Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Which Engine 318 or 400? #913629
01/25/11 02:02 PM
01/25/11 02:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
O
OrangeProwler Offline OP
top fuel
OrangeProwler  Offline OP
top fuel
O

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
Just wondering if you had the choices between these two setups for power and possible fuel mileage.

#1 Numbers 68 318 with Enginequest heads, KB167 pistons, Performer Intake; 800 Thermoquad, headers, Lunati Voodoo 60401 and .039 head gaskets matched to a low gear 904, 2k stall and 2.76 gears.

#2 74 400 block with stock heads KB240s, headers, performer intake, 800 TQ, and Lunati 60300 or 60301 cam; and not sure on the head gaskets. Stock 727 wity 2k stall and 2.76 gears.

On the street which engine would be better and get better fuel economy? I know that sounds like an oxymoron but, with gas going to 5 bucks a gallon potentially in the future. I have to ask.

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: OrangeProwler] #913630
01/25/11 02:35 PM
01/25/11 02:35 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,107
Spring Valley ,Ca.
moparsquid Offline
super stock
moparsquid  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,107
Spring Valley ,Ca.
What type car?

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: OrangeProwler] #913631
01/25/11 03:20 PM
01/25/11 03:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,122
Grand Haven, MI
patrick Offline
I Live Here
patrick  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,122
Grand Haven, MI
Quote:

Just wondering if you had the choices between these two setups for power and possible fuel mileage.

#1 Numbers 68 318 with Enginequest heads, KB167 pistons, Performer Intake; 800 Thermoquad, headers, Lunati Voodoo 60401 and .039 head gaskets matched to a low gear 904, 2k stall and 2.76 gears.

#2 74 400 block with stock heads KB240s, headers, performer intake, 800 TQ, and Lunati 60300 or 60301 cam; and not sure on the head gaskets. Stock 727 wity 2k stall and 2.76 gears.

On the street which engine would be better and get better fuel economy? I know that sounds like an oxymoron but, with gas going to 5 bucks a gallon potentially in the future. I have to ask.




#1 I'd wager at ~320-330 hp, 350-370tq
#2 I'd wager at ~340-370 hp, 425-460tq

highway cruising I could see the 'teen getting significantly better mileage, probably upper teens vs. lower 20's...in town, probably little difference

for the price difference in the pistons, you could probably pick up a rebuildable 360 shortblock and KB107's, I'd expect probably 330-350hp and 400-430tq out of that, mileage probably in between the other two....


1976 Spinnaker White Plymouth Duster, /6 A833OD
1986 Silver/Twilight Blue Chrysler 5th Ave HotRod **SOLD!***
2011 Toxic Orange Dodge Charger R/T
2017 Grand Cherokee Overland
2014 Jeep Cherokee Latitude (holy crap, my daughter is driving)
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: OrangeProwler] #913632
01/25/11 03:26 PM
01/25/11 03:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
why bother...get a honda if you are concerned about gas prices.
I'd say if you have a B or E body use the 400 if you have an A body use the 318. I would however not use 2.76 gears on either. lower gear doesn't always mean better mpg. Plus you'd have to drive it a TON on the highway to get any benefit. $5 a gallon is nothing compaired to the cost of building and maintaining a muscle car.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #913633
01/25/11 04:13 PM
01/25/11 04:13 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,168
Vancouver, WA
MoparMarq Offline
super stock
MoparMarq  Offline
super stock

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,168
Vancouver, WA
Quote:

why bother...get a honda if you are concerned about gas prices.
I'd say if you have a B or E body use the 400 if you have an A body use the 318. I would however not use 2.76 gears on either. lower gear doesn't always mean better mpg. Plus you'd have to drive it a TON on the highway to get any benefit. $5 a gallon is nothing compaired to the cost of building and maintaining a muscle car.




Agreed. As an aside, back in the day, my '72 RR had the factory 400/727 with 3.55s in the rear. Needless to say, fuel economy not too good. Swapped in 3.23s to improve it a bit. It did improve it some. Went to 2.76s later on, zero difference. Same as the 3.23s. Of course, the top end was a lot better, but it was a pig off the line. Much depends on power, weight, torque, how it's driven, etc.

