|
Re: 1971 400 Compression Ratio?
[Re: R/T1968R/T]
#972572
04/13/11 02:36 PM
04/13/11 02:36 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,729 Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,729
Rio Linda, CA
|
If anything, the advertised CR is higher than the actual CR by about half a point.
The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
|
|
|
Re: 1971 400 Compression Ratio?
[Re: 1972challenger]
#972575
04/13/11 03:15 PM
04/13/11 03:15 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
You would be luck if it's 7.5 to 1
|
|
|
Re: 1971 400 Compression Ratio?
[Re: R/T1968R/T]
#972576
04/13/11 03:51 PM
04/13/11 03:51 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
take your conclusions:
-stock pistons are around 0.100-0.110 below the deck -open heads are around 90 cc
These measurements are ACTUALLY AND PERSONALLY checked by me
then, IF MORE needed, add the gasket thickness.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
|