One thing I really noticed was the NOS panel weighs much more than the repro.



DutchPanel Area.


Door Jamb area.

Front to Rocker

TailPanel


Tail Panel2


Window Felt. Yuck, Crooked stamping, but fixable.


Next up is some measurements.

Excellent photos ! Now that is the kind of info we need and want ! Thanks for all the comparisons . I only hope that the AMD panels have these issues corrected.

Thanks ehbody!!!
Very interested hearing about the measurements.
Also have you compared the Passenger's side?

The Bad. Windows frame on my example is very narrow at the top.


These measurement are compared to NOS 72-74 Quarter. I do not have passenger. My car only had a sectioning on the drivers side. I would love to hear about the tail panel however.


I guess the big question is which will I use. I cannot answer until car is stripped and quarter is off. I thought MA would be better with their use of "Authentic Restoration Product" license. But if you were doing both side and they were off the same measurement, you would be hard pressed to see it.

Since you have an NOS 1/4 panel,how about grabbing your bathroom scale,and hold the NOS panel while standing on the scale,Then grab the Goodmark 1/4 and stand on the scale so we can see the weight difference.

I weighed them for you.They weight is the same with in a pound of each other . However I did a NOS cuda rear pan and it is 12 pounds and goodmark pan is 7 pounds.The oem 1/4 is 25 and the other is 25 both weighed with trunk gutter and filler to the rear tail panel. So it just show's that if the tooling would have been finished we could have had one of the most needed mind blowing parts in the mopar hobbie. JAYCUDA