Posted By: 71Chip
383 10:1 with 516 heads in california? - 07/09/09 11:58 PM
A while back I made a thread about helping my friend on his 383. We are using machine tech in oceanside...
They have all the machine work done and all the parts except the 9:1 pistons they were going to use from keith black have been on back order for over a month.
The car is sitting in a borrowed lift stall so we need to get it out of there.
They have the block measured and the factory closed-chambered heads CCed. They said there is a similar price piston in stock (not sure of manufacturer...I can ask) that they know they can get that will put the motor at 10:1.
I went with the reccomendation of one of the guys at IMM and got the comp 265DEH. Car has highway gears and a 2200 stall...will 10:1 work on california 91 octane?
Posted By: RapidRobert
Re: 383 10:1 with 516 heads in california? - 07/10/09 12:35 AM
With actual measured .035"-.040" quench (piston to head clearance) in each hole, yes
Posted By: rexus31
Re: 383 10:1 with 516 heads in california? - 07/10/09 03:16 AM
With the crappy gas we get here I would not run a motor at 10:1. What happens if it rattles on 91 octane? Then what? I would go with 9:1 or lower if I was your friend. Before I rebuilt my 383 (with 516's) it was 10:1 with the piston .035 in the hole and it pinged. When I rebiult it I put a set of 452's on which dropped the compression to 8.8:1 which is fine for a street motor. It's got a ton of low end torque and is fun to drive. For me, it's better to be safe than sorry.
Posted By: johnnyrotten
Re: 383 10:1 with 516 heads in california? - 07/10/09 03:31 AM
Why not just go to another piston manufacturer? Or just get thicker head gaskets. You can get cometics in many thicknesses.
Posted By: 1_WILD_RT
Re: 383 10:1 with 516 heads in california? - 07/10/09 03:35 AM
Posted By: Rug_Trucker
Re: 383 10:1 with 516 heads in california? - 07/10/09 03:40 AM
If it rattles? Water injection!
Posted By: 383man
Re: 383 10:1 with 516 heads in california? - 07/10/09 07:21 AM
I run 10.0 comp in my iron headed 440. It has 906 heads with KB quench pad pistons for about .042 quench. Runs on 92 with no ping and 38 total timing. Ron
Posted By: rexus31
Re: 383 10:1 with 516 heads in california? - 07/10/09 03:05 PM
I hear what you guys are saying and you are correct. The reason I like to err on the safe side is I live in CA, a state that probably has the tighest emmissions standars in the country. I woke up one day and premium dropped from 93 to 91 octane. What happens if we wake up on day and they change it again from 91 to 90 or 89? That 9.6:1 motor is going to rattle.
Posted By: Real-Fury
Re: 383 10:1 with 516 heads in california? - 07/10/09 04:56 PM
I don't mean to HiJack the thread but I have a stock 1964 383 4bbl that's supposed to be 330HP and 10:1 compression. It doesn't "rattle" on 91 octane. Is this really a 10:1 compression engine or is that just the mfg's advertised ratio? What is the real or more likely compression ratio of a stock 383?
Thanks,
Butch
Posted By: patrick
Re: 383 10:1 with 516 heads in california? - 07/10/09 05:41 PM
no, it's not 10:1....I'd be suprised if it's a true 9:1....
Posted By: stubbs300
Re: 383 10:1 with 516 heads in california? - 07/10/09 06:07 PM
Well FWIW, my 66-300 w/516's is advertized as a 10:1 motor that's still original except for a Hughes 2330 cam and I have some mild ping with 89 octane. Call me a cheap skate, but I dialed back the timing a couple degrees and run 87 with no problems. I do live on the left coast! Ya know as gas becomes cheaper in quality, your either going to have to de-tune or suffer the consequences with pinging because I can see that super will go by the wayside in due time. Sooner than later! Everybody talks about this and that with pinging, but yet they are so pigheaded that they refuse to de-tune to prevent the complaints that arise here and on other boards. As the old saying goes, "You can't have your cake, and eat it too", something has got to give!
Posted By: Real-Fury
Re: 383 10:1 with 516 heads in california? - 07/10/09 06:34 PM
That's kinda what I figured.
thanks!
Butch