Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: A4SixtyNineRR]
#60631
05/20/08 10:34 PM
05/20/08 10:34 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,195 Snowing in the north!
Dart 340
moparts member
|
moparts member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,195
Snowing in the north!
|
Whats wrong with the 3:23? I had that in my cuda and it would light the tires up just fine plus would top it out at around 140 MPH. I have a 2:76 in my dart thats a 4 speed that roasts the tires off. Sell me your 3:23 if you don't like it.
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: Dart 340]
#60632
05/20/08 10:43 PM
05/20/08 10:43 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 292 dead center
CHRONiklyDEMONic
Demonized
|
Demonized
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 292
dead center
|
3.55.
Last edited by CHRONiklyDEMONic; 05/21/08 10:41 PM.
"After a Day filled with burning Rubber, you may find it time to re-tire."
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: A4SixtyNineRR]
#60633
05/20/08 10:45 PM
05/20/08 10:45 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
roadrunners where light to light terrors.. NOT hiway cruizers.. so stick some 4.30's in there.
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: Dart 340]
#60635
05/20/08 11:38 PM
05/20/08 11:38 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,319 Puyallup, WA
StealthWedge67
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,319
Puyallup, WA
|
I'm gonna go against the grain here. I run 3.91's in my Satellite, and love them. But, My car is used around town only. It rarely sees freeway miles, and when it does, I'll admit its not exactly the hot ticket! If you do any freeway miles, I'd go with 3.73's, just so you can peek at 60 MPH below 3g. If its just a Saturday Night Special, and you're in it for the fun factor.....3.91's are fun. Heck... 4:10's!!!
LemonWedge - Street heavy / Strip ready - 11.07 @ 120
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: CHRONiklyDEMONic]
#60636
05/20/08 11:40 PM
05/20/08 11:40 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,101 cincinnati ohio
mcat4321
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,101
cincinnati ohio
|
Quote:
3.55. The best gear choice ever. Period. My friend has a fox body mustang that run's 7.90 in the 1/4 mile, with a 3.55 gear.
why would anyone care what your friend has...
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: StealthWedge67]
#60638
05/21/08 12:57 AM
05/21/08 12:57 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419 Kalispell Mt.
HotRodDave
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
|
I have a 2.76 in my 318 cuda and it will lite em up real good. It is great on the highway unless I plan to break a speed limit at all, then I wish I had even higher. I would use the 3.23 or higher for cruising and especially considering MPG these days.
I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: HotRodDave]
#60639
05/21/08 01:37 AM
05/21/08 01:37 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
8-3/4 is a pretty quick swap, enough practice and you can change gears in 20 min. I have 3.91 in my runner and like it, but change to 2.76 for the highway. If I had 4.88 I would probably use that for bursts about town. I do like 3.55 as an all around gear.
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#60642
05/21/08 09:29 AM
05/21/08 09:29 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
i drove with 4.30's on the hiway with a 28" tall tire at 60-65mph.. wasn't all that bad.
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: Pacnorthcuda]
#60645
05/21/08 11:12 AM
05/21/08 11:12 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,169 clarks summit pa
73cuda340
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,169
clarks summit pa
|
Not to high jack but would a swap to a 3.73 or 3.91 from a 3.23 be noticable and how much will it affect the top end?
1973 Cuda 528 all aluminum Hemi, 4 speed, 3.23 Sure-Grip,
(JA5) Silver Frost Metallic
1973 Challenger Rallye 340
1985 W150 Power Ram prospector
1986 Camaro IROC-Z 305 tpi
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: Kudakidd]
#60648
05/21/08 11:31 AM
05/21/08 11:31 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
355's in my 69 roadrunner is just right
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#60650
05/21/08 11:36 AM
05/21/08 11:36 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,358 Berwyn, IL
challenger70
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,358
Berwyn, IL
|
Quote:
depends on how much highway driving you are going to do. What are the engine specs..and on and on. 3.91's are a good gear for a b-body. With a set of 275/60/15's you can cruise at 70 no problem. 3.55's are ok but they are dog gears compared to 3.91's...as are 3.23's. Try the 3.73's they are pretty new to mopars. Let us know how they run.
I have 3.91's on 28" tires and drove my car from Sanfrancisco to Chicago no problems and they have some pretty high speed limits out west. It can get a little buzzy on the highway but it isn't terrible below 70-75.
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: HotRodDave]
#60652
05/21/08 11:56 AM
05/21/08 11:56 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,195 Snowing in the north!
Dart 340
moparts member
|
moparts member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,195
Snowing in the north!
|
Quote:
Quote:
i drove with 4.30's on the hiway with a 28" tall tire at 60-65mph.. wasn't all that bad.
