383 HP 330vs335 hp
#2305673
05/16/17 08:37 PM
05/16/17 08:37 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
I know the Superbee/RR 383 HP got a diff camshaft than the 383 HP Magnum/supercomando used on the Charger, Coronet, Satellite and as far I know is the only difference, but what are the spec on them?
Is the lower of the purpleshaft cams correct for the 330 or to the 335 hp engine?
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2305679
05/16/17 08:43 PM
05/16/17 08:43 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
440 heads? Different from the 383?
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2305706
05/16/17 09:38 PM
05/16/17 09:38 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
Ok, would like to know the specs on diff parts between the 330 and the 335 horse power engines
Diff exhaust manifolds between them? I know diff with 2 bbls but being both 4 bbls ? I guess both were called magnum as well ( Dodge )
Last edited by NachoRT74; 05/16/17 09:47 PM.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: elmor353]
#2305753
05/16/17 10:48 PM
05/16/17 10:48 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951 northwest USA
NANKET
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951
northwest USA
|
. 68 to 71 383's all used the same heads as 440's. No they don't. 68-70 are the same 906 heads, 1971 are 3462346 heads
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: elmor353]
#2305757
05/16/17 10:51 PM
05/16/17 10:51 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951 northwest USA
NANKET
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951
northwest USA
|
335 hp engines usually got the HP exhaust manifolds, while the 330 hp engines usually got logs like the 2bbls. No they did not get log manifolds. The 383 4 bbl engines absolutely have HP manifolds 1968-1971, The 1967 and older 383 4 BBl engines in B and C bodies got log manifolds.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2305760
05/16/17 10:55 PM
05/16/17 10:55 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
Well, I'm looking at several 68/70 Charger engine bays with 383 Magnum and I can see HP manifold exhaust on everyone
Last edited by NachoRT74; 05/16/17 10:57 PM.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 68mannix]
#2305783
05/16/17 11:29 PM
05/16/17 11:29 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 727 Michigan
BlueRacer69
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 727
Michigan
|
the difference is that the 335 horse engine got a windage tray and the 330 horse engine did not that's the 5 horse difference. Not true. My 69 383 Dart GTS with 330hp had the windage tray in the oil pan from day one. And I'm the original owner.
Last edited by BlueRacer69; 05/16/17 11:30 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: BlueRacer69]
#2305789
05/16/17 11:38 PM
05/16/17 11:38 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,116 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,116
Bend,OR USA
|
Mopar derated the HP on all the 383 A body engines(300 or maybe 305 HP) supposedly due to the driver side exhaust manifold, so they said Me thinks that the 335 HP rated 390 FE Mustang and Fairlane GT and the 1968 1968 and up 428 ford motors ratings of 330 and 335 HP had a lot of input on Mopars decision on those A body HP rating Epecially the 275 HP 340 motors
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 05/16/17 11:39 PM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 6bblgt]
#2305909
05/17/17 08:31 AM
05/17/17 08:31 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,388 Abilene, Texas
fastmark
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,388
Abilene, Texas
|
the reason for this pissing match is the original question is not specific enough to answer the question properly
WHAT YEAR & BODY 383 4bbl VS. 383HP 4bbl are "WE" discussing?
1970?
383 4bbl 330hp blue engine w/CARTER carb (B, C & E-bodies) VS. 383HP 4bbl 335hp orange engine w/HOLLEY carb (B & E-bodies) ZERO C-bodies
what specifically would you like to discuss ?? Like Dan says. Give him some specifics and he can answer most questions. I've never known him to get anything wrong as far as I far as my knowledge goes. I do have a 70 Challenger 383 SE with the blue 330 horse ( not the RT or HP). It has air and a Carter carb. It has no windage tray, a 402 pan, and hp manifolds. My original 70 Cuda with the orange 335 HP Version had a Holley and hp manifolds.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2305931
05/17/17 09:51 AM
05/17/17 09:51 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
Yes, I just detailed 68 and 69 ( as an example ) dealer datasheet specs and compared the info between chargers and superbees, and states Chargers got the standard camshaft and superbees got the hight lift ones, along with the diff springs of course
Never thought a 383 magnum charger ( and I guess coronets and Belvederes with supercomandos ) engine got standard camshafts! I always thought all BB magnums got same performance camshafts and sorings, so the same than 440 mkaing the "Magnum" name more standard to all BB meaning same inner parts for everyone. And superbees/RR got a even "higher step" one.
What are the difference between the standard and the "high lifft" camshafts then ?
I guess the first one of the purpleshaft cams is to the 440s and superbees/RR 383s then
Wondering now about the 400 magnums camshafts too
Last edited by NachoRT74; 05/17/17 09:57 AM.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2305941
05/17/17 10:26 AM
05/17/17 10:26 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,311 Prospect, PA
BSB67
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,311
Prospect, PA
|
What are the difference between the standard and the "high lifft" camshafts then ?
I guess the first one of the purpleshaft cams is to the 440s and superbees/RR 383s then
Wondering now about the 400 magnums camshafts too
The lift is not that different, like 0.020" more. I have the numbers, just to lazy to go get them. The duration is bigger as well, and the real reason for the performance increase. None of the "purple shafts" were installed by the factory. The original purples shaft/shafts were a step up or more from what was installed from the factory in wedge motors. I guess now you can purchase a resto cam from MP. Maybe it is called a purple cam too.
Last edited by BSB67; 05/17/17 10:28 AM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2305970
05/17/17 11:35 AM
05/17/17 11:35 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
The difference?
One is orange the other isn't.
One has a fancy pie plate the other doesn't.
One it said to be 335hp by Chrysler, the other isn't, and this is the point. I'm sure both made their rated HP at some RPM level, but that doesn't mean it's max or that they really are that different in output.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Supercuda]
#2306113
05/17/17 02:51 PM
05/17/17 02:51 PM
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27 NY,USA
Bad B-rad
member
|
member
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27
NY,USA
|
This is my first post here, I had almost this exact question on another site.
SO I have a 69 Charger 383 4bbl A/C 330HP car. My car is a #'s matching car that is low miles (7,000) and mostly org shape. It came to me with #'s matching 383 4bbl(Holley)carb, A/C(330HP) engine painted blue(turquoise) and a duel snorkel air cleaner. It had no pie tin. My question would be what pie tin should I have,383 4bbl,or 383 Magnum? and do I have the correct air cleaner? Most 69 383 4bbl A/C cars I have looked up, have the duel snorkel, but I have also come across ever possible combo of color engine and air cleaner and pie tins you could imagine. SO what is factory correct? Also what makes the 383 330hp vs the 383 335HP? I was told it was just the cam, that 383 A/C (330hp) engines uses the cam as the 383 2bbl engine.And the 335hp engine uses the R.R./magnum cam.(just what I was told, I do not know this as fact,just what was told to me)
Could it be the carb?(A/C has Holley vs non air Carter?) I also would love to know what makes the 5 hp difference between the motors.? And what tin my car should have on it? Thanks, hope to learn the thing that make the motors different.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Bad B-rad]
#2306118
05/17/17 03:00 PM
05/17/17 03:00 PM
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27 NY,USA
Bad B-rad
member
|
member
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27
NY,USA
|
I was also told,a while back, that all 4bbl Big block engines in 2nd gen Chargers, were Magnum engines, no matter the color it is painted. Because it was Dodge's performance engine in its performance car, and all A/C car engines were blue,but in a Charger it was called a Magnum.
Again I do not know that to be a fact, I am not trying to argue with anyone, I am just saying what I was told years ago by some guys, I am just trying to educate myself on the matter.
I mean you can't even feel a 5 hp difference in a 330hp vs 335hp 383 anyway, and I think the HP and torque #'s are rated at same rpm on the motors.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Bad B-rad]
#2306209
05/17/17 06:20 PM
05/17/17 06:20 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233
fredericksburg,va
|
This is my first post here, I had almost this exact question on another site.
SO I have a 69 Charger 383 4bbl A/C 330HP car. My car is a #'s matching car that is low miles (7,000) and mostly org shape. It came to me with #'s matching 383 4bbl(Holley)carb, A/C(330HP) engine painted blue(turquoise) and a duel snorkel air cleaner. It had no pie tin. My question would be what pie tin should I have,383 4bbl,or 383 Magnum? and do I have the correct air cleaner? Most 69 383 4bbl A/C cars I have looked up, have the duel snorkel, but I have also come across ever possible combo of color engine and air cleaner and pie tins you could imagine. SO what is factory correct? Also what makes the 383 330hp vs the 383 335HP? I was told it was just the cam, that 383 A/C (330hp) engines uses the cam as the 383 2bbl engine.And the 335hp engine uses the R.R./magnum cam.(just what I was told, I do not know this as fact,just what was told to me)
Could it be the carb?(A/C has Holley vs non air Carter?) I also would love to know what makes the 5 hp difference between the motors.? And what tin my car should have on it? Thanks, hope to learn the thing that make the motors different. Might be wrong but the only 383 engine that used a Holly was the 70 all the others AFB-AVS. 2 cams low performance and high performance + 6 barrel type, same specs just different lobe angle. Each engine each year shared the same head just springs where different, (67 had different ex valve size LP to HP) Chrysler did some stupid things but they did keep it simple on this stuff. Way to many 383 Hemi six-packs out there.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: BSB67]
#2306215
05/17/17 06:26 PM
05/17/17 06:26 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
The lift is not that different, like 0.020" more. I have the numbers, just to lazy to go get them. The duration is bigger as well, and the real reason for the performance increase.
None of the "purple shafts" were installed by the factory. The original purples shaft/shafts were a step up or more from what was installed from the factory in wedge motors. I guess now you can purchase a resto cam from MP. Maybe it is called a purple cam too.
Damn! sometimes I forgett I have the direct conection performance book!! Actually my 74 Mopar parts catalog matches the number posted there for the HiPo camshaft, 3512907 camshaft... used on all 383/400 HP and 440 HP, but this means the 335 383 or 330 383 ? so the 330 383 is not an HP still being a magnum ? then there is a superseded number for it, 4071002 camshaft one of them I have it NOS on its original box, and is purple. now... does that number takes to the MP 4452783 ? then read it better on some other section and the 335 383 camshaft takes the stock 3512907... which by the direct conection book is 268-284 camsshaft with 450 lift... that meets the MP 4452783 spec and the fact the higher camshaft used from factory is a purple one but still on the previous section talking about stock assemblies, is not clear what is considered a 383 HP to take one or the other being the 330 or the 335 engine. pics of books later
Last edited by NachoRT74; 05/17/17 06:28 PM.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Bad B-rad]
#2306217
05/17/17 06:31 PM
05/17/17 06:31 PM
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27 NY,USA
Bad B-rad
member
|
member
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27
NY,USA
|
My 69 383 4bbl A/C car has duel exhaust,with what looks to be factory "H" pipe and hangers and mufflers. And I now think I figured out the yellow crayon 68 written on the front of my pass side valve cover is not a 68 it is an 899 and one 9 is gone and its written upside down. I will now have to go see if the pipes and mufflers have any numbers on them so I can figure out this semi-mystery!!!
