Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
4.7 into e body? #84170
07/05/08 12:00 AM
07/05/08 12:00 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 480
Kentucky, USA
D
derekeh Offline OP
mopar
derekeh  Offline OP
mopar
D

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 480
Kentucky, USA
Just wondering if anyone has ever put a 4.7 into an E body or any older mopar for that matter. I always thought it would be cool to put a supercharged one into my 70 cuda and still keep the fuel injection and so on.

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: derekeh] #84171
07/05/08 12:02 AM
07/05/08 12:02 AM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,118
85086
moparpollack Offline
Lil Herman
moparpollack  Offline
Lil Herman

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,118
85086
See Resto Rick's website. He's doing a 68 Plymouth vert with a 4.7.


56 Plaza 63 D100 step side 67 Coronet, 68 Roadrunner, 69 Super Bees, 69 Coronet 500 convertible, 70 Roadrunner Post, 79 D150 360, and a severe case of Mopar a,d,d
Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: moparpollack] #84172
07/05/08 01:28 AM
07/05/08 01:28 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,064
Arlington, Texas
earlybee Offline
master
earlybee  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,064
Arlington, Texas
I have one in a 4900+# Ram 4dr 2wd, with a 392 gear and 20" A/T tires. It burns and turns them real good for a stock 287ci engine. With a A-B-E body weight
it should fly 12-13s in the 1/4 IMO. Excellent street torque/rpms till 5 grand, then it falls on its face.

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: derekeh] #84173
07/05/08 05:31 AM
07/05/08 05:31 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
Clair_Davis Offline
master
Clair_Davis  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
Here's RestoRick's Web Site, but it doesn't have much info on the project. Have there been any updates?

I think this would be agreat little engine, too, and I'm keeping my eyes out for a good opportunity on a late-model one. The 2008 models got a pretty significant upgrade, and make 303hp @ 5650rpm and 330lbft @ 3950rpm. Those are almost the exact same numbers that my warm 340 make right now, and I'm sure thre would be a significant mileage increase due to smaller size and roller everything. The 4.7 will bolt up to any LA bolt pattern trans, but it's got (IIRC) an 8-bolt crank flange that is NOT the same as the old Hemi 8-bolt flange, so manual trans applications will require a custom flywheel.

Keep us posted!

Clair

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: Clair_Davis] #84174
07/06/08 12:44 PM
07/06/08 12:44 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,304
WI
RestoRick Offline
top fuel
RestoRick  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,304
WI
I just found this post...

I'm finally getting settled in my new place to start getting back on this project.
I'm at a point where I need to sort out how I'm 'gonna run this.
Possibly megasquirt and a trans controller.

I spoke with a Chrysler tech who said he'd done a couple with using the factory harness and weeding out the emissions related plugs.
I can't remember what he said about trouble codes this would generate... I'm guessing it'd run in a limp mode?

It would be nice if there were a "plug & play" harness like you can buy for Chivy's.. from someone like Painless, etc.

Rick

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: RestoRick] #84175
07/06/08 02:03 PM
07/06/08 02:03 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
Quote:


I spoke with a Chrysler tech who said he'd done a couple with using the factory harness and weeding out the emissions related plugs.
I can't remember what he said about trouble codes this would generate... I'm guessing it'd run in a limp mode?





I did this when converting an 80's carb 2.2 to EFI. It worked and did not run in limp mode, but the 80's emissions equipment was crude in comparasin to what we have today. It was a ton of work to sort through everything and wire it all up. Then when all is said and done, you're still hammered by the lack of tunability. IMO an aftermarket EFI controller would be worth the cost.

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: DaytonaTurbo] #84176
07/06/08 08:06 PM
07/06/08 08:06 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,304
WI
RestoRick Offline
top fuel
RestoRick  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,304
WI
Agreed... I'm not so concerned about cost as much as being able to figure it out and get it sorted out correctly.

Is the megasquirt the only aftermarket EFI controller available? or the only one that would work?

Thanks,
Rick

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: RestoRick] #84177
07/06/08 08:22 PM
07/06/08 08:22 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
Tonnes of EFI controllers out there that'll work for both fuel and spark. I only bought a megasquirt because it's the cheapest efi controller on the market, and the only one that I could afford.

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: RestoRick] #84178
07/06/08 09:58 PM
07/06/08 09:58 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
Clair_Davis Offline
master
Clair_Davis  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
If you're going to run an essentially stock system anyway, why not run the stock ECM/PCM if you can? No tuning needed on a stone-stock engine/trans, you just need to convince them that they're in Durango/Dakota/Ram/Whatever they came in originally. No reason you couldn't install the emissions items necessary to keep the ECM/PCM happy. There's not much to be gained by ditching the converters, especially if you go with a couple decent high-flow units. For that matter, you could go with just one in a single 3" pipe and either split to duals after the axle, or heck, right after the cat. A buddy of mine just did a similar swap with a new Hemi in to his 93 Ramcharger, and it turned out to be a great package. The only thing that doesn't work that used to is the cruise control. He thought he could learn to live without that...

