Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stick #85293
07/07/08 01:59 PM
07/07/08 01:59 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 571
Western NC
68Bullit Offline OP
mopar
68Bullit  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 571
Western NC
Real simple here. Would my car be more fun to drive with a 5-spd Tremec or my current 904 with a GV setup? Which would be a better investment, the automatic, or 5-spd? Originality is NOT an issue here. Nothing original about my Charger SE mild small block car. Will the 5-spd give me more power than the auto w/GV? I know they are both strong setups but I'm beginning to think that my car's potential will always be limited in front of the 904 tranny? My Charger is a driver, and I want to drive it alot and have fun while driving it, including to start taking it on a couple of 2-3 hour trips each year. The GV has a .78 overdrive and the Tremec that I'm eyeballing right now is the TKO-600 with the .64 overdrive. The car will keep it's current 3.91 SG's. Which would you choose for fun, if you could afford either one? Thanks

Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stic [Re: 68Bullit] #85294
07/07/08 02:04 PM
07/07/08 02:04 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,195
Snowing in the north!
D
Dart 340 Offline
moparts member
Dart 340  Offline
moparts member
D

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,195
Snowing in the north!
My opinion is a manual is always more fun to drive. As for faster, I guess that's what you mean. Automatics are human error free for the most part.
You are not going to miss a gear with an auto, and you dont have the slight time lapse - power loss shifting. You can rev up a manual and dump the clutch without doing a neutral drop like in an automatic.

It's all a matter or preference.

Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stic [Re: Dart 340] #85295
07/07/08 02:22 PM
07/07/08 02:22 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,233
petaluma,ca. u.s.a.
west Offline
master
west  Offline
master

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,233
petaluma,ca. u.s.a.
autos are quicker and more cosistant in the 1/4 mile only.
manuals require less stuff and maintnence and are much more efficent on hills and turns.
autos are easier to install if the car was originally an auto.
I built an auto car,if i did it again it would be a manual.

Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stick [Re: 68Bullit] #85296
07/07/08 05:32 PM
07/07/08 05:32 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 413
northeast ohio
M
mkdart Offline
mopar
mkdart  Offline
mopar
M

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 413
northeast ohio
Replaced the 727 in my dart with a TKO-600 ,5-speed(.64 fifth). It was pricey but it's a blast to drive. Mike

Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stick [Re: 68Bullit] #85297
07/07/08 05:36 PM
07/07/08 05:36 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,819
Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
Pacnorthcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,819
Kirkland, Washington
Trick question. Stick is more fun, Auto is faster.

The thing about this age-old debate is that in almost all cases, low-powered cars are faster in stick form due to parasitic losses of the automatic. High powered cars can afford these losses (the rear tires/suspension usually become the limiting factor)

Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stick [Re: 68Bullit] #85298
07/07/08 05:45 PM
07/07/08 05:45 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,424
Florida STAYcation
dOc ! Offline
The village idiot's idiot
dOc !  Offline
The village idiot's idiot

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,424
Florida STAYcation
The big Q to answer is this.... does your mild small block have the cajones to pull that big Charger with a .64 OD ?

Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stic [Re: Dart 340] #85299
07/07/08 06:09 PM
07/07/08 06:09 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
D
DPelletier Offline
I Live Here
DPelletier  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
Quote:


It's all a matter or preference.




...yep.


Dave


1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 1974 'Cuda 2008 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Ram 3500 Diesel 2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel 2003 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Durango Limited [url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stic [Re: DPelletier] #85300
07/07/08 06:16 PM
07/07/08 06:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
ScottSmith_Harms Offline
Mr Wizzard
ScottSmith_Harms  Offline
Mr Wizzard

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
My opinion based post........

Manual is more fun
Manual is usually a bit faster (if it's an 833 trans that is) but NOT if it's a Kielser! They don't shift as Fast/Smooth as an 833.
Manual will get you better milage

Automatic is more consistant
Automatic is generally lower maintainance

If I were in your shoes I'd buy the Gear vendor unit regardless of if you run a 727 auto or an 833 4 speed if over drive is your goal, also look into Jamie Passons 4 speed OD unit, price is competitive and bullit proof..

Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stic [Re: ScottSmith_Harms] #85301
07/07/08 09:04 PM
07/07/08 09:04 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



MAN...
obviously some of you dudes never drove a manual valvebody trans car before.

Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stick [Re: Pacnorthcuda] #85302
07/07/08 09:15 PM
07/07/08 09:15 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
Quote:

Trick question. Stick is more fun, Auto is faster.

The thing about this age-old debate is that in almost all cases, low-powered cars are faster in stick form due to parasitic losses of the automatic. High powered cars can afford these losses (the rear tires/suspension usually become the limiting factor)




Manual if more fun but in general auto is faster. If you've got a 500hp car, auto will definitely be faster, but like he said, if you've got a low-powered car, IE more like 300hp, the stick may in fact be faster because of the extra gearing is now worth the time spent shifting. All-in-all no matter what, manual trans is always more fun, but if you're chasing ET's, auto is the way to go.

As for manual valve body autos, I dunno, just something about that conceptually turns me off. I mean what's the point of shifting manually if you don't have a clutch pedal to play with? I thought that was the whole point...

Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stic [Re: DaytonaTurbo] #85303
07/07/08 09:24 PM
07/07/08 09:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
M
MoparforLife Offline
Too Many Posts
MoparforLife  Offline
Too Many Posts
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
Back in the day the 4 speed was deemed faster and rated according to NHRA as such. At that time there were numerous drivers out there both pro and non pro that new how to bang gears keeping the right to the floor and bearly touching the clutch pedal. don't see all that many now. They are there but in the numbers there were back then. Also the autos of the day were not quite as quick shifting as there were not the kits and valve bodies available then as now.


Clean it, if it's Dirty. Oil it, if it Squeaks. But: Don't fix it, if it Works!
Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stic [Re: MoparforLife] #85304
07/07/08 10:20 PM
07/07/08 10:20 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 177
4
440Demon Offline
member
440Demon  Offline
member
4

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 177
I agree with Scott - I run a "standard" Jamie Passon stick in a BB A body and love it. I had the same choice in front of me when I re-did the car between 02 and 05. Put the stick in and never looked back. Much like six flags, more gears = more fun!
John
72440Demon

Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stic [Re: 440Demon] #85305
07/07/08 10:52 PM
07/07/08 10:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
M
MoparforLife Offline
Too Many Posts
MoparforLife  Offline
Too Many Posts
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
Quote:

I agree with Scott - I run a "standard" Jamie Passon stick in a BB A body and love it. I had the same choice in front of me when I re-did the car between 02 and 05. Put the stick in and never looked back. Much like six flags, more gears = more fun!
John
72440Demon



As you get older the more shiftless you get. I used to like it and knew how and could bang gears too but not no more.

Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stick [Re: 68Bullit] #85306
07/07/08 10:56 PM
07/07/08 10:56 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 375
Columbus, Ohio MAINTAIN RIGHT!
Max Rockatansky Offline
Spell Checker
Max Rockatansky  Offline
Spell Checker

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 375
Columbus, Ohio MAINTAIN RIGHT!
Musclecars should have clutches and big, burly shifters. Automatics are for gir...oops, here comes my wife, gotta go.

Last edited by 1972 GTX; 07/07/08 11:00 PM.

Press hard, four copies.
Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stick [Re: Max Rockatansky] #85307
07/07/08 11:21 PM
07/07/08 11:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
ScottSmith_Harms Offline
Mr Wizzard
ScottSmith_Harms  Offline
Mr Wizzard

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
Quote:

As you get older the more shiftless you get. I used to like it and knew how and could bang gears too but not no more.




I'm 45, how old do I have to be to get tired of shifting? I'll answer for you, It would be after I'm dead!

I've driven just about every kind of automatic combo out there (manual valve body, reverse manual valve body, SS/DA car with 5,500 stall converters, heck even drove a clutch-flite a few times, remember those?), some are more fun than others and all are easier to drive than a stick, but none have come close to the fun factor a manual offers, not for me anyway.

Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stic [Re: MoparforLife] #85308
07/07/08 11:24 PM
07/07/08 11:24 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Stick is always going to be more fun. Especially an 833

Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stic #85309
07/07/08 11:32 PM
07/07/08 11:32 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,169
clarks summit pa
73cuda340 Offline
super stock
73cuda340  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,169
clarks summit pa
4 speed will always be more fun


1973 Cuda 528 all aluminum Hemi, 4 speed, 3.23 Sure-Grip, (JA5) Silver Frost Metallic 1973 Challenger Rallye 340 1985 W150 Power Ram prospector 1986 Camaro IROC-Z 305 tpi
Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stick [Re: 68Bullit] #85310
07/08/08 12:52 AM
07/08/08 12:52 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259
Khemi, Stygia
Mebsuta Offline
enthusiast
Mebsuta  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259
Khemi, Stygia
Manual all the way. Would not even consider owning an automatic unless I was hurt or had bad knees and couldn't work the clutch and shifter. To date I have never owned any type of vehicle with an automatic, hot-rod or otherwise.


68 Roadrunner. 383 4-spd. Beat up.
Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stic [Re: 73cuda340] #85311
07/08/08 12:57 AM
07/08/08 12:57 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,161
CT
GTX MATT Offline
master
GTX MATT  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,161
CT
If you go with something with a quick first gear I think you'll like it better. Alot of the advantage of newer cars is the gearing that they get away with because of 5th and 6th speed overdrive. First gear is in the mid 3s:1 and differential is often in the mid to high 4s in these little engined sports cars. You dont need that much torque when youve got all that mechanical advantage on your side.

You think a 225 hp 300 ft lb of torque 302 would have propelled a late 60s Mustang to mid 14s like the 5.0s of the 80s?

3.35 first gear helps those cars alot.


Now I need to pin those needles, got to feel that heat
Hear my motor screamin while I'm tearin up the street
Re: Which would be more fun, and faster? Auto vs. stic [Re: 68Bullit] #85312
07/08/08 06:05 PM
07/08/08 06:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,788
Hamilton, Ontario Canada
Magnum Offline
master
Magnum  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,788
Hamilton, Ontario Canada
Quote:

Which would be a better investment, the automatic, or 5-spd?




You've already had many responses concerning which is better but I will add another point.

I've watched the prices of Tremecs on the Mustang forums. It's a nice upgrade over the factory Mustang transmission too. As for investment.

Even used, like raced for 6 years used. These are still selling for $1600-$2000 and being sold FAST.

Also the internal rail shift mechanism feels like day one after thousands of miles.


69 Super Bee, 93 Mustang LX, 04 Allure Super
Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1