|
Re: Pro Stock help
[Re: Leigh]
#2469976
03/21/18 08:30 PM
03/21/18 08:30 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 104
New Jersey
Alan Prusiensky
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 104
New Jersey
|
He didn't say the rules didn't make it more difficult. If there we 20 mopars out there, it would be easier. To think the RPM rule didn't hurt the dodges is just rediculous. I seem to remember, that teams continued to use the older design head, because it made better power with higher rpm, rather than start over with R&D on the newer head, and they all fell behind at the rule switch. I'm probably wrong. I use the new heads.
|
|
|
Re: Pro Stock help
[Re: Alan Prusiensky]
#2470011
03/21/18 09:43 PM
03/21/18 09:43 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,041
New Jersey
Qwik426
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,041
New Jersey
|
Hi guys it's been a long time since I posted here. I still check in time to time to see what kind of things you guys are up to. As you may or may not know I've been Racing Pro Stock for the past 4 years. Not to break your balls or anything like that, I'd like to know what's "Stock" about Pro $tock? Nothing as far as I can see. NHRA should've renamed that eliminator a long time ago because it has NOTHING in common with the original concept of that class unlike its lesser brethren, Super Stock and Stock eliminator, which still do albeit it in a very refined and scienced-out state.  Just my pet peeve. Carry on, like the English say. Pete
Last edited by Qwik426; 03/21/18 09:44 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Pro Stock help
[Re: Alan Prusiensky]
#2470174
03/22/18 01:14 AM
03/22/18 01:14 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,264
New York, USA
Chargerfan68
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,264
New York, USA
|
You just got my vote! Best of luck. Your doing Mopar proud for sure. Thank you!
1.50 60Ft. , 10.75@ 127MPH Hauling 3900 LBS.
|
|
|
Re: Pro Stock help
[Re: Alan Prusiensky]
#2470765
03/23/18 12:31 AM
03/23/18 12:31 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 43
Otsego, mi. by Martin 131 stri...
JT612GTX
member
|
member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 43
Otsego, mi. by Martin 131 stri...
|
Voted. Almost gave up hope with Allen Johnson calling it quits,as least with Pro Stock, carry that MOPAR banner as long as possible!!!
Hang tough, Good Luck! Mopower to ya!
86 Daytona - 612/ glide - 2400lbs - 8.60 alot more left
71 S/G Challenger - 469/glide - 2800lbs - 9.20s and tuning
70 Challenger - mild 440/727 - 3475lbs - 10.96 best
70 GTX - future quick 16? more $$$$$$
|
|
|
Re: Pro Stock help
[Re: Alan Prusiensky]
#2470769
03/23/18 12:36 AM
03/23/18 12:36 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,587
Great Neck,LI,new york
hemi-itis
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,587
Great Neck,LI,new york
|
I have raced Mopar since I started in 1993 my first car was a 69 Charger. I will only race a Dodge car with a Hemi engine in it. I hope that helps you make your decision. As far as NHRA screwing up Pro Stock that's not true. we will run fast as the Chevys this year. I voted for you! What about the rev limiter? That has to be a hard one to overcome? No? I don't think any of the rules have hurt us like everybody thinks. I just think we just need to do a better job of making power within the rules. That's what I worked on over the winter and it seems to be paying off. I hope you're saying you found some power to stay with the Chevy show.This class has lost too many AJ fans so now you have that weight on your shoulders.Make it happen and the MOPAR fans will be yours.
HEMI-ITIS has no cure.
My condition is fully BLOWN!!
|
|
|
Re: Pro Stock help
[Re: Qwik426]
#2470815
03/23/18 03:13 AM
03/23/18 03:13 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 275
brisbane,australia
coletrickle
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 275
brisbane,australia
|
Hi guys it's been a long time since I posted here. I still check in time to time to see what kind of things you guys are up to. As you may or may not know I've been Racing Pro Stock for the past 4 years. Not to break your balls or anything like that, I'd like to know what's "Stock" about Pro $tock? Nothing as far as I can see. NHRA should've renamed that eliminator a long time ago because it has NOTHING in common with the original concept of that class unlike its lesser brethren, Super Stock and Stock eliminator, which still do albeit it in a very refined and scienced-out state. Just my pet peeve. Carry on, like the English say. Pete So did you vote?
|
|
|
|
|
