Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
72-93 D200 front suspension questions #2281354
04/03/17 06:27 AM
04/03/17 06:27 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
W
Wyle E Coyote Offline OP
member
Wyle E Coyote  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
I have a '72 D100 chassis under my 66 Dodge pickup. This chassis is a factory disc brake option truck. (Discs became standard in 73) I'm thinking of going to 3/4 ton for a number of reasons that I won't get into now. What I'm wondering is two main things. First, What year would you recommend that I get my parts from? Secondly, are the 3/4 and 1/2 ton A-Arms the same? I seem to recall that they are, in which case I might not need that part from the donor.

Thanks everyone! up


25 Dodge Roadster
66 D100 440/727 (on 72 D100 chassis)
67 W200 360/727
72 IH TravelAll 1110 4x4 345/727/NP205
76 Scout 2 360/727/D20
'08 Dakota SLT Quad Cab 4wd 4.7L
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2281754
04/03/17 06:12 PM
04/03/17 06:12 PM
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 259
n.c.
G
geo. Offline
enthusiast
geo.  Offline
enthusiast
G

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 259
n.c.
I don't now for sure but I'd expect you're right.
If you need any measurements I've got an '89 D250,'85 D350, and '76 W200.
I would caution you, there is almost no selection of 16.5 tires, and both 16.5 and 16 inch truck tires are all over $125 each, at least in my area.
If you know of any cheaper choices let me know!

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2281816
04/03/17 08:24 PM
04/03/17 08:24 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,042
colorado
S
savoy64 Offline
top fuel
savoy64  Offline
top fuel
S

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,042
colorado
i think the ball joints are different which may mean the a arms are different-----parts house will have the numbers....

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2281909
04/03/17 11:09 PM
04/03/17 11:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,536
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,536
Freeport IL USA
Dodge gave you several options on front suspension. Most trucks could be had with a light duty, or the heavy duty suspension, depending on what box was checked when the truck was ordered. There was really little rhyme or reason other then checking the desired box on the order form. Most times, the suspension and the steering parts are tied together, seldom did one get heavier unless the other also got heavier, but there are those few examples that didn't follow the suit.

D100 is a light duty nearly car suspension. It generally came on slant 6 or 318 base model trucks.

D150 is the heavy duty version for a 1/2 ton, and resided under most 1/2 ton trucks. These featured larger brakes, and a higher capacity springs. They also had larger ball joints and tie rods.

D200 is a light duty 3/4 ton truck. It was basically a heavy duty 1/2 ton with 8 bolt rotors and 8 rear brakes with a Dana 60 rear axle assembly.

A D250 was the heavy duty 3/4 ton truck, often referred to as a "Camper Special". It had larger brakes, heavy springs, and larger suspension parts, it was a heavy duty truck.

A D300 is a one ton truck. It could be had with single rear wheels or dual rear wheels. This was the same basic truck as the Camper Special 3/4 ton with the option of getting dual wheels. There was also a heavy duty 1 ton that had big truck underpinnings, but those were pretty rare. Most guys that wanted a heavy duty 1 ton bought a big truck instead.

To add complexity, any truck could be ordered with rear overload springs, they were additional springs spaced above the original spring pack and seated against brackets on the frame when the load reached a certain point. Usually, but not always, when overloads were ordered, the truck got the next up spring and suspension package.

To make things even more fun, somewhere along the course of truck building, Dodge eliminated the extra size listings and went with a 150, a 250 and a 350, but any could have had the light duty suspension or the heavy duty suspension and steering components.

A truck with a "D" prefix is a 2 wheel drive. A truck with a "W" prefix is a 4x4 truck. For a while, Dodge decided to call the D trucks 150, 250, and 350, but the same version of the W trucks were 100, 200, and 300. Are we having fun yet?

So in answer to your question regarding brake rotor and other parts swapping between a 5 bolt and an 8 bolt, the correct answer is: YES, and NO! Some parts from a heavy duty 1/2 ton and a light duty 3/4 ton will swap, you just have to know which parts are on which truck.

Fortunately, Dodge often referred to truck suspension as a weight capacity, two trucks of the same weight capacity should have the same suspension. The nice thing is, one doesn't have to look very hard to see if the parts are the same size, its pretty obvious a light duty version is very much lighter then the heavy duty version. Gene

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: poorboy] #2282045
04/04/17 07:44 AM
04/04/17 07:44 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
W
Wyle E Coyote Offline OP
member
Wyle E Coyote  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
Thanks for the info Gene. I didn't know about the difference in say, 100 vs 150. I always thought that they went to the latter number to change things up a bit. You know, mostly for sales gimmicks. Anyway, I knew about the whole "light duty D250s" and such, because my Dad had an '86 D250 with the "light duty" front axle. We discovered this the hard way, while trying to replace a blown wheel bearing on the side of the road. And we also learned about many other one year only things that the '86 came with. Which is kinda why I was inquiring. So maybe I should phrase the question this way; If you were going to swap out the front suspension from 1/2 to 3/4 ton on this '72 chassis, what year of truck would you take it from?

If the question pops up of light vs heavy duty, I imagine that light duty will be fine. I don't currently haul anything that I feel I'd need a high load capacity, nor do I foresee that in the future. The step up is mainly for using the truck to tow a travel trailer, and maybe carry around extra camping gear like firewood, bicycles, etc. Larger steering joints and bearings for the added stresses, and larger brakes for obvious reasons. At first I'll be running a 360, but a stroked 440 is possible in the future. Mainly because I really want to build one and I really don't have anything else to put it in.

Another reason why I want to swap this stuff is because I need new rotors and such, and I don't even know what they're from. I went to service the bearings years ago and found out that someone had swapped the whole spindle and brake assembly from an unknown vehicle, TO the donor chassis. And the Hollander only shows Dodge van for the interchange. Anyway, I want to get this thing going for my 84 year old Dad to knock around in until he can't drive himself anymore. Then..., in comes the stroker! up

Thanks again.


25 Dodge Roadster
66 D100 440/727 (on 72 D100 chassis)
67 W200 360/727
72 IH TravelAll 1110 4x4 345/727/NP205
76 Scout 2 360/727/D20
'08 Dakota SLT Quad Cab 4wd 4.7L
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2282064
04/04/17 09:43 AM
04/04/17 09:43 AM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,042
colorado
S
savoy64 Offline
top fuel
savoy64  Offline
top fuel
S

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,042
colorado
i always thought the jump from a 100 to a 150 to a 1500 was fueled by marketing to make people think they were getting a bigger 1/2 ton truck---kind of following ford and chevy doing the same thing----i never noticed them being offered in the same year---oh well......

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: savoy64] #2282100
04/04/17 11:14 AM
04/04/17 11:14 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,626
in a cattle trailer down by th...
G
Guitar Jones Online laugh2
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
Guitar Jones  Online laugh2
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
G

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,626
in a cattle trailer down by th...
Originally Posted By savoy64
i always thought the jump from a 100 to a 150 to a 1500 was fueled by marketing to make people think they were getting a bigger 1/2 ton truck---kind of following ford and chevy doing the same thing----i never noticed them being offered in the same year---oh well......


