Moparts

ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly?

Posted By: A990

ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 12:06 AM

This is for a street driver, no racing, with an occasional Jungle Jim style burnout.
FSM says 140 or 90, but since I have enough ATF4 on hand I thought I'd seek some input
Posted By: ademon

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 12:24 AM

Bad,
Posted By: FuryUs

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 01:00 AM

...then ugly.
Posted By: Pacnorthcuda

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 01:02 AM

never good...
Posted By: A990

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 01:08 AM



OK, Im truly not trying to euthanize it. So just dump in some 140 and call it good. Or is 75-90 or 90 a better setup?

While I'm at it, would a magnetic drain plug be worthwhile?
Posted By: ahy

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 01:32 AM

Agree no ATF+4. With gear oil the 140 will make it quieter but possibly slow shifting and create a bit more friction. I'd do 75W90 or 80W90 but straight 90 would be OK also.
Posted By: 68LAR

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 01:45 AM

I'm the original owner of my RR. Since it was vertually new I've run nothing but Dextron ATF. Never broke it and never had to change parts because of wear. Say what you will about ATF. Everyone has an opinion. Mine is there is nothing to be affraid of with ATF. I race my car, but most of the time it is street driven. No issues at all doing either. When racing, it shifts like butter through a hot knife. On the street, the same, hot or cold. Take it from 43 years of first hand experience. ATF does work in A833's. ATF4 is another story. I don't have any experience with it. But being nothing more than an ATF synthetic, it should work also, but with an additional cost.
Posted By: DJVCuda

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 01:59 AM

Quote:

I'm the original owner of my RR. Since it was vertually new I've run nothing but Dextron ATF. Never broke it and never had to change parts because of wear. Say what you will about ATF. Everyone has an opinion. Mine is there is nothing to be affraid of with ATF. I race my car, but most of the time it is street driven. No issues at all doing either. When racing, it shifts like butter through a hot knife. On the street, the same, hot or cold. Take it from 43 years of first hand experience. ATF does work in A833's. ATF4 is another story. I don't have any experience with it. But being nothing more than an ATF synthetic, it should work also, but with an additional cost.




I agree - and anyone who thinks ATF will cause damage is nuts!


My dad is the original owner of a '70 challenger 383 4 speed car - he now has 114,000 miles on it. it had a rebuild at 112,000 miles and all that went in it was bearings, shift forks, seals, & gaskets.
He towed a camper trailer from NJ to as far as Missouri. He also drag races it when he has time and is never easy on it.


Guess what was in it? ATF!

guess what went back in it ? ATF

Trailer in the 70's ( skyline drive)


Here is how he drives it...




ATF has never been a problem -

The only other lube I'd recommend is the one Jamie Passon makes on his own, as I am sure he has a well developed product.
Posted By: Cab_Burge

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 02:05 AM

Quote:

This is for a street driver, no racing, with an occasional Jungle Jim style burnout. FSM says 140 or 90, but since I have enough ATF4 on hand I thought I'd seek some input


I have owned many Mopars with NP 833 4 speeds in them that had ATF in them from the factory ATF will work excellent and make the trans. shift a lot easier than 75-80W gear oil will Especially if you live in a area that has cool to cold weather A 727 trans have a lot more gears and pressures internally than a NP833 does
Posted By: HPMike

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 02:08 AM

ATF was actually the recommended fluid by Chrysler when these units were in cars in cold climates. I have rebuilt countless 833's in the last 25 years or so and will tell you that in my experience, the ATF doesn't seem to have a negative affect.

BTW. The absolute BEST fluid to run in one of these units is GM Synchromesh. YOu will not believe the shift quality with this fluid in there. That being said, if it were a trailer queen/resto, I would spec gear oil. The "cling" of that heavy stuff helps keep things happy.

MB
Posted By: fourgearsavoy

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 03:28 AM

ATF for auto trans
Gear oil for manual trans
I personally don't think ATF will lubricate a manual trans as well as gear oil does
Gus

Attached picture 6660335-burnoutpicturegus.JPG
Posted By: 451Mopar

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 03:50 AM

RedLine MTL:

http://www.redlineoil.com/product.aspx?pid=45&pcid=7
Posted By: kilroy

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 04:09 AM

What atf? Dexron, type F ? Which one are the atf guys using.

One thing I wouldnt use personally is synthetic 75-90w. Switched from standard to synthetic it was TERRIBLE! Wont down shift properly now, slower up shifts. Thinking about trying out atf, best experiences in life are those you try, even if you fail.
Posted By: mshred

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 04:15 AM

Quote:



BTW. The absolute BEST fluid to run in one of these units is GM Synchromesh. YOu will not believe the shift quality with this fluid in there.