If fuel economy is the goal, I'd go with the 318. The weight difference between the two will help with economy numbers, as will engine power.

The goals aren't mutually exclusive; but how much do you want to spend anyway?

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #913634
01/25/11 06:57 PM
01/25/11 06:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,122
Grand Haven, MI
patrick Offline
I Live Here
patrick  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,122
Grand Haven, MI
Quote:

why bother...get a honda if you are concerned about gas prices.
I'd say if you have a B or E body use the 400 if you have an A body use the 318. I would however not use 2.76 gears on either. lower gear doesn't always mean better mpg. Plus you'd have to drive it a TON on the highway to get any benefit. $5 a gallon is nothing compaired to the cost of building and maintaining a muscle car.




some of us enjoy driving our cars on a regular basis...I built a 318 along the same recipie as him, except I'm using a small hydraulic roller, eddie RPM air gap, and OEM magnum castings. it's enough motor to push my 3900 lb pig to mid 14's using 27" tires, 3.55's and an A500, and is very entertaining to drive, while yielding a solid 17+ mpg in daily (mixed) driving....


1976 Spinnaker White Plymouth Duster, /6 A833OD
1986 Silver/Twilight Blue Chrysler 5th Ave HotRod **SOLD!***
2011 Toxic Orange Dodge Charger R/T
2017 Grand Cherokee Overland
2014 Jeep Cherokee Latitude (holy crap, my daughter is driving)
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: OrangeProwler] #913635
01/25/11 09:31 PM
01/25/11 09:31 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,454
oklahoma
F
forphorty Offline
pro stock
forphorty  Offline
pro stock
F

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,454
oklahoma
I have a 318 in my duster but all my B bodies have had big blocks. I would never consider a small block in a B body myself unless it was already in there. If you run a small block , all the cheap headers hang low on the drivers side and have the center link pass through them. The big block headers do not. With a big block, intake swaps are much easier and you dont have to drain any water. Distributor is up front where it should be. Windage trays are cheaper and don't require extra hardware. If you have to change a broken water pump on the side of the road, you will appreciate that it only requires removing four bolts for the fan and pulley and four bolts for the pump and its off, whereas with the sb you will be fooling with the lower hose and PS brackets. Yep, i prefer big blocks. Having said that, my Duster will probably end up with a 360 magnum. As far as mileage goes i don't know what's good or bad. My 73 gets about 15- 17 mpg on the highway. Has a .030 400 with a 268 XE comp, 750 DP, MP 175k converter and 2.76s. My 440 powered Satellite gets much worse but has more cam, more converter, etc.

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: patrick] #913636
01/25/11 11:03 PM
01/25/11 11:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Quote:

why bother...get a honda if you are concerned about gas prices.
I'd say if you have a B or E body use the 400 if you have an A body use the 318. I would however not use 2.76 gears on either. lower gear doesn't always mean better mpg. Plus you'd have to drive it a TON on the highway to get any benefit. $5 a gallon is nothing compaired to the cost of building and maintaining a muscle car.




some of us enjoy driving our cars on a regular basis...I built a 318 along the same recipie as him, except I'm using a small hydraulic roller, eddie RPM air gap, and OEM magnum castings. it's enough motor to push my 3900 lb pig to mid 14's using 27" tires, 3.55's and an A500, and is very entertaining to drive, while yielding a solid 17+ mpg in daily (mixed) driving....




what's that got to do with it? I enjoy driving mine too I wouldn't have built it if not. I was running 12.0's in a 67 coronet w/ a 440 and getting 12-13 with 3.91's. My 72 340 swinger ran 13.86's with a mild 340 and 3.55's and netted 17+mpg's. Car is not going to be very impressive at all w/ 2.76 gears and they might hurt his milage. If he was building a Bonneville car the 2.76's would be fine. I'd wager a cold 12 pack the difference in mpg's between 2.76's and 3.55's would be less than 2mpg (compined driving) Put the performance would be way up.
I guess my main point is people dump all kinds of dumb $$$ into a ride and worry about mpgs and how much it costs to fill the tank. Gas won't be $5/gallon for a long while. I doubt 93 will go over $4 for too long. Build it to run it's best. If you build a performace engine, back it up. If you want a pretty car you can drive everyday build a stockish roller 360 and get a set of 3.23's.

