Re: Hydraulic roller vs hydraulic flat tappet
[Re: 70charger512]
#2566060
10/18/18 06:13 PM
10/18/18 06:13 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,664 Wichita
GY3
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,664
Wichita
|
I run a hydraulic roller on the street. No downsides for me at all. As long as you keep the rpm down (strokers don't need a lot of rpm anyway) below 6,500, you'll keep them happy.
Very quiet operation and the lash was a set it and forget it affair.
'63 Dodge 330 11.19 @ 121 mph Pump gas, n/a, through the mufflers on street tires with 3.54's. 3,600 lbs. 10.01 @ 133mph with a 250 shot of nitrous an a splash of race gas. 1.36 60 ft. 3,700 lbs.
|
|
|
Re: Hydraulic roller vs hydraulic flat tappet
[Re: AndyF]
#2566085
10/18/18 07:00 PM
10/18/18 07:00 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,664 Wichita
GY3
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,664
Wichita
|
Hyd rollers cost more and they might require the use of a bronze gear depending on the mfg. But they have the ability to make more power since you can get more aggressive with the lift and area under the curve. You don't have to use a bronze gear.
'63 Dodge 330 11.19 @ 121 mph Pump gas, n/a, through the mufflers on street tires with 3.54's. 3,600 lbs. 10.01 @ 133mph with a 250 shot of nitrous an a splash of race gas. 1.36 60 ft. 3,700 lbs.
|
|
|
Re: Hydraulic roller vs hydraulic flat tappet
[Re: 70charger512]
#2566324
10/19/18 04:08 AM
10/19/18 04:08 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,437 Omaha Nebraska
Brian_wo
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,437
Omaha Nebraska
|
Are there off the shelf “mild” rollers now days? Been thinking roller cam in the stroker I am just starting and have no clue what cam I want to run but was thinking roller just so I don’t have to worry about rounding a lobe with today’s oils.
who is that guy?
|
|
|
Re: Hydraulic roller vs hydraulic flat tappet
[Re: 70charger512]
#2566341
10/19/18 08:52 AM
10/19/18 08:52 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,243 Charlotte, North Carolina
sgcuda
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,243
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
Todays production engines are roller cam design. You don't have to worry about zinc additives, like already said, make more power than hydraulic flat tappets. Should be lots of grinds available by now.
[image][/image]
|
|
|
Re: Hydraulic roller vs hydraulic flat tappet
[Re: Brian_wo]
#2566354
10/19/18 09:59 AM
10/19/18 09:59 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,664 Wichita
GY3
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,664
Wichita
|
Are there off the shelf “mild” rollers now days? Been thinking roller cam in the stroker I am just starting and have no clue what cam I want to run but was thinking roller just so I don’t have to worry about rounding a lobe with today’s oils. One example. https://www.summitracing.com/parts/hrs-723445-10
'63 Dodge 330 11.19 @ 121 mph Pump gas, n/a, through the mufflers on street tires with 3.54's. 3,600 lbs. 10.01 @ 133mph with a 250 shot of nitrous an a splash of race gas. 1.36 60 ft. 3,700 lbs.
|
|
|
Re: Hydraulic roller vs hydraulic flat tappet
[Re: 70charger512]
#2566493
10/19/18 02:46 PM
10/19/18 02:46 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
My issues with hydraulic rollers is in the name. Hydraulic.
The lobes of a good hydraulic roller are fast enough it's my opinion that the hydraulics don't like it. You can band aid it, but I'm just not a big fan of hydraulic lifters with roller lobes. I've seen too many issues.
Yes, plenty of guys using them, but plenty are having issues. I used to use 20w50 oil in any hydraulic roller build and they made more power with it.
For me, the juice isn't worth the squeeze.