Why would anyone want to drive just 60 or 65 ? Even 70 is not gonna keep up with trafic around here
Even with my 2.76 gears and lock-up trans I am turning 3000 @ 80mph.
I have to agree. I spend as much if not more time in a 70 MPH speed limit zone than city. If you can't light the tires up maybe you need a tune up...
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: Dart 340]
#60653
05/21/08 01:15 PM
05/21/08 01:15 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123 Grand Haven, MI
patrick
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123
Grand Haven, MI
|
if you plan on doing any freeway driving, I'd go 2.94's or 3.23's w/28" tires.
my car with 3.55's and 27" tires was turning 3k RPM at 70mph without the OD tranny, and it got tiring after about 30 minutes at that speed....now I cruise at ~2200 RPM at 70 with my A500...
1976 Spinnaker White Plymouth Duster, /6 A833OD 1986 Silver/Twilight Blue Chrysler 5th Ave HotRod **SOLD!*** 2011 Toxic Orange Dodge Charger R/T 2017 Grand Cherokee Overland 2014 Jeep Cherokee Latitude (holy crap, my daughter is driving)
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: A4SixtyNineRR]
#60654
05/21/08 01:45 PM
05/21/08 01:45 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439 So Cal
Sinitro
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
|
Quote:
Hey guys I want to get everyone's opinion on this one. I have a '69 RR that I am currently restoring and I am trying to decide what gear ratio to use in the rear end (currently a 3.23). I want to be able to use it on the street for cruising, but want to be able to light up the tires when I feel the need. The obvious choices are 3.55, 3.73, or 3.91 for the set up but I have only driven a 3.91 other than my 3.23. I am afraid a 3.91 might be too low and give me too high of rpm's with whining going down the highway. SO I am thinking that narrows it down to 3.55 or 3.73. Any opinions on which is better or is there even a noticeable difference between the two? Thanks for helping out!!
Before selecting a gear ratio..
I would ask a couple of questions.. 1. Type of trans; Stick or Auto 2. If Auto, type of converter & stall speed 3. Engine build like what cam, compression
My experience with the Mopars is that the 3.23 is a great gear, more for cruisin. If the engine is built somewhat like bigger cam (low vacuum) I would step it up to a 3.55. As the engine is built up, typically the HP moves upward while dropping the lower end torque. Also What type of driving also is pertinent here, country road cruisin or stop & go..
Just my ..
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: Jeff_383]
#60659
05/21/08 04:18 PM
05/21/08 04:18 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562 Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck
Not enough dumb comments...yet
|
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
|
Quote:
When put behind 600lbft. of torque 3:55's are NOT a dog gear.
doubt he'll be pushing close to those numbers..and whatever 3.55's can do 3.91's can do better.
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: terzmo]
#60661
05/21/08 04:57 PM
05/21/08 04:57 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562 Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck
Not enough dumb comments...yet
|
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
|
Quote:
I reccommend 355 with a tire size of 25 or 26 inches...that roadrunner will accept some meaty shoes and what I would do is run a drag/street tire of 30 inches hieght and run 391 or 410.Either way you will light them and have a very nice top end
yeah a 25-26" tire on the back of a b-body looks all wrong.
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: HotRodDave]
#60663
05/21/08 08:27 PM
05/21/08 08:27 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
Quote:
i drove with 4.30's on the hiway with a 28" tall tire at 60-65mph.. wasn't all that bad.
Why would anyone want to drive just 60 or 65 ? Even 70 is not gonna keep up with trafic around here
Even with my 2.76 gears and lock-up trans I am turning 3000 @ 80mph.
cause i'm not in a hurry to go anywhere. if i really, really have to go on a superspeed long trip.. 20mins and the 2.76's are in.
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: Jeff_383]
#60664
05/21/08 08:29 PM
05/21/08 08:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562 Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck
Not enough dumb comments...yet
|
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
|
Quote:
My "street driver" has 600 ftlbs.
do you have 3.55's and an auto?
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#60665
05/21/08 08:51 PM
05/21/08 08:51 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877 Pittsburgh, Pa
Jeff_383
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
|
YES
Sorry caps lock was on, yes
Last edited by Jeff_383; 05/21/08 08:53 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
#60667
05/21/08 10:19 PM
05/21/08 10:19 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318 Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
|
Quote:
cause i'm not in a hurry to go anywhere. if i really, really have to go on a superspeed long trip.. 20mins and the 2.76's are in.
Kinda defeats the purpose if you have to change every time you want to go on a longer highway trip tho. I know some guys do the swap quick but I'm not that good.
