Topic Options
#2425746 - 12/30/17 09:59 AM 68 Road Runner Speedo Lens Lettering-Some With or Without???
440PURSUIT Offline
pro stock

Registered: 12/17/04
Posts: 1394
Loc: DC, MD Suburbs
Why do some RR, GTX, Coronet 68-69-70 Speedo lenses have the switch calloouts on the lower lens?

Different Suppliers? There is only 1 part # for the lens in the 68 Parts Book???

I recall using my as bought in '97 lens. when googling pics I see Hemi Cars, AC Cars, GTX etc with either lettered or non-lettering


Attachments
Dashassem4.JPG

RR DASH Chrome letters.jpg


_________________________
1966 Hemi Belvedere II,
1969 Hemi Charger R/T,
1970 440 6pack Superbird,
1968 Fury I Police Pursuit 440 Super Commando 2 door sedan (Black/Blue)

Top
#2425751 - 12/30/17 10:04 AM Re: 68 Road Runner Speedo Lens Lettering-Some With or Without??? [Re: 440PURSUIT]
440PURSUIT Offline
pro stock

Registered: 12/17/04
Posts: 1394
Loc: DC, MD Suburbs
Ive also noticed that the Speedo #'s on the Lens appear larger and crisper on the "non-Switch Lettered" lens
_________________________
1966 Hemi Belvedere II,
1969 Hemi Charger R/T,
1970 440 6pack Superbird,
1968 Fury I Police Pursuit 440 Super Commando 2 door sedan (Black/Blue)

Top
#2425774 - 12/30/17 10:43 AM Re: 68 Road Runner Speedo Lens Lettering-Some With or Without??? [Re: 440PURSUIT]
RJS Offline
master

Registered: 01/20/03
Posts: 5514
Loc: JERSEY
From what I remember it was an early (with) and late (without) thing.
Mainly because it was too cluttered with the writing.
Ron

Top
#2425794 - 12/30/17 11:15 AM Re: 68 Road Runner Speedo Lens Lettering-Some With or Without??? [Re: 440PURSUIT]
440PURSUIT Offline
pro stock

Registered: 12/17/04
Posts: 1394
Loc: DC, MD Suburbs
my Car was built 11/6/67
_________________________
1966 Hemi Belvedere II,
1969 Hemi Charger R/T,
1970 440 6pack Superbird,
1968 Fury I Police Pursuit 440 Super Commando 2 door sedan (Black/Blue)

Top
#2425815 - 12/30/17 11:33 AM Re: 68 Road Runner Speedo Lens Lettering-Some With or Without??? [Re: RJS]
A12 Offline
I Live Here

Registered: 01/20/03
Posts: 17842
Loc: N.E. OHIO, USA
Originally Posted By RJS
From what I remember it was an early (with) and late (without) thing.
Mainly because it was too cluttered with the writing.
Ron


Again as in the FMVSS regs for non or low reflective areas in front of the driver FMVSS NO. 101 called for the controls to be identified (labeled) effective (1-1-68) but NOT illuminated until (9-1-72) Maybe Chrysler decided to meet the phase in '72 illuminated regulation early in '68 and found it to not only be a little confusing (as Ron stated), not cost effective and redundant with only having to highlight in white the control name above the control. Which brings up the question if the white paint was slightly reflective and we've been using the incorrect paint forever for the labeling?????


Edited by A12 (12/30/17 11:35 AM)

Top

Advertisement
Sponsored Link
Forum Stats
25,349 Registered Members
32 Forums
190,249 Topics
2,219,940 Posts

Most users ever online: 1,424 @ 06/20/18 07:18 PM
Moparts Newest Topics
Voltage drop during cranking
by AndyF
06/23/18 12:30 AM
Journey electrical question
by GKMOPAR
06/22/18 11:13 PM
Utiline '79 Power Wagon
by 4x4 Roundup
06/22/18 10:12 PM
Blowing off steam--pissed at Koni and Summit Racing
by Pacnorthcuda
06/22/18 09:31 PM