MB




I have heard this more than once.. I picked up some 80W90 high pressure gear oil for mine, but im wondering if I should give the synchromesh a try
Posted By: cudaman1969

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 04:29 AM

If im not mistaking atf was used in the hemi trans and gear oil used in the 23 spline. The 18 spline had brass bushings and the 23 run metal to metal on the main shaft. been 40 years since i worked for the dodge dealer,might be wrong.
Posted By: rallye73

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 06:59 AM

I switched out the ATF-4 in my SRT-4 and went to Royal Purple synchromax. It seems to shift smoother and has quieter operation. The ATF-4 didn't seem to last as long between changes. As far as my 833 in the Challenger, I'll be using 80w90. I don't figure I'll be driving it in the winter anyway.
Posted By: Kern Dog

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 07:12 AM

Nobody here has a factory service manual? I have one from 1969 and it shows ATF for cold to mild climates. I have used Valvoline Dexron ATF in the 833 in the FrankenDuster for years. ZERO troubles. The ATF+4 is synthetic and may have a lower coefficient of friction, which would certainly wreak havoc with the synchronizers. They need some friction to work properly. It is this need of slight friction that Hypoid type gear oil is also NOT recommended for manual transmissions.
Posted By: azmopar

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 07:18 AM

my moms 74 duster IN AZ had atf (dexron) from the factory in it still does

slant 6 4sd od
Posted By: gdonovan

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 08:33 AM

Quote:

I agree - and anyone who thinks ATF will cause damage is nuts!






As a factory tech in the 80's I saw a number of 833's (In trucks of course) with excessive bearing wear which in my opinion was caused by the factory fill of ATF used at the time for better MPG.

The lightest fill I would use would be a 15W40 or other such lube but not ATF
Posted By: quickd100

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 11:17 AM

I ran ATF up here in Minnesota in my 4-spds in the winter. At -30 you can't even get it in gear when it's cold with 80-90. In the summer I'd run the 80-90 just because it was quieter. Dave
Posted By: 85_Ram_4speed

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 11:33 AM

I used 1 qt of ATF and filled the rest with 80w90. That seemed to give me the best feel when shifting. I tried all 80w90 and it was to hard to shift and straight ATF was just too loose feeling and gave me personally the wrong feel for shifting causing mis-shifts. So I compromised and mixed them.

Is there something out there better? Maybe, and yea, the Factory service manuals I have seen all called for straight ATF. But I will never run it straight in my stuff again. At the time too (about 10 years ago), ATF and 80w90 were CHEAP! Nowadays with dino oils approaching that of synthetics, I mght be inclined to try a synthetic when I get my 4-speed back together in a running vehicle.
Posted By: DJVCuda

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 01:09 PM

Quote:

Quote:

I agree - and anyone who thinks ATF will cause damage is nuts!






As a factory tech in the 80's I saw a number of 833's (In trucks of course) with excessive bearing wear which in my opinion was caused by the factory fill of ATF used at the time for better MPG.

The lightest fill I would use would be a 15W40 or other such lube but not ATF




If you take not of the picture I attached - The 4 speed ( 23 spline ) that I am basing my post on has towed a camper, with a family of 4 and bikes on the roof - it was beat on heavily it's entire life. It had brass syncro's and they were in excellent condition and did not need to be replaced.
Posted By: gdonovan

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 01:17 PM

Quote:


If you take not of the picture I attached - The 4 speed ( 23 spline ) that I am basing my post on has towed a camper, with a family of 4 and bikes on the roof - it was beat on heavily it's entire life. It had brass syncro's and they were in excellent condition and did not need to be replaced.




1) I stated nothing about syncros if you read my posting. Syncros with ATF I have no opinion, bearing wear on the other hand..

2) You are one example compared to the dozens of vehicles that sat in my work bay.

The roller bearings on the countershaft seem to really get hammered the most, ATF doesn't have great lubrication properties compared to gear oil or even motoroil.
Posted By: therocks

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 01:27 PM

I agree gear oil.My 65 had that in it from the factory and still has it.Still shifts perfect.Rocky
Posted By: JohnRR

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 01:28 PM

Quote:



The roller bearings on the countershaft seem to really get hammered the most, ATF doesn't have great lubrication properties compared to gear oil or even motoroil.




The transmissions I have rebuilt that were ATF filled all needed the cluster gear shaft replaced , very noticeable wear pattern from the rollers.

If ATF is the godsend then why does one even have to replace the bearings? They should last forever, correct ?
Posted By: DJVCuda

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 02:02 PM

maybe if it sits... like in your case - and does not get driven...lol

i never said it was a godsend and was replying to various people ( regarding the brass syncors)

A persons driving habbits / ability I think will have a far greater impact on the condition of the case then the lube...

If your a hack and cant shift - even with gear oil - you will wear alot more then someone who can shift with ATF
Posted By: JohnRR

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 03:12 PM

Quote:

maybe if it sits... like in your case - and does not get driven...lol






They were not my transmissions but transmissions I rebuilt for others.

