Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB #752079
07/19/10 12:42 AM
07/19/10 12:42 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
CurYellowBird Offline OP
mopar
CurYellowBird  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
I'm looking for mainly opinions on this thread, but also the pros and cons of these two setups.

Of course costs is the REALLY big one and which is more simplistic. Seems like you could always take the costs of an EFI system, get a decent carb and put the rest of the money towards other parts of the car.

Any opinions/info is appreciated.


Project War Bird: 1971 Plymouth Roadrunner 383 4 speed with air conditioning GY3 Curious yellow All original
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752080
07/19/10 01:15 AM
07/19/10 01:15 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,477
Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY Offline
I Live Here
CrAzYMoPaRGuY  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,477
Canada
Drivability is the big issue as far as I'm concerned.
The cost is the big "con".

A well set up car with a carb or two that actually RUNS WELL would be the best comparison, but many guys who have drivability problems with poor running carb setups will let their enthusiasm wane towards their car because they don't enjoy it like they should.

IMO anyways...

Top end all out power will be very close, maybe some low and midrange torque numbers would lean towards the EFI.

Cold start drivability between the two would be noticeable too IMO.


CrAzYMoPaRGuY
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CrAzYMoPaRGuY] #752081
07/19/10 01:20 AM
07/19/10 01:20 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
CurYellowBird Offline OP
mopar
CurYellowBird  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
I tested a 2 barrel holley projection kit on my sbc 350 that had a decent summit cam and the other aftermarket goodies. The thing was a complete pain in the a** from the start, ran rich, and wouldn't tune well with the analog computer.

It had excellent torque response, but even while tuning it, it would stay rich. I think the biggest issue was it was an open circuit EFI and not a closed circuit with all the sensors and what not.

MPG didn't seem to change at all. If anything I swapped back to my edelbrock carb cause the EFI was putting my MPG into the ground.


Project War Bird: 1971 Plymouth Roadrunner 383 4 speed with air conditioning GY3 Curious yellow All original
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752082
07/19/10 01:24 AM
07/19/10 01:24 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,477
Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY Offline
I Live Here
CrAzYMoPaRGuY  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,477
Canada
Quote:

I tested a 2 barrel holley projection kit on my sbc 350 that had a decent summit cam and the other aftermarket goodies. The thing was a complete pain in the a** from the start, ran rich, and wouldn't tune well with the analog computer.

It had excellent torque response, but even while tuning it, it would stay rich. I think the biggest issue was it was an open circuit EFI and not a closed circuit with all the sensors and what not.

MPG didn't seem to change at all. If anything I swapped back to my edelbrock carb cause the EFI was putting my MPG into the ground.




A poor EFI setup will dim most of the view of EFI setups too.

I think the latest sequential multiport setups with a good ECU are hard to beat. I'm not a fan of some of the smaller systems, but some guys have made them work...


CrAzYMoPaRGuY
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CrAzYMoPaRGuY] #752083
07/19/10 01:52 AM
07/19/10 01:52 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
I've got a megasquirt, victor efi intake, fuel injectors, pump, etc etc everything needed to put together a MPI system for my 440. But it's been sitting on the shelf for a few years now. Never got around to installing it. I've been seriously considering selling it all and just building a carb. I think I want to spend my time driving the car rather than putting the efi system together. Not that I would come out a million $ ahead, just that doing a carb would be much more doable from a time investment standpoint.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752084
07/19/10 05:06 AM
07/19/10 05:06 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
I just put the EZ-EFI system on my tunnel ram.



on the electrical side there were 2 sensor connections on the car that were not on the throttle body, water temp, and O2.

on the electrical side there was +/- and key power aside from the fuel pump.

I elected to run a new fuel system, including tank mounted pump.

Cost? I didnt have to touch the intake, just unbolt the carbs and replace - but dont just think of the cost of the carbs, you'd have to include the jet kit, air bleeds, accel pump kit, wideband O2 sensor, carb book, and the time to make all the necessary changes several times a second to get a carb anywhere near close to where these suckers run.

