Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: ledft79] #868775
12/02/10 11:15 AM
12/02/10 11:15 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,188
Twin Cities, MN
MN-ScatPack Offline OP
master
MN-ScatPack  Offline OP
master

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,188
Twin Cities, MN
Quote:

I think it all boils down to, do you want to put highway miles on it, or do you want to put 1/4 miles on it? Where is your heart at with this car?




No 1/4 miles. Maybe stop light to stop light but mainly car shows and cruising around town but like I said, mpg's is not an issue, the fun factor is! Oh, and money could be a factor also so think somewhat towards budget.

Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: MN-ScatPack] #868776
12/02/10 12:47 PM
12/02/10 12:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123
Grand Haven, MI
patrick Offline
I Live Here
patrick  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123
Grand Haven, MI
Quote:

Well those are exactly the responses I was looking for. I am not going for 700hp, rather a fun, reliable and snappy ride. I really don't care much about mpg's as this is strictly a "fun" car, not a daily driver (except to work on all nice days, work is only a mile away from home).

So, now that I'm leaning towards the 400 stroked, tell me how you would build it.

What kit?
How many cubes?
Heads?
six pack? dual 4's? efi? single?
others?
estimated price (roughly)?

I hope this is not asking to much and I'm sure answers will be all over the place, but would be nice to get a bunch of opinions. Again, don't care about high hp, lets just build a fun motor that doesn't break the bank!






personally, for a snappy, quick cruiser I'd go with a 5.7 or 6.1 with an upgraded cam. 400-500 HP is easy with decent manners and probably still getting 20mpg on the highway.

tranny, I'd maybe check out the new passon 5 speed.

since the car is already set up for a big block, what about keeping the 400 but NOT stroking it? AndyF made ~580HP with aroller cammed, eddie headed, stock stroke 400 running an RPM air gap intake and 800 eddie carb about 4 or 5 years ago. maybe he can pipe in with the combo details, or search the race section for 580HP 406...


1976 Spinnaker White Plymouth Duster, /6 A833OD
1986 Silver/Twilight Blue Chrysler 5th Ave HotRod **SOLD!***
2011 Toxic Orange Dodge Charger R/T
2017 Grand Cherokee Overland
2014 Jeep Cherokee Latitude (holy crap, my daughter is driving)
Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: MN-ScatPack] #868777
12/02/10 01:13 PM
12/02/10 01:13 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
D
DPelletier Offline
I Live Here
DPelletier  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
451, Eddy or MP Alum Heads, 10:1, RPM Air Gap, not too wild on the cam. headers or HP manifolds depending on personal preference and hp expectations and finish it off with a good 2.5" mandrel bent exhaust system and low restriction mufflers.

For your stated use, the 400 stroker is definitely the way to go with the biggest advantage of the 5.7 being mileage. +

Dave


1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 1974 'Cuda 2008 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Ram 3500 Diesel 2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel 2003 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Durango Limited [url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #868778
12/02/10 01:16 PM
12/02/10 01:16 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
D
DPelletier Offline
I Live Here
DPelletier  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
Quote:

Quote:

The reason I said the 5.7 was that this car is a vert.. I have never been a fan of any vert being on the race car side..

Want more hp than that stroker? Add a turbo tp the 5.7 and run away from the stroker 400. And that is easy... I am looking at a 67 fast back barracuda for a race car and it will have a turbocharged 5.7 in it.. I just do not understand why people are so afraid of wiring...

have a 512 in my Challenger... would I do it again? nope.. everything from here on will be late model stuff...




yeah put a turbo on a stroker 400 and it will run away from a 5.7. apples to onions there..
easy? it's not EASY to add a turbo to a BB, Let alone fab something up to a new 5.7 or 6.1. And if you keep it injected it becomes more complicated. Not too mention if you want to run a new auto trans or a 5-6 speed you'll have to start cutting up the car. I guess if you own a shop or work for a magazine everything is easy. But for most of us here it is not easy and not a practical build to take on.






A turbo 5.7 is an interesting build but complexity and expense is easily double.

Dave


1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 1974 'Cuda 2008 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Ram 3500 Diesel 2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel 2003 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Durango Limited [url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: MN-ScatPack] #868779
12/02/10 01:57 PM
12/02/10 01:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline
Senior Management
feets  Offline
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Build a snappy 400 or if you must stroke it, do a 451. Those are common enough that parts are readily available with reasonable prices.

Skip the ported heads. You want to keep the port velocity high for cruising. Forget the guys that say you need 638 cubic inches and a 12.7" lift cam with 836 degres duration.

A set of Edelbrock heads (or similar) would do the trick. Find a cam around .500 lift with moderate duration and you can still use the stock valvetrain. It will make plenty of power for what you need.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: feets] #868780
12/02/10 02:16 PM
12/02/10 02:16 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,188
Twin Cities, MN
MN-ScatPack Offline OP
master
MN-ScatPack  Offline OP
master

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,188
Twin Cities, MN
So engine builders, what kind of ballpark figure am I looking to have this 400 turned into a 451 from carb to pan with eddy heads?
$4000? $5000? $10,000?

Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: dezduster] #868781
12/02/10 03:27 PM
12/02/10 03:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Yes build a 408 small block. I like the little package big bang effect. Light weight = better handling better stopping,oh and with my 422 small block 11.1 stock eddies and a hughes flat tappet hyd cam my duster was getting 20 mpg at 70mph. Keisler 5 speed and 3.23 gears helped.




again, to equal the torque and HP of a BB you'll need to spend many more dollars in order to get the numbers out of a SB. It's not going in a little and light A-body. It's going into a heavy E-body.

Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: MN-ScatPack] #868782
12/02/10 03:28 PM
12/02/10 03:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

So engine builders, what kind of ballpark figure am I looking to have this 400 turned into a 451 from carb to pan with eddy heads?
$4000? $5000? $10,000?




Depends on who is doing the work and how much stuff you can buy used. I think they sell complete 500ci for around 5k. So if you have some of the parts and can do some of your own work I don't see why you can't do it for under 4k.

Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #868783
12/02/10 11:34 PM
12/02/10 11:34 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,560
Downtown Roebuck Ont
Twostick Offline
Still wishing...
Twostick  Offline
Still wishing...

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,560
Downtown Roebuck Ont
A 4.15 stroke kit with the Chev rod journal size should be the easiest stroker to build at 496 cube. There should be no block grinding required and you can spec a piston that will live a long happy life on the street. With OOTB E-heads,9:1 compression, it's an easy 600 ft/lb torque on 87 reg with a mild cam that won't need big gears, hi stall converter, etc.

An 833 4spd and a 2.94 or a 3.23 would be just the ticket with all that torque on hand from idle to the end.

Kevin

Re: Which would you do? Stroker vs. 5.7 hemi? [Re: Twostick] #868784
12/04/10 12:42 AM
12/04/10 12:42 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,188
Twin Cities, MN
MN-ScatPack Offline OP
master
MN-ScatPack  Offline OP
master

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,188
Twin Cities, MN
Thanks twostick.

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1