|
Re: Camshaft guys
[Re: 72sat]
#2466309
03/14/18 12:24 PM
03/14/18 12:24 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205 New York
polyspheric
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205
New York
|
and you have to be registered to read it
Boffin Emeritus
|
|
|
Re: Camshaft guys
[Re: polyspheric]
#2466316
03/14/18 12:41 PM
03/14/18 12:41 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
and you have to be registered to read it Yep because that thread is in the advanced tech section.
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: Camshaft guys
[Re: 72sat]
#2466473
03/14/18 04:56 PM
03/14/18 04:56 PM
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,489 northern,Ohio,USA
Clanton
master
|
master
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,489
northern,Ohio,USA
|
If you are into valve timing events, cam specs, and theory. You have to read this post on speed talk. It's in the advanced engine tech forum, under camshaft events. I'm going to have to apologize to my wife tomorrow, because I basically told my wife to stop talking to me while I was trying to read, and comprehend the post. When I read things there sometimes I print it for later.I liked the Limiting port velocity calc mach.55 vs .60 topic
|
|
|
Re: Camshaft guys
[Re: 72sat]
#2466498
03/14/18 05:43 PM
03/14/18 05:43 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205 New York
polyspheric
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,205
New York
|
Limiting port velocity calc mach.55 vs .60 topic
IMHO over rated, that's an average speed and doesn't represent the actual gas molecule's behavior over the range of rod ratios, compression ratios (I hope I don't have to explain), port shapes, etc.
Registered 20 years ago, password stopped working, they don't answer my e-mail.
Boffin Emeritus
|
|
|
|
|
|