When unleaded fuel was mandated for passenger cars and 1/2 ton pickups is when the 150 designation came out. It was just enough extra GVWR to skirt the mandate.


"Follow me the wise man said, but he walked behind"


'92 D250 Club Cab CTD, 47RH conversion, pump tweaks, injectors, rear disc and hydroboost conversion.
'74 W200 Crew Cab 360, NV4500, D44, D60 and NP205 divorced transfer case. Rear disc and hydroboost coming soon!
2019 1500 Long Horn Crew Cab 4WD, 5.7 Hemi.
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2282395
04/04/17 06:57 PM
04/04/17 06:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,536
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,536
Freeport IL USA
Wyle E Coyote, How big is that travel trailer you want to tow?

Modern is a relative term. I have a 2003 1500 Dodge sitting here, everything on the front end of that 1500 is way more heavy duty then most of the 72-93 stuff until you got into the 1 ton stuff.

When Dodge came out with the new designed 1994 trucks, everything older became obsolete. Finding parts for pre 94 anything is getting harder, and will only get worse. Most of the aftermarket simply quit making things for the earlier then 94 trucks almost overnight. If you truly want to upgrade your 66 pickup to something you will be able to get parts for, I would look for at least a 2001 Dodge (2001 was another chassis update and is almost 18 years old now) and swap out the chassis. The modern Dodge trucks are at least consistent in parts usage, but it will probably be a pretty big undertaking. You would be putting your cab, box and front sheet metal on the newer frame/chassis.

If you want more easy, locate a complete 73-93 heavy duty 3/4 ton pickup chassis, and swap all the front and rear suspension and brakes over, then hope the next time you need parts, they are still available. Gene

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2282503
04/04/17 10:26 PM
04/04/17 10:26 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
B
BIGGERED Offline
Reasonable Title
BIGGERED  Offline
Reasonable Title
B

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
Wyle E

I have DT parts books here from 72 thru 83 and will scan any pages you want I just I'm not sure where to start.

I will start with control arms

Red

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2282508
04/04/17 10:34 PM
04/04/17 10:34 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
B
BIGGERED Offline
Reasonable Title
BIGGERED  Offline
Reasonable Title
B

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
I'm not sure how clear this is?

Red

image.jpegimage.jpegimage.jpeg
Last edited by BIGGERED; 04/04/17 10:42 PM.
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: poorboy] #2282667
04/05/17 07:55 AM
04/05/17 07:55 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
W
Wyle E Coyote Offline OP
member
Wyle E Coyote  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
Hey Gene! cool

I'm shooting for the 8-10K range for trailer weight towing capacity. I'm keeping my eyes open for a vintage travel trailer to restore and take out, and I want to pull it with a matching vintage vehicle. And they're often much heavier than modern trailers. If it gets beyond 10k, I'll likely just get a late model Diesel pickup. But I'd rather use the old truck. But this is several years down the road at this point.

As for obsolescence, I'm sure there will be some of that, especially since it's not a GM vehicle. But I'm just wanting to work with what I've got. I have several ideas for other suspensions and/or chassis swaps. Each one being more involved and expensive than the next. I just want to keep this low buck, quick and simple right now. For the short term, the truck will sit a lot at my Dad's place, get driven once a week or so down to the hardware store or something, and only really work if I need to haul or tow something (which won't likely be very far). Long term, the truck comes back to me and I'm highly likely to build a full tube chassis and drop in a 440 Source stroker kit into a 440 I have and go blast around trying to make my wife pee her pants. laugh

My immediate need is for some rotors. But since they're apparently from a car, I have no idea what they're from. So I basically have to replace my spindles/rotors, just to know what I have. So it makes sense to me that if I need to change those, that I bump up to the 3/4 ton stuff. And make it a more practical vehicle that way.

I remember from my Dad's 86, that it had a Quadrajet carburetor, a GM steering column (and maybe box) And something else that seemed distinctly GM.. Maybe the master cylinder? Anyway, with the slight mix of GM stuff, maybe some years had interchangeable parts with GM? shruggy I guess that I was hoping that someone had this info on the top of their head.


25 Dodge Roadster
66 D100 440/727 (on 72 D100 chassis)
67 W200 360/727
72 IH TravelAll 1110 4x4 345/727/NP205
76 Scout 2 360/727/D20
'08 Dakota SLT Quad Cab 4wd 4.7L
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2282825
04/05/17 02:06 PM
04/05/17 02:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,536
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,536
Freeport IL USA
My guess would be that the car rotors on your truck are probably off a big late 60s or early 70s Chrysler (likely both of those are the same part number). Those were probably the same rotors originally installed as an optional disc brake set up for the 1 year only brake option on your 72 truck chassis. The standard 73 disc brake setup was probably specifically designed for the truck chassis and may, or may not have used the same rotor. The difference being; an optional disc brake rotor for a 72 only truck may not have a part number listing, or the number could be superseded to the car rotor, very few 72 disc brake units may have been sold. When the disc brakes became standard on the 73 truck, every 73 truck rolled off the assembly line with those rotors.

Disc brakes were still a relatively new thing in the automotive industry in 72 (1st introduced into production in 65 I believe, by Chrysler). Since the truck chassis was also new in 72, it would follow a Chrysler tradition of using off the shelf parts, if at all possible, as an option on a new design chassis or a body change on a product line.

I would look into the idea the car rotors on your truck are from a big Chrysler, but they also might not be available. Maybe the guy above can check rotor numbers for a 72 pickup, against the rotor number for a 70 Chrysler New Yorker. Might also want to check the rotor number on a 73 Dodge 1/2 ton light duty pickup as well. As a side note, Chrysler upped the size of a lot of car brake rotors in 73 across the product line.

If you have access to a light duty 70s era 3/4 ton brake rotor, I think I would see how it fits on your spindle, and check to see if the caliper will still clear the rotor. You may also find that the 70s era light duty 3/4 ton spindles and brakes will bolt on to your ball joints and tie rod ends. Gene

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2282876
04/05/17 03:24 PM
04/05/17 03:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 516
,Pa.
68dodge Offline
mopar
68dodge  Offline
mopar

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 516
,Pa.
Most of your rotors are 73-78 that were the same for cars like a New yorker, Polara and light trucks. If your thinking of a spindle change from a car. It will not work.

Last edited by 68dodge; 04/05/17 03:25 PM.
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2282978
04/05/17 07:17 PM
04/05/17 07:17 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,683
Des Moines IA
S
Soopernaut Offline
master
Soopernaut  Offline
master
S

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,683
Des Moines IA
Do the spindles have a parts number? There should be a place to look that up online. If they are truck or van parts they should be in the parts book Biggered has.

Maybe they are the correct parts and you got the wrong bearings. It seems more likely wherever you got the bearings from had the wrong listing since they were 1 year only parts.