Also do 383HP MAGNUM ROAD RUNNER 335Horse engines use the same pistons as 383 330horse pistons, or do the 335horse motors have valve pockets in them? Could you put a "RoadRunner/Magnum" cam in the 330hp 383 with 2bbl cam with out causing any damage? I know my engine(330horse) the pistons almost have a positive deck height at TDC.
Last edited by Bad B-rad; 05/17/17 09:07 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Bad B-rad]
#2306220
05/17/17 06:34 PM
05/17/17 06:34 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
I was also told,a while back, that all 4bbl Big block engines in 2nd gen Chargers, were Magnum engines, no matter the color it is painted. Because it was Dodge's performance engine in its performance car, and all A/C car engines were blue,but in a Charger it was called a Magnum.
well the color change on Magnums is a 69/71 setup, but we had pre 68 engines being magnum and turqoise, same as post 72 being corporated blue... no matter if A/C or not. Thats doesn't eliminate the magnum spec ( or supercommando on plymouths )
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2306223
05/17/17 06:37 PM
05/17/17 06:37 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
ok, this is an oooold file I have had saved and forgott about it untill now, but really dunno how to read everyone of these specs. I think we can find some conclusions here
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2306233
05/17/17 06:54 PM
05/17/17 06:54 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
Ok, pics of my 74 catalog and DC book
This "prooves" the basic of the Purple shafts is the highest of the production shafts.
Last file is on the DC section talking about the upgrade suggestions
Last edited by NachoRT74; 05/17/17 07:17 PM.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2306251
05/17/17 07:21 PM
05/17/17 07:21 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
Now I'm noticing a debate never thought it was to come and it is about the HP exhaust manifolds... which I think is CLEAR all magnum engines were with them.
My main concern is it seems the 335 hp 383 is MORE MAGNUM than the other LOL.
And per the mopar parts catalog, the 400 magnum got the same camshaft than the 383 335 engine, being a lower performance engine
Last edited by NachoRT74; 05/17/17 07:23 PM.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2306297
05/17/17 08:41 PM
05/17/17 08:41 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,228 Colleyville
3hundred
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,228
Colleyville
|
[quote=BSB67]
then there is a superseded number for it, 4071002 camshaft one of them I have it NOS on its original box, and is purple. I vaguely recall that number, it was a newer "smog" cam, same lift and duration but altered timing events. Robert
'68 Fury Convertible '69 300 Convertible '15 Durango 5.7 Hemi '16 300 S Hemi
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 375inStroke]
#2306344
05/17/17 10:15 PM
05/17/17 10:15 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
Specs are 383 2V, 330HP 4V, and 350HP 440 256°/260° .425"/.435"
335HP 383, and 475HP 440 268°/284° .450"/.458" I missed this post! Thats sounds like the dealer databooks says, but DC book seems to be slightly contradictory So, any 383 4V is a magnum still with standard cam and springs, and all got HiPo exhaust manifolds. But the 335HP is a magnum "plus" And any 400 4V is also a magnum BUT they got all the "high lift" cam, still with the lower compression rate. LOL
Last edited by NachoRT74; 05/17/17 10:24 PM.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2306511
05/18/17 03:33 AM
05/18/17 03:33 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948 Harlan, Iowa
69CoronetRT
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948
Harlan, Iowa
|
Specs are 383 2V, 330HP 4V, and 350HP 440 256°/260° .425"/.435"
335HP 383, and 475HP 440 268°/284° .450"/.458" So, any 383 4V is a magnum still with standard cam and springs, and all got HiPo exhaust manifolds. But the 335HP is a magnum "plus" No. The 383-4 335 horse was introduced in 68 with the Road Runner. The difference between it and the 330 horse assembly was, basically, it used the higher lift cam and springs introduced the year before in the GTX and Coronet R/T. The carb was different than the 330 horse as well as the 335 was intended to get a windage tray. The 906 heads were used on all 68 big blocks. The springs were different with the 335 but not the head casting. As Dan stated earlier, there are no HP exhaust manifolds. There are two and 4bbl manifolds. When Dodge brought out the Super Bee mid year, they used the 335 horse assembly and called it the Magnum. The 335 horse variant of the 383-4 was used from 68-70. The applications changed each year. In 68 only the RR and SB without A/C got the 335 assembly. In 69, any B body with manual transmission without A/C and the RR or SB with either transmission and without A/C got the 335 horse version. Any 69 B body with A/C got the 330 horse. Any non RR or SB B body (Charger, Satellite, Coronet) with automatic transmission got the 330 horse. The 1970 applications get a little more convoluted with the use of the 335 horse in B and E bodies. However, there was a 335 horse assembly available with A/C in 1970. Properly and originally, the term 383 Magnum refers to a 68-70 Dodge with the 335 horse version. Dodge did use the term Magnum on other engines after 1970. So.... 1968: 383 Magnum in Super Bees without A/C. 1969: Manual transmission B bodies without A/C OR a Super Bee with either transmission and without A/C. So no 69 Charger with A/C or automatic would have the 335 horse Magnum.
Seeking:
1969 St. Louis plant VINs, SPD, and VONs. Over 2,000 thanks to you!
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2306587
05/18/17 11:02 AM
05/18/17 11:02 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,161 CT
GTX MATT
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,161
CT
|
Wow so much bad information
Now I need to pin those needles, got to feel that heat Hear my motor screamin while I'm tearin up the street
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 69CoronetRT]
#2306942
05/18/17 07:23 PM
05/18/17 07:23 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259 Khemi, Stygia
Mebsuta
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259
Khemi, Stygia
|
Properly and originally, the term 383 Magnum refers to a 68-70 Dodge with the 335 horse version. Dodge did use the term Magnum on other engines after 1970.
I agree.
68 Roadrunner. 383 4-spd. Beat up.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Bad B-rad]
#2306978
05/18/17 08:29 PM
05/18/17 08:29 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 173 Milano, Italia
FK5
member
|
member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 173
Milano, Italia
|
My 69 383 4bbl A/C car has duel exhaust,with what looks to be factory "H" pipe and hangers and mufflers. And I now think I figured out the yellow crayon 68 written on the front of my pass side valve cover is not a 68 it is an 899 and one 9 is gone and its written upside down. I will now have to go see if the pipes and mufflers have any numbers on them so I can figure out this semi-mystery!!!
Also do 383HP MAGNUM ROAD RUNNER 335Horse engines use the same pistons as 383 330horse pistons, or do the 335horse motors have valve pockets in them? Could you put a "RoadRunner/Magnum" cam in the 330hp 383 with 2bbl cam with out causing any damage? I know my engine(330horse) the pistons almost have a positive deck height at TDC. These guys are probably more knowledgable than me, but I don't think there is such a thing as a "factory H-pipe." Just FYI since you are talking about swapping a cam nobody will ever see for originality...
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2307199
05/19/17 03:41 AM
05/19/17 03:41 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948 Harlan, Iowa
69CoronetRT
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948
Harlan, Iowa
|
Nacho....what part has been unclear about applications of the 335 horse assembly in 1968?
Seeking:
1969 St. Louis plant VINs, SPD, and VONs. Over 2,000 thanks to you!
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2307201
05/19/17 03:43 AM
05/19/17 03:43 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948 Harlan, Iowa
69CoronetRT
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948
Harlan, Iowa
|
Another Charger with 383... Magnum? https://youtu.be/eApCxdPxLmwSellers says is matching numbers and original miles engine. Driver side manifold seems to be HiPo one. What part was unclear about the A/C application in 1969?
Seeking:
1969 St. Louis plant VINs, SPD, and VONs. Over 2,000 thanks to you!
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Thread Ender1]
#2307254
05/19/17 10:29 AM
05/19/17 10:29 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
Sorry, somehow missed that... no AC on 68/69 383 Magnum/SuperCommandos? soo the you couldn't get a Superbee/RR with AC ? Was just 68/69 or also up to 71? Just because that 68 charger has a 383 magnum pie tin doesn't make it one. Of course I know, but they seems to be born there! On a side note! ( a bit off topic ) How does the pie tin air cleaner takes the air? I can't find any entry on them
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Bad B-rad]
#2307318
05/19/17 12:47 PM
05/19/17 12:47 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233
fredericksburg,va
|
Might be wrong but the only 383 engine that used a Holly was the 70 all the others AFB-AVS. 2 cams low performance and high performance + 6 barrel type, same specs just different lobe angle. Each engine each year shared the same head just springs where different, (67 had different ex valve size LP to HP) Chrysler did some stupid things but they did keep it simple on this stuff. Way to many 383 Hemi six-packs out there.[/quote] No,I looked up the numbers on my Holley in the little white numbers books I have and it comes back as a 69 383 4bbl(with a note 570cfm). I THINK that big block cars with air used the Holley carbs. Because most every 69 383 w A/C I have looked at had duel snorkel air cleaner and Holley carb. So my car DID org have a Holley, but WHY it did, I do not know I can only guess, the above reason. [/quote] Per FSM in 69
Last edited by cudaman1969; 05/19/17 12:49 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: elmor353]
#2307326
05/19/17 12:58 PM
05/19/17 12:58 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
335 hp engines usually got the HP exhaust manifolds, while the 330 hp engines usually got logs like the 2bbls. Incorrect, 330HP engine in 68/69/70 ... which is the engine he asks about ... is a 4bbl engine with what people refer to as the HP manifolds.
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 68mannix]
#2307330
05/19/17 01:00 PM
05/19/17 01:00 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
the difference is that the 335 horse engine got a windage tray and the 330 horse engine did not that's the 5 horse difference. did you type that with a straight face ?
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: cudaman1969]
#2307331
05/19/17 01:00 PM
05/19/17 01:00 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,954 Blairsden, CA
Triggerfish
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,954
Blairsden, CA
|
Might be wrong but the only 383 engine that used a Holly was the 70 all the others AFB-AVS. 2 cams low performance and high performance + 6 barrel type, same specs just different lobe angle. Each engine each year shared the same head just springs where different, (67 had different ex valve size LP to HP) Chrysler did some stupid things but they did keep it simple on this stuff. Way to many 383 Hemi six-packs out there. No,I looked up the numbers on my Holley in the little white numbers books I have and it comes back as a 69 383 4bbl(with a note 570cfm). I THINK that big block cars with air used the Holley carbs. Because most every 69 383 w A/C I have looked at had duel snorkel air cleaner and Holley carb. So my car DID org have a Holley, but WHY it did, I do not know I can only guess, the above reason. [/quote] Per FSM in 69 [/quote] You're right, some 70 383 Super Commandos did have Holleys. In 70, I bought a new 70 383, 4 speed 'Cuda with A/C off the showroom at Sam Krug Chrysler Plymouth in Vegas & it had the twin snorkel, black air cleaner with a Holley. First thing I did was remove the A/C compressor to save weight, install headers & a small triangular air cleaner with a foam element that melted into the carb whenever the Holley backfired. Dumb kid I was. Threw a rod thru the block racing my friend's big buick on the freeway & bye bye went the 'Cuda.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2307332
05/19/17 01:01 PM
05/19/17 01:01 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
Sorry, somehow missed that... no AC on 68/69 383 Magnum/SuperCommandos? soo the you couldn't get a Superbee/RR with AC ? Was just 68/69 or also up to 71? Just because that 68 charger has a 383 magnum pie tin doesn't make it one. Of course I know, but they seems to be born there! On a side note! ( a bit off topic ) How does the pie tin air cleaner takes the air? I can't find any entry on them Yes you could get a road runner, and supebee, with A/C , it would have the 330HP engine instead of the 335hp .
