idle. My 440 makes about 16" @ 900 rpm with about 25 degrees advance. Sent my dist to Don @ FBO who beleives maifold vacuum is correct. You can't just plug it in one or the other and hope one works better, it has to be setup properly.
Posted By: 383man

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 07:19 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Ported vacumn is generated by flow velocity thru the venturi of the carb.





That is correct. And intake manifold vacum will be right around o at wide open throttle where ported vacum will be high. Thats why ported is used so much as it will give more advance with more throttle. . Ron




Again, this is wrong information. At wide open throttle regardless if it is ported or manifold vacuum there will be no vacuum or very little vacuum. The ported vacuum is there for just idle or very close to idle conditions. Once you are on the road there is very little difference between the two. I still think that using ported vacuum is better for more situation as long as the distributor advance slots have been shortened to allow much more mechanical advance then is the norm on the stock dist.







The ONLY difference between "ported" and manifold is the ported passage is just above the throttle blades. When the throttle is closed it closes the port = no vacuum = no vacuum advance at idle. As soon as you crack the throttle past the port it then sees manifold vacuum. This was an emissions era invention.

The manifold vacuum port passage is below the blades so it sees vacuum or the lack of it all the time.

A simple test to confirm this is get 2 vacuum gauges and hook one to each port. You will find that they will be basically the same everywhere but idle.

Kevin





I agree I used the wrong words as I was refering to venturi vacum but I said ported.
Ported is actually manifold vacum but it is placed above the throttle plate so you have no vacum at the port at idle.
Venturi vacum is from airflow thru the carb venturi which increases with more airflow. It is how the vacum carbs work from venturi vacum. Mopar also ueed a venturi vacum signal to the EGR amplifier in the 70's as it was the signal it got and it told the amplifier when to put intake vacum to the EGR valve.

Another thing to remember is intake and ported vacum will be strongest on closed throttle decell and then at idle. And when at part throttle the intake and ported vacum signal is still strong as thats why the vacum advance can help part throttle power and milage. But when the throttle reaches a certain point close to and at wide open throttle the vacum drops to about 0 because with the throttle open there is no way to create a low pressure area under the throttle.

Many cars in the 70's with all the emission devices used the dual vacum advance which at times also put manifold vacum on the other side of the vacum diaphram to retard timing at idle. That way they could open the throttle more to maintain idle speed letting in more air thus leaner mixture at idle. They also used Decell valves that would advance the timing under decelleration as another emission device.

Bottom line is most vacum advances use ported vacum which is intake vacum taken above the throttle plate and would give alot of advance at part throttle but when going to wide open throttle the vacum advance would drop off and the mechanical advance was what took over.
I was wrong in stating most vacum advances use venturi vacum as some did but not alot. Ron
Posted By: 540DUSTER

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 07:38 PM

there is ported vacuum at idle,at lease with all the mopar dist. I have ever messed with.Get a service manual and look it up for yourself.Might not be alot but it is there.
Posted By: Supercuda

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 08:17 PM

I'd be real hesitant to accept what works on some other brand of engine as gospel for all engines.

GM may very well have used ported vacuum for whatever reason that is completely inapplicable to MoPar engines. During the emissions time frame that GM engineer speaks of Chrysler used lean burn whereas GM used air injection and cats well before Chrysler had to. So something in the engine design was very different between the two.

I can also tell you this, my 65 Cuda uses ported vacuum as did my 64 300, both well before tail pipe sniffing became the norm.
Posted By: Lee446

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 11:06 PM

Don't know what I was thinking, Y'all are correct, if ported was venturi vac, you would have 50* plus at WOT. Mea Culpa!
Posted By: BigBlockMopar

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/07/11 11:56 PM

Quote:

My question would be, what are the pros and cons of hooking up a vacuum advance to manifold vacuum?




Quote:

"ported vacuum" was strictly an early, pre-converter crude emissions strategy, and nothing more.






If your car has a mandatory smog-test every year, use Ported vacuum. Otherwise use Intake vacuum.
Posted By: Crazy68Dart

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/08/11 12:39 AM

I really appreciate the articles. I understood the reasoning behind the use of vacuum advance, but I never understood why base timing was so retarded on engines when we know they like more initial timing. The emissions info clears it up. I still see no reason to use ported vacuum for the advance.