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #913637
01/26/11 12:44 PM
01/26/11 12:44 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,788
Hamilton, Ontario Canada
Magnum Offline
master
Magnum  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,788
Hamilton, Ontario Canada
This thread seems to be losing a bit of focus. It also fails to mention the goals and what car it's intended for.

All else equal, 318 will surpass a 400 in mileage.

Also, I'm not buying the deeper gear might get better mileage. May for the 5 to 10 seconds it takes to accelerate from a light but once you are at a constant speed. Lower rpm equals better mileage.


69 Super Bee, 93 Mustang LX, 04 Allure Super
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: Magnum] #913638
01/26/11 12:53 PM
01/26/11 12:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,935
Holly/MI
D
Dean_Kuzluzski Offline
master
Dean_Kuzluzski  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,935
Holly/MI
Quote:

All else equal, 318 will surpass a 400 in mileage.

Also, I'm not buying the deeper gear might get better mileage. May for the 5 to 10 seconds it takes to accelerate from a light but once you are at a constant speed. Lower rpm equals better mileage.




Agreed. Any time you can run down the road with the engine at highest vacuum, closest to idle, you'll get best mileage.

Driving like there's an egg, not hardboiled, between your foot and the gas pedal will gain best mpg. The trouble is, with mild gearing that means letting the vehicle attain cruising speed in a longer manner at it's own rate. In more populated areas it isn't practical. Rural it works. My 318, 904 lock-up, 2.20:1 geared 80 Cordoba got a VERY honest 20 mpg with every tankful for 2 full summers. I drive 24 miles each way to work with only 2 traffic lights on the way there.


R.I.P.- Gary "Coop" Davis 02/09/68-05/13/04
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #913639
01/26/11 01:46 PM
01/26/11 01:46 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
D
DPelletier Offline
I Live Here
DPelletier  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

why bother...get a honda if you are concerned about gas prices.
I'd say if you have a B or E body use the 400 if you have an A body use the 318. I would however not use 2.76 gears on either. lower gear doesn't always mean better mpg. Plus you'd have to drive it a TON on the highway to get any benefit. $5 a gallon is nothing compaired to the cost of building and maintaining a muscle car.




some of us enjoy driving our cars on a regular basis...I built a 318 along the same recipie as him, except I'm using a small hydraulic roller, eddie RPM air gap, and OEM magnum castings. it's enough motor to push my 3900 lb pig to mid 14's using 27" tires, 3.55's and an A500, and is very entertaining to drive, while yielding a solid 17+ mpg in daily (mixed) driving....




what's that got to do with it? I enjoy driving mine too I wouldn't have built it if not. I was running 12.0's in a 67 coronet w/ a 440 and getting 12-13 with 3.91's. My 72 340 swinger ran 13.86's with a mild 340 and 3.55's and netted 17+mpg's. Car is not going to be very impressive at all w/ 2.76 gears and they might hurt his milage. If he was building a Bonneville car the 2.76's would be fine. I'd wager a cold 12 pack the difference in mpg's between 2.76's and 3.55's would be less than 2mpg (compined driving) Put the performance would be way up.
I guess my main point is people dump all kinds of dumb $$$ into a ride and worry about mpgs and how much it costs to fill the tank. Gas won't be $5/gallon for a long while. I doubt 93 will go over $4 for too long. Build it to run it's best. If you build a performace engine, back it up. If you want a pretty car you can drive everyday build a stockish roller 360 and get a set of 3.23's.




