Re: Fusible link vs inline fuse
[Re: jsully]
#985067
05/02/11 09:54 PM
05/02/11 09:54 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,225 Looking for a way out of Middl...
IMGTX
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,225
Looking for a way out of Middl...
|
My preference is to have a fusible link at the Alternator and at the battery. The factory didn't have one on the alternator but if the voltage regulator goes bad or a wire shorts a field to ground and it goes full charge it will toast the wiring the same as a shorted wire. DAMHIK. Having one at both voltage sources protects your wiring.
|
|
|
Re: Fusible link vs inline fuse
[Re: RapidRobert]
#985070
05/03/11 12:25 AM
05/03/11 12:25 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
actually the fuse link will protect the short from BATTERY never from alt. The batt is the only source able to KEEP the short being feeded. If you were running just sourced from alt, the engine will stall on the first instance of the short and that will kill the short instantly, even with 100 amps.
The increased fuse link gauge would be just to support the increased load when a death battery. Bigger alt and death batt will mean the alt will feed and recharge faster the batt with more load. BUT hardly will suck 100 amps unless you rev up hard the engine. That will mean the fuse link will hardly receive the 100 amps load.
14 gauge fuse link will be just fine even with 100 amps alt.
You can increase the load protection BUT you can't go to the extreme because if you get a short, fuse link will never burn, or will take too much time to burn, and damage will be bigger on the short area before the fuse link blows out completelly. Better smaller than bigger on this case.
In Line fuse is a good idea, IF you over rate the fuse to be able to support a peak/surge.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: Fusible link vs inline fuse
[Re: GoodysGotaCuda]
#985072
05/03/11 12:38 AM
05/03/11 12:38 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
|
Nacho that makes sense and Goody I'll check into prices/avail.
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: Fusible link vs inline fuse
[Re: RapidRobert]
#985073
05/03/11 02:59 AM
05/03/11 02:59 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421 Balt. Md
383man
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
|
When cars started using Power Distribution Centers under the hood the very large fuse looking links replaced the fuse links on the cars. You might find a fuse link in certain circuit on a new car but I cant think of any. The ones I mean are the ones under the hood in the PDC that look like a giant plastic 2" fuse and many of them bolt in with eyelets on both ends but some are push in. When I put my battery in the trunk I made a few changes and use 2 of the PDC type fuse links and I have never had one blow out. I use a 60 at the alt and a 80 at the battery. When I put my battery in my trunk I did not want the battery cable hot unless the car was cranking as I run it under the carpet. So I used a Ford type solenoid in the trunk to keep the battery cable dead other then starting and I ran a 10 gauge wire from the battery to the factory starter relay where the car picks up all the hot battery feeds. I put the bolt in 80 amp fuse link right at the battery cable. Like I said I have never had any trouble with this setup at all. Ron
Last edited by 383man; 05/03/11 03:00 AM.
|
|
|
|
|