I can only speak to the EZ system, as it's the one I picked to go with, I didnt want to design a system ( cheaper) or map out my own fuel and timing curves ( more expensive) I wanted to control my own timing and make some adjustments, but not need a laptop to even get moving, or after a significant change in the engine.


I have about 1000 miles on it after several long car event weekends and my exhaust tips are clean, the smell does not kill you from behind the car, and i am getting better mileage...

I'd seriously consider more of these setups on my other cars.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: DJVCuda] #752085
07/19/10 06:40 AM
07/19/10 06:40 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,422
Warren, MI
71TA Offline
I Live Here
71TA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,422
Warren, MI
That EZ-EFI looks nice.
I was also looking at EFI for my BB but because of the $ I bought a new 830CFM annular, mechanical secondary Speed Demon (with all replaceable jets). Using the LMI A/F meter to properly tune it, it starts better than my modern daily driver. That LMI IS the tool that s required to setup a carb. Reading plugs and other old school methods are JUST that.


www.DetroitMuscleTechnologies.com Mopar body and heater box restoration gaskets
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: 71TA] #752086
07/19/10 07:09 AM
07/19/10 07:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,076
Berlin, N.J.
A
abodyjoe Offline
I Live Here
abodyjoe  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,076
Berlin, N.J.
i have to agree with DJV. i have been in his car with the efi and also another friend that put a single set up on his big block. holy cow, the difference in how smooth they run, the power, and drivabilty is incredible. no doubt you can get a carb close but you'll never get it dead on like injection. just way too many changing weather conditions for a carb to have a perfect mixture all the time. i'll be saving for a fast ez efi set up. those two cars made me a believer. i thought it was kinda expensive to do but the results were worth it in my opinion. i guess it depends on how much you drive your car too. someone that just cruises to local events it may not be worth going efi. but for someone like me that likes long cruises and often long cruises its definatley worth it in my opinion...


It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

www.MoparMisfits.com
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: 71TA] #752087
07/19/10 08:09 AM
07/19/10 08:09 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
Quote:

That EZ-EFI looks nice.
I was also looking at EFI for my BB but because of the $ I bought a new 830CFM annular, mechanical secondary Speed Demon (with all replaceable jets). Using the LMI A/F meter to properly tune it, it starts better than my modern daily driver. That LMI IS the tool that s required to setup a carb. Reading plugs and other old school methods are JUST that.




while i could not find the 830 annular I found the 850 speed demon

$450

I looked up holley parts since BG's are not listed


jet kit - 50
gasket kit ( for jet changes) - 42
acc pump tuning kit - 120
air bleed assortment kit - 195
LM-2 - single channel O2 sensor - 399

TOTAL - 1256


Now - the carb choice could go another 2-400 bux depending on your selection and the EZ system is on summit for 1749

Both fuel systems are omitted to keep it simple.

If you went with a holley ultra HP 950 ( 800 bux ) the cost get closer and closer... ( 1600 )

not including the built in rev limiter, programmable electric fan switch, and ac idle bump the $150 - $ 500 difference can even get closer from ebag...( 1649 from a quick search)

now your down to $50 - $400 price difference. and remember the EZ Throttle body is 1000 CFM!

\
lets not forget that you set that carb up in the spring ( 50 degrees) and now its 100 out in the dead of summer.... will you jet it to perfection every 20 degree temp change? how about atmospheric changes? how about driving in the mountains? do you jet lean, rich, or stop, pull the bowls and make a change in the middle?

I can change it all from the drivers seat - and if I dont want to touch a thing i can do that too. the system monitors make changes, it checks the O2 sensor and corrects, noting the correction for next time ( self learning )

I was a carb guy through and trough, but after watching this thing learn how to work 2000 CFM on top of a stocker 360 and have better mileage, better driveability, and better manners I'm sold!