1970 Dodge d100/eventually going on a 77 D100 frame
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2283203
04/06/17 03:31 AM
04/06/17 03:31 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
W
Wyle E Coyote Offline OP
member
Wyle E Coyote  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
Ok, I'll go through the story (quickly) about my current parts. But since this was 22 years ago, (I built it in early 1992 and she's been parked since 2002), there will be gaps in my exact recollection. The truck chassis was a 72 according to the VIN. It came with factory installed overload springs, making it a D150 I guess. Anyway, in about 1995, the brakes were getting bad so I tore it down to get the rotors turned and such. I decided to replace the bearings while I was there. I took the rotors down and they were barely legal, but the shop turned them enough to make them true again. The parts house gave me the bearings that the book called for. (Back then the store I dealt with verified everything the computer said by their books, since that was a rather new thing and was frequently wrong)

When I got the parts home, the new bearings were far larger than what came out of the hubs. So I cleaned up the old bearings and the seal and headed back to the parts house. We matched the bearings and seal by the number stamped in them. Out of curiosity we looked up the small bearings and there were lots of references for cars, but nothing for trucks or vans. We checked the 73-up bearings, and although they weren't the small ones, they were different than the 72 also. I called a source of mine at a wrecking yard and he confirmed that the Hollander manual (in 1995) showed an interchange between the Dodge B van and the pickup for 72 as a one year only for disc brakes. For 73 and beyond, a totally different part but still the same for truck and van. Nothing else was listed in the interchange manual.

So here's where I'm at now with this. I don"t know, much less care, what these spindles are from because they're far smaller than what should be on the truck. Once I get it tore apart, maybe I'll find a casting number on it and run it. If I can figure it out, I'll make it known. If nothing else as a bit of trivia information. What I am after is replacing it with known components that are beefy enough to handle the job. At this point they could be GM parts for all I care. And since I'm replacing these parts, I was curious to know if there were years to avoid or years to seek?

I was hoping that someone might reply like the following example; "Get the 90-93 truck parts because the rotors, pads and calipers were the same as early 90's GM trucks.", or something like that. Whatever is on there now is going away. I just don't want to buy donor parts from a truck that is already known to have parts availability problems. Like the 72 or the 86 for example.

Thanks everyone! apimp


25 Dodge Roadster
66 D100 440/727 (on 72 D100 chassis)
67 W200 360/727
72 IH TravelAll 1110 4x4 345/727/NP205
76 Scout 2 360/727/D20
'08 Dakota SLT Quad Cab 4wd 4.7L
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2283236
04/06/17 09:34 AM
04/06/17 09:34 AM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
B
BIGGERED Offline
Reasonable Title
BIGGERED  Offline
Reasonable Title
B

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
Wyle E

It appears that 1/2 ton Dodge trucks share front steering knuckles from 1973-1980, along with upper and lower (3000-3600# axle) control arms

3634908 and 3634909 knuckles

There are differences in the Arm-steering- knuckles between at least 73 -78 along with 79-81

1973 3634920-1

1974-77 3634924-5

1978 3634924-5

79-81 4088048-9

I can parse through this some more later if you want

Red

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2283315
04/06/17 01:10 PM
04/06/17 01:10 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 655
Alberta
R
rustbuckett68 Offline
mopar
rustbuckett68  Offline
mopar
R

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 655
Alberta
My 79 van is a B-300, and my parts unit is an 81 B150. I think they changed the rating numbers in ~1980, about the same time they went from 'sportsman' to 'ram'. I suspect this is the same in the trucks as well, just a model designation change only. Seem to recollect my Hollanders saying the suspension parts are mostly the same, with some upgrades in 1978-79.

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2283357
04/06/17 02:30 PM
04/06/17 02:30 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
R
ruderunner Offline
master
ruderunner  Offline
master
R

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
Wow! Lots and lots of misinformation here. Wylie, don't change anything yet or buy anything yet till we can figure out which of the 2 suspension ratings you currently on.

Lunch is ending, I'll have to post more later...


Angry white pureblood male
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: BIGGERED] #2283781
04/07/17 07:18 AM
04/07/17 07:18 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
W
Wyle E Coyote Offline OP
member
Wyle E Coyote  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
Red: Yes! Please do. What info do you have about the A-Arms themselves? Since I want to strip everything from one donor truck, I'd think that the most important thing is if the mounts on the frame will accept the parts from the donor. This might be more involved than simple interchange listings, because it's not like I'm trying to use a newer spindle with an older arm, or something like that. Or maybe we need to look at frame measurements to see if the mounting points from 72-80 and 81-93 differed?

Rustbucket68: I felt the same way about it. Like when Ford went from F-1 to F-100 then to F-150. Just a simple change to make the vehicle sound newer.

Ruderunner: No worries, I'm not changing anything yet. This is research time only. I have several other ideas for front suspension. I'm trying to start by working with what I've got. But unfortunately, I'm not sure of what I got. And I don't want to throw good money after bad trying to remedy the situation. And as far as axle weight rating, I'm sure that the lighter one will be fine. Because just remember, I'm not planning to carry a big load, just pull one.

Everyone: At work tonight (technically last night I guess), I had a couple of thoughts.

1. Since the spindles are from an unknown car, what assurance do I really have that the A-Arms aren't also? I can't guarantee anything at this point. Maybe when I get it apart and can find some casting numbers?

2. If this gets too involved, I'll just hunt for a full chassis, or just have the yard whack it off back under the cab. Then I'll take my pick-up bed trailer and remove the hitch head and graft on the newer front onto it.

Thanks again everyone!


25 Dodge Roadster
66 D100 440/727 (on 72 D100 chassis)
67 W200 360/727
72 IH TravelAll 1110 4x4 345/727/NP205
76 Scout 2 360/727/D20
'08 Dakota SLT Quad Cab 4wd 4.7L
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2283886
04/07/17 12:24 PM
04/07/17 12:24 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
B
BIGGERED Offline
Reasonable Title
BIGGERED  Offline
Reasonable Title
B

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
Wyle E.

Why do you think the spindles are from a car? I am pretty sure front disks were a option on a D100 in 1972.

Also your topic says D200 suspension yet you mention a D100 chassis. I am assuming your hope is to upgrade from a D100 to D200. Am I correct?

Red

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: ruderunner] #2284187
04/07/17 10:37 PM
04/07/17 10:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,536
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,536
Freeport IL USA
Originally Posted By ruderunner
Wow! Lots and lots of misinformation here. Wylie, don't change anything yet or buy anything yet till we can figure out which of the 2 suspension ratings you currently on.

Lunch is ending, I'll have to post more later...


If there is so much misinformation here, I would think you should be able to offer the correct info. I and others I'm sure, are waiting for your correct information.

I will happily admit I'm wrong as soon as you (or anyone else) provide proof my info is incorrect. A 21 year period of time that happened 24 years ago can make a memory a bit fuzzy, especially when we are dealing with Dodge trucks. Gene

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2284199
04/07/17 10:47 PM
04/07/17 10:47 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
B
BIGGERED Offline
Reasonable Title
BIGGERED  Offline
Reasonable Title
B

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
^^^^ This

Red

72-73 DODGE TRK STEERING KNUCKLES.jpg72-73 DODGE TRK STEERING ARM.jpg
Last edited by BIGGERED; 04/07/17 11:22 PM.
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2284216
04/07/17 11:42 PM
04/07/17 11:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
R
ruderunner Offline
master
ruderunner  Offline
master
R

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
Sorry Poorboy, some of us work for a living....

that said , after a 16 hour day im tooo beat to get into it now. Be up at 4 am for the scoop.