I tend to agree. It may not really answer the OP's question (which is impossible without knowing how much weight HE assigns to power vs. economy)but after buying my car, restoring it, building a garage to put it in, etc. etc. Fuel economy is my last concern (obvious with my 440-6 and 4.10's, I suppose).
I'm not knocking anyone trying to maximize thier economy in order to spend more time driving my car, but (for me) If it ever gets too expensive to drive my car, I'll drive it less before I'll sacrifice most of the performance.

Dave


1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 1974 'Cuda 2008 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Ram 3500 Diesel 2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel 2003 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Durango Limited [url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: Magnum] #913640
01/26/11 01:49 PM
01/26/11 01:49 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
D
DPelletier Offline
I Live Here
DPelletier  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
Quote:

This thread seems to be losing a bit of focus. It also fails to mention the goals and what car it's intended for.

All else equal, 318 will surpass a 400 in mileage.

Also, I'm not buying the deeper gear might get better mileage. May for the 5 to 10 seconds it takes to accelerate from a light but once you are at a constant speed. Lower rpm equals better mileage.




You have a point, but the truth is that it certainly IS possible to get as good or better mileage AROUND TOWN with a lower gearset. The increased torque multiplication for acceleration from a stop can overshadow the steady-state rpm based fuel consumption. A lower rpm equals better mileage on the highway.....but around town that doesn't necessarily hold true.

Dave


1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 1974 'Cuda 2008 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Ram 3500 Diesel 2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel 2003 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Durango Limited [url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: DPelletier] #913641
01/26/11 01:58 PM
01/26/11 01:58 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
5
540challenger Offline
master
540challenger  Offline
master
5

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
Quote:

Quote:

This thread seems to be losing a bit of focus. It also fails to mention the goals and what car it's intended for.

All else equal, 318 will surpass a 400 in mileage.

Also, I'm not buying the deeper gear might get better mileage. May for the 5 to 10 seconds it takes to accelerate from a light but once you are at a constant speed. Lower rpm equals better mileage.




You have a point, but the truth is that it certainly IS possible to get as good or better mileage AROUND TOWN with a lower gearset. The increased torque multiplication for acceleration from a stop can overshadow the steady-state rpm based fuel consumption. A lower rpm equals better mileage on the highway.....but around town that doesn't necessarily hold true.

Dave




True but i think the OP stated he had a 904 with a low gear set in first gear that should help out and IMO it would be a better way to go for what the OP wants to do.

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: 540challenger] #913642
01/26/11 02:49 PM
01/26/11 02:49 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
D
DPelletier Offline
I Live Here
DPelletier  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

This thread seems to be losing a bit of focus. It also fails to mention the goals and what car it's intended for.

All else equal, 318 will surpass a 400 in mileage.

Also, I'm not buying the deeper gear might get better mileage. May for the 5 to 10 seconds it takes to accelerate from a light but once you are at a constant speed. Lower rpm equals better mileage.




You have a point, but the truth is that it certainly IS possible to get as good or better mileage AROUND TOWN with a lower gearset. The increased torque multiplication for acceleration from a stop can overshadow the steady-state rpm based fuel consumption. A lower rpm equals better mileage on the highway.....but around town that doesn't necessarily hold true.

Dave




True but i think the OP stated he had a 904 with a low gear set in first gear that should help out and IMO it would be a better way to go for what the OP wants to do.




Yep, I don't necessarily disagree (I have a 318/904/2.76 setup in the 'Cuda) but I just wanted to point out what I believe to be an error in fact to do with the contention that a higher gear set ALWAYS means better mileage. I don't think that is true in every circumstance.

Dave


1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 1974 'Cuda 2008 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Ram 3500 Diesel 2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel 2003 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Durango Limited [url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: DPelletier] #913643
01/26/11 02:59 PM
01/26/11 02:59 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
5
540challenger Offline
master
540challenger  Offline
master
5

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

This thread seems to be losing a bit of focus. It also fails to mention the goals and what car it's intended for.

All else equal, 318 will surpass a 400 in mileage.