Clair

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: Clair_Davis] #84179
07/06/08 10:13 PM
07/06/08 10:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,304
WI
RestoRick Offline
top fuel
RestoRick  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,304
WI
Hi Clair,

Mine is from a 2002. I checked out schematics in the factory manual (CD) and it seemed to be tied in with gauges too... other things I can't recall as well.
(it's been awhile )
To get all the emissions pieces might be a nightmare too. I've considered picking up a parts truck to rob parts from too, but it seems I'd have some pretty serious $$ tied up in that route.
I suppose a late model boneyard is an option too.

I'm all ears for any suggestions...

cool on your buddy's Hemi into the '93 Ramcharger !

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: RestoRick] #84180
07/07/08 10:01 AM
07/07/08 10:01 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
Clair_Davis Offline
master
Clair_Davis  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
I'll see if I can get some info from him on how the gauge output functions were handled. Seems like they wouldn't be critical since they're "probably" just reporting info for the gauges to show, but I have no idea if that's really the case. Seems like I remember the whole Hemi/PCM package being nearly stand-alone once the redundant/useless stuff was culled out.

Clair

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: Clair_Davis] #84181
07/07/08 11:34 AM
07/07/08 11:34 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
Just remember though, if you want to do any HP mods after that, you will be at the mercy of the few who can reprogram a stock ECU. Which from what I've seen is a very poor substitute for tuning your engine yourself. But if you keep it bone stock, it will work great because all the tuning is already done for you. I've done the stock ecu retrofit twice now, but I won't do it again. In the long haul, it's just not worth it for me because nothing stays stock forever. Then your kicking yourself for investing the time/money into a non-user tunable system. But either way... good luck.

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: DaytonaTurbo] #84182
07/07/08 01:07 PM
07/07/08 01:07 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
Clair_Davis Offline
master
Clair_Davis  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
Yeah, the OP is probably going to need to go aftermarket if boost is in the plan. Duner managed to boost the snot out of the 4.7L in his Dak, but I forget how he managed the extra fuel. I think I remember that it was some sort of external FMU, but I've slept too many times since I discussed it with him. Sounds like RestoRick may be keeping it stock for a cruiser, so maybe the OEM stuff would suit his needs. Although I'd love to have a stock 303HP 4.7L under my hood, I don't know if I could keep my hands off it, either... At least I wouldn't have to worry about running the auto trans, too.

Clair

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: Clair_Davis] #84183
07/07/08 02:31 PM
07/07/08 02:31 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,670
A
Andrewh Offline
master
Andrewh  Offline
master
A

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,670
you know I have been thinking about aftermarket computer controlers.
I understand now that the base stuff seems to be the same, just the connectors are wrong.

Not saying it would not be a pain and look ugly, but when painless comes out with the efi for the 5.9, couldn't you just cut the connectors off the stock harness and use it with the sensors they use and run it? Might need to tune it still, but it would be the right firing order, and close to the right programming,to at least fire it up.

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: Andrewh] #84184
07/07/08 03:05 PM
07/07/08 03:05 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
Clair_Davis Offline
master
Clair_Davis  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
I'm not sure, but I don't think the 4.7L has a distributor, so there would have to be a little work to get the coil-on-plug ignition to work, although the Mag dizzie doesn't really do anything but give the spark a place to go. Probably something like one of the LS engine controllers could do the trick, though.

Clair

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: Clair_Davis] #84185
07/09/08 04:32 PM
07/09/08 04:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,304
WI
RestoRick Offline
top fuel
RestoRick  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,304
WI
Well...

While a basic cruiser is the plan, I could very well play with it more down the road.

What are some EFI controllers worth looking at?
I've googled and come with a bunch for motorcycle applications... also the multisquirt.

Clair, "LS engine controller"... what is that?


Rick

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: RestoRick] #84186
07/09/08 04:58 PM
07/09/08 04:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 457
Hightstown, NJ
njdevil2 Offline
mopar
Happy Birthday njdevil2  Offline
mopar

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 457
Hightstown, NJ
You would think that F.A.S.T. would have something. How about ACCEL?
I'm really interested in this little project, I always thought the 4.7 was a torquey engine in the Dakota. With a little tuning, should run 350 hp easy, I would think.


1970 road runner Convertible
1 of 179
Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: RestoRick] #84187
07/09/08 05:57 PM
07/09/08 05:57 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
Clair_Davis Offline
master
Clair_Davis  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
Rick,
The "LS" engine controller is one of many/any that are capable of running one of GM's LS-series engines. These generally have sequential injection, distributorless ignition, coil-on-plug ignition, etc. As with many GM control systems, even the OEM parts have a bunch of aftermarket support and some tuning capability. I think an LS-1 system was used early on as a stand-alone system to run the new Hemi, so the 4.7L shouldn't be too hard to adapt, either.

Clair

Re: 4.7 into e body? [Re: Clair_Davis] #84188
07/10/08 09:14 AM
07/10/08 09:14 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,304
WI
RestoRick Offline
top fuel
RestoRick  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,304
WI
Cool.. thanks... I'm looking into it.

Rick







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1