Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Medium Duty Trucks #2205957
12/01/16 05:30 PM
12/01/16 05:30 PM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 760
Canada
C
CTD5.9 Offline OP
super stock
CTD5.9  Offline OP
super stock
C

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 760
Canada
Do any of you have any experience with medium duty trucks? I am giving up my goal of an old dodge hauler, mainly because I can't find an older crew cab.

So this weekend I am going to take a look at 3 trucks, I have done some research but you always just seem to find the bad/terrible.

The trucks I am looking at are:

Freightliner - 8.3 cummins(manual pump) eaton 9 speed
International - DT466 6 speed manual
Freightliner - 3126 Cat 6 speed manual

All of them have the GCVW I need and crew cabs, just not sure about the engine combo's and what is the most reliable.

Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: CTD5.9] #2206067
12/01/16 09:00 PM
12/01/16 09:00 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1 Offline
Too Many Posts
Challenger 1  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
I own a small fleet of med duty trucks since 1983. What year trucks are you looking at?

Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: CTD5.9] #2206070
12/01/16 09:07 PM
12/01/16 09:07 PM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 760
Canada
C
CTD5.9 Offline OP
super stock
CTD5.9  Offline OP
super stock
C

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 760
Canada
The freightliner with the 8.3 is a 95, the other 2 are 99's. All of them are between 185k-200k miles, and in my price range. They will only be used for 2000ish miles a year hauling trucks to mud bogs.

Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: CTD5.9] #2206130
12/01/16 10:56 PM
12/01/16 10:56 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1 Offline
Too Many Posts
Challenger 1  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Go with the freightliner and the 8.3 and the nine speed for sure. 95 is a good year imo.

I owned a 97 Kenworth with a 8.3 and a roadranger 9 speed....great truck...freightliner liners are real close to Kenworth imo.

I currently own 4 freightliners, 4 internationals and just sold 2
Internationals cab chassis last week. switching over to all freightliners,
Kenworth.
Also have 5 f350 450 550 fords.


The DT 466 used to be the best deal going as we had 12 internationals at one point in the late 70-80s The mid to late 90s the internationals trucks went way downhill.the 2000 models are terrible. I owned a 2003 and 2-2004 4400 internationals and were terrible all three trucks. Still have one left and I hope replace it next year.

8.3 motor is a good one.

I just bought a new freightliner with the 8.3 rated at 300hp with a real 2 stage jakebrake (not a exhaust brake)and auto trans Allison .

Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: Challenger 1] #2206162
12/01/16 11:26 PM
12/01/16 11:26 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1 Offline
Too Many Posts
Challenger 1  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
I have owned this FL112 since 2002, used to pull a 51' mini semi. Then I used it to pull a 49' mini semi race trailer. Now for the last 7 years we use it for vacations as it is fully equipped .We live in it up to 2 weeks. C-12 Cat motor making 505hp Allison double overdrive 2stage jake air ride long wheelbase wonderful handling RV rig with big power and awesome mpg with overdrive.

I looked like you did for years to build my own, found this custom rig 4 months old and motrtgaged my house to get it. Been worth it big time and now I own it free and clear for a few years now. [img]http://http[/img]

Last edited by Challenger 1; 12/01/16 11:45 PM.
Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: CTD5.9] #2206192
12/02/16 12:02 AM
12/02/16 12:02 AM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 760
Canada
C
CTD5.9 Offline OP
super stock
CTD5.9  Offline OP
super stock
C

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 760
Canada
Thanks! I will definitely look at that one close. The only thing I don't like is it has more of an extended cab with the back seats facing each other and the others are crew with actual doors. But I'm pretty sure my kids will be fine back there for a few years, its bigger then a dodge truck with those same seats.

Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: CTD5.9] #2206212
12/02/16 12:27 AM
12/02/16 12:27 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1 Offline
Too Many Posts
Challenger 1  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
The 9 speed is much nicer to drive than either of the 6 speeds because the 9 speed is not synchronized. I owned a 93 DT466 with a 10 speed Eaton for about 15 years and about 750k miles was a good truck. Nothing like the Kenworth we had at the time.

Last edited by Challenger 1; 12/02/16 12:43 AM.
Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: CTD5.9] #2206230
12/02/16 12:52 AM
12/02/16 12:52 AM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 760
Canada
C
CTD5.9 Offline OP
super stock
CTD5.9  Offline OP
super stock
C

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 760
Canada
The only issue with the 9 speed truck for me is air brakes, and really it just means I can't have a few beverages with my buddies after the mud bog and have my wife drive it home. Unless I convince her to get her air endorsement

Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: CTD5.9] #2206234
12/02/16 12:57 AM
12/02/16 12:57 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1 Offline
Too Many Posts
Challenger 1  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally Posted By rednuck
The only issue with the 9 speed truck for me is air brakes, and really it just means I can't have a few beverages with my buddies after the mud bog and have my wife drive it home. Unless I convince her to get her air endorsement


If it is for personal use, then no CDL needed. Believe me you want air brakes! They are a must!!!

Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: Challenger 1] #2206245
12/02/16 01:14 AM
12/02/16 01:14 AM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 760
Canada
C
CTD5.9 Offline OP
super stock
CTD5.9  Offline OP
super stock
C

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 760
Canada
Originally Posted By Challenger 1
If it is for personal use, then no CDL needed. Believe me you want air brakes! They are a must!!!


Our licensing requirements are a bit different in Canada, but air is just a simple written test. The single axle trucks land under our normal license even if it was for a job.

Plus mine will be under my farm, a few other laws are relaxed...like no more mandatory inspections.

Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: CTD5.9] #2206907
12/03/16 01:03 PM
12/03/16 01:03 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1 Offline
Too Many Posts
Challenger 1  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
I have been maintaining med duty trucks since the 80s. Here's one example of why I think Navistar trucks are junk now a days. Not to mention the oil leaky engine with it's hi pressure oil pump that does not last. 800 bucks for a hi pressure oil pump to fire the injectors and cause leaks.

This is a 2004 4400 that I have owned since new. Early on the window regulator stripped out, driver would have to help it past the stripped area until it did not work at all. I bought a new regulator/door lock assembly from the dealer and installed it years ago. It cost 550 bucks...the assembly, can't just buy the regulator by it's self on this model truck. It lasted only a few years like the original did.

I removed a good one from a used cab chassis that I sold last week to install in this truck before I sold it. I installed it again last night. It is a PIA taking the door apart to install it, not a easy deal at all. The outside door handle/lock and latch all have to be removed to install it.

Here's what it looks like out of the truck.

I have older Navistar trucks that the window regulators lasted forever. These trucks have plastic gears on the regulators...total junk. Lucky this regulator was free out of my old truck I sold. The buyer will have to find a used one which are hard to find since they don't hold up and like I said new ones are 500+ bucks!

Things like this make the late model Internationals junky,expensive and a PIA to own. IMO



Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: Challenger 1] #2206910
12/03/16 01:06 PM
12/03/16 01:06 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1 Offline
Too Many Posts
Challenger 1  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
All these late model internationals have required new steering columns because a bearing goes out. Steering columns are 1000 bucks.

Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: CTD5.9] #2207026
12/03/16 04:45 PM
12/03/16 04:45 PM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 760
Canada
C
CTD5.9 Offline OP
super stock
CTD5.9  Offline OP
super stock
C

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 760
Canada
Interesting I went and looked at the international and 2 of the windows wouldn't roll down. The interior was pretty trashed, lots of broken switches. It was also a railway truck and I wouldn't want to deal with the extra 2 feet of frame sticking out the front. Off to look at the freightliners this afternoon.

Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: Challenger 1] #2207027
12/03/16 04:47 PM
12/03/16 04:47 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,974
new jersey usa
1
11secdart Offline
master
11secdart  Offline
master
1

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,974
new jersey usa
My company has two Internationals, a 2007 Tractor bought used, and a 2010 bought new with used 24 ft box and lift gate both have been very troublesome and the local dealer takes forever to get any repairs done. IF I had known how bad the Internationals were i would have tried harder to talk the company owners into a Freightliner instead. I drive the box truck a lot and it rides rough compared to the Freightliners we have rented because the International was in the shop. What i find odd is that the truck being an automatic has no Park, when parking you put it in neutral and apply the air parking brake.

IMG_0910.jpg

68 Dart 410 / 904
92 D150 original owner
21 Ram 1500 Quad Cab, Big Horn , Hemi ,4x4
23 Audi Q5
16 Honda HRV
Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: CTD5.9] #2207159
12/03/16 09:12 PM
12/03/16 09:12 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1 Offline
Too Many Posts
Challenger 1  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally Posted By rednuck
Interesting I went and looked at the international and 2 of the windows wouldn't roll down. The interior was pretty trashed, lots of broken switches. It was also a railway truck and I wouldn't want to deal with the extra 2 feet of frame sticking out the front. Off to look at the freightliners this afternoon.


They might have been electric, the windows. If so then motors and actuators are cheap and readily available.

Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: 11secdart] #2207219
12/03/16 10:18 PM
12/03/16 10:18 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1 Offline
Too Many Posts
Challenger 1  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally Posted By 11secdart
My company has two Internationals, a 2007 Tractor bought used, and a 2010 bought new with used 24 ft box and lift gate both have been very troublesome and the local dealer takes forever to get any repairs done. IF I had known how bad the Internationals were i would have tried harder to talk the company owners into a Freightliner instead. I drive the box truck a lot and it rides rough compared to the Freightliners we have rented because the International was in the shop. What i find odd is that the truck being an automatic has no Park, when parking you put it in neutral and apply the air parking brake.


No park huh? biggrin
A Spring parking brake is the strongest parking brake, stronger than if you tried to do it in the trans.
That is what you have when you release the air when parking.
Our 2002 frieghtliner Fl112 has a auto trans, put your foot on the brake and stab D for drive and off you go. Anyone can drive it. I had 2 race crew members and my wife has driven our rig, mainly because of the auto trans.

Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: Challenger 1] #2207256
12/03/16 10:52 PM
12/03/16 10:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,974
new jersey usa
1
11secdart Offline
master
11secdart  Offline
master
1

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,974
new jersey usa
I`ve seen pics of your truck on here, nice rig. I`ve always liked those.


68 Dart 410 / 904
92 D150 original owner
21 Ram 1500 Quad Cab, Big Horn , Hemi ,4x4
23 Audi Q5
16 Honda HRV
Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: Challenger 1] #2207793
12/04/16 09:32 PM
12/04/16 09:32 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,151
Cruising!
Q
QuickDodge Offline
super stock
QuickDodge  Offline
super stock
Q

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,151
Cruising!
Originally Posted By Challenger 1
The 9 speed is much nicer to drive than either of the 6 speeds because the 9 speed is not synchronized.



Challenger, could you explain why the transmission without synchronizers is easier to drive?

Thanks for the info on the International trucks. I know a guy who is an International fan, but he quit driving 20 years ago. I had no idea their quality had gone down hill since then.

Last edited by QuickDodge; 12/04/16 09:35 PM.
Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: QuickDodge] #2207961
12/05/16 01:50 AM
12/05/16 01:50 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,512
Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
Rhinodart Offline
Rhinotruck
Rhinodart  Offline
Rhinotruck

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,512
Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
I have driven Eaton-Fuller 9 speeds for years, once you get used to them they ARE easy to drive, not clunky crapola like the G56 6-speed Mercedes piece of dung in the later Cummins Rams. tsk I didn't much like the NV4500 and NV5600's either, and they didn't like me. To this date I have never broken a 9-speed, yet... luck


The funny thing about science is that if you change one miniscule parameter you change the entire outcome to the way you want it.

JB Rhinehart, Realist

A-Body's RULE!
Re: Medium Duty Trucks [Re: QuickDodge] #2208496
12/06/16 01:10 AM
12/06/16 01:10 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1 Offline
Too Many Posts
Challenger 1  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally Posted By QuickDodge
Originally Posted By Challenger 1
The 9 speed is much nicer to drive than either of the 6 speeds because the 9 speed is not synchronized.



Challenger, could you explain why the transmission without synchronizers is easier to drive?

Thanks for the info on the International trucks. I know a guy who is an International fan, but he quit driving 20 years ago. I had no idea their quality had gone down hill since then.


Sure,

A non synchronized trans takes more skill to use, but once your one with the truck then it is easier to shift as you don't have sychros fighting you when you shift and you don't use the clutch until you stop or start.

A synchronized trans can be driven without the clutch also, there is more friction/resistance when you shift unless you shift just at right RPMs. . But the sychros fighting you kind of sucks without a bit of clutch.

Once I learned to drive our first 9 speed then I could drive any tranny without the clutch

Double clutching...ever heard of the that? That is how you shift a non synchronized trans until you learn to drive without the clutch. I have taught 4 guys over the years to drive my 9 and 10 speeds when we had them. Now we have all auto trans except for one truck. Makes it much easier to drive a truck all day especially in the city with autos.

Today I replaced PTO U joints on a tanker and then changed 6 tires on another tanker truck all after lunch. I worked in the office until noon and then did 2 sales calls and was in the garage by 2 PM. Just got home at 9:30PM. Filling that tire with air, takes like 4-5 minutes to air them up to 110PSI.

Truck sat outside because my shop is small. I had trouble getting the inner wheels off the hub from rust. Truck is only 1 year old. I had to set it down on the ground to break the inner wheels off on both sides. Big PIA but I got them off.


Got more tires to mount tomorrow, had 2 trucks that needed them and I waited until snow was in the forecast to get as much mileage out of the tires as possible.


Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1