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: cudaman1969]
#2307335
05/19/17 01:06 PM
05/19/17 01:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
Might be wrong but the only 383 engine that used a Holly was the 70 all the others AFB-AVS. 2 cams low performance and high performance + 6 barrel type, same specs just different lobe angle. Each engine each year shared the same head just springs where different, (67 had different ex valve size LP to HP) Chrysler did some stupid things but they did keep it simple on this stuff. Way to many 383 Hemi six-packs out there.
No,I looked up the numbers on my Holley in the little white numbers books I have and it comes back as a 69 383 4bbl(with a note 570cfm). I THINK that big block cars with air used the Holley carbs. Because most every 69 383 w A/C I have looked at had duel snorkel air cleaner and Holley carb. So my car DID org have a Holley, but WHY it did, I do not know I can only guess, the above reason. Per FSM in 69 I haven't seen 69 383 4 bbls with A/C and holleys in 69 , the 4bbl manifolds before 1970 were not holley friendly. And don't take the LITTLE WHITE BOOK info as gospel, Galen has admitted it has mistakes ...
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Fab64]
#2307337
05/19/17 01:08 PM
05/19/17 01:08 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
It wasn't just the cams; the other difference in the engines was the HP used 440 heads. Sorry I don't have the cam specs - they should be available online. Did you type that with a straight face ?
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: GTX MATT]
#2307338
05/19/17 01:10 PM
05/19/17 01:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
Wow so much bad information no kidding
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Bad B-rad]
#2307342
05/19/17 01:23 PM
05/19/17 01:23 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
My 69 383 4bbl A/C car has duel exhaust,with what looks to be factory "H" pipe and hangers and mufflers. And I now think I figured out the yellow crayon 68 written on the front of my pass side valve cover is not a 68 it is an 899 and one 9 is gone and its written upside down. I will now have to go see if the pipes and mufflers have any numbers on them so I can figure out this semi-mystery!!!
Also do 383HP MAGNUM ROAD RUNNER 335Horse engines use the same pistons as 383 330horse pistons, or do the 335horse motors have valve pockets in them? Could you put a "RoadRunner/Magnum" cam in the 330hp 383 with 2bbl cam with out causing any damage? I know my engine(330horse) the pistons almost have a positive deck height at TDC. Someone changed the headpipes on that car, there isn't an H pipe on any 383 Mopar , only on 440hp, 6pk 70/71 and Hemi cars. The 383 330hp and 335 hp engine in 68 and 69 have the same pistons, .0025 in the hole with NO VALVE RELIEFS, there is only flat top or big round shallow dish pistons in 383's. Yes you can put the 4bbl cam in your motor and if your pistons are positive deck height then someone cut that block or Chrysler screwed the pooch machining it originally because no 383's have a positive deck height piston from the factory ... you want to change your valve springs also with your cam change, the 4 bbl cam used a spring with an internal flat wire damper spring also. The crayon mark I don't think is 899, the number is the engine assembly number ... I'd have to do some digging to find out what the 69 A/C equipped 383 engine assembly number is.
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: BlueRacer69]
#2307346
05/19/17 01:30 PM
05/19/17 01:30 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
Okay you call it one thing, I call it another. The principal still the same. And I don't believe the so called windage tray made 5 horse power difference. It was in the more restrictive exhaust manifolds. No , the principle is not the same, it's not even close, the baffles in the B body and A body pan do not do anything the same as a windage tray. The baffles are for oil sloshing on accell and decell, the windage tray as made by chrysler, slows the oil getting back to the sump ... but it's supposed to keep the crank windage from foaming the oil
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2307358
05/19/17 02:23 PM
05/19/17 02:23 PM
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27 NY,USA
Bad B-rad
member
|
member
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27
NY,USA
|
As far as the blue charger for sale in above post: Well mine is a 69, not a 68, but I THINK that A/C big blocks had the duel snorkel air cleaners(68/69 B-body) So maybe that was changed a while back, because the one he has looks much cooler then the duel snorkel. Also the fuel line looks to be going to the wrong spot,as if maybe the carb has been swaped? Again maybe its different in 68 vs 69, but 69 A/C 383 got Holley.
I was told on a different site that 68/69 big block A/C, 4Bbl cars all got Holley carbs.
That may be the fuel line for the Carter?
Back to the other topic:
I don't take the little white books as gospel,just a point in the right direction, but the numbers on my Holley carb come back as a 69, 383 a/c carb, so my car being a 69 383 A/c Charger, I am guessing it the correct (org ) carb. The car is 45+ years old so it could have been changed. My car has 7,000 miles it was hit hard in driver 1/4 panel over 37 years ago and has been parked from then on, so most of all the stuff on my car looks factory. But anything could have been changed/swapped, I don't personally know. The build sheet has the engine # as 899 that's how I came to that conclusion about yellow crayon mark on pass side valve cover. At first,I thought it was a 68, but after looking at build sheet and the valve cover I now think it may have read 899.
Last edited by Bad B-rad; 05/19/17 02:39 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Bad B-rad]
#2307373
05/19/17 02:49 PM
05/19/17 02:49 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,515 Las Vegas, NV
6bblgt
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,515
Las Vegas, NV
|
Well mine is a 69, not a 68, but I THINK that A/C big blocks had the duel snorkel air cleaners(68/69 B-body) ...........
I was told on a different site that 68/69 big block A/C, 4Bbl cars all got Holley carbs. too much wrong info/thinking in this one post ..... B-rad, you'd be best to start your own thread giving specifics of your car and the questions you have. 1969 383HP 4bbl originally used Carter AVS carbs ONLY 1969 383 4bbl used HOLLEY carbs with and without A/C 1969 383 4bbl & 383HP 4bbl both originally used dual exhaust manifolds (as pictured below)
Last edited by 6bblgt; 05/19/17 03:41 PM. Reason: correction, added info & clarity
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: JohnRR]
#2307376
05/19/17 02:56 PM
05/19/17 02:56 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,679 owt west
Thread Ender1
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,679
owt west
|
Sorry, somehow missed that... no AC on 68/69 383 Magnum/SuperCommandos? soo the you couldn't get a Superbee/RR with AC ? Was just 68/69 or also up to 71? Just because that 68 charger has a 383 magnum pie tin doesn't make it one. Of course I know, but they seems to be born there! On a side note! ( a bit off topic ) How does the pie tin air cleaner takes the air? I can't find any entry on them Yes you could get a road runner, and supebee, with A/C , it would have the 330HP engine instead of the 335hp . yes because there is no windage tray.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 6bblgt]
#2307382
05/19/17 03:05 PM
05/19/17 03:05 PM
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27 NY,USA
Bad B-rad
member
|
member
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27
NY,USA
|
I agree with you on what you said above. But in 69 383 A/C,Automatic Used Holley Carbs #R4440(4160 series)
They did NOT use the Holley carbs in 68. They also used Holley in 1970 with the N/96 and N96+n95 And 71
I do not know why they did this. And I am not trying to argue with anyone as I am not an expert. I was told it was just A/C cars in 69, that used the Holley.
Last edited by Bad B-rad; 05/19/17 03:27 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Bad B-rad]
#2307407
05/19/17 03:56 PM
05/19/17 03:56 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233
fredericksburg,va
|
I agree with you on what you said above. But in 69 383 A/C,Automatic Used Holley Carbs #R4440(4160 series)
They did NOT use the Holley carbs in 68. They also used Holley in 1970 with the N/96 and N96+n95 And 71
I do not know why they did this. And I am not trying to argue with anyone as I am not an expert. I was told it was just A/C cars in 69, that used the Holley.
Those pics I gave where from a 1969 factory service manual, the only Holly it listed was a 440 and if I'm not mistaken only for a c-body. Being from that time era and working for my uncle's Dodge dealership, my understanding was the 300-330 hp engine had the more restrictive a-body manifold and the 335 hp the other one. Have to ask Rhino if one of his 383 Darts came with the windage tray in 68-69. My m-code 440 has the tray and the a-body pan. Always thought that tray was worth more than 5 hp. Besides 330 was at 5000 and 335 was at 5200, that 200 could equal 5 hp. Just a numbers game
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: JohnRR]
#2307411
05/19/17 04:03 PM
05/19/17 04:03 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
Sorry, somehow missed that... no AC on 68/69 383 Magnum/SuperCommandos? soo the you couldn't get a Superbee/RR with AC ? Was just 68/69 or also up to 71? Just because that 68 charger has a 383 magnum pie tin doesn't make it one. Of course I know, but they seems to be born there! On a side note! ( a bit off topic ) How does the pie tin air cleaner takes the air? I can't find any entry on them Yes you could get a road runner, and supebee, with A/C , it would have the 330HP engine instead of the 335hp . yes, just read that, but it seems on 69, not in 68
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: cudaman1969]
#2307412
05/19/17 04:09 PM
05/19/17 04:09 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
Besides 330 was at 5000 and 335 was at 5200, that 200 could equal 5 hp. Just a numbers game no need for that, you can get an hp curve going down or flat from 5000 instead keep growing
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 69CoronetRT]
#2307426
05/19/17 04:25 PM
05/19/17 04:25 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
In 69, any B body with manual transmission without A/C and the RR or SB with either transmission and without A/C got the 335 horse version.
mid year change on B bodies ?( but SB and RR ) is not on dealership databooks... or I missed in any of the cases... optional or standard on this setup ?
Last edited by NachoRT74; 05/19/17 04:26 PM.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2307498
05/19/17 06:21 PM
05/19/17 06:21 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,200 Someplace you aren't
SomeCarGuy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,200
Someplace you aren't
|
If you rebuild the engine non of this stuff matters. You're going to replace stuff and upgrade things. So if no windage tray for example, you'll add one or do a crank scraper. And so on. Pistons cam etc same deal. If you have logs, in the trash they go.
I want my fair share
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2307541
05/19/17 07:36 PM
05/19/17 07:36 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,311 Prospect, PA
BSB67
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,311
Prospect, PA
|
The lift is not that different, like 0.020" more. I have the numbers, just to lazy to go get them. The duration is bigger as well, and the real reason for the performance increase.
None of the "purple shafts" were installed by the factory. The original purples shaft/shafts were a step up or more from what was installed from the factory in wedge motors. I guess now you can purchase a resto cam from MP. Maybe it is called a purple cam too.