A test that I want to do now is hook up my mighty vac to the vacuum can and see when full vacuum advance is achieved. Interesting. I am assuming that the adjustable cans adjust the amount of advance, and not how much vacuum it takes to get full advance.
Posted By: Wild_Hemi

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/10/11 02:30 AM

Taking vacuum from a ported area provides a better vacuum signal at the restriction of the throttle bores. It is accurate. The signazl for a distributro is much better at the throttle bore. The restriction creates the added velocity. Sorry but your wrong.
Posted By: larrymopar360

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/10/11 05:46 AM

Because of my limited knowledge, I am a bit confused. I thought ported vacuum was manifold vacuum because it screws into the manifold. So where does a "manifold vacuum" hose connect exactly? Also, what is the "can". I know of vacuum ports and vacuum amplifier on my MP 360/300hp crate motor. Where should my vacuum advance be connected? Idle is a little crappy right now. Thanks.
Posted By: Wild_Hemi

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 08/10/11 11:15 PM

Manifold vacuum is just as it says. Taken from the manifold. Ported vacuum is above the throttle plates. Remember the constriction at the throttle bores creates velocity. cacuum it this pot is governed by the size of the bore. As the throttle plates opemna small slot on the side of the bore in the primaries is less restricted and the value of the port vacuum declines.As you would expect from the engine rpms increasing.
Posted By: YO7_A66

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distribu - 11/04/11 04:49 PM

What is the difference between "timed" and "ported"? Are they the same just different terminology?

After doing some more reading, this Winter I am going to buy a distributor that is setup for manifold vacuum advance (which comes with a lower rated can).
I like the idea of having more timing at idle (especially in D at a stop) and if the distributor is already setup for manifold vacuum, then the idle should not fluctuate as others have witnessed.

Thanks for all of the replies in the past on this issue.

Thanks
Posted By: RemCharger

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distribu - 11/04/11 07:06 PM

Timed and ported are the same.
Just set your timing for best idle performance, in gear and nuetral, and shorten your advance to get that initial, and best full mechanical.
Then hook your vac back up and see if it pings and bucks good.
Posted By: 5thAve

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 11/06/11 10:15 AM

Quote:

I'd be real hesitant to accept what works on some other brand of engine as gospel for all engines.

GM may very well have used ported vacuum for whatever reason that is completely inapplicable to MoPar engines. During the emissions time frame that GM engineer speaks of Chrysler used lean burn whereas GM used air injection and cats well before Chrysler had to. So something in the engine design was very different between the two.

I can also tell you this, my 65 Cuda uses ported vacuum as did my 64 300, both well before tail pipe sniffing became the norm.




Exactly. GM did things differently then Chrysler and articles about why and how they did it is irrelevant.
Posted By: Strawdawg

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 11/06/11 02:58 PM

So, if the laws of physics are different between GM, Ford, and Mopar, how about some info as to why Mopar did it the way they did.
Posted By: Fury Fan

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 11/07/11 05:19 PM

There's so much contradiction typed with confidence that it's making a Green bearing discussion look unanomous.
Posted By: Strawdawg

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 11/07/11 05:44 PM

LOL...that is true.

The facts are pretty simple here. NOx became the big target in that period and lower compression, egr, and retarded (reduced) timing were the tools available in those days to try to reduce levels and the implementation was very crude by today's standards given the lack of computer control.

All the manufacturers had similar versions because the science was the same for all. It should be a moot point today as most of us are after performance and are not running timing curves similar to what the factories had to impose to achieve the reduction.

Performance was a secondary consideration and the results definitely reflected that.
Posted By: runinonmt

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distributor? - 11/08/11 04:31 PM

Quote:

I am assuming that the adjustable cans adjust the amount of advance, and not how much vacuum it takes to get full advance.



Just the opposite. The adjustment adds tension to the spring inside changing starting advance vacuum and delaying full advance. To adjust full advance a shim has to be placed between the arm and the stop(backside of the can)
Ron
Posted By: YO7_A66

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distribu - 11/15/11 04:23 PM

When plumbing the vacuum line from the distributor to a manifold vacuum source, does it matter if I use an existing port on the back of my RPM intake or do I need to use the smaller manifold port on the carb?

I thought that I may have read somewhere that the intake port may not have as strong of a signal as the port on the carb due to it's larger orifice size.

Thanks
Posted By: Mattax

Re: Why Use Manifold Vacuum for Vacuum Advance Distribu - 11/18/11 01:18 AM

Probably no measurable difference due to the orafice size as its dead head (no flow). However, on a hot cam it would seem possible that lower rpm vacuum might not be as steady in a runner. If you see lots of evidence of reversion (carbon up into the intake) then that would be a clue that further from the valve would be smoother.

OTH if the cam is that hot, its unlikely the engine will really want manifold sourced vac advance...
© 2024 Moparts Forums