Personally none of the 4 speed equipped Mopars I have owned ever had ATF in them when I bought them. What they had for a factory fill, I have no idea.
Posted By: DJVCuda

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 03:25 PM

well I do - and they were ATF when shipped around here.
Posted By: 76Beeper

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 06:06 PM

Have a read.............
Posted By: John_Kunkel

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 06:32 PM


I see a difference between the ATF that the factory recommended in the sixties/seventies and the ATF+4 of today. "Slippery" fluid defeats the purpose of the synchro rings.

Even though some current standard transmissions use +4 from the factory they have different (composite?) synchros than the 833.
Posted By: JohnRR

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 07:11 PM

Quote:

well I do - and they were ATF when shipped around here.




Since I live further North than you I can only ASSuME that the factory fill here was also ATF but for some reason the owners of some/many cars switched to gear oil?

We will never agree on this.
Posted By: JohnRR

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 07:17 PM

Quote:


I see a difference between the ATF that the factory recommended in the sixties/seventies and the ATF+4 of today. "Slippery" fluid defeats the purpose of the synchro rings.

Even though some current standard transmissions use +4 from the factory they have different (composite?) synchros than the 833.




there is even a difference between the recommended fill of Dexron to the currently available Dexron/Mercron III , I wouldn't even think of using that +3 or +4 fluid.

John is also correct late model manual transmissions thaat call for ATF don't have BRASS syncro stop rings .
Posted By: DJVCuda

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 07:52 PM

i know we will never agree - bu read what the use of gear oil does to a manual tranny .....
Posted By: gdonovan

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 07:59 PM

Quote:

Have a read.............





Try again, thanks for playing.

Picture is from my battered 1970 service manual, not some "after the fact" book.

Note the factory fill is SAE140, if cold weather use 80W or 90W or ATF. Once warmer weather returns in bold it states to replace ATF with SAE140.

Gary

Attached picture 6661734-DSCN2848x.jpg
Posted By: Dean_Kuzluzski

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 08:19 PM

ATF is 5w oil. That's why bearings tend to gall or leave a wear pattern.

I run a MIX of 80/90w gear oil and ATF to help shifting and reduce bearing wear.
Posted By: A990

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/01/11 09:21 PM

I appreciate the replies. The SRT-4 uses it for diff lube and you'd think the ring/pinion and quaife mechanism would need something a little more robust.

I'll look into GMs synchromesh

Ken
Posted By: Blakcharger440

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/02/11 02:33 AM

In my A833 (23spline) I run 80-90W gear oil that says it works well in extreme pressure and hypoid type of rear ends. It also says it works well in manual transmission and differentials.

There is usually difficulty in shifting from 2nd to 3rd gear fairly consistently...and it seems to occur more often when the car gets warmed up.

The trans is in my 70 Charger RT with 512RB engine with a new Hurst competition plus shifter kit. Could this problem be caused by the type of fluid?

Or is there another thing that could be causing the problem
Posted By: ahy

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/02/11 02:49 AM

Quote:

I used 1 qt of ATF and filled the rest with 80w90. That seemed to give me the best feel when shifting. I tried all 80w90 and it was to hard to shift and straight ATF was just too loose feeling and gave me personally the wrong feel for shifting causing mis-shifts. So I compromised and mixed them.

Is there something out there better? Maybe, and yea, the Factory service manuals I have seen all called for straight ATF. But I will never run it straight in my stuff again. At the time too (about 10 years ago), ATF and 80w90 were CHEAP! Nowadays with dino oils approaching that of synthetics, I mght be inclined to try a synthetic when I get my 4-speed back together in a running vehicle.




Gear oil is good but if you want something better, try Redline "MTL" which stands for manual transmission lube. It is a synthetic rated 70W90 from memory with additives designed to work with syncros. Twice I've had transmissions that were rattling and noisey on ATF and hard shifting on gear oil (not 833's). The MTL made a big difference. I'm guessing Passon's special lube - which I've never used - is similar. Summit and others sell it.

I use "sycromesh" in newer transmissions that call for it - 98 Neon, 08 Caliber, Tremtec - but I don't believe it is heavy enough for a 833. It would be like running ATF with the bearing wear concerns mentioned above.
Posted By: mshred

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/02/11 04:35 AM

Quote:

In my A833 (23spline) I run 80-90W gear oil that says it works well in extreme pressure and hypoid type of rear ends. It also says it works well in manual transmission and differentials.

There is usually difficulty in shifting from 2nd to 3rd gear fairly consistently...and it seems to occur more often when the car gets warmed up.

The trans is in my 70 Charger RT with 512RB engine with a new Hurst competition plus shifter kit. Could this problem be caused by the type of fluid?