Damn! sometimes I forgett I have the direct conection performance book!! Actually my 74 Mopar parts catalog matches the number posted there for the HiPo camshaft, 3512907 camshaft... used on all 383/400 HP and 440 HP, but this means the 335 383 or 330 383 ? so the 330 383 is not an HP still being a magnum ? then there is a superseded number for it, 4071002 camshaft one of them I have it NOS on its original box, and is purple. then read it better on some other section and the 335 383 camshaft takes the stock 3512907... which by the direct conection book is 268-284 camsshaft with 450 lift... that meets the MP 4452783 spec and the fact the higher camshaft used from factory is a purple one If you are talking "original" purple shaft, I think your dot connecting might be flawed. What Direct Connection and Mopar Performance called "Purple Shafts" back in the 1970s started with the "Hemi Grind", I believe, followed by the 484 and 292, previously Racer Brown SSH-25 and -44 respectively. As years went by, the family of "purple shaft" grew and at some point added the replacement cam you have. I don't recall anyone in the 1970s or 1980 calling the factory cam a "purple cam", or running out to by one. Could be mistaken.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: BSB67]
#2307667
05/19/17 11:26 PM
05/19/17 11:26 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,116 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,116
Bend,OR USA
|
The original direct Connection Chrysler HP street cams that where non Racer Brown, Crane and Cam Dynamics race roller cams for the wedge motors where the infamous "Street Hemi 284 Purple Shaft" grind that made absolutely no manifold vacuum and didn't work worth a hoot IMO I sold one to a customer, garage owner and friend of mine that put it into a original 1968 Dodge Charger 383 330 HP car with a 727, I went over to his shop one night and helped him degree it in properly, I also made sure later that it started right away and was broken in properly. He drove the car around the block once and pulled that cam out and bought and installed R.V. cam so the car would stop more than once in traffic, the car belong to a 18 year old kid that wrapped it around a power pole in less than three months after getting the car back from the engine over haul I've used some of the Mopar OEM replacement cam kits for SB like the 1968 340 automatic that they use to sell, it work okay Iskys, Comp Cams, Lunati and other cam brands I can't think of right now worked better
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: JohnRR]
#2307668
05/19/17 11:26 PM
05/19/17 11:26 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948 Harlan, Iowa
69CoronetRT
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948
Harlan, Iowa
|
The crayon mark I don't think is 899, the number is the engine assembly number ... I'd have to do some digging to find out what the 69 A/C equipped 383 engine assembly number is .
899 auto and A/C 897 four speed with A/C
Last edited by 69CoronetRT; 05/19/17 11:28 PM.
Seeking:
1969 St. Louis plant VINs, SPD, and VONs. Over 2,000 thanks to you!
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2307671
05/19/17 11:31 PM
05/19/17 11:31 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948 Harlan, Iowa
69CoronetRT
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948
Harlan, Iowa
|
Sorry, somehow missed that... no AC on 68/69 383 Magnum/SuperCommandos? soo the you couldn't get a Superbee/RR with AC ? Was just 68/69 or also up to 71? Just because that 68 charger has a 383 magnum pie tin doesn't make it one. Of course I know, but they seems to be born there! On a side note! ( a bit off topic ) How does the pie tin air cleaner takes the air? I can't find any entry on them Yes you could get a road runner, and supebee, with A/C , it would have the 330HP engine instead of the 335hp . yes, just read that, but it seems on 69, not in 68 Yes, you could get the RR or SB in 68 with ac. You got the 330 horse engine.
Seeking:
1969 St. Louis plant VINs, SPD, and VONs. Over 2,000 thanks to you!
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2307675
05/19/17 11:36 PM
05/19/17 11:36 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948 Harlan, Iowa
69CoronetRT
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948
Harlan, Iowa
|
In 69, any B body with manual transmission without A/C and the RR or SB with either transmission and without A/C got the 335 horse version.
mid year change on B bodies ?( but SB and RR ) is not on dealership databooks... or I missed in any of the cases... optional or standard on this setup ? 69 B bodies with manual tranny and no ac got the 335 horse. Not optional, not mid year change. Plants like standardization and easy. Having a 330 horse manual no ac was a bit of overkill. It would be just as easy to use the 335 horse manual version rather than assembling a 330 horse manual version. Dealer books don't get into specific applications.
Last edited by 69CoronetRT; 05/19/17 11:37 PM.
Seeking:
1969 St. Louis plant VINs, SPD, and VONs. Over 2,000 thanks to you!
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2307800
05/20/17 10:06 AM
05/20/17 10:06 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
Ok... so more less in conclussion these are the basic ( waiting to be corrected yet ) at least for 68 and 69... 70 and 71 s are a kinda diff story what we haven't talked completelly yet. Some questions still on this post.
383 2 bbl Standard camshaft standard valve springs, no windage tray, low compression pistons, dual snorkel air cleaner, standard exhaust manifolds.... cast or forged crank ? I think all got still forged in those years. Tourquoise paint. I guess single timming chain
383 4 bbl 330 Standard camshaft standard valve springs, windage tray ( still debating ), high compression pistons, dual snorkel air cleaner, HP exhaust manifolds ( seems to be a standard agreement but still some doubts ), forged crank. No Magnum/supercommando denomination so, no HP stamp? Turquoise paint, I guess double timing chain ?
383 4 bbl 335 High performance ( 440 Magnum ) camshaft, valve springs with dampener, windage tray, high compression pistons, pie tin air cleaner, HP exhaust manifolds, forged crank. Magnum/supercommando denomination so, HP stamp. Orange paint from 69 but still turquoise on 68 ? Of course double timing chain.
Camshafts specs were posted allong the thread and the Magnum one is the MP purpleshaft one, the first one of the list. DC book adds a bit of confusion on the info thought.
Then we have another details floated on here like the cars they came in, carbs used, which got AC and which not, what were good adds yo the thread I wasn't really asking initially but is ALLWAYS good to know. I guess some other differences could be around like the bearings used on ones or the others.
I guess the valve springs are different NOT just due the dampener but the specs itself are also different... harder and stuff...
I think the orange paint on all magnum/supercomando engines began in 69, right?
A bit off topic I added another question and it was, WHERE takes the air the unsilenced ( pie tin ) air cleaner? I can't find any opening on them!
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2307811
05/20/17 10:37 AM
05/20/17 10:37 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
Need to add some notes about what I told about purple shafts. I'm not saying the magnum cam was called purple shaft back in the days, but it is now and since sometime in the past ( what I can't tell ). I was calling it on the way is actually. Need to say however, the superseded 4071002 production replacement cam, which I have one NOS on its original factory/dealer box, not being MP or DC labeled thought just regular Chrysler logo and Mopar print on box ( like any regular replacement part ), OF THE 3512907 production for HP engines ( stated on my 74 Parts catalog like that but I guess an earlier PN on earlier catalogs, something like 28xxxxx ), IT GOT purple paint. I have the pic of the camshaft somewhere posted. Can't say the ones original installed on engines from factory got the purple finish or if DC book would call it Purple shaft, but the replacement parts dealer piece I have got the purple finish. Aaand meets the MP 4452783 specs, plus the MP catalog descriptions it like the Magnum replacement, being purple. EDITING, this is an ooooold thread on dc.com where I posted the PN cross reference when I bought the camshaft. Maybe some other numbers are missed on the way up to the last MP one. Pics are there and you can see the purple finish on the one I got. Magnum/Supercomando camshaft PN crossreference
Last edited by NachoRT74; 05/20/17 10:48 AM.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2307870
05/20/17 12:19 PM
05/20/17 12:19 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233
fredericksburg,va
|
On the air cleaner, air comes in from the bottom edge, the cover is a larger diameter than the base. No cast cranks till the 400. I'm not positive but I think I remember seeing a pinkish- purple mark on the stock hipo cam too. The two springs are different, got both. My book shows two 383 engines in 69, 2 & 4 barrel, 2 bbl got the small cam 4 bbl got the big cam, it shows Barracuda and Road Runner having same engine. Couldn't find anything about the windage tray. Been a long time, can't remember all the stuff.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: cudaman1969]
#2307933
05/20/17 01:52 PM
05/20/17 01:52 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948 Harlan, Iowa
69CoronetRT
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948
Harlan, Iowa
|
From 68-70, there are two versions of the 383-4. The 330 horse and the 335 horse. The install applications vary by year.
Books and websites, generally, do not cover in detail the various applications for each year and assembly.
Seeking:
1969 St. Louis plant VINs, SPD, and VONs. Over 2,000 thanks to you!
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2307964
05/20/17 02:49 PM
05/20/17 02:49 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
Lol, not about 5hp, but just the correct setup on each one... informative thread
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: cudaman1969]
#2307965
05/20/17 02:52 PM
05/20/17 02:52 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
On the air cleaner, air comes in from the bottom edge, the cover is a larger diameter than the base. Gotcha, just detailing some dissasembled cleaners at nicksgarage website and can note now you mention the base is just about the filter element diameter due the recession shape I seeing, and the top supports over the element not over the base, then get an extra room after the support area for it. No cast cranks till the 400. Pretty sure on 70 and 71 383 2 bbls got cast
Last edited by NachoRT74; 05/20/17 03:08 PM.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2307981
05/20/17 03:24 PM
05/20/17 03:24 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,436 Blair County,PA
62maxwgn
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,436
Blair County,PA
|
On the air cleaner, air comes in from the bottom edge, the cover is a larger diameter than the base. Gotcha, just detailing some dissasembled cleaners at nicksgarage website and can note now you mention the base is just about the filter element diameter due the recession shape I seeing, and the top supports over the element not over the base, then get an extra room after the support area for it. No cast cranks till the 400. Pretty sure on 70 and 71 383 2 bbls got cast Non HP in 71 but forged in 70.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 62maxwgn]
#2308039
05/20/17 05:19 PM
05/20/17 05:19 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233
fredericksburg,va
|
On the air cleaner, air comes in from the bottom edge, the cover is a larger diameter than the base. Gotcha, just detailing some dissasembled cleaners at nicksgarage website and can note now you mention the base is just about the filter element diameter due the recession shape I seeing, and the top supports over the element not over the base, then get an extra room after the support area for it. No cast cranks till the 400. Pretty sure on 70 and 71 383 2 bbls got cast Non HP in 71 but forged in 70. Humm. I do have a 71 fury in the back with the 383-2 bbl. I'll that check out. Factory service manuals are pretty thorough.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2308087
05/20/17 06:44 PM
05/20/17 06:44 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,691 MO
cdp
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,691
MO
|
"383 4 bbl 330 Standard camshaft standard valve springs, windage tray ( still debating ), high compression pistons, dual snorkel air cleaner, HP exhaust manifolds ( seems to be a standard agreement but still some doubts ), forged crank. No Magnum/supercommando denomination so, no HP stamp? Turquoise paint, I guess double timing chain ?"
I have a 69 Charger, H-code, 330 horse 383. Was 95% original when I got it. Engine is turquoise, not stamped as an HP motor. Factory HP manifolds, small round 340/383/440 HP air cleaner (no snorkels) with red 383 4-barrel pie tin . Standard 4v intake, and of course the car has A/C. I think the 69 manual states a specific carb...compared to HP stamped 383's (like 6 numbers listed). Did not have a double roller chain.
When I pulled the heads, they had red valve springs, and factory details that it had a standard 2v camshaft.