Also, I'm not buying the deeper gear might get better mileage. May for the 5 to 10 seconds it takes to accelerate from a light but once you are at a constant speed. Lower rpm equals better mileage.




You have a point, but the truth is that it certainly IS possible to get as good or better mileage AROUND TOWN with a lower gearset. The increased torque multiplication for acceleration from a stop can overshadow the steady-state rpm based fuel consumption. A lower rpm equals better mileage on the highway.....but around town that doesn't necessarily hold true.

Dave




True but i think the OP stated he had a 904 with a low gear set in first gear that should help out and IMO it would be a better way to go for what the OP wants to do.




Yep, I don't necessarily disagree (I have a 318/904/2.76 setup in the 'Cuda) but I just wanted to point out what I believe to be an error in fact to do with the contention that a higher gear set ALWAYS means better mileage. I don't think that is true in every circumstance.

Dave


Very true

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: DPelletier] #913644
01/26/11 06:52 PM
01/26/11 06:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Quote:

This thread seems to be losing a bit of focus. It also fails to mention the goals and what car it's intended for.

All else equal, 318 will surpass a 400 in mileage.

Also, I'm not buying the deeper gear might get better mileage. May for the 5 to 10 seconds it takes to accelerate from a light but once you are at a constant speed. Lower rpm equals better mileage.




You have a point, but the truth is that it certainly IS possible to get as good or better mileage AROUND TOWN with a lower gearset. The increased torque multiplication for acceleration from a stop can overshadow the steady-state rpm based fuel consumption. A lower rpm equals better mileage on the highway.....but around town that doesn't necessarily hold true.

Dave




true. a tale of two trucks one a 94 dakota V6 3.55's one a 95 sport dak w/ 5.2 and 3.92's. Both 5 speeds bought 2 weeks apart. My 5.2 got better gas milage than my buddies V6 and CRUSHED it an every catagory. Why the small engine has to work harder at low rpm to move the vehicle. A 318 w/ 2.76's in a heavy b-body would require the engine to work harder than the 400. Depending on cam, converter selection 2.76's might not even work as well as a stock cam. If you ahve any performance upgrades you need to look at converter and gear selection. For your 2.76's to pay off you will have to be doing a ton of highway driving at a maintained speed.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: OrangeProwler] #913645
01/26/11 08:50 PM
01/26/11 08:50 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
O
OrangeProwler Offline OP
top fuel
OrangeProwler  Offline OP
top fuel
O

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
To answer a few questions. Yes the car is a 68 B-Body. The 318 is already in the car so no cost there. I also have a 400 laying around already with a 727.

To answer the question on the gears I have thought about 3.23s for the car but, I do like the 2.76 gears as I do have a lot of highway to travel here locally. Most of my driving is done between 55-65 mph.

As far as mileage is concerned I do put a lot of miles on the car and while it's not a huge concern I also kind of want to have my cake so to speak and I do plan driving the car cross country a few times or so I hope in my life. Hopefully that answers a few questions.

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: OrangeProwler] #913646
01/26/11 08:58 PM
01/26/11 08:58 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
O
OrangeProwler Offline OP
top fuel
OrangeProwler  Offline OP
top fuel
O

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
To answer some other questions the reason why I am thinking of doing the 318 is because it is different and the org engine to the car. #2 is because it is about 100 lbs lighter than the 400 not to mention a 904 is 35 lbs lighter than a 727 and with less loss. I figure it might be close in performance because of those factors.

I am considering the 400 because of its bore size, transmission, and because it could make the car worth a little more potentially but, value is not at the top of my list. Just wasn't sure how close it would be because I have heard of 383s and 400s getting 20 mph out on the open road which is where my LA-headed 318 is now.

Last edited by magnumminded; 01/26/11 09:02 PM.
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: OrangeProwler] #913647
01/26/11 09:21 PM
01/26/11 09:21 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
D
DPelletier Offline
I Live Here
DPelletier  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
Quote:

To answer some other questions the reason why I am thinking of doing the 318 is because it is different and the org engine to the car. #2 is because it is about 100 lbs lighter than the 400 not to mention a 904 is 35 lbs lighter than a 727 and with less loss. I figure it might be close in performance because of those factors.






