Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: court9155] #335992
06/03/09 04:02 PM
06/03/09 04:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
Quote:

Quote:

I did this one a few years ago. 400 with a 383 forged crank, Hemi rods and 451 pistons. With lightly ported Edelbrock heads and a decent roller cam it makes 600 hp. Made for a slightly radical A body car that my buddy drove to the track and back.






What kind of machining was involved? What 451 pistons?

I already have the 400 block and forged 383 crank please advise!!

Dan




That motor has 1.320 CH pistons and virtually NON EXISTENT 6.965 rods , .990 pin , std mopar big end .

Machining , should have bolted together no problems

Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: furious70] #335993
06/03/09 04:21 PM
06/03/09 04:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647
IL
7
71383beep Offline
top fuel
71383beep  Offline
top fuel
7

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647
IL
Quote:

based on my own use of one on an 383HP in a street car and the Hot Rod test, stay away from the Holley Street Dominator intake for sure if you want low end grunt. Don't know anything about that old Weiand.




Why's that?

I am running one now it pulls great for me in my 383. The holley SD intake rated just fairly lower than the Edelbrock RPM that one of mags tested a few years ago with a whole bunch of intakes on a fairly vanila 383 IIRC. If that's what you have it's not a terrible intake.

Ohh here it is...hot rod did it with a bunch of manifolds. http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/hrdp_0712_mopar_intake_manifold_comparo/index.html


'73 GK6 Challenger Rallye - 340 4-Speed
Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: 71383beep] #335994
06/03/09 04:27 PM
06/03/09 04:27 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 531
SE Michigan
F
farmington Offline
mopar addict
farmington  Offline
mopar addict
F

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 531
SE Michigan
I'm doing a 383 for my Duster. TRW 12.5 pistons .030 (new on ebay for $160) uncut 452 heads works out to 10.7:1 with shim gaskets. Big valves and pocket ported. Comp Hi energy solid 284- .520 .540. Eddy RPM, 1.75 TTi headers. Should run pretty decently.

Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: 71383beep] #335995
06/03/09 04:34 PM
06/03/09 04:34 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
furious70 Offline
top fuel
furious70  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
Quote:

Quote:

based on my own use of one on an 383HP in a street car and the Hot Rod test, stay away from the Holley Street Dominator intake for sure if you want low end grunt. Don't know anything about that old Weiand.




Why's that?

I am running one now it pulls great for me in my 383. The holley SD intake rated just fairly lower than the Edelbrock RPM that one of mags tested a few years ago with a whole bunch of intakes on a fairly vanila 383 IIRC. If that's what you have it's not a terrible intake.

Ohh here it is...hot rod did it with a bunch of manifolds. http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/hrdp_0712_mopar_intake_manifold_comparo/index.html




at 3000rpm the SD is down 17ft lbs to a tm6, down 27ftlbs to an rpm perf, and down 37ftlbs to a plain performer. Imagine what those numbers would be at 2500rpm? That's a serious gap in tq for a street cruiser.
The SD made great power up top but gives up 17ftlbs more at 3000rpm than any other intake tested. That's exactly how it felt on my engine vs the stock intake and rpm perf. I can see using a SD on a stroker or a race engine, but I can't see using it on a street car based on my butt-o-meter. Maybe you should try a torker or rpm perf on yours, you might like it even better if it's a street car.

Last edited by furious70; 06/03/09 04:37 PM.

70 Sport Fury
68 Charger
69 Coronet
72 RR
Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: furious70] #335996
06/03/09 04:56 PM
06/03/09 04:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,256
Salisbury North Carolina
8secDart Offline
pro stock
8secDart  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,256
Salisbury North Carolina
I build my street motors different then most.I try to kill as much low end as I can.Most if not all my stuff is on the jug.So tight converters and wide lobe cams make for TQ less motors down low.That is what I like.If you can't hook it what good is all that low end TQ.Lenny

Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: 8secDart] #335997
06/03/09 04:58 PM
06/03/09 04:58 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
furious70 Offline
top fuel
furious70  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
sure, but this guy seems to be working on the lower end of the scale here where you're looking at a 400hp/450ftlbs engine maybe? All the tq you can muster is useful at that level.


70 Sport Fury
68 Charger
69 Coronet
72 RR
Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: furious70] #335998
06/03/09 05:16 PM
06/03/09 05:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,256
Salisbury North Carolina
8secDart Offline
pro stock
8secDart  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,256
Salisbury North Carolina
The little motor in the picture is making maybe 700 or better on the spary.I still say even at a 400hp level most cars can't hook it on the street.

Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: 8secDart] #335999
06/03/09 06:14 PM
06/03/09 06:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,668
Mi,U.S.A.
M
mike s Offline
top fuel
mike s  Offline
top fuel
M

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,668
Mi,U.S.A.
Most of the blocks I see need some machining to reach 9.980 deck height.There should be plenty of clearance with a small street perf cam.As far as the 7511 Weiand intake with a port match and a bit of clean up inside they are the equal of a Torker.