I've got 3.55's with a 27" tire and it's okay, but still revving high for me at 60mph. Doesn't really matter that much for me because I don't take my car out on the highway much anyway. 3.55's are a compromise gear. They'll cruise on the highway and they'll race down the strip, but they won't do either one that well. However I still think they're a better middle ground than 3.23's. But if you've got 3.23's already, is it worth the $ to change to 3.55's? IMO, no. Play with the speed/rpm calculator linked to a few posts up and get a feel for what you can handle. I think 3.73's would give me a little more punch and not give up much on the highway, but again, not worth the $ for that little of a change.
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: DaytonaTurbo]
#60670
05/21/08 11:02 PM
05/21/08 11:02 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
Quote:
cause i'm not in a hurry to go anywhere. if i really, really have to go on a superspeed long trip.. 20mins and the 2.76's are in.
Kinda defeats the purpose if you have to change every time you want to go on a longer highway trip tho. I know some guys do the swap quick but I'm not that good.
I've got 3.55's with a 27" tire and it's okay, but still revving high for me at 60mph. Doesn't really matter that much for me because I don't take my car out on the highway much anyway. 3.55's are a compromise gear. They'll cruise on the highway and they'll race down the strip, but they won't do either one that well. However I still think they're a better middle ground than 3.23's. But if you've got 3.23's already, is it worth the $ to change to 3.55's? IMO, no. Play with the speed/rpm calculator linked to a few posts up and get a feel for what you can handle. I think 3.73's would give me a little more punch and not give up much on the highway, but again, not worth the $ for that little of a change.
IF i had too. but i have no problem going 70mph either with 4.30's on the hiway. if your engine can't handle that for a couple hundred miles.. build a better engine, or get EAR plugs.
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
#60676
05/22/08 12:39 PM
05/22/08 12:39 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421 Balt. Md
383man
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
|
Quote:
amen to that Ron.
You got it as I love the 4.30's in my 63. I was going to use 3.91's but I wanted a taller tire in my B-body wheelwell as we use 3.91's in my sons Dart with 26" tires and they look fine in his smaller A-body wheelwell. With the 29" tire I run the 4.30's work perfect for a good launch and I can still drive the freeway. And the 29" tire looks good in my stock wheelwell. I agree....Amen to that ! Ron
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: chagjr]
#60677
05/22/08 12:42 PM
05/22/08 12:42 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421 Balt. Md
383man
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
|
Quote:
I currently run 3.91. I also have a 4.30 pumpkin. If your big block is putting out good tourqe you do not need a lot of gear. With a good tourqe converter 2800 or so, 2.94 and or 3.23 are great gears. I ran a 14.65 @ 96mph with 2.94, 11 inch converter. The 3.91 gears just get me down the track quicker 14.018 @ 95mph.
You are giving up 6 tenths in the 1/4 mile so I would say you do need the gear for drag racing in that combo. If you dont care about your 1/4 mile et then yes the gear dont matter. I do agree some bigblocks make enough torque that you wont need as much gear as a combo with less torque. Ron
|
|
|
Re: Best Street Gear Ratio?? -HELP
[Re: A4SixtyNineRR]
#60678
05/23/08 06:23 AM
05/23/08 06:23 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162 USA
360view
Moparts resident spammer
|
Moparts resident spammer
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
|
(here's an attempt to figure out gear ratio for highway cruise in a scientific way, based on piston speed and intake manifold vacuum. comments welcome) ------------ Now lets discuss gearing and fuel economy.
In city driving gearing doesn't matter nearly as much as not having a 'heavy foot' or hauling a lot of weight in the bed of the truck.
A vehicle that is either overgeared or undergeared will lose MPG at highway cruise.
An engine is numerically overgeared if it is not cruising at about 60-75% open throttle.
An engine is undergeared and "too weak for the job" if it has to operate with its pistons going faster than an average of about 1200 feet per minute when at 75% throttle.
Note that you could reduce engine weakness by turbocharging as well as the much more common thought to just make the engine larger in cubic inches. This is the reason nearly all diesels have become turbocharged in the last 20 years.
How do you calculate this average piston speed?
Multiply the stroke of the engine in inches by two (because the piston goes both up and down on one rpm) and then divide by 12 to convert inches to feet. Multiply this by the rpm.