Essentially, it seems its a 2v- base motor with nothing more than a 4v intake, and HP exhaust manifolds. And all should have had AC.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: cdp]
#2308105
05/20/17 07:30 PM
05/20/17 07:30 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,853 Pattison Texas
CSK
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,853
Pattison Texas
|
"383 4 bbl 330 Standard camshaft standard valve springs, windage tray ( still debating ), high compression pistons, dual snorkel air cleaner, HP exhaust manifolds ( seems to be a standard agreement but still some doubts ), forged crank. No Magnum/supercommando denomination so, no HP stamp? Turquoise paint, I guess double timing chain ?"
I have a 69 Charger, H-code, 330 horse 383. Was 95% original when I got it. Engine is turquoise, not stamped as an HP motor. Factory HP manifolds, small round 340/383/440 HP air cleaner (no snorkels) with red 383 4-barrel pie tin . Standard 4v intake, and of course the car has A/C. I think the 69 manual states a specific carb...compared to HP stamped 383's (like 6 numbers listed). Did not have a double roller chain.
When I pulled the heads, they had red valve springs, and factory details that it had a standard 2v camshaft.
Essentially, it seems its a 2v- base motor with nothing more than a 4v intake, and HP exhaust manifolds. And all should have had AC. And flat top pistons instead of dished.
1968 Charger COLD A/C Hilborn EFI 512ci 9.7 compression, Stealth heads, 4.10 gear A518 ODtrans 4100lb,10.93 full street car trim 2020 T/A 392 Stock 11.79 @ 114.5
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 62maxwgn]
#2308106
05/20/17 07:40 PM
05/20/17 07:40 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259 Khemi, Stygia
Mebsuta
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259
Khemi, Stygia
|
Boy,all this for 5 hp,glad it isn't 50 hp !! ikr. All to go as fast as a Nissan Altima. lol.
68 Roadrunner. 383 4-spd. Beat up.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: cbusters]
#2308131
05/20/17 08:10 PM
05/20/17 08:10 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259 Khemi, Stygia
Mebsuta
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259
Khemi, Stygia
|
I scanned through the posts in the thread and didn't notice anyone mentioning the fact that the 69 335hp 383 motor had positive deck height flat top pistons originally. If you mention that, somebody will insist that they weren't +dh, so I never say anything.
68 Roadrunner. 383 4-spd. Beat up.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2308153
05/20/17 09:04 PM
05/20/17 09:04 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
How much over DH got your pistons?
( yes somebody mentioned about that )
Did 2bbl engines get dished instead lower CH pistons? I thought they were simply lower ones.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Mebsuta]
#2308246
05/21/17 12:08 AM
05/21/17 12:08 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,311 Prospect, PA
BSB67
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,311
Prospect, PA
|
I scanned through the posts in the thread and didn't notice anyone mentioning the fact that the 69 335hp 383 motor had positive deck height flat top pistons originally. If you mention that, somebody will insist that they weren't +dh, so I never say anything. How much + have you measured them?
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: BSB67]
#2308286
05/21/17 01:14 AM
05/21/17 01:14 AM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784 Florida
cbusters
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784
Florida
|
I scanned through the posts in the thread and didn't notice anyone mentioning the fact that the 69 335hp 383 motor had positive deck height flat top pistons originally. If you mention that, somebody will insist that they weren't +dh, so I never say anything. How much + have you measured them? Long ago, far far away. It was less than .100 , if my yellow book surfaces I will check to see if it mentions it.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Mebsuta]
#2308310
05/21/17 02:14 AM
05/21/17 02:14 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,200 Someplace you aren't
SomeCarGuy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,200
Someplace you aren't
|
I scanned through the posts in the thread and didn't notice anyone mentioning the fact that the 69 335hp 383 motor had positive deck height flat top pistons originally. If you mention that, somebody will insist that they weren't +dh, so I never say anything. Paging johnrr
I want my fair share
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: cbusters]
#2308323
05/21/17 02:50 AM
05/21/17 02:50 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,116 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,116
Bend,OR USA
|
I scanned through the posts in the thread and didn't notice anyone mentioning the fact that the 69 335hp 383 motor had positive deck height flat top pistons originally. It wasn't much but it kept anyone from just doing a quick bolt on of the 67 440 closed chamber heads to increase compression. You had to make sure your head gasket was thick enough to keep the piston from hitting the combustion chamber. When rebuilding the engines in the 70's, the catalog had a listing for both pistons, neutral and positive height. Consider this as a possibility as to why the horsepower rating was different. Eventually the taller pistons were just dropped from the books and like now only one is shown.
I recall this was one of the tips mentioned in the big yellow Direction Connection Racing Manual.
Perhaps Plymouth converted to the open chamber heads for emissions or some other Federal Mandate and the piston change was a little cheat to help performance. Me thinks your source got it wrong on the year of the positive deck height pistons on the 383 Magnum motor, I'll swear it was only the 1970 383 magnum motors that had the Holley carbs also that where listed by Chrysler to NHRA tech. department with + .005 deck height, just like the 390 HP 440 6 pack motors where
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: cbusters]
#2308353
05/21/17 08:09 AM
05/21/17 08:09 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,311 Prospect, PA
BSB67
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,311
Prospect, PA
|
I scanned through the posts in the thread and didn't notice anyone mentioning the fact that the 69 335hp 383 motor had positive deck height flat top pistons originally. If you mention that, somebody will insist that they weren't +dh, so I never say anything. How much + have you measured them? Long ago, far far away. It was less than .100 , if my yellow book surfaces I will check to see if it mentions it. I've measured a few unaltered originals, they were all below the deck. The NHRA spec is like 0.020" proud, I have never seen one from the factory like that. I knew a guy that ran an A body 383 car in Super Stock had to actually grind on the pistons to clear the 906 heads where the head overhung the bore. The 1.932" CH piston was used in at least 1968 and 69 383, maybe 1970 too.
Last edited by BSB67; 05/21/17 08:13 AM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2308371
05/21/17 09:51 AM
05/21/17 09:51 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 89 sweden
carter
member
|
member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 89
sweden
|
I had seven or eight virgin 383 past the years, two was -71 (G) One 2bbl and one was a 4bbl both painted blue. All had forged cranks.
My match# 383 4bbl Non-HP for my -70 E-body ( N-code) Is painted blue, has HP manifold, 402 oil pan without vindage tray, Carter carb # 4736s. (G9)
Last edited by carter; 05/21/17 09:55 AM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: cbusters]
#2308490
05/21/17 01:53 PM
05/21/17 01:53 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,116 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,116
Bend,OR USA
|
Here you go, fresh from the DC Racing Manual circa 1979. Let me clarify that I didn't doubt that you read that in a Mopar manual, what I should have said that I jhave never seen a production 383, from 1959 to 1971, that had the stock OEM piston tops above the decks You need to remember that the original beaded steel head gaskest where .022 thick and had a smaller bore size than the later 440/400 bore size .017 thick beaded steel head gaskets Which leads me to say do not believe every thing you see in print Have you heard the old adage to not believe any thing you hear and only half of what you see Many myths out there. Mopar, Chevy and Ford provided many false specs. to NHRA, NASCAR and other sanctioning racing organizations on many different parts they made for racing only that where not used on production cars
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 05/21/17 02:29 PM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: cbusters]
#2308500
05/21/17 01:59 PM
05/21/17 01:59 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
interesting reading from the DC book. I have the book but never advertised that... will search and read I scanned through the posts in the thread and didn't notice anyone mentioning the fact that the 69 335hp 383 motor had positive deck height flat top pistons originally. If you mention that, somebody will insist that they weren't +dh, so I never say anything. How much + have you measured them? Long ago, far far away. It was less than .100 , if my yellow book surfaces I will check to see if it mentions it. less than .100"??? still being .050 sounds a bit of too much for a factory assembly!!! I have had constanty bad decking jobs on my 400 and I'm worried now will have to cut it again and hoping will be getting around 0.020. on one of the sides. The other side seems to be at zero. Will use the felpro brass shim on that side to get both sides equalized. well that was a bit off topic.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 70 buzz]
#2308528
05/21/17 02:50 PM
05/21/17 02:50 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948 Harlan, Iowa
69CoronetRT
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,948
Harlan, Iowa
|
The only way to truly know what any specific engine puts out is with a dyno.
Estimating actual horsepower based on a, probably, inaccurate factory rating is probably not a good idea. Only a dyno would give you the facts.
Seeking:
1969 St. Louis plant VINs, SPD, and VONs. Over 2,000 thanks to you!
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2308550
05/21/17 03:37 PM
05/21/17 03:37 PM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784 Florida
cbusters
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784
Florida
|
Here you go, fresh from the DC Racing Manual circa 1979. Let me clarify that I didn't doubt that you read that in a Mopar manual, what I should have said that I jhave never seen a production 383, from 1959 to 1971, that had the stock OEM piston tops above the decks You need to remember that the original beaded steel head gaskest where .022 thick and had a smaller bore size than the later 440/400 bore size .017 thick beaded steel head gaskets Which leads me to say do not believe every thing you see in print Have you heard the old adage to not believe any thing you hear and only half of what you see Many myths out there. Mopar, Chevy and Ford provided many false specs. to NHRA, NASCAR and other sanctioning racing organizations on many different parts they made for racing only that where not used on production cars I can verify it past the reading stage. I actually rebuilt engines with the taller pistons. It was a Mopar thing, not a slop thing or an aftermarket thing. I had a daily driver 69 RR that got too cold and froze and blew open the block. I found another block and then we first found out about the pistons when we rebuilt it and only needed to replace one. I will say it is past the myth stage here. Believe as you wish.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: cbusters]
#2308556
05/21/17 03:42 PM
05/21/17 03:42 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,311 Prospect, PA
BSB67
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,311
Prospect, PA
|
Here you go, fresh from the DC Racing Manual circa 1979. Right, but that does not necessarily make it so from the factory. I'm still waiting for someone that has measured a factory original that is proud. Between the ones I've measured, and people that I trust that have measured them, I have not heard of any being positive. There could be some due to factory tolerance differences, but I have not seen or heard of any. They ranged from very near zero to 0.008" below. I have run 915 head on a 1.932" CH 68 383.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2308568
05/21/17 04:02 PM
05/21/17 04:02 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,165 Park Forest, IL
slantzilla
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,165
Park Forest, IL
|
NHRA Stock specs are what is allowed in teardown. It has nothing to do with factory specs.
"Everybody funny, now you funny too."
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: slantzilla]
#2308666
05/21/17 07:54 PM
05/21/17 07:54 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,116 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,116
Bend,OR USA
|
NHRA Stock specs are what is allowed in teardown. It has nothing to do with factory specs. According to NHRA tech. directors when I started racing NHRA in 1973, Farmer Dismuke and Jim Dale, and the other directors that have served as NHRA Tech directors since them all say that NHRA only uses the engine and car specs. furnished to them from the car makers Back in the early days of SS and stock Grumpy Jenkins proved to NHRA and probably Plymouth racing division that the piston dome height for the 1963 415 HP M.W. motors was incorrect for the advertised compression ratio. stock was between + .062 and + .065 from TRW, they needed to be + .091 to have the true compression ratio Plymouth and Dodge said they had according to the math. NHRA changed their spec. after that to allow the +.091 dome height on those motors in 1965 or 1966 The only way to get a OEM legal stock piston to measure that was to use a 1964 415 HP piston and mill the top down from +.120 to +.123 to +.091 To much politics in every form of competion
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 05/21/17 07:56 PM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2309039
05/22/17 01:36 PM
05/22/17 01:36 PM
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27 NY,USA
Bad B-rad
member
|
member
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27
NY,USA
|
Well some people on here had asked how much above deck it sat, that's why I mentioned the dial indicator. As I said on my engine, at TDC it totally appears to be above the deck just a small amount,so small that you would need a dial indicator to measure how much above the deck. And then we would have a measurement to use for future discussions.