Its really simple with a couple minor twists, most of whats been stated might be true but fairly irrelevant.


Angry white pureblood male
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: ruderunner] #2284226
04/08/17 12:09 AM
04/08/17 12:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,536
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,536
Freeport IL USA
Originally Posted By ruderunner
Sorry Poorboy, some of us work for a living....

that said , after a 16 hour day im tooo beat to get into it now. Be up at 4 am for the scoop.

Its really simple with a couple minor twists, most of whats been stated might be true but fairly irrelevant.


You are assuming the rest of us don't work? I'm self employed, some days I have a few minutes during the day, some days I don't. 4-5 hours of sleep is my normal.

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: BIGGERED] #2284298
04/08/17 07:38 AM
04/08/17 07:38 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
W
Wyle E Coyote Offline OP
member
Wyle E Coyote  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
Originally Posted By BIGGERED
I'm not sure how clear this is?

Red


Sorry, it's not that clear. But I really think that this is where we need to start. So could you please try that again? What I'm going to do is take those part numbers for the 72 and 73 and start looking forward. I hope to determine what years of A-Arms interchange. Also, I need to know what the numbers in the columns that are labeled 100, 200 and 300 actually mean.

Thanks! up


25 Dodge Roadster
66 D100 440/727 (on 72 D100 chassis)
67 W200 360/727
72 IH TravelAll 1110 4x4 345/727/NP205
76 Scout 2 360/727/D20
'08 Dakota SLT Quad Cab 4wd 4.7L
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2284309
04/08/17 09:30 AM
04/08/17 09:30 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,683
Des Moines IA
S
Soopernaut Offline
master
Soopernaut  Offline
master
S

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,683
Des Moines IA
Originally Posted By Wyle E Coyote
Originally Posted By BIGGERED
I'm not sure how clear this is?

Red


Sorry, it's not that clear. But I really think that this is where we need to start. So could you please try that again? What I'm going to do is take those part numbers for the 72 and 73 and start looking forward. I hope to determine what years of A-Arms interchange. Also, I need to know what the numbers in the columns that are labeled 100, 200 and 300 actually mean.

Thanks! up


The 100, 200 and 300 are for 1/2 ton, 3/4 ton and 1 ton. The numbers below are the number required on the vehicle. I can read most of the scans and there aren't as many part numbers as it appears. Make sure the 1st column has a D for 2wd truck. The B column is van parts.


1970 Dodge d100/eventually going on a 77 D100 frame
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2284322
04/08/17 10:55 AM
04/08/17 10:55 AM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
R
ruderunner Offline
master
ruderunner  Offline
master
R

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
OK feeling much better after a good nights sleep. So now heres the rest of the story...

For 72-93 D trucks and 73 up B vans there are essentially 2 front suspensions designs, light duty and heavy duty. For the sake of reference I'm going to referr to the HD as 4000# front end since that's what Dodge called it. Also I mentioned B vans and while there is a fair bit of interchangablity, there's plenty that doesn't swap. Regardless, the pattern is the same for both chassis.

Among the 2 suspension designs, there are also early and late style, biggest difference was a redesign of the steering circa 1978.

To dispell some myths, the badge on the truck is pretty much irrelevant to which suspension the truck is equipped with. Exception is that all 100,150 trucks came with the light duty front end. No need to have an axle that can suport 4000# in a vehicle with a GVW of 4500# 200/250 and 300/350 were a mixed bag though the 4000# setup was more common on the 300/350, standard with dual wheels.

The GVW sticker in the door jamb is also fairly irrelevant, factors such as tires and frame rails can impact that number. Meaning a ld front end truck can have the same FAWR as a 4000# truck. The underhood sticker if present seems to be more accurate.

Engine choice is also mostly a non factor with the exception of the Cummins trucks, all factory Cummins trucks had the 4000# axle.

So, other than these cases, how does one tell which front end you have? Basically if it's 5 lug wheels its ld. The other tick is the tie rods, ld had fairly short inner and outter tie rods with a long sleeve. In fact the inner and outter tie rods can be swapped as an assembly. Techincally the factory speced l/h threads for the inner ad r/h for the outter but it's common to find them the other way.

The 4000# axle has long inner tie rods, short outters and short sleeves, they can't be swapped end for end and on vans the inners are different drivers vs passenger side. All 4000# are 8 lug wheels, BUT not all 8 lugs are 4000#

There are some parts that can be swapped between ld and 4000#, but not much. Pitman arm and idler arms are about it, possibly strut rod bushings. Even the shocks are different lengths. That said, as complete* assemblies they can be swapped. *Complete would include the engine/suspension crossmember though most who swap from ld to 4000# simply drill out the holes for the lower control arm bushings, it's ahrder to go the other way.

I mentioned lug patterns, the ld has 3 availible: 5x4.5, 5x5.5, and 8x6.5 and most are one piece hub and rotor. The 4000# has a separte hub and rotor. As for swapability of the ld rotors, well that gets extremely murky as bearings are different and the catalogs aren't much help in discerning which is which. Bet the 8 lug ld rotors take a different spindle.

So whats this all mean to Wylie? well based on the info he's given I'm going to say he definitely has the ld front end with currently 5x4.5 lug pattern wheels. Yes the oddball disc brakes, likely car sourced (C body?) bet they're pin type calipers. That said, I wouldn't automatically call them inferior since they're car based, plenty of C bodies had GVW that rivaled pickups. That said, parts availiblity for his current setup is going to be tough and a swap to newer stuff would certainly be worthwhile. BTW the 3/4 ton rotors aren't that much bigger than the half ton parts at least in the 73 up trucks. I'd have to look them up but I believe the calipers swap between half and 3/4 and yes 74-78 C bodies. So even the 3/4 ton brakes are car based...

So for Wylie to get 8 lug rotors without a complete front end replacement he'd have to find a ld 8 lug truck and grab everything from the ball joints out. Ideally a pre 78 truck to match the steering design but he could likely just swap the steering arms to keep things happy.

A note on ball joints: the 4000# setup used the same ball joints throughout the run. The 4000# joints have larger studs. The ld used the same ball joints throughout their run with the exception of some early trucks that may have used a threaded in lower ball joint vs a pressed in. Threaded vs pressed i believe used the same size stud however.

Not yet asked but upgrading to 8 lug rears will net a huge increase in brake size, 12x2.5 or 12x3 vs his current 10" (most likely) The most practical way to upgrade the rear brakes is with a complete axle swap.

As an aside, Wylie, just how big a camper do you intend to tow? 8000-10000 pounds would be something in the 24-30 foot range. Not many vintage campers in that size range.


Angry white pureblood male
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2284330
04/08/17 11:25 AM
04/08/17 11:25 AM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
B
BIGGERED Offline
Reasonable Title
BIGGERED  Offline
Reasonable Title
B

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
Wyle E.

The numbers in the columns are QTY required per truck.

Since your chassis is a 1/2 Ton Conventional Cab Truck the Model designation is D. Model designation for vans is B.

From parts manuals I BELIEVE the following....