Or is there another thing that could be causing the problem




I am now worried about this also...I just got done filling up my A833 with 80W90 extreme pressure gear oil from the local auto parts house...Will I now have problems shifting it????

Wish I had known this before
Posted By: JohnRR

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/02/11 04:37 AM

Quote:

In my A833 (23spline) I run 80-90W gear oil that says it works well in extreme pressure and hypoid type of rear ends. It also says it works well in manual transmission and differentials.

There is usually difficulty in shifting from 2nd to 3rd gear fairly consistently...and it seems to occur more often when the car gets warmed up.

The trans is in my 70 Charger RT with 512RB engine with a new Hurst competition plus shifter kit. Could this problem be caused by the type of fluid?

Or is there another thing that could be causing the problem




If it's GL5 that is your problem.
Posted By: mshred

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/02/11 04:46 AM

Quote:

Quote:

In my A833 (23spline) I run 80-90W gear oil that says it works well in extreme pressure and hypoid type of rear ends. It also says it works well in manual transmission and differentials.

There is usually difficulty in shifting from 2nd to 3rd gear fairly consistently...and it seems to occur more often when the car gets warmed up.

The trans is in my 70 Charger RT with 512RB engine with a new Hurst competition plus shifter kit. Could this problem be caused by the type of fluid?

Or is there another thing that could be causing the problem




If it's GL5 that is your problem.




Is there a such thing as GL4 extreme pressure lube? I am using cheap house brand oil, so im hoping that even though its extreme pressure its still maybe GL4...I hope will using the GL5 actually deteriorate the synchros?

Took me forever to fill the darn thing too
Posted By: JohnRR

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/02/11 04:53 AM

GL5 will not deteriorate the syncros , you may have gear clash ... aka shifting issues ... since you love to cheap out on stuff , run it and tell us how it works .

Posted By: ademon

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/02/11 05:12 AM

Passon in mine, looked to be like 5w 30 oil weight. Easy shifting!
Posted By: MoparKansas

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/02/11 07:03 PM

Where can you find GL-4 rated gear old at? Every jug I look at in the parts stores is GL-5. I see Pennzoil synchomesh all over - how well would that work? My tranny is ready to be filled...
Posted By: 64dodge572

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/02/11 07:16 PM

If you can't find it local I have Penn 80/90 GL4. Syncromesh will work fine, but is more prone to leaking.
Dan
Posted By: GomangoCuda

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/02/11 07:36 PM

Quote:

Syncromesh will work fine, but is more prone to leaking.
Dan




Amen to that. I had a couple of tiny leaks that weren't bad enough to warrant trany r&r until I tried Syncromesh. I would think that atf would leak just as bad.
Posted By: mshred

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/02/11 09:12 PM

Quote:

GL5 will not deteriorate the syncros , you may have gear clash ... aka shifting issues ... since you love to cheap out on stuff , run it and tell us how it works .






thats it, I just LOVE to cheap out on stuff
Posted By: mshred

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/02/11 09:13 PM

Quote:

If you can't find it local I have Penn 80/90 GL4. Syncromesh will work fine, but is more prone to leaking.
Dan




Just picked up some Delco synchromesh to replace to the GL5 gear oil that i put in....why is it that it is more prone to leaking? im assuming because its thinner? Everything at the parts store is GL5 for gear oil, so i got the synchromesh instead
Posted By: 64dodge572

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/02/11 09:25 PM

Thinner when its hot. The same goes for engine or rear. Also the reason newer engines have much tighter bearing clearance.
Dan
Posted By: therocks

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/02/11 09:39 PM

I used to drive my 65 year round.Even in 10 below it shifted fine with gear oil.It had gear oil from the factory and was sold in Ohio as were a few others I worked on and owned.None had problems.Rocky
Posted By: CompSyn

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/02/11 10:56 PM

What Frank Adkins says, be sure to get a GL-4 rated manual transmission fluid which is not the same as a GL-5 rated differential fluid.

Also, one can compare the operational viscosities of the various commonly available lubes.

Notice how the ATF and Synchormesh are close in terms of thickness...

PENNZOIL MULTI-VEHICLE ATF: Viscosity 33.82 @ 104(F)

PENNZOIL SYNCHROMESH FLUID: Viscosity 41.60 @ 104(F)

Now notice how the 75W-90 GL-4 is over twice the thickness...

PENNZOIL SYNTHETIC SAE 75W-90 GL-4: Viscosity 108.00 @ 104(F)

I'd go with a good 75W-90 GL-4
Posted By: A990

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/03/11 12:30 AM

I just called around locally and can get 3 brands. Royal Purple, Redline, and Sta-lube.