There are reasons to use the 318 but the weight vs. performance compared to a 400 aren't some of them. From a pure performance perspective the extra weight of the 400 and it's 727 pay off in spades. If you want to use the 318 because it's the original engine, because it's cheaper or because it may get better mileage, then by all means; go ahead. If you're thinking it will be close in performance I think you'll be disappointed.
A Hemi is alot heavier than a slant six, but.........


Dave


1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 1974 'Cuda 2008 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Ram 3500 Diesel 2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel 2003 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Durango Limited [url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #913648
01/27/11 12:43 AM
01/27/11 12:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,406
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,406
Kalispell Mt.
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

This thread seems to be losing a bit of focus. It also fails to mention the goals and what car it's intended for.

All else equal, 318 will surpass a 400 in mileage.

Also, I'm not buying the deeper gear might get better mileage. May for the 5 to 10 seconds it takes to accelerate from a light but once you are at a constant speed. Lower rpm equals better mileage.




You have a point, but the truth is that it certainly IS possible to get as good or better mileage AROUND TOWN with a lower gearset. The increased torque multiplication for acceleration from a stop can overshadow the steady-state rpm based fuel consumption. A lower rpm equals better mileage on the highway.....but around town that doesn't necessarily hold true.

Dave




true. a tale of two trucks one a 94 dakota V6 3.55's one a 95 sport dak w/ 5.2 and 3.92's. Both 5 speeds bought 2 weeks apart. My 5.2 got better gas milage than my buddies V6 and CRUSHED it an every catagory. Why the small engine has to work harder at low rpm to move the vehicle. A 318 w/ 2.76's in a heavy b-body would require the engine to work harder than the 400. Depending on cam, converter selection 2.76's might not even work as well as a stock cam. If you ahve any performance upgrades you need to look at converter and gear selection. For your 2.76's to pay off you will have to be doing a ton of highway driving at a maintained speed.




I dare someone to explain what it means from a physics point of view what happens in a engine that is "working harder" and getting worse MPG. The fact is the smaller engine is going to have less friction, less pumping losses due to smaller displacement and since you have to run a higher throttle angle to achieve the same HP output you will have less vacuum fighting the pistons downward movement. It will also have the air and fuel molecules packed more closely together so they burn better, just because mopar failed with the execution of the 3.9 does no mean it should get worse MPG than a 5.2 my current 3.9 dakota v6 is the first V6 truck I have owned after owning many 318 and 360 trucks and with the same driving habits it kills ( or CRUSHES) the other dodge trucks I have owned in the MPG department. I built a 318 just to get better MPG in my cuda and got 29 mpg, I got significantly worse MPG with a 2.94 gear than I did with the 2.76 INCLUDEING in town. It is all about execution of the entire package. And if you tune it to get proper air fuel mix and ign timing at low RPM than it will get better MPG when geared higher. Low speed/high load tuning is very hard with a carb and distributor. I also dare someone to explain how they built a 512 cube big block with 4.88 gears that got 29 MPG because it hardly had to work at all to move a cuda. How come a neon with only a 122 cube engine and even heavier than my cuda can get 33 mpg? That little engine is working its butt off to move those things, especially the newer ones that are bigger and have an OD gearset.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: HotRodDave] #913649
01/27/11 12:13 PM
01/27/11 12:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,122
Grand Haven, MI
patrick Offline
I Live Here
patrick  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,122
Grand Haven, MI
another alternative, build the 318 like you plan (but I'd do a little more looking into the torque converter, look for a high stall, but tight converter), and then when you're feeling slow, toss a cetrifugal supercharger on it, boosting it by about 6-8psi...all of a sudden a 320hp/350 tq 318 will be putting out more like 450hp/480tq....

as far as gears, you could look into some 2.94's...they're not the easiest to find, but I think the best compromise gear for a non-od tranny in a car you might want to take on the highway.


