Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? #868755
12/01/10 12:12 PM
12/01/10 12:12 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,188
Twin Cities, MN
MN-ScatPack Offline OP
master
MN-ScatPack  Offline OP
master

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,188
Twin Cities, MN
I am still trying to determine what to put in my 71 challenger convertible. I bought it with a 1972 400 that needs a rebuild. Its going to have a 5 or 6 speed tranny but I don't know if I should build the 400 into a stroker motor or put in a 5.7 or 6.1 hemi from the bone yard. I know the conversion kits for the hemis have got much better/easier.

What would you do if you had the choice? I'm also assuming the prices will be somewhat similar after all is said and done, would you agree?


Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: MN-ScatPack] #868756
12/01/10 12:36 PM
12/01/10 12:36 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,648
GA
Boosted Offline
master
Boosted  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,648
GA
I would say for a daily driver that you would want to take out of town and enjoy with the top down the 5.7 hemi would be the ticket... You will get some performance, mpg and drive-ability will be allot better also..

And you can put the Hemi emblems on it...


2011 RAM3500

1967 Fastback Barracuda with some go fast goodies.
Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: MN-ScatPack] #868757
12/01/10 12:49 PM
12/01/10 12:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Well the price thing could be argued either way depending on what you use and how good of deals you can get and so could HP. If you are thinking that you want to use stock heads than the 6.1 will be faster, it will make more HP OOTB and weigh a lot less, plus with a big stoker kit in the future and CNC ported stock heads it can make incredible HP, the big block will need heavily worked Victors to keep up in the HP department. Now TQ on the other hand it will be hard for the hemi to keep up as most of the stroker kits for the hemi only get up to 440 or so cubes while the 400 block can swallow over 500 cubes. To make 700 hp with a hemi you add a 440 stroker kit and port the heads, 950hp on a mopar single plane intake or XV intake and big cam and you are there, stock blocks can take it with their cross bolted mains. 700 hp in a 400 block is scarey, you need a good girdle, aluminum caps, aftermarket heads...

You will get lots of different takes on the subject but that is my


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: MN-ScatPack] #868758
12/01/10 12:53 PM
12/01/10 12:53 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,998
Salem
Grizzly Offline
Moparts Proctologist
Grizzly  Offline
Moparts Proctologist

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,998
Salem
Phew, tough question of the day.......

I would go with the 400 stroker: The car is already set up for it, you can build it to any power level you want, and the maintenance is simple.

If you are going for something more modern with the 5.7/6.1 then the engine will be out-dated by the time you are done the swap. That is, the 6.4 is already on it's way out, the 5.7 has already gone through significant changes, and I'm sure Mopar is working on the final version of the Hemi; a 426/7.0 liter. To keep up with the new engines is going to be very expensive.

What is it that you want to be able to do with the car?


Mo' Farts

Moderated by "tbagger".
Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: Grizzly] #868759
12/01/10 01:18 PM
12/01/10 01:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
The Netherlands
BigBlockMopar Offline
master
BigBlockMopar  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
The Netherlands
With a nice stroker engine which is build for torque you don't need 5 or 6 gears nor steep gears in the back.
The stock transmission or an A518 with a bigblock-bellhousing and 3.23 gears are more than enough for happy cruising.
The Hemi only adds potential 'misery' in the form of a bunch wires, injectors and computer stuff. Sure it will mostlikely get better MPG but other than that probably the only fun-factor is when you open the hood.
With a stroker motor the fun happens every time you press the gaspedal...

Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: MN-ScatPack] #868760
12/01/10 02:09 PM
12/01/10 02:09 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
D
DPelletier Offline
I Live Here
DPelletier  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
Quote:

What would you do if you had the choice? I'm also assuming the prices will be somewhat similar after all is said and done, would you agree?






The 400 stroker without question. Not a fan of modern motors in classic cars. I believe the 400 stroker would be simpler; and, I believe, cheaper and easier.

.....some jurisdictions insist that you use all the polution controls that came with a particular motor rather than the car itself. Maybe not where you are today, but in the future who knows? Just another thing to think about.

Anyway, that's what *I* would do.



Dave


1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 1974 'Cuda 2008 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Ram 3500 Diesel 2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel 2003 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Durango Limited [url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: MN-ScatPack] #868761
12/01/10 02:25 PM
12/01/10 02:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Stroker will be muuuch cheaper and muuuuch easier.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #868762
12/01/10 10:13 PM
12/01/10 10:13 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,188
Twin Cities, MN
MN-ScatPack Offline OP
master
MN-ScatPack  Offline OP
master

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,188
Twin Cities, MN
Well those are exactly the responses I was looking for. I am not going for 700hp, rather a fun, reliable and snappy ride. I really don't care much about mpg's as this is strictly a "fun" car, not a daily driver (except to work on all nice days, work is only a mile away from home).

So, now that I'm leaning towards the 400 stroked, tell me how you would build it.

What kit?
How many cubes?
Heads?
six pack? dual 4's? efi? single?
others?
estimated price (roughly)?

I hope this is not asking to much and I'm sure answers will be all over the place, but would be nice to get a bunch of opinions. Again, don't care about high hp, lets just build a fun motor that doesn't break the bank!


Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #868763
12/01/10 10:15 PM
12/01/10 10:15 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 662
Tampa FL
H
hemibeep Offline
mopar
hemibeep  Offline
mopar
H

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 662
Tampa FL
another angle, a 5.7 and 6.1 will not "sound" like a big block. I have a 6.1 in my runner and even with upgraded cam, it is not the same.

And the wiring and mods are a bit of a challenge, but do-able.

However that 6.1 does run real nice.

Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: MN-ScatPack] #868764
12/01/10 10:47 PM
12/01/10 10:47 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,456
oklahoma
F
forphorty Offline
pro stock
forphorty  Offline
pro stock
F

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,456
oklahoma
roll bar?

Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: forphorty] #868765
12/01/10 10:55 PM
12/01/10 10:55 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,648
GA
Boosted Offline
master
Boosted  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,648
GA
The reason I said the 5.7 was that this car is a vert.. I have never been a fan of any vert being on the race car side..

Want more hp than that stroker? Add a turbo tp the 5.7 and run away from the stroker 400. And that is easy... I am looking at a 67 fast back barracuda for a race car and it will have a turbocharged 5.7 in it.. I just do not understand why people are so afraid of wiring...

have a 512 in my Challenger... would I do it again? nope.. everything from here on will be late model stuff...


2011 RAM3500

1967 Fastback Barracuda with some go fast goodies.
Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: Boosted] #868766
12/01/10 11:00 PM
12/01/10 11:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

The reason I said the 5.7 was that this car is a vert.. I have never been a fan of any vert being on the race car side..

Want more hp than that stroker? Add a turbo tp the 5.7 and run away from the stroker 400. And that is easy... I am looking at a 67 fast back barracuda for a race car and it will have a turbocharged 5.7 in it.. I just do not understand why people are so afraid of wiring...

have a 512 in my Challenger... would I do it again? nope.. everything from here on will be late model stuff...




yeah put a turbo on a stroker 400 and it will run away from a 5.7. apples to onions there..
easy? it's not EASY to add a turbo to a BB, Let alone fab something up to a new 5.7 or 6.1. And if you keep it injected it becomes more complicated. Not too mention if you want to run a new auto trans or a 5-6 speed you'll have to start cutting up the car. I guess if you own a shop or work for a magazine everything is easy. But for most of us here it is not easy and not a practical build to take on.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #868767
12/01/10 11:19 PM
12/01/10 11:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
I'd go with the stroker. The 3.75 stroke 451 or 3.9 stroke 470 make great combos with decent height pistons and rod ratio for durability. Top it off with mildly ported Edelbrock or Stealth heads and a cam in the 230-240 @.050 intake range and you should have 450 to 500 torquey and streetable HP. Compression ratio in the low to mid 10's with quench should be very happy with pump gas.

Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: ahy] #868768
12/01/10 11:27 PM
12/01/10 11:27 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,188
Twin Cities, MN
MN-ScatPack Offline OP
master
MN-ScatPack  Offline OP
master

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,188
Twin Cities, MN
Anyone else?

Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: MN-ScatPack] #868769
12/01/10 11:40 PM
12/01/10 11:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,478
Candler,NC / Myrtle Beach, SC
J
JDMopar Offline
master
JDMopar  Offline
master
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,478
Candler,NC / Myrtle Beach, SC
I can tell you from experience, that if you want to enjoy the car because it's a convertible....don't get too carried away with the motor. When I built my 71 Challenger conv. back in 92, I put a beast of a 340 six pak motor in it. Sure it ran like a gut shot cat, but it was not much fun just to ride in. I ended up taking the hot 340 out, and replacing it with a mild 360 around 94-95. It's still in there, and the car is MUCH more enjoyable without all the thumping,shaking and having to hunt race gas. If you build a stroker, build a mild 451 that you can run big block HP manifolds on, and get one of Jamie Passons new 5 spds to go behind it. Good luck

Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: MN-ScatPack] #868770
12/01/10 11:48 PM
12/01/10 11:48 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,333
MARYLAND
69Cuda340S Offline
master
69Cuda340S  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,333
MARYLAND
I would stroke that 400 and run some ported aluminum heads on there. Torque is king in a street car and with a stick you won't be able to get the smile off your face. As for stroker kit have a good local shop balance it so that it gets balanced correctly. You need to hook up with someone who knows how to build a stroked 400 and have them guide you through choosing the right parts based on what you want.

Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: MN-ScatPack] #868771
12/01/10 11:51 PM
12/01/10 11:51 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,238
Nevada
D
dezduster Offline
pro stock
dezduster  Offline
pro stock
D

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,238
Nevada
Yes build a 408 small block. I like the little package big bang effect. Light weight = better handling better stopping,oh and with my 422 small block 11.1 stock eddies and a hughes flat tappet hyd cam my duster was getting 20 mpg at 70mph. Keisler 5 speed and 3.23 gears helped.

Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: dezduster] #868772
12/02/10 12:51 AM
12/02/10 12:51 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 587
minot north dakota
ledft79 Offline
mopar
ledft79  Offline
mopar

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 587
minot north dakota
I think it all boils down to, do you want to put highway miles on it, or do you want to put 1/4 miles on it? Where is your heart at with this car?


DRIVE EM, DONT HIDE EM.
Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: MN-ScatPack] #868773
12/02/10 10:32 AM
12/02/10 10:32 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
My vote would be about a 500 to 512 stroker in the 400 block. 10.5 to 1 Ported Edelbrocks (jump on one of the deals on race section) A mild hydraulic roller cam (but milder cam for sure 230/236 ish @ .050 duration.)
will make a good cruiser in a 505 will act like a 218/224 cam in a 400 cube.
5 speed and have plenty cruising fun. 750 3310 vacuum sec or an 800 edelbrock thunder series.

Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: Dodgem] #868774
12/02/10 10:57 AM
12/02/10 10:57 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 387
N.J. north west
1972challenger Offline
enthusiast
1972challenger  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 387
N.J. north west
I'd run the 400. You own it. I'd stroke it. Had a 452 stroker with M.P. aluminum heads, 500 horse on pump gas and it's still running strong 10 years and 80k later.

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1