Heading out now and will report findings, so stay tuned
Posted By: Pacnorthcuda

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/03/11 01:10 AM

I currently have Redline's "MT-90" in my 18-spline. Don't remember exactly WHY I chose that over MTL but something on Redline's website caused me to make that choice. Box shifts great under aggressive OR relaxed driving. I think in the 5 years I've been driving it I've missed 3rd twice. And I thrash it from time to time. Under relaxed (slow shift) conditions I can feel the gears engage--I LIKE that! Part of that feel is the coarser cut of the 18 spline's gears though.

I don't downshift into first (hardest job for a synchro) at anything over about 15 mph but it always completes the job just fine.
Posted By: A990

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/03/11 01:55 AM

MT90 is what I picked up. GL-4 and is comparable to 40w motor oil (per the package label) MTL is comparable to 30w

Royal Purple has no GL rating at all, and at $15 per qt, someone with deeper pockets than I will have to beta test it

Sta-Lube is made by CRC, but I didnt go over to Napa to check it out

On a different note, when the SRT-4 needs a fluid change, I'm hearing good things about Royal Purple. On cold days the ATF4 lets the 1-2 upshift crunch a little till things get warmed up- I dont like that

As far as feeling the gears engage, my Ford pickup does that and it is very good to know the 833 can do it too
Posted By: Blakcharger440

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/06/11 03:51 AM

Quote:

Quote:

In my A833 (23spline) I run 80-90W gear oil that says it works well in extreme pressure and hypoid type of rear ends. It also says it works well in manual transmission and differentials.

There is usually difficulty in shifting from 2nd to 3rd gear fairly consistently...and it seems to occur more often when the car gets warmed up.

The trans is in my 70 Charger RT with 512RB engine with a new Hurst competition plus shifter kit. Could this problem be caused by the type of fluid?

Or is there another thing that could be causing the problem




If it's GL5 that is your problem.




Well I simply did not know that I was running something that was not compatible with the type of gear setup in my trans.

But...yep it says SAE 80W-90 GL-5,GL-4,GL-3 on the bottle. The trans shifts like butter except from 2nd to 3rd when the trans starts to get warmer the longer I am cruising.

I thought that I was doing a good thing buy running the thicker 80w-90....but I guess all 80W-90 is not created equal.

I am gonna dump that stuff and get some other gear oil in there.
Posted By: JohnRR

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/06/11 02:51 PM

Quote:



But...yep it says SAE 80W-90 GL-5,GL-4,GL-3 on the bottle. The trans shifts like butter except from 2nd to 3rd when the trans starts to get warmer the longer I am cruising.






I don't know enough about oils to know if it's possible to rate an oil like that , if it has the stuff for GL5 in there can it really be 4 and 3 compatible ?

Put a thinner oil in it , heck put ATF in , it must be ok since I read it on the internet ...

Posted By: Blakcharger440

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/07/11 01:18 AM

Quote:

Quote:



But...yep it says SAE 80W-90 GL-5,GL-4,GL-3 on the bottle. The trans shifts like butter except from 2nd to 3rd when the trans starts to get warmer the longer I am cruising.






I don't know enough about oils to know if it's possible to rate an oil like that , if it has the stuff for GL5 in there can it really be 4 and 3 compatible ?

Put a thinner oil in it , heck put ATF in , it must be ok since I read it on the internet ...






Nahh..I am gonna stay away from the internet ATF. I will call Jamie at Passon and get some of his stuff.
Posted By: DJVCuda

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/07/11 02:46 AM

Quote:




ATF has never been a problem -

The only other lube I'd recommend is the one Jamie Passon makes on his own, as I am sure he has a well developed product.




GOOD MOVE!
Posted By: rbkt65

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/07/11 04:51 AM

back in 1970/71 mopar put out memo that was directed to owners in cold weather states saying if stick trannys shifted hard in xx degrees and colder,drop gear oil and put in atf.thought that a bit odd but reports back from cws was "thanks can shift the sob now"
Posted By: gdonovan

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/07/11 10:17 AM

Quote:

back in 1970/71 mopar put out memo that was directed to owners in cold weather states saying if stick trannys shifted hard in xx degrees and colder,drop gear oil and put in atf.thought that a bit odd but reports back from cws was "thanks can shift the sob now"




It states that in the service manual picture I posted (more or less)
Posted By: mshred

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 01:34 AM

not to resurrect an older thread, but i feel i need some advice.

some of you have seen and replied in my other thread about my A833 grinding when i make the 1-2 shift under partial or hard throttle, but not under very light acceleration. I have taken the whole transmission apart and inspected every peice, and everything is working and worn as it should be with no visible issues at all. I changed the fluid in the transmission to AC delco synchromesh, and now im wondering my problem is the fluid im using?