1972-83 (Probably beyond 83) D series 100, 200 and 300 shared the same Upper Control Arms 3492122-3


1972-83 (Probably beyond 83) D series 100 and 200 (Up through 3600# front axle) shared the same Lower Control Arms 3492860-1.
Note the lowers can change in a 200 with a HD pkg.

It also appears that 72-77 100-200 (maybe some 300) Vans shared the same lowers and 72-77 100-300 Vans appear to share the same uppers. Both B200 and D200 receieved 300 series lowers in the HD packages.

Let me know what else you need.

Anyone who notices any incorrect info please point it out to me, I will verify and amend my posts.

Thank you

Red

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2284337
04/08/17 11:34 AM
04/08/17 11:34 AM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
B
BIGGERED Offline
Reasonable Title
BIGGERED  Offline
Reasonable Title
B

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
Wyle E.

Here are sections of the parts catalog which detail bearings. If by chance your current rotors (though may be one year only) are true 72 D100 discs it appears they share some part numbers with D200 and B200-300 vans. They may not be as wimpy as they appear.

Red

72-73 DODGE TRUCK INNER WHEEL B.jpg72-73 DODGE TRUCK OUTER WHEEL B.jpg
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2284614
04/09/17 12:06 AM
04/09/17 12:06 AM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,042
colorado
S
savoy64 Offline
top fuel
savoy64  Offline
top fuel
S

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,042
colorado
after all this----here is a final---sell the 1/2 ton and buy the 3/4 ton you really want---from a friend of mine----- about my project of putting a 4 speed truck tranny where the automatic used to be----that was the project from hell.....

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: BIGGERED] #2285173
04/10/17 05:52 AM
04/10/17 05:52 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
W
Wyle E Coyote Offline OP
member
Wyle E Coyote  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
Originally Posted By BIGGERED
^^^^ This

Red
AAAHH! Much better! Thanks!


25 Dodge Roadster
66 D100 440/727 (on 72 D100 chassis)
67 W200 360/727
72 IH TravelAll 1110 4x4 345/727/NP205
76 Scout 2 360/727/D20
'08 Dakota SLT Quad Cab 4wd 4.7L
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: ruderunner] #2285174
04/10/17 06:14 AM
04/10/17 06:14 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
W
Wyle E Coyote Offline OP
member
Wyle E Coyote  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
Originally Posted By ruderunner
OK feeling much better after a good nights sleep. So now heres the rest of the story...

For 72-93 D trucks and 73 up B vans there are essentially 2 front suspensions designs, light duty and heavy duty. For the sake of reference I'm going to referr to the HD as 4000# front end since that's what Dodge called it. Also I mentioned B vans and while there is a fair bit of interchangablity, there's plenty that doesn't swap. Regardless, the pattern is the same for both chassis.

Among the 2 suspension designs, there are also early and late style, biggest difference was a redesign of the steering circa 1978.

To dispell some myths, the badge on the truck is pretty much irrelevant to which suspension the truck is equipped with. Exception is that all 100,150 trucks came with the light duty front end. No need to have an axle that can suport 4000# in a vehicle with a GVW of 4500# 200/250 and 300/350 were a mixed bag though the 4000# setup was more common on the 300/350, standard with dual wheels.

The GVW sticker in the door jamb is also fairly irrelevant, factors such as tires and frame rails can impact that number. Meaning a ld front end truck can have the same FAWR as a 4000# truck. The underhood sticker if present seems to be more accurate.

Engine choice is also mostly a non factor with the exception of the Cummins trucks, all factory Cummins trucks had the 4000# axle.

So, other than these cases, how does one tell which front end you have? Basically if it's 5 lug wheels its ld. The other tick is the tie rods, ld had fairly short inner and outter tie rods with a long sleeve. In fact the inner and outter tie rods can be swapped as an assembly. Techincally the factory speced l/h threads for the inner ad r/h for the outter but it's common to find them the other way.

The 4000# axle has long inner tie rods, short outters and short sleeves, they can't be swapped end for end and on vans the inners are different drivers vs passenger side. All 4000# are 8 lug wheels, BUT not all 8 lugs are 4000#

There are some parts that can be swapped between ld and 4000#, but not much. Pitman arm and idler arms are about it, possibly strut rod bushings. Even the shocks are different lengths. That said, as complete* assemblies they can be swapped. *Complete would include the engine/suspension crossmember though most who swap from ld to 4000# simply drill out the holes for the lower control arm bushings, it's ahrder to go the other way.

I mentioned lug patterns, the ld has 3 availible: 5x4.5, 5x5.5, and 8x6.5 and most are one piece hub and rotor. The 4000# has a separte hub and rotor. As for swapability of the ld rotors, well that gets extremely murky as bearings are different and the catalogs aren't much help in discerning which is which. Bet the 8 lug ld rotors take a different spindle.

So whats this all mean to Wylie? well based on the info he's given I'm going to say he definitely has the ld front end with currently 5x4.5 lug pattern wheels. Yes the oddball disc brakes, likely car sourced (C body?) bet they're pin type calipers. That said, I wouldn't automatically call them inferior since they're car based, plenty of C bodies had GVW that rivaled pickups. That said, parts availiblity for his current setup is going to be tough and a swap to newer stuff would certainly be worthwhile. BTW the 3/4 ton rotors aren't that much bigger than the half ton parts at least in the 73 up trucks. I'd have to look them up but I believe the calipers swap between half and 3/4 and yes 74-78 C bodies. So even the 3/4 ton brakes are car based...

So for Wylie to get 8 lug rotors without a complete front end replacement he'd have to find a ld 8 lug truck and grab everything from the ball joints out. Ideally a pre 78 truck to match the steering design but he could likely just swap the steering arms to keep things happy.

A note on ball joints: the 4000# setup used the same ball joints throughout the run. The 4000# joints have larger studs. The ld used the same ball joints throughout their run with the exception of some early trucks that may have used a threaded in lower ball joint vs a pressed in. Threaded vs pressed i believe used the same size stud however.

Not yet asked but upgrading to 8 lug rears will net a huge increase in brake size, 12x2.5 or 12x3 vs his current 10" (most likely) The most practical way to upgrade the rear brakes is with a complete axle swap.

As an aside, Wylie, just how big a camper do you intend to tow? 8000-10000 pounds would be something in the 24-30 foot range. Not many vintage campers in that size range.


Now we're getting somewhere! cool

To answer your aside question first, I threw that number out there for reference. Mainly to show that I'm not always playing with light stuff. For example, I have access to a stout 7 1/2 x 18' flatbed trailer that I can haul anything I want on it, including cars. Dry empty weight on this is 3500# alone! Throw a full size pickup on there and 8K isn't so unrealistic. I know that the vintage trailers don't weight that much, but I want to be prepared for most anything, within reason. If it gets about 10K, I have access to bigger equipment that will have no trouble moving it.

So as far as the rear end goes, swapping to an 8 lug rear is exactly what I'd planned. I'm frankly tired of going through axle bearings, or wondering if they're stout enough to handle what I'm doing at the time.