I have not even checked it at the dyno or track y
et, but I should not see any major increases unless my carb tuning skills were shot to begin with ( as far as peak power.. but who knows!

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: DJVCuda] #752088
07/19/10 08:33 AM
07/19/10 08:33 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
CurYellowBird Offline OP
mopar
CurYellowBird  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
I plan on driving my 71' roadrunner all the time and probably cross country with some pro touring. Planning a future trip from down here in san antonio, texas up to augusta, maine. Big difference in climates for sure.


Project War Bird: 1971 Plymouth Roadrunner 383 4 speed with air conditioning GY3 Curious yellow All original
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752089
07/19/10 09:30 AM
07/19/10 09:30 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 420
Central Ohio
L
Ledman_70 Offline
mopar
Ledman_70  Offline
mopar
L

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 420
Central Ohio
Can someone give me a little more info on the LMI a/f meter? Cost? Availability? How it works, etc. I can tune a carb to run decent, but I can't get it to the gnat's ass. I am having the same issue with the 800 dp Holley on my 426 as I had with the 750 sp... there's a slight stumble right off idle. I haven't tried drilling holes in the primary butterflies yet. Thanks


Jeff Adams 64 426 Polara
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Ledman_70] #752090
07/19/10 10:08 AM
07/19/10 10:08 AM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Houston TX
G
GregCon Offline
super stock
GregCon  Offline
super stock
G

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Houston TX
When I read this thread title I thought you meant fuel injection.....and I was going to tell you that injection has some driveability issues but you can get around that by using a good VST setup like Kinsler's. As for power, the max HP is about the same but there's no comparison from any point between idle and full RPM. The fuel injection is just vicious compared to a carb. But, then I realized you were talking about the kind of fuel delivery system they use on Grandma's car. Nevermind!

6093687-Hilborn.jpg (827 downloads)
Last edited by GregCon; 07/19/10 10:13 AM.
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: GregCon] #752091
07/19/10 10:29 AM
07/19/10 10:29 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,481
Mesa, AZ
P
Pat_Whalen Offline
super gas
Pat_Whalen  Offline
super gas
P

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,481
Mesa, AZ
I was planning on going with a megasquirt multiport injection setup on my 440 Ramcharger. (DaytonaTurbo )

I think everyone has a particular set of reasons or requirements that would cause them to choose one over the other.

My list of things is:

Driveability
System feedback
Ignition control (power/cruise/economy modes)
Modern "feel"
No need to "keep in tune".

I also have to take into consideration that this truck is my daily driver and also a vehicle that will be used for camping. My current elevation is roughly 1200' AMS, and I could potentially drive in a couple of hours and be pushing close to 7000' AMS. That's not always the best circumstances for running a carb.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Pat_Whalen] #752092
07/19/10 11:38 AM
07/19/10 11:38 AM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 198
Staten Island, NY
T
Theorio1025 Offline
member
Theorio1025  Offline
member
T

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 198
Staten Island, NY
Has anyone used the powerjection 3 setup? It looks similar to the ez efi, but it has the ability to laptop tune as well.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Theorio1025] #752093
07/19/10 11:48 AM
07/19/10 11:48 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
I could not fir them on my tunnel ram, with EZ EFI I didnt even adjust my throttle / kickdown linkage.

they also require a laptop to make any changes... the handheld on the EZ unit makes all the changes I need.


Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: DJVCuda] #752094
07/19/10 12:03 PM
07/19/10 12:03 PM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 198
Staten Island, NY
T
Theorio1025 Offline
member
Theorio1025  Offline
member
T

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 198
Staten Island, NY
The tunnel ram isn't an issue for me. How well does the self tuning work on either?

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Theorio1025] #752095
07/19/10 12:32 PM
07/19/10 12:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
the EZ self tuning works excellent. The sensors monitor the engine and make the fuel delivery, which is checked by the O2, which tells the sensors to make any needed adjustments and this happens several times per second. It was cool feeling a stumble off idle diminish to a smooth running motor with bog no where!