1976 Spinnaker White Plymouth Duster, /6 A833OD
1986 Silver/Twilight Blue Chrysler 5th Ave HotRod **SOLD!***
2011 Toxic Orange Dodge Charger R/T
2017 Grand Cherokee Overland
2014 Jeep Cherokee Latitude (holy crap, my daughter is driving)
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: HotRodDave] #913650
01/28/11 12:13 PM
01/28/11 12:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
"I dare someone to explain what it means from a physics point of view what happens in a engine that is "working harder" and getting worse MPG" ??? maybe because you have to put your foot to the floor to get it moving, when all you need w/ a v8 is to nudge it a little.
go ahead build a performace motor and use 2.76's. I'm sure it will run killlller.

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #913651
01/28/11 02:51 PM
01/28/11 02:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 587
IL . usa
C
cjs69mope Offline
mopar
cjs69mope  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 587
IL . usa
Buy a 1000 doller beeter civic or mitsu marage for weekday gas savings.
Build A BIG BLOCK FOR FUN AND WEEK END DRIVING !
#1 gas $ saved during the week will pay for week end gas !
#2 Plus you will feel more acepted at car shows with the big block car and not past over buy most with a wimp small block in there .
#3 I know small blocks can run but it does not mater to the masses
perception and coolness is everything that is why you have a 68 b-body in the first place anyway right ?


1969 Dodge Charger 1969 Dodge Superbee
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: cjs69mope] #913652
01/28/11 04:31 PM
01/28/11 04:31 PM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 195
pa.
S
slantsic Offline
member
slantsic  Offline
member
S

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 195
pa.
HOW about a 66 valiant with a 170 3 on the tree for a daily driver? You would never be lost in the crowd.

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: slantsic] #913653
01/29/11 07:37 AM
01/29/11 07:37 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 38
ontario, canada
S
shag766 Offline
member
shag766  Offline
member
S

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 38
ontario, canada
do a little math and put in a t600 tremac. a little pricey but the best of both worlds. i have one going into a hemi b body with 3;90's

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: shag766] #913654
01/29/11 01:29 PM
01/29/11 01:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,935
Holly/MI
D
Dean_Kuzluzski Offline
master
Dean_Kuzluzski  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,935
Holly/MI
OK, here's one.............

Put a 4" MP cast stroker crank in that 318 and have more power than a low compression 400 w/o all the required big block parts to make it happen.


R.I.P.- Gary "Coop" Davis 02/09/68-05/13/04
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: Dean_Kuzluzski] #913655
01/29/11 01:45 PM
01/29/11 01:45 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 22,873
Chicken coop
dustergirl340 Offline
Chicken Little
dustergirl340  Offline
Chicken Little

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 22,873
Chicken coop
Quote:

OK, here's one.............

Put a 4" MP cast stroker crank in that 318 and have more power than a low compression 400 w/o all the required big block parts to make it happen.




I like your thinking! But the "car show" crowd wouldn't be impressed by it, lol.

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: dustergirl340] #913656
01/29/11 04:38 PM
01/29/11 04:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,935
Holly/MI
D
Dean_Kuzluzski Offline
master
Dean_Kuzluzski  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,935
Holly/MI
Quote:

Quote:

OK, here's one.............

Put a 4" MP cast stroker crank in that 318 and have more power than a low compression 400 w/o all the required big block parts to make it happen.




I like your thinking! But the "car show" crowd wouldn't be impressed by it, lol.




Thank you! Thank you very much!

And that, is the beauty of it. Stealth hp & torque to tame those cocky big block guys. Top that lil' stroker with some ported Magnum heads, all on the low-$ side and it'll stun & amaze friends and aquaintances.


R.I.P.- Gary "Coop" Davis 02/09/68-05/13/04
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: Dean_Kuzluzski] #913657
01/29/11 05:03 PM
01/29/11 05:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

OK, here's one.............