Thanks again for all of this great info. Lots to study. up


25 Dodge Roadster
66 D100 440/727 (on 72 D100 chassis)
67 W200 360/727
72 IH TravelAll 1110 4x4 345/727/NP205
76 Scout 2 360/727/D20
'08 Dakota SLT Quad Cab 4wd 4.7L
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: BIGGERED] #2285175
04/10/17 06:20 AM
04/10/17 06:20 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
W
Wyle E Coyote Offline OP
member
Wyle E Coyote  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
Originally Posted By BIGGERED
Wyle E.

The numbers in the columns are QTY required per truck.

Since your chassis is a 1/2 Ton Conventional Cab Truck the Model designation is D. Model designation for vans is B.

From parts manuals I BELIEVE the following....


1972-83 (Probably beyond 83) D series 100, 200 and 300 shared the same Upper Control Arms 3492122-3


1972-83 (Probably beyond 83) D series 100 and 200 (Up through 3600# front axle) shared the same Lower Control Arms 3492860-1.
Note the lowers can change in a 200 with a HD pkg.

It also appears that 72-77 100-200 (maybe some 300) Vans shared the same lowers and 72-77 100-300 Vans appear to share the same uppers. Both B200 and D200 received 300 series lowers in the HD packages.

Let me know what else you need.

Anyone who notices any incorrect info please point it out to me, I will verify and amend my posts.

Thank you

Red



Thanks Red! smoke It was mentioned in another post about how in 1979 there were steering geometry changes. Any thoughts on that?


25 Dodge Roadster
66 D100 440/727 (on 72 D100 chassis)
67 W200 360/727
72 IH TravelAll 1110 4x4 345/727/NP205
76 Scout 2 360/727/D20
'08 Dakota SLT Quad Cab 4wd 4.7L
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2285416
04/10/17 07:23 PM
04/10/17 07:23 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
B
BIGGERED Offline
Reasonable Title
BIGGERED  Offline
Reasonable Title
B

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
Originally Posted By Wyle E Coyote
[quote



Thanks Red! smoke It was mentioned in another post about how in 1979 there were steering geometry changes. Any thoughts on that? [/quote]


There are differences in the Arm-steering- knuckles between at least 73 -78 along with 79-81

1973 3634920-1

1974-77 3634924-5

1978 3634924-5

79-81 4088048-9



Red

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: BIGGERED] #2286270
04/12/17 08:06 AM
04/12/17 08:06 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
W
Wyle E Coyote Offline OP
member
Wyle E Coyote  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
Originally Posted By BIGGERED
Wyle E.

The numbers in the columns are QTY required per truck.

Since your chassis is a 1/2 Ton Conventional Cab Truck the Model designation is D. Model designation for vans is B.

From parts manuals I BELIEVE the following....


1972-83 (Probably beyond 83) D series 100, 200 and 300 shared the same Upper Control Arms 3492122-3


1972-83 (Probably beyond 83) D series 100 and 200 (Up through 3600# front axle) shared the same Lower Control Arms 3492860-1.
Note the lowers can change in a 200 with a HD pkg.

It also appears that 72-77 100-200 (maybe some 300) Vans shared the same lowers and 72-77 100-300 Vans appear to share the same uppers. Both B200 and D200 receieved 300 series lowers in the HD packages.

Let me know what else you need.

Anyone who notices any incorrect info please point it out to me, I will verify and amend my posts.

Thank you

Red


Ok, so after studying what Red and RudeRunner have posted, this is what I have determined: I'm going to look for the complete suspesnion from a Pre-83 truck. Since the A-arms are the same part number, they should bolt up. And since I don't want to change the crossmember, I should stick with those years. Plan B is if I stumble upon a complete chassis that I roll it on the trailer complete, or at least the front clip. Then I turn my Pickup bed trailer back into a regular truck with a frame graft. grin

Thanks again! cool up


25 Dodge Roadster
66 D100 440/727 (on 72 D100 chassis)
67 W200 360/727
72 IH TravelAll 1110 4x4 345/727/NP205
76 Scout 2 360/727/D20
'08 Dakota SLT Quad Cab 4wd 4.7L
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2286304
04/12/17 10:54 AM
04/12/17 10:54 AM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
R
ruderunner Offline
master
ruderunner  Offline
master
R

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
Wylie, I don't think you need to worry about a frame graft or even swapping control armsUnless you want to upgrade to the full on 4000# front end.

Most 3/4 ton pickups use the LD front end and most if not all are 8 lug. From what I know, you should be able to find one and just grab the knuckles/spindles and brakes and swap them right to your truck. I'd stick to a pre 78 donor just because I'm not sure of what/why the steering was changed then. Just pop the ball joint studs and tie rod studs and grab what falls on your toes.

Red, do you know if any of those steering arm numbers are supercessions of previous ones? Or do your catalogs not have that info?


Angry white pureblood male
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: ruderunner] #2287082
04/13/17 03:18 PM
04/13/17 03:18 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
W
Wyle E Coyote Offline OP
member
Wyle E Coyote  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
Originally Posted By ruderunner
Wylie, I don't think you need to worry about a frame graft or even swapping control armsUnless you want to upgrade to the full on 4000# front end.

Most 3/4 ton pickups use the LD front end and most if not all are 8 lug. From what I know, you should be able to find one and just grab the knuckles/spindles and brakes and swap them right to your truck. I'd stick to a pre 78 donor just because I'm not sure of what/why the steering was changed then. Just pop the ball joint studs and tie rod studs and grab what falls on your toes.

Red, do you know if any of those steering arm numbers are supercessions of previous ones? Or do your catalogs not have that info?


I'm not concerned about whether I have the 4000# front end or not, but I'll be sure to verify that before I get my tools out. There still seems to be plenty of older iron around me that I don't think it will be too hard to find. Especially since I can get these from a van also.

Thanks again everyone for the good discussion! cool up


25 Dodge Roadster
66 D100 440/727 (on 72 D100 chassis)
67 W200 360/727
72 IH TravelAll 1110 4x4 345/727/NP205
76 Scout 2 360/727/D20
'08 Dakota SLT Quad Cab 4wd 4.7L
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: ruderunner] #2287316
04/13/17 10:42 PM
04/13/17 10:42 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
B
BIGGERED Offline
Reasonable Title
BIGGERED  Offline
Reasonable Title
B

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
Originally Posted By ruderunner


Red, do you know if any of those steering arm numbers are supercessions of previous ones? Or do your catalogs not have that info?


The only supercessions in the books are handwritten in. I was trying to get a friend who's a FCA parts guy to look further but they are buried at work. I'm not even sure if dealers have this info any more?

I was expecting googling the appropriate part numbers to get superseded info but I did not find a lot of discussion / reference myself.

Red

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2288073
04/15/17 07:56 AM
04/15/17 07:56 AM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
R
ruderunner Offline
master
ruderunner  Offline
master
R

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
Originally Posted By Wyle E Coyote
Originally Posted By ruderunner
Wylie, I don't think you need to worry about a frame graft or even swapping control armsUnless you want to upgrade to the full on 4000# front end.