I only pulled my heads do to stuck valve, so I did not think to check and measure piston deck height, but as I rotated it to check cylinder walls I noticed pistons looked to be above the deck a small amount.
So I understand you don't HAVE to have a dial indicator to tell if its positive deck height but to have an actual number vs a guess seams like a small bit of useful info.
Also zero deck ht and 0.008 above or below is very hard to see by feel or sight.
Last edited by Bad B-rad; 05/22/17 01:43 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Bad B-rad]
#2309211
05/22/17 05:48 PM
05/22/17 05:48 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,853 Pattison Texas
CSK
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,853
Pattison Texas
|
Well some people on here had asked how much above deck it sat, that's why I mentioned the dial indicator. As I said on my engine, at TDC it totally appears to be above the deck just a small amount,so small that you would need a dial indicator to measure how much above the deck. And then we would have a measurement to use for future discussions.
I only pulled my heads do to stuck valve, so I did not think to check and measure piston deck height, but as I rotated it to check cylinder walls I noticed pistons looked to be above the deck a small amount.
So I understand you don't HAVE to have a dial indicator to tell if its positive deck height but to have an actual number vs a guess seams like a small bit of useful info.
Also zero deck ht and 0.008 above or below is very hard to see by feel or sight. Feeler gauges work pretty well .
1968 Charger COLD A/C Hilborn EFI 512ci 9.7 compression, Stealth heads, 4.10 gear A518 ODtrans 4100lb,10.93 full street car trim 2020 T/A 392 Stock 11.79 @ 114.5
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: CSK]
#2309268
05/22/17 07:29 PM
05/22/17 07:29 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,311 Prospect, PA
BSB67
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,311
Prospect, PA
|
So I understand you don't HAVE to have a dial indicator to tell if its positive deck height but to have an actual number vs a guess seams like a small bit of useful info.
Also zero deck ht and 0.008 above or below is very hard to see by feel or sight.
Feeler gauges work pretty well . This.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: JohnRR]
#2309306
05/22/17 08:24 PM
05/22/17 08:24 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 173 Milano, Italia
FK5
member
|
member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 173
Milano, Italia
|
My 69 383 4bbl A/C car has duel exhaust,with what looks to be factory "H" pipe and hangers and mufflers. And I now think I figured out the yellow crayon 68 written on the front of my pass side valve cover is not a 68 it is an 899 and one 9 is gone and its written upside down. I will now have to go see if the pipes and mufflers have any numbers on them so I can figure out this semi-mystery!!!
Also do 383HP MAGNUM ROAD RUNNER 335Horse engines use the same pistons as 383 330horse pistons, or do the 335horse motors have valve pockets in them? Could you put a "RoadRunner/Magnum" cam in the 330hp 383 with 2bbl cam with out causing any damage? I know my engine(330horse) the pistons almost have a positive deck height at TDC. Someone changed the headpipes on that car, there isn't an H pipe on any 383 Mopar , only on 440hp, 6pk 70/71 and Hemi cars. Um... what? Pretty sure this is bum info too. I have a 375 hp/440 'cuda from 1970 and it doesn't have any h-pipe either. I was there when we picked it up at the dealer.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2309873
05/23/17 04:17 PM
05/23/17 04:17 PM
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27 NY,USA
Bad B-rad
member
|
member
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27
NY,USA
|
I was wrong, My car(69 charger 3834Bbl A/C) does NOT have an H-pipe, It is straight duel exhaust. I am sorry about that. I guess I have been under way to many Mopars as of late,thats a good and bad thing,LOL.
But now I am Making time for my car, so I should be getting to know it better. I got in late Dec,16, and I have not done very much, but look at it, and sit in it making Vroom, Vroom sounds.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2312214
05/28/17 01:57 AM
05/28/17 01:57 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,691 MO
cdp
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,691
MO
|
On this episode of mopar-myth-busters, we'll check the piston height on a stock, H-Code, 1969 Charger SE with the mischievous and mysterious 383-330 horse engine, with original pistons.
And the results on this one: APX .005 to .008 ABOVE deck.
Last edited by cdp; 05/28/17 02:05 AM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: cdp]
#2312256
05/28/17 04:47 AM
05/28/17 04:47 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259 Khemi, Stygia
Mebsuta
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259
Khemi, Stygia
|
On this episode of mopar-myth-busters, we'll check the piston height on a stock, H-Code, 1969 Charger SE with the mischievous and mysterious 383-330 horse engine, with original pistons.
And the results on this one: APX .005 to .008 ABOVE deck.
Thank you.
68 Roadrunner. 383 4-spd. Beat up.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2312283
05/28/17 09:24 AM
05/28/17 09:24 AM
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27 NY,USA
Bad B-rad
member
|
member
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 27
NY,USA
|
I do not know what all 68/69 engines are, but my 1969 H code 383 4Bbl a/c engine(330HP) has pistons that are above the deck surface, That is a fact, I just changed heads, Now I wish I had measured how much above the deck. So as far as buying miss info as truth, the Chrysler guys had a hand to do with that because they built my engine with Positive deck height AND they printed info about it in books.
I can only speak for my engine, but there are a ton of cases of people having the valve kiss the top of the piston using camshafts, that are not all that crazy, by most engine standards, I was just trying to help some one avoid a costly mistake, as I will limit my cam choices to the Magnum/Roadrunner cam .(I also used the steel shim Mopar head gasket, and at Mancini's price I got three sets,its nice to have stuff on hand,just in case)
I did post the one photo where you can see the piston sticking above the block.
But I am gonna guess most 383 engines are not using the stock factory pistons anymore like my engine, so it may not even be an issue to most guys. As most new pistons have valve pockets in them as to make valve to piston clearance exceptable.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2312296
05/28/17 10:19 AM
05/28/17 10:19 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233
fredericksburg,va
|
Think about this, if the piston is above the deck and the stock beaded steel head gaskets where(and are) .022 thick what is going to happen The standard acceptable minimum safe piston the head clearance is .035 No worky very long my friend, your buying misinformation as truth When things don't make sense, their is usually a reason for that If using 67 heads then yes would be close, but the 68 up have an "open" chamber, made for the 440 bore On a similar note, I have a 383 with the TRW popups with zero deck and 67 heads, blue felpro gasket. That engine had some get up and go.
Last edited by cudaman1969; 05/28/17 10:23 AM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2312365
05/28/17 01:01 PM
05/28/17 01:01 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,691 MO
cdp
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,691
MO
|
No problem.
I put the shorblock together some time ago and its been in the corner of the garage for a few years now, as other projects have taken over. I never really paid attention to the deck-height, but after reading this forum, it got me thinking and I had just a couple bolts holding the heads on. So I did a quick check with my trusty calipers. Due to the chamfer, that you mentioned, its tough to measure, but I came up with .006, but I think its slightly more. I don't have an indicator handy at at the moment.
To reiterate this particular H-code 383/330 horse engine out of our 69 Charger: It is an AC car, with a turquoise, non-HP block. It had red springs on the original heads, and a standard, I think 666 intake manifold, along with HP exhaust manifolds. The carb was replaced with an AVS, so I'm not 100% sure on what carb it came with originally, but it appears it may have been a holley 4160 series. No windage tray, but 402 pan. I tossed the original came, in favor of a full Lunati matching kit, but what I had researched a few years ago, and several threads on here, is that they had a 2v-camshaft. The pie tin is red, with the "383-four barrel" designation, with the standard small round HP-air cleaner. Some where, I have pics, but they are from a long time ago, and the cars been long time torn apart.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2312461
05/28/17 04:56 PM
05/28/17 04:56 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,691 MO
cdp
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,691
MO
|
301 intake would be the correct one. I had one of each and couldn't remember which one belonged where.
Your N97 sounds right also. Would love to see more pics of the car your working on.
Another correction, I was wrong on the valve springs. Found the original springs(replaced with lunati) and they were std. 2v springs with no damper, which was stated earlier from the factory service manual.
Last edited by cdp; 05/28/17 05:02 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Bad B-rad]
#2312739
05/29/17 01:34 AM
05/29/17 01:34 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233
fredericksburg,va
|
My car sounds just like yours, except mine had the duel snorkel air filter, but my car had the "N97" Noise reduction package, and that got duel snorkel air cleaner housing. I think California cars got the "N97" I guy just showed me how to find that out on the build sheet, it is not on fender tag. So that my help clear up air cleaner housing differences between the engines, one was built with the standard air cleaner and cars with the "N97" got duel snorkel.
I also think mine has the "301" intake manifold. But the rest is the same. I have not had the oil pan off yet to tell if it has a windage try, I would guess that it does not have that.
If I remember correctly the "noise reduction package" also had regular turn down tail pipes, no chrome tips
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Bad B-rad]
#2312937
05/29/17 01:14 PM
05/29/17 01:14 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233
fredericksburg,va
|
That is how my pipes are, I had thought that maybe the tips were removed or didn't have them. So did all cars, with out the N97 package all have tips on them? Can't say for sure, there might be exceptions, but tips, mufflers and air cleaner are a package deal. Either or, poor Californians at the time had to put up with that crap, now most "people" there should have that package, lol.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2332919
07/07/17 05:49 AM
07/07/17 05:49 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 234 Brisvegas, Australia
Alchemi
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 234
Brisvegas, Australia
|
Better late than never
4-8 up one bank 2-3 the other with piston tilted 68 2bbl 383 9cc dish piston
Last edited by Alchemi; 07/07/17 05:53 AM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: dan9]
#2332945
07/07/17 09:22 AM
07/07/17 09:22 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421 Balt. Md
383man
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
|
If I remember correctly the ads or road tests of the new RR and Super Bee stated that they came with 440 heads. Maybe that lead to a a lot of confusion. I have old mags from the era and I am curious about what they said. I remember reading that in a 68 Roadrunner add. And the reason being up to 1968 the 383 and 440 had different heads. After that as far as I remember both the 383 and 440 used the same 906 head up to 1970. But before 1968 the 383 used the small 1.60 exh valve heads and the 440 the 1.74 exh valve heads. I believe in 1967 the 383 in the A-body (Dart & Cuda) that was rated at 290 hp used the small valve 1.60 heads and the 383 two brl cam. I think in 1968 the A-body 383 got the large valve 906 heads and the 300 hp rating and in 1969 the 383 A-body got the better 383 Roadrunner/SuperBee cam and the 330 hp rating. All in all it sure can get confusing. Ron
Last edited by 383man; 07/07/17 09:23 AM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 383man]
#2333047
07/07/17 01:09 PM
07/07/17 01:09 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,023 pa.
dan9
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,023
pa.
|
Thank you for clearing that up for me. Back then we had to rely on the car mags for info. It seems like the older these cars get the more people know about them. The mags back then said the 70 motors were smog motors and rated at less hp.
