looking for some advice got the old style 8 3/4 axles in my car looking to up date which is the best and cheapest route to go? Also want strength want to stay with the an 8 3/4 .
Posted By: moparsquid
Re: 64 dodge polara - 02/27/10 06:19 AM
id go with 65-70 b-body rear.
Posted By: RemCharger
Re: 64 dodge polara - 02/27/10 06:23 AM
And I believe the 66-67s are the shortest...
can i just replace the axles with the newer style has the cutter pin stlye in it now.
Posted By: therocks
Re: 64 dodge polara - 02/27/10 12:09 PM
Dr Diff i believe has a kit to run new style axles in them.Probally cheaper and easier to jut get a 65 to 70 B body rear.The 65 66 for sure are the narrowest.I believe 67 is also.Rocky
Posted By: RUNCHARGER
Re: 64 dodge polara - 02/28/10 04:16 AM
Talk to Dr. Diff. I think he has axles that you can cut to length. The bolt pattern on the axle flange is the same as the newer style bearing retainers. It seems to me you might have to grind a bit of the flange for the newer brake backing plates to slide over. Hardest part of the whole deal will be getting the old axles out.
Sheldon
Posted By: dave571
Re: 64 dodge polara - 02/28/10 06:52 AM
I went with a 66/67 B rear.
It was the cheapest option for me anyway.
I think I paid 150 for the housing and axles.
Posted By: therocks
Re: 64 dodge polara - 02/28/10 12:57 PM
One big problem is the taper set with shims.Newer axles set with the screw adjuster on the right axle.I know Dr Diff has a conversion.My 65 azle is under the kids 62 300.When we finally scrap the 66 Charger Ill save the rear from it also.Rocky
Posted By: pushbutton
Re: 64 dodge polara - 02/28/10 02:08 PM
I've got one from a 66 Charger in my 64 Polara.
A little wider than the orig. but bolted right in. Spring perches are in the right location.
There are others that will work also,I just happened to have a friend with a Charger.
Posted By: dave571
Re: 64 dodge polara - 02/28/10 06:42 PM
It should have been narrower than the original. I know mine was.
There are reference charts that show them being the same width, but when I measured my original, it was larger than chart said, and so was the one in my 64 parts car.
Posted By: QuickBpBp
Re: 64 dodge polara - 02/28/10 06:48 PM
I have a 68 Gtx rear under mine and it fits perfect....
Posted By: 383man
Re: 64 dodge polara - 02/28/10 11:35 PM
Got a 65 Ply rear in my 63 and it fit perfect. It seemed to be the same size as the stock rear that was in it. Ron
Posted By: Anonymous
Re: 64 dodge polara - 02/28/10 11:43 PM
Well, I have an 8 3/4 rear end from a 66 Charger under my 64 Polara. Reason? I already had a 66 Charger parts car, so it was free.
I can't tell you if it is wider or narrower than the original, but, other than I think I had to change out one of the emergency brake cables, it bolted right in.
Posted By: pushbutton
Re: 64 dodge polara - 03/02/10 02:31 PM
I can't tell you if it is wider or narrower than the original, but, other than I think I had to change out one of the emergency brake cables, it bolted right in.
Do you remember which cable you changed?
My drivers side doesn't release like it should,
thought I changed it,but maybe not.Do you remember what the cable you used came out of?
Thanks.
Posted By: dvw
Re: 64 dodge polara - 03/02/10 03:06 PM
I have done the 64 to later axle conversion. The problem is that the housing is not machined to accept inner axle seals. You must run the green style bearing which does not require the inner seal. These bearings don't require the end play adjusters either. All you need are the correct length axles and green bearings. It's not a big deal.
Doug