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: Hydraulic roller vs hydraulic flat tappet
[Re: 70charger512]
#2566494
10/19/18 02:49 PM
10/19/18 02:49 PM
|
crabman173
Unregistered
|
crabman173
Unregistered
|
Two things that are crucial to Hyd Roller success
Know exactly what lifter you have ( who made it) and the follow spring pressure specs to the letter--many have very specific specs on seat max and open max pressures--These MUST be followed and not exceeded or you will experience all sorts of trouble Where it all goes wrong is when a cam maker specs higher pressures to get the most out of what they have done and you use the available lifters that say 340 max open etc Morel makes many and IMO the better of what is out there--you may use the tech line from them to assure you have a lifter ( they make a TON of part numbers) that will allow you to gain the most from your cam choice and assure you have the correct pressures for your grind and your lifter valving--Pre-load specs are also CRITICAL and well spec'd on Morel products if you go direct to them for answers ALSO oil weight is spec'd for the different lifters as it critical to gaining the extra RPM they say a lifter part number is capable of
Pre load Oil weight as called for by that lifter maker Spring open and seat max pressures
All of the above must be correct
Along with bronze or other coated etc gears you must also think of the fuel pump push rod --will it live on a steel cam and what do you need? What is available
Stewart in High Point NC was a NASCAR supplier that used to make an exceptional quality fuel pump push rod that had high quality bronze tip and would wear forever but I am not sure they still make them Other brands have caused me trouble so...not sure there--we go electric now and avoid that issue
|
|
|
Re: Hydraulic roller vs hydraulic flat tappet
[Re: madscientist]
#2566509
10/19/18 03:17 PM
10/19/18 03:17 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,310 Prospect, PA
BSB67
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,310
Prospect, PA
|
My issues with hydraulic rollers is in the name. Hydraulic.
The lobes of a good hydraulic roller are fast enough it's my opinion that the hydraulics don't like it. You can band aid it, but I'm just not a big fan of hydraulic lifters with roller lobes. I've seen too many issues.
Yes, plenty of guys using them, but plenty are having issues. I used to use 20w50 oil in any hydraulic roller build and they made more power with it.
For me, the juice isn't worth the squeeze. Generally feel the same. The "hydraulic" is the week link in a hydraulic flat tappet. Putting a roller on the bottom did not fix that. I do get the desire to avoid a lobe going flat, and the slight advantage of more lift with today's aftermarket heads. You just need to decide for yourself the cost benefit balance.
|
|
|
Re: Hydraulic roller vs hydraulic flat tappet
[Re: 70charger512]
#2566528
10/19/18 03:54 PM
10/19/18 03:54 PM
|
crabman173
Unregistered
|
crabman173
Unregistered
|
I agree--I do not use them if I can help it they are very RPM limited Solid baby! That is the way to happiness
|
|
|
Re: Hydraulic roller vs hydraulic flat tappet
[Re: ]
#2566541
10/19/18 04:06 PM
10/19/18 04:06 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,664 Wichita
GY3
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,664
Wichita
|
Howards has a bronze tipped fuel pump pushrod that works great. The Crane coated distributor gear is the way to go.
'63 Dodge 330 11.19 @ 121 mph Pump gas, n/a, through the mufflers on street tires with 3.54's. 3,600 lbs. 10.01 @ 133mph with a 250 shot of nitrous an a splash of race gas. 1.36 60 ft. 3,700 lbs.
|
|
|
Re: Hydraulic roller vs hydraulic flat tappet
[Re: ]
#2566581
10/19/18 05:33 PM
10/19/18 05:33 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,270 Morrow, OH
markz528
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,270
Morrow, OH
|
I agree--I do not use them if I can help it they are very RPM limited Solid baby! That is the way to happiness I gotta agree. I have one in the the 440 I recently took out. It wants to rev like crazy and before 6000 rpm its floating the valves. Its a Lunati with matched lifters and springs.
67 Coronet 500 9.610 @ 139.20 mph 67 Coronet 500 (street car) 14.82 @ 94 mph 69 GTX (clone) - build in progress......
|
|
|
Re: Hydraulic roller vs hydraulic flat tappet
[Re: 70charger512]
#2566614
10/19/18 07:36 PM
10/19/18 07:36 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 339 Gilroy,CA.
mopardude318
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 339
Gilroy,CA.
|
I have a hydraulic roller in my 408 stroker, I agree that it really likes to rev up quick, but I'm afraid to take it above 6200. Lol. I wish I could go with a solid roller, but I'd have to send the short block off to be bushed and reassembled. I don't want to spend on that right now.
408 Stroker 533 HP 520 FT LBS...........................1970 Dart RMS AlterKation
|
|
|
|
|