So where does 1200 feet per minute end up for various engines? Here some examples:
For the 3.58 stroke of 3.7, 5.7, 5.9 Dodge engines: 2011 rpm = 1200 ft/min /( 2 x 3.58 inches/12 inches per ft)
For the 3.405 stroke of the Dodge 4.7V8 2114 rpm = 1200/(2x3.405/12)
For the 3.00 stroke of the Ford 5.0L V8 2400 rpm = 1200/(2x3.00/12)
For the 4.72 stroke of the Cummins Inline 6 diesel 1525 rpm = 1200/(2x4.72/12)
Is it possible for an engine to be made to get its best fuel economy at a piston speed above the typical 1200 feet per minute? Yes. Very thin piston rings, using less than the normal 3 rings, slippery coatings on piston skirts, extremely hard but slick coatings on bore walls like "NikoSil" and keeping the bore walls very hot so that the oil there will be thin and less viscous can all allow the 'best economy' piston speed to be raised but even 'state of the art' giant marine diesel where nearly every trick is used seldom exceed 1500 feet per minute.
Honda has announced that over the next 5 year period that the major part of their engine research $ will be spent on ways to reduce internal engine friction, and this is from a company that NASCAR engine builders already admit has the best rod and crankshaft bearing material for sale.
Which is more important: having the rpms near this 1200 foot per minute speed for the pistons, or having the throttle in the 65-75% open range? Answer: it is more important to be in the 70% throttle range and you should slow down the rpms to get there. There is not much change in efficiency when piston speed drops from 1200 down to 800 ft/minute but there is a big change in efficiency when the throttle goes from 70% open to 40% open.
Why?
Imagine that you have a disassembled engine in front of you. Put a loose piston in a bore and pull it down against the friction of the rings. It won't be very hard.
Now imagine that same piston in the bore has the top of the bore sealed off and has a vacuum sucked of 12 inches of Mercury. 12 inches of vacuum is about 6 psi of negative pressure. If the piston is 4.00 inches in diameter it has an area of about 12.5 square inches (remember pi R squared but most cherry pies are round?) 6 pounds per square inch times 12.5 square inches = 75 pounds would be required to pull the piston down - you probably couldn't do it with the grip of just a couple fingers! An engine running with a high vacuum in the intake manifold has to do just this, and for eight cylinders!
Engineers refer to this as one of the two parts of "Pumping Losses". The other part of Pumping Losses is due to pushing the exhaust out the tailpipe. Most engine owners easily imagine that exhaust loss, accept it, and spend a lot of time and money on mufflers, headers, Y pipes etc. These same engine owners would do well to remember the "Pumping Loss" on the intake side and try to keep it low during highway cruise conditions.
{Note to engineers: Yea, I know, 'negative pressure' does not really exist and what actually happened is 14.7 psi of air pressure is pushing the underside of the piston and there was just less pressure on the top of the piston to create a delta P - but the general public thinks in 'vacuum' terms. And it is not just the general public - talk to the biologists who think -100 psi or more of 'negative' pressure pulls water up capillaries to tree tops}
Setting Gear Ratios to suit the Customer's Expectations
Most auto manufacturers intentionally overgear their vehicles because they know from experience that customers will bitterly complain about a vehicle that downshifts to climb a hill.
Engineers know that to give their customers the best possible highway MPG the transmission would downshift on EVERY hill, but the sales department reminds them that that every employee at the automaker (including engineers) will lose their jobs if customers {even ignorant ones} get mad and buy someone else's vehicle that meets their expectation.
So vehicles are overgeared to 'feel strong' during the 20% of the time they are climbing hills in Overdrive, even if it means this hurts MPG a bit during the 80% of the time the vehicle is on level roads or going downhill.
An engine is numerically undergeared if it is trying to cruise in the 'Power Enrichment' zone above about 80% throtttle opening where the PCM computer greatly enriches the air to fuel ratio from 14.7 to 11. On most vehicles with automatic transmissions it is not possible to cruise in OD on level highways in the power enrichment zone because the transmission will downshift to a lower gear long before the accelerator is pressed that far.
For the same reason anyone who presses the accelerator down all the way near the floor whether they are driving in the city, highway, climbing a hill, or pulling a trailer is going to get about 25% worse MPG than someone who presses right up to about 70% throttle but never goes over it.
This is why the old advice to install a vacuum gauge can certainly help MPG if the driver watches it out of the corner of his eye.
When the vacuum gauge reads about 1 to 6 inches of mercury you are in the fuel guzzling 'Power Enrichment' zone that you want to avoid except when you want the highest horsepower and accept the higher fuel usage.
When the vacuum gauge is showing about 7 to 9 inches of mercury vacuum your engine is converting fuel into horsepower at its most efficient level.
Each engine goes into Power Enrichment at a slightly different MAP sensor level, but if you listen closely to the engine sound you can hear it happen as the engine gets a bit smoother with the very rich mixture.
|
|
|
|
|