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752096
07/19/10 01:23 PM
07/19/10 01:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
Mopar_Rich Offline
top fuel
Mopar_Rich  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
Quote:

I'm looking for mainly opinions on this thread, but also the pros and cons of these two setups.

Of course costs is the REALLY big one and which is more simplistic. Seems like you could always take the costs of an EFI system, get a decent carb and put the rest of the money towards other parts of the car.

Any opinions/info is appreciated.




CurYellowBird
I can answer any/all questions you may have about the FAST EFI systems, but here's a quick overview of the EZ-EFI system(s):

EZ-EFI TB Pros:
- Easy to install (bolts on instead of a carb)
- No tuning
- It works as advertised
- Great throttle response
- Good drivability, good mileage, good cold start, user can tune the target A/F ratio table as various points (cruise, WOT, etc)

EZ-EFI (TB type) Cons:
- Does not control timing (you use a standard distributor and ignition box)
- Operates in bank-to-bank mode. Not really a draw back because the injectors are in the throttle body.
- Injectors are in TB (wet manifold). Not as "ideal" as port injection.
- Injector sizes limit HP to 550-600 HP for a single TB- No problem if you run two TBs or use the EZ port injected system.
- Requires an EFI fuel system (but any EFI system would)
- Can only drive up to 8 high-Z injectors.

One newer option is the same EZ-EFI ECU but for port injection manifolds. This option gives you more HP capability (8 injectors instead of 4) and the manifold runs dry.

Pricing:
The 30226-kit Single EZ TB (no fuel system components) $1689.
The 30227-kit (30226 kit + fuel system; pump, filters, regulator, etc.) $1945
The 304155 second TB upgrade kit $850
The 302000 EZ-EFI kit for port injection $825

Hope this helps

www.fastmanefi.com

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Mopar_Rich] #752097
07/19/10 02:59 PM
07/19/10 02:59 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
CurYellowBird Offline OP
mopar
CurYellowBird  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
Thanks mopar rich! I'm still learning the fuel injection systems as my experience is only with the TBI 2 barrel holley projection system on a sbc. It really had it's flaws but I don't base that experience on all systems.

I don't foresee myself making 500hp with the engine build I'm planning for this car. More in the 425hp/475lb. range is what I'm shooting for out of my 383.

I do have a complete 440 but I have my own personal reasons for not going with the 440. With the way the price of gas is going and the quality of it, I feel better with the 383. I've got a spare 383 block so I can swap out the numbers one so I can actually put my foot into without fear of breaking original numbers parts.

I looked at those parts you listed and is there a kit for a port injection setup rather than a TB setup? I looked at the last set you listed and it looks like just a wiring harness and some computer stuff. Where are the injectors on that TB setup you listed? Are they below those mini fuel rails?

Is EZ's EFI systems a closed loop system that uses sensors and what not to do self adjustments rather than having to constantly adjust an analog computer? Please forgive me on my lack of knowledge in this area as some of my questions seem to be a little repetitive.

I've got a Barry Grant 750 carb that is one of his first carbs to come out before holley sued him over his "holley look-alike". This is the alternative to using EFI. But after looking at the price of that TB setup from EZ-EFI, I'm starting to lean towards EFI. All the other kits I looked at such as the XFI kit from FAST was around $4500 and others were in the 3-3500 range in price.


Last edited by CurYellowBird; 07/19/10 03:39 PM.
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: DJVCuda] #752098
07/19/10 03:29 PM
07/19/10 03:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,788
Hamilton, Ontario Canada
Magnum Offline
master
Magnum  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,788
Hamilton, Ontario Canada
Quote:

It was cool feeling a stumble off idle diminish to a smooth running motor with bog no where!




I think the debate ends here.


69 Super Bee, 93 Mustang LX, 04 Allure Super
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1