Put a 4" MP cast stroker crank in that 318 and have more power than a low compression 400 w/o all the required big block parts to make it happen.




I like your thinking! But the "car show" crowd wouldn't be impressed by it, lol.




Thank you! Thank you very much!

And that, is the beauty of it. Stealth hp & torque to tame those cocky big block guys. Top that lil' stroker with some ported Magnum heads, all on the low-$ side and it'll stun & amaze friends and aquaintances.




yeah dump all that money into a small block to equal the HP of a very mild BB build. makes sense. Do it for the 400 and you'll make twice the motor at the same price.. 408 318 small block vs. 512 400 BB.

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #913658
01/29/11 08:25 PM
01/29/11 08:25 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 22,873
Chicken coop
dustergirl340 Offline
Chicken Little
dustergirl340  Offline
Chicken Little

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 22,873
Chicken coop
The 318 is his car's original engine, so that in itself is cool. Stroked big blocks are fine if they are quick...I've seen many only running 12's.
BTW...a 408 would be a stroked 360, not 318.

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #913659
01/29/11 08:42 PM
01/29/11 08:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,935
Holly/MI
D
Dean_Kuzluzski Offline
master
Dean_Kuzluzski  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,935
Holly/MI
Twice the motor????

A 4" stroked 318 is a 394 or at best 396, not 408.

394 X 2 = 718!! NOT 512.

Lets keep it real folks.


R.I.P.- Gary "Coop" Davis 02/09/68-05/13/04
Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: Dean_Kuzluzski] #913660
01/29/11 08:49 PM
01/29/11 08:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Twice the motor????

A 4" stroked 318 is a 394 or at best 396, not 408.

394 X 2 = 718!! NOT 512.

Lets keep it real folks.





just run TWICE AS GOOD. a 318 2bbl in a B-body is as impressive as a super model w/ fakies. Do me a favor build a 394 storker for your b-body and let me build a 512 on the same budget. I'll spot you 3 lights.
If the OP just wants a nice car that sounds good and drives nice by all means do the 318...if he wants ANY performance go big or go home.

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #913661
01/30/11 02:30 AM
01/30/11 02:30 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
5
540challenger Offline
master
540challenger  Offline
master
5

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
Quote:

Quote:

Twice the motor????

A 4" stroked 318 is a 394 or at best 396, not 408.

394 X 2 = 718!! NOT 512.

Lets keep it real folks.





just run TWICE AS GOOD. a 318 2bbl in a B-body is as impressive as a super model w/ fakies. Do me a favor build a 394 storker for your b-body and let me build a 512 on the same budget. I'll spot you 3 lights.
If the OP just wants a nice car that sounds good and drives nice by all means do the 318...if he wants ANY performance go big or go home.


Ya does small block strokers are terds. At this point the small block stroker would be much cheaper build for a mild performance engine he has everything he nneds to run a small block. and get some nice heads cheap to make the stroker scream. The amount of money in heads alone for a 512 would put it way over in cost for a street car

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: OrangeProwler] #913662
02/01/11 12:00 PM
02/01/11 12:00 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
O
OrangeProwler Offline OP
top fuel
OrangeProwler  Offline OP
top fuel
O

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
Just wanted to say thank you everyone. Looks like I will go the 400 route for now. Not looking at building a stroker engine. Just something fun and something to cruise/hot rod in leisure times. I really like the 318 though.

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: OrangeProwler] #913663
02/01/11 12:02 PM
02/01/11 12:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
O
OrangeProwler Offline OP
top fuel
OrangeProwler  Offline OP
top fuel
O

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,819
Middle of A Field
I think I will also upgrade to a set of 3.23s for the car as well.

Re: Which Engine 318 or 400? [Re: OrangeProwler] #913664
02/01/11 12:04 PM
02/01/11 12:04 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
5
540challenger Offline
master
540challenger  Offline
master
5

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
Just more food for thought. This was a 318 build for MPG. Anyway have fun with the 400 iam sure it would be a blast

https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/show...0&fpart=all

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1