Leave the gun.......take the Cannoli's....Mike
Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: mike s] #336000
06/03/09 07:27 PM
06/03/09 07:27 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,825
Sk. Canada
RemCharger Offline
master
RemCharger  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,825
Sk. Canada
If fast is a bad word and you're trying to pull a boat and need torque, just go bone stock and put a small cam in it.

Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: RemCharger] #336001
06/03/09 09:27 PM
06/03/09 09:27 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
NachoRT74 Offline
master
NachoRT74  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
I'm happy noticing how everybody has been keeping ON THE INITIAL DEAL



With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: furious70] #336002
06/03/09 10:39 PM
06/03/09 10:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647
IL
7
71383beep Offline
top fuel
71383beep  Offline
top fuel
7

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647
IL
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

based on my own use of one on an 383HP in a street car and the Hot Rod test, stay away from the Holley Street Dominator intake for sure if you want low end grunt. Don't know anything about that old Weiand.




Why's that?

I am running one now it pulls great for me in my 383. The holley SD intake rated just fairly lower than the Edelbrock RPM that one of mags tested a few years ago with a whole bunch of intakes on a fairly vanila 383 IIRC. If that's what you have it's not a terrible intake.

Ohh here it is...hot rod did it with a bunch of manifolds. http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/hrdp_0712_mopar_intake_manifold_comparo/index.html




at 3000rpm the SD is down 17ft lbs to a tm6, down 27ftlbs to an rpm perf, and down 37ftlbs to a plain performer. Imagine what those numbers would be at 2500rpm? That's a serious gap in tq for a street cruiser.
The SD made great power up top but gives up 17ftlbs more at 3000rpm than any other intake tested. That's exactly how it felt on my engine vs the stock intake and rpm perf. I can see using a SD on a stroker or a race engine, but I can't see using it on a street car based on my butt-o-meter. Maybe you should try a torker or rpm perf on yours, you might like it even better if it's a street car.




All that is true, but there's a big difference in spending $230 on an intake and running what you have on hand. Kind of the same situation this guy has. If he's got a single plain and he's not looking at spending a ton of $$ than use it. It's better than stock and it won't be terrible...A lot depends on gearing and converter too. I'm running 3.73's and a 2600 ish converter so the motor is in the power band above 3k often.

I'll gladly swap an RPM on if I can get a good deal on one but those aren't old enough intakes to be found in the swaps much. Free is good though if your offering...


'73 GK6 Challenger Rallye - 340 4-Speed
Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: 71383beep] #336003
06/04/09 01:20 AM
06/04/09 01:20 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,445
N.Wilkesboro,NC
D
DusterKrazy Offline OP
master
DusterKrazy  Offline OP
master
D

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,445
N.Wilkesboro,NC
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

based on my own use of one on an 383HP in a street car and the Hot Rod test, stay away from the Holley Street Dominator intake for sure if you want low end grunt. Don't know anything about that old Weiand.




Why's that?

I am running one now it pulls great for me in my 383. The holley SD intake rated just fairly lower than the Edelbrock RPM that one of mags tested a few years ago with a whole bunch of intakes on a fairly vanila 383 IIRC. If that's what you have it's not a terrible intake.

Ohh here it is...hot rod did it with a bunch of manifolds. http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/hrdp_0712_mopar_intake_manifold_comparo/index.html




at 3000rpm the SD is down 17ft lbs to a tm6, down 27ftlbs to an rpm perf, and down 37ftlbs to a plain performer. Imagine what those numbers would be at 2500rpm? That's a serious gap in tq for a street cruiser.
The SD made great power up top but gives up 17ftlbs more at 3000rpm than any other intake tested. That's exactly how it felt on my engine vs the stock intake and rpm perf. I can see using a SD on a stroker or a race engine, but I can't see using it on a street car based on my butt-o-meter. Maybe you should try a torker or rpm perf on yours, you might like it even better if it's a street car.




All that is true, but there's a big difference in spending $230 on an intake and running what you have on hand. Kind of the same situation this guy has. If he's got a single plain and he's not looking at spending a ton of $$ than use it. It's better than stock and it won't be terrible...A lot depends on gearing and converter too. I'm running 3.73's and a 2600 ish converter so the motor is in the power band above 3k often.

I'll gladly swap an RPM on if I can get a good deal on one but those aren't old enough intakes to be found in the swaps much. Free is good though if your offering...




You hit the nail on the head with that one! The clue is that Im poor as dirt. Big $$ items are out of the question, Im 27 and far from rich.