Most 3/4 ton pickups use the LD front end and most if not all are 8 lug. From what I know, you should be able to find one and just grab the knuckles/spindles and brakes and swap them right to your truck. I'd stick to a pre 78 donor just because I'm not sure of what/why the steering was changed then. Just pop the ball joint studs and tie rod studs and grab what falls on your toes.

Red, do you know if any of those steering arm numbers are supercessions of previous ones? Or do your catalogs not have that info?


I'm not concerned about whether I have the 4000# front end or not, but I'll be sure to verify that before I get my tools out. There still seems to be plenty of older iron around me that I don't think it will be too hard to find. Especially since I can get these from a van also.

Thanks again everyone for the good discussion! cool up


I agree that for your intended use you don't need the 4000# front end setup, but you do need to make sure the donor truck is a non 4000# setup. Otherwise you are looking at swapping arms and at least modifying the crossmember. Yes van spindles work, but double check the steering arm numbers.

Note, finding a pickup donor is better as you can grab the rear axle too. Van axles don't swap straight in, the spring spacing is different and iirc the whole thing is wider.


Angry white pureblood male
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: ruderunner] #2289898
04/18/17 07:11 AM
04/18/17 07:11 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
W
Wyle E Coyote Offline OP
member
Wyle E Coyote  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 96
Nampa, Idaho
Originally Posted By ruderunner
Originally Posted By Wyle E Coyote
Originally Posted By ruderunner
Wylie, I don't think you need to worry about a frame graft or even swapping control armsUnless you want to upgrade to the full on 4000# front end.

Most 3/4 ton pickups use the LD front end and most if not all are 8 lug. From what I know, you should be able to find one and just grab the knuckles/spindles and brakes and swap them right to your truck. I'd stick to a pre 78 donor just because I'm not sure of what/why the steering was changed then. Just pop the ball joint studs and tie rod studs and grab what falls on your toes.

Red, do you know if any of those steering arm numbers are supercessions of previous ones? Or do your catalogs not have that info?


I'm not concerned about whether I have the 4000# front end or not, but I'll be sure to verify that before I get my tools out. There still seems to be plenty of older iron around me that I don't think it will be too hard to find. Especially since I can get these from a van also.

Thanks again everyone for the good discussion! cool up


I agree that for your intended use you don't need the 4000# front end setup, but you do need to make sure the donor truck is a non 4000# setup. Otherwise you are looking at swapping arms and at least modifying the crossmember. Yes van spindles work, but double check the steering arm numbers.

Note, finding a pickup donor is better as you can grab the rear axle too. Van axles don't swap straight in, the spring spacing is different and iirc the whole thing is wider.


Yeah, I will double check. The online used part locators all seem to list a 3300# and a 3800# axle, of which I'm obviously going with the lighter one. I have considered the van set-up because I know that the lower control arms have a pocket in them for the coil spring. And that was a low buck way to drop the front end down on these trucks, before anyone made new spindles. But I'll have to be careful because it seems that there's not as many vans in the yards near me, as there are old class C motorhomes. And I'd suspect that even the shortest of those would be the stronger axle.

If my memory serves, the van rear axles are not just the wrong spring perch spacing, but I believe they're slightly offset to the right. But there is at least one place locally that seems to have everything on one truck. I might have to just go look at it and see if I can get the rolling chassis for about the same price.


25 Dodge Roadster
66 D100 440/727 (on 72 D100 chassis)
67 W200 360/727
72 IH TravelAll 1110 4x4 345/727/NP205
76 Scout 2 360/727/D20
'08 Dakota SLT Quad Cab 4wd 4.7L
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #2290154
04/18/17 06:27 PM
04/18/17 06:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 774
Midland,Tx
wyldebill Offline
super stock
wyldebill  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 774
Midland,Tx
I have a little bit to add. The nomenclature of 100 150 200 250, were not available in the same years. 100, 200, 300 were altogether. Likewise 150,250,350. 1972 likely has the 2 piece rotor with pin type caliber. 1973 went to uni-cast. The absolute easiest way to tell whether ld or HD is to look at the lower control arm. If it has a large pocket for the coil, it is a hd. If the spring sits on top (like your current lower) it's a ld. Ld whether 100 or 200, uses the same ball joint. One of the biggest upgrades that you can make is finding a sway bar, especially if you can find one on a 300 or 350. I would stay away from jy coil springs. All the big parts stores can get you a new set at a reasonable price.

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: ruderunner] #2290183
04/18/17 07:28 PM
04/18/17 07:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,886
Lost and Spaced
B
bboogieart Offline
master
bboogieart  Offline
master
B

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,886
Lost and Spaced
Originally Posted By ruderunner
Van axles don't swap straight in, the spring spacing is different and iirc the whole thing is wider.

Also, the center is off set because the motor sits closer to the passenger side.


I have mechanical Aptitude.
I can screw up anything.
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: wyldebill] #2290648
04/19/17 06:02 PM
04/19/17 06:02 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,683
Des Moines IA
S
Soopernaut Offline
master
Soopernaut  Offline
master
S

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,683
Des Moines IA
Originally Posted By wyldebill
I have a little bit to add. The nomenclature of 100 150 200 250, were not available in the same years. 100, 200, 300 were altogether. Likewise 150,250,350.


The D150 came out in 77. The D100 didn't end until 1989 but there were a few years in between that didn't have a D100.


1970 Dodge d100/eventually going on a 77 D100 frame
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Wyle E Coyote] #3154722
06/27/23 03:56 PM
06/27/23 03:56 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 229
iowa
W
weinerboy1 Offline
enthusiast
weinerboy1  Offline
enthusiast
W

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 229
iowa
Are the steering knuckles the same between a d200 and d300? Is the width different between a srw and drw dana? Thanks.

Last edited by weinerboy1; 06/27/23 03:57 PM.
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: Soopernaut] #3154735
06/27/23 05:22 PM
06/27/23 05:22 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,104
Byron, NY
W.I.N. Racing Offline
top fuel
W.I.N. Racing  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,104
Byron, NY
Originally Posted by Soopernaut
Originally Posted by wyldebill
I have a little bit to add. The nomenclature of 100 150 200 250, were not available in the same years. 100, 200, 300 were altogether. Likewise 150,250,350.


The D150 came out in 77. The D100 didn't end until 1989 but there were a few years in between that didn't have a D100.

100's = 1/4 ton
150's = 1/2 ton
200/250's =3/4 ton
300/350's = 1 ton
Lots of details missing but that was the general idea of it.


'01 P1500, Blown/Inj BAE,/Veney ,Bruno/CS2,Dana 60
'01 Dodge 3500 S Cummins Auto, Fresh air kit, 4" Exhaust,
'05 Dodge Magnum R/T - Too Much to list
'60 Willys CJ5
'01 International LPX - Project,DT466, Allison
'64 Plymouth Valiant, Inj 528 Hemi, 2spd
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: weinerboy1] #3154749
06/27/23 06:24 PM
06/27/23 06:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
R
ruderunner Offline
master
ruderunner  Offline
master
R

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
Originally Posted by weinerboy1
Are the steering knuckles the same between a d200 and d300? Is the width different between a srw and drw dana? Thanks.


Knuckles Depends on axle weight rating. Rear axle depend on srw, pickup drw or cab and chassis drw.