Last edited by dan9; 07/07/17 01:15 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Bad B-rad]
#2333103
07/07/17 02:59 PM
07/07/17 02:59 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,133 Mesa, Arizona
dart4forte
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,133
Mesa, Arizona
|
Several years ago a buddy of mine who owns a flow bench did a flow comparison between the various exhaust manifolds. The test was done out of curiosity and from a similar thread on moparts posted at the time. The test was to measure flow and port velocity. The manifolds tested were the B body magnum driver side, C Body magnum Driver side and my 68 GTS 383 driver side manifold. All the subjects were tested at 25" of Vacum. All the exhaust ports were tested to come up with an average
Both the B and C manifolds flowed within 5" of each other. Both had the heat riser with the flap wide open. The A Body driver side manifold flowed slightly less on average between the B and C. The number wasn't significant. It had the heat riser removed.
Of course I went looking for the charts in all my stuff that's still unpacked from our move two years ago and have yet to find them. I'll be going up north next month where I can get copies to post.
Last edited by dart4forte; 07/07/17 03:01 PM.
“So if it’s on the internet it must be true”
Abe Lincoln
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: dart4forte]
#2333163
07/07/17 04:31 PM
07/07/17 04:31 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,517 Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
Rhinodart
Rhinotruck
|
Rhinotruck
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,517
Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
|
Several years ago a buddy of mine who owns a flow bench did a flow comparison between the various exhaust manifolds. The test was done out of curiosity and from a similar thread on moparts posted at the time. The test was to measure flow and port velocity. The manifolds tested were the B body magnum driver side, C Body magnum Driver side and my 68 GTS 383 driver side manifold. All the subjects were tested at 25" of Vacum. All the exhaust ports were tested to come up with an average
Both the B and C manifolds flowed within 5" of each other. Both had the heat riser with the flap wide open. The A Body driver side manifold flowed slightly less on average between the B and C. The number wasn't significant. It had the heat riser removed.
Of course I went looking for the charts in all my stuff that's still unpacked from our move two years ago and have yet to find them. I'll be going up north next month where I can get copies to post. So do you mean passenger side? The drivers side did not have heat risers.
The funny thing about science is that if you change one miniscule parameter you change the entire outcome to the way you want it.
JB Rhinehart, Realist
A-Body's RULE!
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 383man]
#2333193
07/07/17 05:18 PM
07/07/17 05:18 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233
fredericksburg,va
|
If I remember correctly the ads or road tests of the new RR and Super Bee stated that they came with 440 heads. Maybe that lead to a a lot of confusion. I have old mags from the era and I am curious about what they said. I remember reading that in a 68 Roadrunner add. And the reason being up to 1968 the 383 and 440 had different heads. After that as far as I remember both the 383 and 440 used the same 906 head up to 1970. But before 1968 the 383 used the small 1.60 exh valve heads and the 440 the 1.74 exh valve heads. I believe in 1967 the 383 in the A-body (Dart & Cuda) that was rated at 290 hp used the small valve 1.60 heads and the 383 two brl cam. I think in 1968 the A-body 383 got the large valve 906 heads and the 300 hp rating and in 1969 the 383 A-body got the better 383 Roadrunner/SuperBee cam and the 330 hp rating. All in all it sure can get confusing. Ron On the 67 440 engine, hp=big ex valve, lp=small ex valve. Dad bought a 67 New Yorker for parts for his car, came with the 440-2 barrel 915 head small valve. I Had the big valve installed and used them on my 69 383. I think 67 was the first year for the big ex valve on a production engine (GTX type) Dads NYorker had the 375 engine in it, same as GTX-RT
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: dan9]
#2334839
07/10/17 05:25 PM
07/10/17 05:25 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
Not to change the subject but I thought the 440's in Chryslers were 350hp. 350HP std , 375HP optional in some models.
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Alchemi]
#2334841
07/10/17 05:37 PM
07/10/17 05:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
[quote=Alchemi]I have a 68 non hp 2bbl short block sitting assembled with new rings and bearings, I can not say for sure that the deck is untouched, but I do have a couple of pistons proud of the deck, they are dished I will get some pics up soon [/quote
Did you check them all? I have the same piston right here next to me and the the only way it would be above the deck is if either the factory cut the block too much originally, which isn't the norm as they are usually tall, or someone cut it to square during a rebuild. Is the factory stampings still intact on the front pass side ID pad ?
The CH of that piston is 1.932, same as the HP flat top, and on a blueprint spec block deck it is .0025 in the hole .
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: JohnRR]
#2335198
07/11/17 10:25 AM
07/11/17 10:25 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 234 Brisvegas, Australia
Alchemi
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 234
Brisvegas, Australia
|
JohnRR the pad looks intact D383 3 1 2
R its a 67 casting date and only has a number stamped on the bottom of the bellhousing under the starter It had been apart prior to me, one of the 906 heads ended with a -1 and the other -5 Recently it has been honed and the pistons/rods bead blasted, crank polished, machinist said a couple of pistons were down a few thou, and a couple of bores slightly larger (when I did ring gap, 2 ended up .004-5 bigger) When I originally pulled the motor down a couple of years ago I checked the deck heights with a single piston and got not identical but similar results to below, that piece of paper long gone though The odd side was at 0 ish - I could get .003 up on #1 giving it a tap with a dowel and 2 others less, but #5 is just under Pad side however is way off 2 - 0, +.004T 4 - +.003, +.0075T 6 - +.0025, +.007T 8 - +.005, +.008T If that side was machined, it was done very poorly compared to the other side (and would explain the intact pad?) After looking at how both 5&6 seem a bit lower than the neighbors id say I lost a thou or two on the crank polish and 6 must be a loose piston with the high tilt value
Machinist said I would have a bit of piston slap when cold and not to race it.... plans changed - it was thrown together to get the car moving, but now has much better internals collating. Wondering how it would go with some sidewinders and 2 different gasket heights, run it till it blows and then put the good stuff in... lols
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Rhinodart]
#2335427
07/11/17 06:07 PM
07/11/17 06:07 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,133 Mesa, Arizona
dart4forte
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,133
Mesa, Arizona
|
Several years ago a buddy of mine who owns a flow bench did a flow comparison between the various exhaust manifolds. The test was done out of curiosity and from a similar thread on moparts posted at the time. The test was to measure flow and port velocity. The manifolds tested were the B body magnum driver side, C Body magnum Driver side and my 68 GTS 383 driver side manifold. All the subjects were tested at 25" of Vacum. All the exhaust ports were tested to come up with an average
Both the B and C manifolds flowed within 5" of each other. Both had the heat riser with the flap wide open. The A Body driver side manifold flowed slightly less on average between the B and C. The number wasn't significant. It had the heat riser removed.
Of course I went looking for the charts in all my stuff that's still unpacked from our move two years ago and have yet to find them. I'll be going up north next month where I can get copies to post. So do you mean passenger side? The drivers side did not have heat risers. No, we did the driver side. I just mis-spoke. Guess I had passenger side on the brain. Still digging through my stuff. I did find the flow numbers on the heads on the 68 GTS.
Last edited by dart4forte; 07/11/17 06:09 PM.
“So if it’s on the internet it must be true”
Abe Lincoln
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Alchemi]
#2335960
07/12/17 03:06 PM
07/12/17 03:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
JohnRR the pad looks intact D383 3 1 2
R its a 67 casting date and only has a number stamped on the bottom of the bellhousing under the starter It had been apart prior to me, one of the 906 heads ended with a -1 and the other -5 Recently it has been honed and the pistons/rods bead blasted, crank polished, machinist said a couple of pistons were down a few thou, and a couple of bores slightly larger (when I did ring gap, 2 ended up .004-5 bigger) When I originally pulled the motor down a couple of years ago I checked the deck heights with a single piston and got not identical but similar results to below, that piece of paper long gone though The odd side was at 0 ish - I could get .003 up on #1 giving it a tap with a dowel and 2 others less, but #5 is just under Pad side however is way off 2 - 0, +.004T 4 - +.003, +.0075T 6 - +.0025, +.007T 8 - +.005, +.008T If that side was machined, it was done very poorly compared to the other side (and would explain the intact pad?) After looking at how both 5&6 seem a bit lower than the neighbors id say I lost a thou or two on the crank polish and 6 must be a loose piston with the high tilt value
Machinist said I would have a bit of piston slap when cold and not to race it.... plans changed - it was thrown together to get the car moving, but now has much better internals collating. Wondering how it would go with some sidewinders and 2 different gasket heights, run it till it blows and then put the good stuff in... lols Can you post a picture of the pad area ? The fact that the info is still thetre tells me it was either purposely machined like that and you would see a step , I have had a couple of 383's decked on a Rottler CNC and specifically asked that the ID pad not have the info machined off. If you are expecting all the pistons to be the same depth from cylinder to cylinder you are expecting way too much from that engine. It MIGHT have been pretty close when it was new but after x number or hundreds , or even thousands of heat cycles? I'm still surprised that you have positive pistons , are you measuring with a deck bridge directly over the center of the pin or out at an edge and rocking the piston? Do you have a way to measure from the crank centerline to the top of the deck on the 4 corners ?
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 68mannix]
#2338494
07/17/17 05:48 PM
07/17/17 05:48 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 45 Georgia
1969383S
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 45
Georgia
|
All A-Body 383 cars in 69 at least, had Windage trays as well. See Attached. So it is doubtful the extra 5 comes from that alone. I think it is more a market game played by Ma Mopar.
Gerald
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 1969383S]
#2339430
07/19/17 12:20 AM
07/19/17 12:20 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 45 Georgia
1969383S
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 45
Georgia
|
The only difference is in the manifolds used and the block configuration. The internals were all the same!
Maybe the model AVS Carb was different as 2 models are listed for each Stick and Auto
A-Bodies were "S" block builds. (Machined off Left side rear engine mount ear and drilled bosses at the oil pump for left side mount, chrome covers and oil breather.) Hemi Orange
RR and SB were "H" block builds (Normal Engine Mount ears no drilled boss at the oil pump.) Hemi Orange
It was nothing but marketing! They both have HP stamps on boss under the Dizzy.
Were they going to tell the buyers the Barracuda or Dart had the same power in an economy car as the highly marketed Road Runner or Super Bee mid size cars? Heck no, you spin it. The loss in advertised HP on the A-body left manifold was easily gained in weight loss of the car. A-body 383 cars rule!
See Attached.