Im thinking of trying ATF since i see quite a few people recommend it, and since its also dirt cheap and there is no non GL5 gear oil on any shelf here. Im wondering though what kind of ATF should I be trying? Dextron? Mercon? straight ATF? does it matter if its Dextron 3 or 4? Just looking for some input here since id like to refill the trans with ATF and see what happens
Posted By: HPMike

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 02:32 AM

Quote:

not to resurrect an older thread, but i feel i need some advice.

some of you have seen and replied in my other thread about my A833 grinding when i make the 1-2 shift under partial or hard throttle, but not under very light acceleration. I have taken the whole transmission apart and inspected every peice, and everything is working and worn as it should be with no visible issues at all. I changed the fluid in the transmission to AC delco synchromesh, and now im wondering my problem is the fluid im using?

Im thinking of trying ATF since i see quite a few people recommend it, and since its also dirt cheap and there is no non GL5 gear oil on any shelf here. Im wondering though what kind of ATF should I be trying? Dextron? Mercon? straight ATF? does it matter if its Dextron 3 or 4? Just looking for some input here since id like to refill the trans with ATF and see what happens




Forget that idea. Its not the fluid. Think about it, if it was an issue of the fluid(which it clearly isn't), then why only 2nd gear? Follow that logic?

Did you do what I mentioned for you to do in tn my previous post in this thread?

MB
Posted By: mshred

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 02:41 AM

Quote:

Quote:

not to resurrect an older thread, but i feel i need some advice.

some of you have seen and replied in my other thread about my A833 grinding when i make the 1-2 shift under partial or hard throttle, but not under very light acceleration. I have taken the whole transmission apart and inspected every peice, and everything is working and worn as it should be with no visible issues at all. I changed the fluid in the transmission to AC delco synchromesh, and now im wondering my problem is the fluid im using?

Im thinking of trying ATF since i see quite a few people recommend it, and since its also dirt cheap and there is no non GL5 gear oil on any shelf here. Im wondering though what kind of ATF should I be trying? Dextron? Mercon? straight ATF? does it matter if its Dextron 3 or 4? Just looking for some input here since id like to refill the trans with ATF and see what happens




Forget that idea. Its not the fluid. Think about it, if it was an issue of the fluid(which it clearly isn't), then why only 2nd gear? Follow that logic?

Did you do what I mentioned for you to do in tn my previous post in this thread?

MB




I posted in that thread last night. I did everything you told me and checked every last part, its all working fine and it good order...this is why im thinking possibly the fluid? I know it sounds weird that its only affecting one gear, but ive been searching the hell outta what fluid to use and it seems that some guys who had problems with only one gear changed fluids, and voila! problem fixed.

I havent actually driven the transmission yet since fixing it, so i was thinking of trying a different fluid to see where it would get me. I still have the drained synchromesh
Posted By: ahy

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 03:49 AM

Having tried many fluids the best for a getting a "touchy" transmission to shift well is Redline synthetic. Its available in two grades: "MTL" which is 70W80 from memory and 90 weight. Either one would work in an 833 - I'd suggest the MTL for easiest shifting with adequate protection of bearings/gears. Summit and others sell it.

I believe the ATF and syncromesh options are too light for an 833 (I know, controversial topic). That said if it won't shift smoothly on syncromesh you might well have problems with the hard parts as posted above.
Posted By: mshred

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 03:57 AM

Quote:

Having tried many fluids the best for a getting a "touchy" transmission to shift well is Redline synthetic. Its available in two grades: "MTL" which is 70W80 from memory and 90 weight. Either one would work in an 833 - I'd suggest the MTL for easiest shifting with adequate protection of bearings/gears. Summit and others sell it.

I believe the ATF and syncromesh options are too light for an 833 (I know, controversial topic). That said if it won't shift smoothly on syncromesh you might well have problems with the hard parts as posted above.




Well the hard parts have been inspected as per instructions here by a qualified manual transmission mechanic and everything is in good working order. I was kinda disappointed to not find anything wrong because now im really stumped. Gonna put it back on the road and see what happens.

Now im really confused...do i spring for some gear oil, or go to ATF? lol
Posted By: NANKET

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 04:03 AM

Quote:

My dad is the original owner of a '70 challenger 383 4 speed car - he now has 114,000 miles on it. it had a rebuild at 112,000 miles and all that went in it was bearings, shift forks, seals, & gaskets.
He towed a camper trailer from NJ to as far as Missouri. He also drag races it when he has time and is never easy on it.