Angry white pureblood male
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: ruderunner] #3155257
06/29/23 01:54 PM
06/29/23 01:54 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,336
north of coder
moparx Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"
moparx  Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,336
north of coder
in my junkyard ownership days, the D100 was a 1/2 ton, and the D150 was considered a "heavy 1/2 ton".
the 1/4 ton pickups were the imported "little" pickups.
beer

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: moparx] #3155344
06/29/23 06:37 PM
06/29/23 06:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,536
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,536
Freeport IL USA
Originally Posted by moparx
in my junkyard ownership days, the D100 was a 1/2 ton, and the D150 was considered a "heavy 1/2 ton".
the 1/4 ton pickups were the imported "little" pickups.
beer


That was always the way the trucks were referred to at the local Dodge dealers as well. Even a Dakota short beds were called 1/2 ton pickups

I believe the Imported long bed D 50 was considered a 1/2 ton as well. I think the Mitsubishi pickup (the D 50) was the only long bed imported small truck offered in the USA. Otherwise, all the import small, short bed trucks were considered as 1/4 ton pickups.

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: poorboy] #3156360
07/02/23 10:21 PM
07/02/23 10:21 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,151
Cruising!
Q
QuickDodge Offline
super stock
QuickDodge  Offline
super stock
Q

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,151
Cruising!
One other point to consider is the frame size. Some of the 1/2 ton trucks in the 1980's had thinner gauge frame rails. The 4x4 trucks and some of the heavier duty 2 wheel drive 1/2 tons had frames that were the same size as the light duty 3/4 ton trucks. There was also a difference in the width of the frames. I think the 1/2 ton trucks typically had 6 inch frames. These could be either the thinner or thicker gauge metal. The heavier duty 3/4 and 1 tons had 7 or 8 inch frames. The longer wheelbase frames were often made of the larger size also.

Personal opinion: If you are going to do a frame swap, use one of the heavier duty frames. It will come with the stronger suspension parts, etc. It seems like the heavier duty trucks may have also used the Dana 70 rear axle. I believe it was Gene who suggested considering a newer frame. That is probably a good idea. Make sure it is safe to cut or weld the newer frame. (Assuming it need to be modified to fit under the older truck.) I've heard some of these newer frames (Hydro-formed type??) can not be welded like the old frames. I don't know what year that started though. (I'm not even sure if Dodge made such frames of it it was some other manufacturer.)

If you will be towing close to a 10,000 lb. trailer, you need a real stout truck. I made the mistake once of pulling a load that size with a light duty 3/4 ton truck. It was originally a 360 powered truck, but a 318 had been swapped into it at some point. The truck had 4.10 gears with a 4 speed. I had to pull that heavy trailer up a long steep grade. Near the top of the hill, it was real questionable whether it would have enough power to make it up the hill. You do NOT want to find yourself in that situation!!!! If you are going to tow that much weight, have a truck that is capable of handling the load.

By the way, I LOVE the idea of using an older truck to tow a vintage camper. I've wanted to do that as well. Unfortunately, there are other priorities in my life currently.

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: QuickDodge] #3156418
07/03/23 08:05 AM
07/03/23 08:05 AM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
R
ruderunner Offline
master
ruderunner  Offline
master
R

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
Now that 6 years has gone by, Wylie has probably moved on.

But, frame size and strength is worth discussing and is just as confusing. The 3 sizes are 6, 7 or 8 inch height, with various thickness.

Best I've been able to determine, 6 inch was used up to 7700 gvw, 7 inch above 8000. The 8 inch got common with the diesel trucks but there's minimal correlation to engine. Rumor is that lots of club cab gas trucks had 8 inch.

I've worked on an 89 W250 Cummins with a 6 inch frame, had an 89 W350 cab and chassis gas 10k gvw with a 7 inch, a 77 W200 8k 7 inch and a 92 D250 Cummins 8500gvw and an 8 inch frame. Other trucks I've owned were under 8000gvw and 6 inch.

The 92 Cummins is odd, it's got the heaviest frame but a lighter rear axle and no overloads compared with the 89 cc. The 92 window sticker does call out an 8500 gvw package which might be the frame upgrade.


Angry white pureblood male
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: ruderunner] #3156747
07/03/23 10:35 PM
07/03/23 10:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,536
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,536
Freeport IL USA
I worked with a lot of Dodge trucks over the years. I have real life experiences.

The 72 new design was updated in 73, and much of the stuff from the 72 and the 73 did not interchange. This always showed up when you started looking for replacement parts. The 72 model year is often listed alone, and then the other siting start at 1973.

Things were pretty decent in the time from 73 up to about mid way through 76. Chrysler was facing hard financial times by mid 76. What ever parts were on hand were used to send the trucks out the doors. That story didn't really change until the 94 new truck design.

Dodge always told you specific trucks had specific parts, That was probably the goal, and I'm sure for the most part was true, but the hard truth was, it was not always true. From about 1980 on, I was buying, selling, scrapping, and building Mopar cars and trucks. I learned very early, you had to look at each specific truck to actually see what Dodge shipped it with, or what someone swapped into it. That was the real life experience.

Now, here we are all these years later and some guys are telling the world that every Dodge 150, 250, or 350 came with specific parts because some book said so. That was not true back then, and it sure doesn't apply now that all these years have passed, and guys have installed what ever they could get their hands on to keep the trucks on the road.

The book guys can keep living in fantasy land, I'll keep living in the real world. The parts under your 1973-1993 Dodge truck may be anything Dodge had on hand at the time it was built, or what ever parts some previous owner installed to keep it functioning.

When you get past the D 350s and into big trucks, things really got twisted, and motor home chassis is a whole new world.

When it comes to Chrysler, the historic events and production timing have a tremendous impact on each other. Chrysler has always been a company with a wide swing of financial position, between very well off to going broke, or somewhere in between. Those financial pictures of times also had a huge impact on production. To discount the financial position Chrysler was in at any given time would be a serious error.

Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: poorboy] #3156795
07/04/23 08:39 AM
07/04/23 08:39 AM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
R
ruderunner Offline
master
ruderunner  Offline
master
R

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,764
ohio
Yep, things were quite random and you have to look to know what you have.


Angry white pureblood male
Re: 72-93 D200 front suspension questions [Re: ruderunner] #3157893
07/07/23 08:48 PM
07/07/23 08:48 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,626
in a cattle trailer down by th...
G
Guitar Jones Online laugh2
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
Guitar Jones  Online laugh2
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
G

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,626
in a cattle trailer down by th...
Well the FSM does list frame specs for different trucks by GVW, wheelbase etc. If you have that information you can measure the frame(s) you have to know what it was supposed to be for. Because in addition to the main frame height there is metal gauge and flange width as well. Probably more but I don't have a book in front of me.


"Follow me the wise man said, but he walked behind"


'92 D250 Club Cab CTD, 47RH conversion, pump tweaks, injectors, rear disc and hydroboost conversion.
'74 W200 Crew Cab 360, NV4500, D44, D60 and NP205 divorced transfer case. Rear disc and hydroboost coming soon!
2019 1500 Long Horn Crew Cab 4WD, 5.7 Hemi.
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1