Last edited by 1969383S; 07/19/17 01:46 AM. Reason: Final Word
Gerald
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 1969383S]
#2339523
07/19/17 04:28 AM
07/19/17 04:28 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,116 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,116
Bend,OR USA
|
A-Bodies were "S" block builds. (Machined off Left side rear engine mount ear and drilled bosses at the oil pump for left side mount, chrome covers and oil breather.) Hemi Orange
RR and SB were "H" block builds (Normal Engine Mount ears no drilled boss at the oil pump.) Hemi Orange
Me thinks your confusing the M code 1969 A body 440 mounts with the H code 383 A body cars, the 440 had the oil pump bosses drilled and tapped, the 383 did not The A body 383 blocks from 1967 to 1969 had two bosses cast into the driver side block that where drilled and tapped for the block steel motor mount to bolt to, no cast in motor mounts ears machine off either I've had two 383 A body cars that where original and seen several original M code 1969 440 A body cars, there are differences in them on the block machining and exhaust manifolds
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 07/19/17 04:30 AM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2339571
07/19/17 10:17 AM
07/19/17 10:17 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233
fredericksburg,va
|
A-Bodies were "S" block builds. (Machined off Left side rear engine mount ear and drilled bosses at the oil pump for left side mount, chrome covers and oil breather.) Hemi Orange
RR and SB were "H" block builds (Normal Engine Mount ears no drilled boss at the oil pump.) Hemi Orange
Me thinks your confusing the M code 1969 A body 440 mounts with the H code 383 A body cars, the 440 had the oil pump bosses drilled and tapped, the 383 did not The A body 383 blocks from 1967 to 1969 had two bosses cast into the driver side block that where drilled and tapped for the block steel motor mount to bolt to, no cast in motor mounts ears machine off either I've had two 383 A body cars that where original and seen several original M code 1969 440 A body cars, there are differences in them on the block machining and exhaust manifolds Also my 69 RR 383 block has those cast bosses for the mounts used in the a-body's .
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2340310
07/20/17 01:24 PM
07/20/17 01:24 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 45 Georgia
1969383S
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 45
Georgia
|
I meant to say above the oil pump for the front mount bosses. Drilled and Tapped
A-body 383 left mount attaches to those 2 bosses above the pump and the front ear. The rear Ear for normal mounts used in RR/SB etc is machined off. Attached is a genuine A-body Block.
Gerald
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 1969383S]
#2340900
07/21/17 12:09 PM
07/21/17 12:09 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,233
fredericksburg,va
|
I meant to say above the oil pump for the front mount bosses. Drilled and Tapped
A-body 383 left mount attaches to those 2 bosses above the pump and the front ear. The rear Ear for normal mounts used in RR/SB etc is machined off. Attached is a genuine A-body Block.
Cool, learn something new everyday. Been a long time, but working on my buddy's 68 383 Darts (had two 383 GTS's, one auto, one 4-speed) can't remember seeing that, we removed engines and put on the stand to go thru.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Triggerfish]
#2340968
07/21/17 02:17 PM
07/21/17 02:17 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,515 Las Vegas, NV
6bblgt
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,515
Las Vegas, NV
|
Thanks much Ron. I didn't realize the Road Runner 383 was different than the Super Commando 383. Back in 70, I bought a 'Cuda 383 4spd new & it had the Super Commando that I thought had the same motor as my friends new Road Runner. that's the 1970 Plymouth b-body "spec's" page not to be confused with anything ELSEmarketing VS. advertising VS. reality = everything is not the same - ASK detailed specific questions & you stand a chance at getting a proper correct answer 1970 383 'cuda 4-speed engine IS the same as 1970 383 Road Runner 4-speed engine
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 1969383S]
#2378250
09/28/17 01:08 PM
09/28/17 01:08 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
The only difference is in the manifolds used and the block configuration. The internals were all the same!
Maybe the model AVS Carb was different as 2 models are listed for each Stick and Auto A body 383's had dual point distributors, RR/SB engines did not, but they did use the same carb as the RR/SB.
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: BlueRacer69]
#2378254
09/28/17 01:11 PM
09/28/17 01:11 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,133 Mesa, Arizona
dart4forte
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,133
Mesa, Arizona
|
the difference is that the 335 horse engine got a windage tray and the 330 horse engine did not that's the 5 horse difference. Not true. My 69 383 Dart GTS with 330hp had the windage tray in the oil pan from day one. And I'm the original owner. The A Body pan had a baffle not a windage tray. FYI. Vans Auto is offfering the original 893 A body big block oil pan as well as the correct pickup.
Last edited by dart4forte; 09/28/17 01:46 PM.
“So if it’s on the internet it must be true”
Abe Lincoln
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Paul_Fancsali]
#2378273
09/28/17 01:43 PM
09/28/17 01:43 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,133 Mesa, Arizona
dart4forte
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,133
Mesa, Arizona
|
Here's an original M code A Body tall deck motor mount
“So if it’s on the internet it must be true”
Abe Lincoln
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: elmor353]
#2378583
09/29/17 12:12 AM
09/29/17 12:12 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 257 Way North Idaho
1KoolBee
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 257
Way North Idaho
|
335 hp engines usually got the HP exhaust manifolds, while the 330 hp engines usually got logs like the 2bbls. My '68 Superbee still has its "born with" 330 horse motor. Many '68 bees were actually 330 horse, by '69 the 335 was standard. This is verified on the trim tag as an engine code of 62 (330 HP) vice 63 (335HP). My 330 horse has exact same 906 heads, exact same HP exhaust manifolds, and exact same unsilenced air-cleaner as 383 HP and 440 HP motors. It did not come with windage tray but did come with a 402 pan. Parts book says cam is 2531190 for 330 horse, 2843564 (440 HP) for 335 horse. Carbs are the same by application between the two 383 motors, distributors are different part numbers, likely different advance curves. Bottom line, more cam, recurved distribuor, and windage tray were the only difference.
'68 Bee 383/TF/Factory Air...high school sweetheart '67 GTX Clone project,500 six pack,Hemi4-speed,Dana 05 Dodge Viper, 505 V-10, 6-speed Tremec
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 1KoolBee]
#2378645
09/29/17 03:23 AM
09/29/17 03:23 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,515 Las Vegas, NV
6bblgt
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,515
Las Vegas, NV
|
WoW! 335 hp engines usually got the HP exhaust manifolds, while the 330 hp engines usually got logs like the 2bbls. WRONG! '68-'70 both 330hp & 335hp received the dual exhaust manifolds which are commonly & incorrectly referred to as HP manifolds383 2bbl engines received the "log" single exhaust manifolds (only on RH for '70) My '68 Superbee still has its "born with" 330 horse motor. Many '68 bees were actually 330 horse, by '69 the 335 was standard. This is verified on the trim tag as an engine code of 62 (330 HP) vice 63 (335HP). ..... WRONG! there is NO "63" used in 1968 335hp was STANDARD on '68 & '69 Super Bee & the only '68 Super Bees with the 330hp engine are also equipped with A/C
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Paul_Fancsali]
#2378841
09/29/17 01:56 PM
09/29/17 01:56 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,974
U.S.S.A.
|
My 69 Sport Sat 383 4 spd had the same engine as my brothers 69 Road runner diference noted dual snorkle air cleaner his has air grabber They both had single point dist. Power wise mine had 3.23s his was 3.55s big difference in power off the line Mine was stamped E383HP same as his engine. i Guess the 5hp was the aircleaner ???? Sounds like you got lucky and the wrong engine was installed, unless the 4speed cars got the 335HP engine ?? The RR engine had the 440 magnum cam, the 330HP engine which your non roadrunner should have had used the same cam as the 350hp 440 and the 2bbl 383 engine, that is where the 5hp is.
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: 69CoronetRT]
#2720108
11/28/19 04:26 PM
11/28/19 04:26 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 7 AK
jimmy
member
|
member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 7
AK
|
Specs are 383 2V, 330HP 4V, and 350HP 440 256°/260° .425"/.435"
335HP 383, and 475HP 440 268°/284° .450"/.458" So, any 383 4V is a magnum still with standard cam and springs, and all got HiPo exhaust manifolds. But the 335HP is a magnum "plus" No. The 383-4 335 horse was introduced in 68 with the Road Runner. The difference between it and the 330 horse assembly was, basically, it used the higher lift cam and springs introduced the year before in the GTX and Coronet R/T. The carb was different than the 330 horse as well as the 335 was intended to get a windage tray. The 906 heads were used on all 68 big blocks. The springs were different with the 335 but not the head casting. As Dan stated earlier, there are no HP exhaust manifolds. There are two and 4bbl manifolds. When Dodge brought out the Super Bee mid year, they used the 335 horse assembly and called it the Magnum. The 335 horse variant of the 383-4 was used from 68-70. The applications changed each year. In 68 only the RR and SB without A/C got the 335 assembly. In 69, any B body with manual transmission without A/C and the RR or SB with either transmission and without A/C got the 335 horse version. Any 69 B body with A/C got the 330 horse. Any non RR or SB B body (Charger, Satellite, Coronet) with automatic transmission got the 330 horse.The 1970 applications get a little more convoluted with the use of the 335 horse in B and E bodies. However, there was a 335 horse assembly available with A/C in 1970. Properly and originally, the term 383 Magnum refers to a 68-70 Dodge with the 335 horse version. Dodge did use the term Magnum on other engines after 1970. So.... 1968: 383 Magnum in Super Bees without A/C. 1969: Manual transmission B bodies without A/C OR a Super Bee with either transmission and without A/C. So no 69 Charger with A/C or automatic would have the 335 horse Magnum. This is correct. I have a 69 Fury III auto with the 330 hp engine, and a 69 RR 383 4-speed with a/c that also has the 330 HP engine. Both these engines came factory blue paint (I use to hate that my RR has the blue motor and a/c, lol). They both have the flat top 10.1 pistons, both came with windage trays installed, and have the 906 heads with dampner coils inside the valve springs. It is my opinion that the cam was a bit smaller on these 330 engines, as I was told, once upon a time, the air conditioner caused to much drain with the regular RR cam at an idle. I notice when I rebuilt the 69 Fury engine with the regular RR cam, the engine had mild lope that it did not have with the 330 hp cam. Take this for what it's worth.
Last edited by jimmy; 11/28/19 05:25 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: pushbutton]
#2720181
11/29/19 12:00 AM
11/29/19 12:00 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,954 Blairsden, CA
Triggerfish
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,954
Blairsden, CA
|
They were rated 335 HP without the air grabber. I don't know where the extra 5 HP came from. I sure remember the 70 'Cuda I bought off the showroom at Sam Krug Chrysler plymouth in Vegas back in 70...383 335hp, Pistol Grip 4 speed & AC. It was pretty foolish to peg the 150 speedo racing my friends 63 Vette (375 hp327 fulie) from the Mount Charleston turnoff on 95! Especially with only F70 14"Polyglass tires. Only mod I did was Hooker headers. I sure remember the air cleaner had the Super Commando pie tin.
|
|
|
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp
[Re: Triggerfish]
#2720187
11/29/19 12:32 AM
11/29/19 12:32 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,317 Ohio
jlatessa
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,317
Ohio
|
FWIW, I bought a 66 New Yorker, new, with the TNT package; 3.23 gears, dual exhaust and a dual snorkel air cleaner, 365 horse power.
The standard Chrysler NY had 350 HP, everything else was the same on both engines.
Joe
PS first year for the 440
Last edited by jlatessa; 11/29/19 12:34 AM.
|
|
|
|
|