DJV CUDA, Please tell all of us the comlete story of why that 1970 Challenger has a 1971 and newer side cover on the trans. You posted a picture of the inside of that trans years ago and I remember you had more to tell about this trans than you are saying here. You had an explaiation for the side cover being changed. That will shed some more light on this original trans that wasn't rebuilt till 112,000 miles.
Posted By: Joshs68

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 04:18 AM

I just changed the fluid in my 833 from Synchromesh to 80w-140 gear oil. I live in a hot (100*) every day climate. It was a large improvement in both gear noise and shift feel. It also matches up with the 68 service manual. cold climate=ATF warmer climate=140w gear oil.
Posted By: 70HemiGTX

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 11:24 AM

I have Liberty gears in my trans. I emailed them and posed this question to them. They said gear oil. 80-90 or comparable. They said to stay away from light stuff.
Posted By: ThermoQuad

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 11:40 AM

I love these posts...well not really...lot's of opinions and hot air, little fact.

Why you would anything other than Passon lube in a 4 speed is beyond me. The year is 2011 NOT 1971!.

Lubricants have come a long ways since 1970. I don't care how many miles so in so ran a 4 speed on atf. It does not matter here or anywhere.

I drove a 4speed car 100,000 miles with all sorts of lubes in it. Anyone else have real data beside me or Jamie Passon??

The only lube that works properly is made by Passon Performance. I have torture tested many lubricants running hot laps the road course for 20 plus years. Most of those other lubes did not help the life or reliability of the 4 speed.
Heat, vibration, leaks, shifter rattle...





Posted By: DJVCuda

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 01:01 PM

Quote:

Quote:

My dad is the original owner of a '70 challenger 383 4 speed car - he now has 114,000 miles on it. it had a rebuild at 112,000 miles and all that went in it was bearings, shift forks, seals, & gaskets.
He towed a camper trailer from NJ to as far as Missouri. He also drag races it when he has time and is never easy on it.




DJV CUDA, Please tell all of us the comlete story of why that 1970 Challenger has a 1971 and newer side cover on the trans. You posted a picture of the inside of that trans years ago and I remember you had more to tell about this trans than you are saying here. You had an explaiation for the side cover being changed. That will shed some more light on this original trans that wasn't rebuilt till 112,000 miles.




Dad ordered this car in late 69, is was built in late '69 and he got it early 1970.
during the first year of his ownership ( going by his story ) he has shifting issues with the original tranny, he had taken the car to Cherry Hill Dodge to have it looked at. He watched as they pulled the trans, pulled it apart, and proceeded to get looked over by about everyone in the shop, they came to him several hours later trying to say they had an issue with the tranny ( Syncros ) and it might be awhile before they could get him a new one, Dad apparently asked if they knew how to put the tranny back together with new syncros, and they told him no!

He had to wait and was given a new tranny. all was well for the next 112,000 miles.

When we rebuilt this ( with the help of Jamie Passon ) we ordered all the parts necessary for a 23 spline 833 and gave Jamie measurements on the front bearing that was supplied with the unit. We recieved the parts and then noticed that the bearing retainer was larger then the bearing. Calling Jamie Passon revealed that we had a small block tranny in a big block bell ( large retainer hole, small retainer bearing)

Jamie was excellent about swapping parts for us, and I bet he remembers this story to this day ( this was rebuild several years ago now)

Anyway, the car was run, with the 1971 tranny since late 1970 till about 2005 / 2006 with the bearing retainer not doing it's job, towing, racing etc... all not centered properly - the good thing is that it was centered close enough and didnt break!

Thats the whole story, probably still confirmable by Jamie himself.

We got it back together, needing new bearings, seals, gaskets, and shift forks.

Cherry Hill Dodge is still in buisness, and has about the same workmanship issues to this day...lol... he wanted to take it back to them and break balls since they didnt know what they were doing inthe first place and messed him us second!


Posted By: cogen80

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 01:16 PM

Quote:


Cherry Hill Dodge is still in buisness, and has about the same workmanship issues to this day...lol




a bunch of hacks at that place.
Posted By: DJVCuda

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 03:13 PM

here is the tranny pix, from 2005 - never opened from the day it was installed in 1970 after the local dealer made a mess of the original.

Ran it's entire life with ATF - and still running

You can see the front bearing was going out - after years and years without a retainer holding it in place.













Posted By: John_Kunkel

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 07:15 PM

Quote:

Think about it, if it was an issue of the fluid(which it clearly isn't), then why only 2nd gear? Follow that logic?




Why only second gear? Because the ratio change from 1st to 2nd is larger than the other gears, so the stop rings have to work harder on the 1-2 shift.

Fluid type has an effect on stop ring efficiency, slippery fluid isn't good.
Posted By: 68LAR

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 07:36 PM

Quote:

I love these posts...well not really...lot's of opinions and hot air, little fact.

Why you would anything other than Passon lube in a 4 speed is beyond me. The year is 2011 NOT 1971!.





I love these post too! Ya' first hand experience here. I'm the original owner of my RR. First 10 years of it's life, it was our family car/daily driver/grocery getter. Now it is my weekend cruiser and part time race car. Since about a month after I bought it the trans has had nothing but ATF. No unusal issues at all. How's 43 years of experience suit you?
Posted By: HPMike

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 07:37 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Think about it, if it was an issue of the fluid(which it clearly isn't), then why only 2nd gear? Follow that logic?