I say it's better for me to experiment and find out than to tinker with honda civics and be really dissapointed overall in many ways

If anybody wants to donate a decent cam, headers,carb,tray or roller timing chain Im all
ears

Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: DusterKrazy] #336004
06/04/09 02:09 AM
06/04/09 02:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
I know on the RB block the Holley Street Dominator is a very good intake. In fact it is know to have very good low end for a single plane. My son runs a Perfromer RPM on the 400 in his Dart and I run the Holley SD intake. My 63 has 60 ft better then his Dart has and the builds are very close as we run the same cam and converter. The Holley SD is the best single plane intake for low end from what I have seen. Ron

Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: 383man] #336005
06/04/09 08:54 AM
06/04/09 08:54 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
furious70 Offline
top fuel
furious70  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
Ron,
I've not personally run the RB or seen dynos on it, but if you read that Hot Rod link further up the chain, the b block SD is down on torque compared to all the other intakes. Don't know if it's something goofy with the b block one or not- the article says that the rb version is more highly regarded but they don't give any data to support the claim.
From my own testing, I had more tire spin from idle with the stock intake and 3.23's than I did with the SD and 3.91's on the same engine in the same car, so it killed a lot of tq in my case. YMMV.

I'm 'cheap' too, I've never bought a new intake. Over 10yrs I've grabbed good deals on about 1/2 dozen different b block intakes just to try them out, including the rpm perf. That's the one on the car now (with efi).


70 Sport Fury
68 Charger
69 Coronet
72 RR
Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: furious70] #336006
06/04/09 12:57 PM
06/04/09 12:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
I decided to try the Street Dominator when I saw that it made almost as much hp in the Mopar Muscle intake shootout as the Victor. The Street Dominator actually made more hp then every manifold other then the Vivtor which it was close. But thats high end hp. I dont remember how it was in the midrange. Thats why I decided to try it. I can say we tried one on my sons Dart. He went 11.55 @ 116 with the RPM in the test and ran 11.59 @ 117 with the Street Dominator. SD had more mph but the RPM had the et as it was better down low. I would like to try an RPM on my 63 one day. Ron

Last edited by 383man; 06/04/09 12:59 PM.
Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: furious70] #336007
06/04/09 06:48 PM
06/04/09 06:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647
IL
7
71383beep Offline
top fuel
71383beep  Offline
top fuel
7

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647
IL
Quote:


I'm 'cheap' too, I've never bought a new intake. Over 10yrs I've grabbed good deals on about 1/2 dozen different b block intakes just to try them out, including the rpm perf. That's the one on the car now (with efi).






We'll all I can say is that you're a lucky guy! I WISH i could find a used B block RPM manifold at the swaps. I jsut checked ebay for grins and I found a couple and all of them were $250+.

I ain't knocking the intake...just saying that compared to stock the SD is really not that bad.

That Mopar muscle article was also WAY more foregiving of the SD than the Hot rod one. For some reason the Hot rod one had great results on just a plain jane performer!?!?! I wanna call foul on that one. That vanilla performer is basically an aluminum version of the stock intake! I have one here on the shelf too and I KNOW the SD runs way better than that intake did on my 383.

Bottom line is if you got it and you have taller than 3.23 gears I don't think its a bad call to use it...unless you have an RPM than it's not an argument.


'73 GK6 Challenger Rallye - 340 4-Speed
Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: 71383beep] #336008
06/04/09 08:42 PM
06/04/09 08:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,072
The Sunny Shuswap
D
dodgefarmer Offline
super stock
dodgefarmer  Offline
super stock
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,072
The Sunny Shuswap
As I posted earlier there is a way to build a decently compressed stock stroke 400. Cut the crank pin to 2.2", Use Scat rod# 6680022(A) @6.800",and either KB 825 @1.480 or KB 828 @1.485. With a 9.98 deck the piston is either 0.010" or 0.005" in the hole, both pistons have a 4.5cc valve relief. Depending on head and gasket combo the CR can be in the mid to upper 9's.

Randy

Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: dodgefarmer] #336009
06/05/09 04:50 AM
06/05/09 04:50 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 301
California
C
court9155 Offline
enthusiast
court9155  Offline
enthusiast
C

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 301
California
Quote:

As I posted earlier there is a way to build a decently compressed stock stroke 400. Cut the crank pin to 2.2", Use Scat rod# 6680022(A) @6.800",and either KB 825 @1.480 or KB 828 @1.485. With a 9.98 deck the piston is either 0.010" or 0.005" in the hole, both pistons have a 4.5cc valve relief. Depending on head and gasket combo the CR can be in the mid to upper 9's.

Randy





When you say cut the crank pin do you mean have the rod journal machined down?


67 charger
Re: Any 400 builds here? (non stroker) [Re: court9155] #336010
06/05/09 09:44 AM
06/05/09 09:44 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,072
The Sunny Shuswap
D
dodgefarmer Offline
super stock
dodgefarmer  Offline
super stock
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,072
The Sunny Shuswap
Yes.

Randy

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1