Why only second gear? Because the ratio change from 1st to 2nd is larger than the other gears, so the stop rings have to work harder on the 1-2 shift.

Fluid type has an effect on stop ring efficiency, slippery fluid isn't good.




I have been using GM Synchromesh since it came out on COUNTLESS 833's and NEVER had a shifting concern like was described. IF it was the fluid it would have affected other speed gears as well, even if it was more pronounced in 2nd.

Then again, what do I know?

MB
Posted By: mshred

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 09:16 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Think about it, if it was an issue of the fluid(which it clearly isn't), then why only 2nd gear? Follow that logic?




Why only second gear? Because the ratio change from 1st to 2nd is larger than the other gears, so the stop rings have to work harder on the 1-2 shift.

Fluid type has an effect on stop ring efficiency, slippery fluid isn't good.




I have actually had guys tell me that ATF displaces better than synchromesh or gear oil which would be better for the synchros. I just picked up some Type F ATF for a pretty good price, so im going to try it out...hopefully it works but if not im going to have to special order some GL4...the transmission is gonna have seen every fluid besides engine oil lol
Posted By: 68LAR

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 10:30 PM

Quote:

have actually had guys tell me that ATF displaces better than synchromesh or gear oil which would be better for the synchros. I just picked up some Type F ATF for a pretty good price, so im going to try it out...hopefully it works but if not im going to have to special order some GL4...the transmission is gonna have seen every fluid besides engine oil lol



I've NEVER tried Type F. I use Dextron.
Posted By: mshred

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/24/11 10:57 PM

Quote:

Quote:

have actually had guys tell me that ATF displaces better than synchromesh or gear oil which would be better for the synchros. I just picked up some Type F ATF for a pretty good price, so im going to try it out...hopefully it works but if not im going to have to special order some GL4...the transmission is gonna have seen every fluid besides engine oil lol



I've NEVER tried Type F. I use Dextron.




I went with type F because it is supposedly the thickest of the ATF's...I"ll find out soon enough, just finished filling it up and waiting for good weather to go for a drive
Posted By: 68LAR

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/25/11 12:35 AM

Type F is supposed to have more friction modifiers in it. It's less sliperier.....
Posted By: kilroy

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/25/11 01:14 AM

Quote:

Type F is supposed to have more friction modifiers in it. It's less sliperier.....




True. GM and chrysler used servos and governors to modify shift points. Ford tuned with the fluid itself. Ive been told to use Dexron/Mercron to but would the synchronizers need benefit from a friction adder? Im sure the gears and bearings wouldn't though.
Posted By: mshred

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/25/11 01:40 AM

well I just took it for a drive and its shifting like a dream! This thing is getting Type F from now on! and in case anyone is wondering which one i used, it was castrol brand type F, so nothing fancy really
Posted By: zrxkawboy

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/25/11 02:31 AM

Quote:

Type F is supposed to have more friction modifiers in it. It's less sliperier.....




First statement false, second statement true. Type F has no friction modifiers, Dex/Merc has some, and HFM (highly friction modified) fluids like ATF+4 have the most. These friction modifiers affect the performance/behavior of friction materials, such as the clutch plates and bands in an AT.
Posted By: DAYCLONA

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/25/11 02:59 AM

Quote:

well I just took it for a drive and its shifting like a dream! This thing is getting Type F from now on! and in case anyone is wondering which one i used, it was castrol brand type F, so nothing fancy really









be sure to let us know in 3-6 months of driving, if it's still in one piece
Posted By: mshred

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/25/11 05:37 AM

Quote:

Quote:

well I just took it for a drive and its shifting like a dream! This thing is getting Type F from now on! and in case anyone is wondering which one i used, it was castrol brand type F, so nothing fancy really









be sure to let us know in 3-6 months of driving, if it's still in one piece




no problem will do
Posted By: mshred

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/25/11 05:39 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Type F is supposed to have more friction modifiers in it. It's less sliperier.....




First statement false, second statement true. Type F has no friction modifiers, Dex/Merc has some, and HFM (highly friction modified) fluids like ATF+4 have the most. These friction modifiers affect the performance/behavior of friction materials, such as the clutch plates and bands in an AT.




so with Type having the least friction modifiers it should "technically" be the best ATF for one of these brass synchro transmissions like the A833?
Posted By: zrxkawboy

Re: ATF4 in A833, good? bad? ugly? - 06/25/11 01:10 PM

Quote:



so with Type having the least friction modifiers it should "technically" be the best ATF for one of these brass synchro transmissions like the A833?




That would be my guess. I'm honestly not sure how much the FMs affect the synchros.
© 2024 Moparts Forums