Re: larger cars and basic handling
[Re: Sweet5ltr]
#2174907
10/14/16 10:59 PM
10/14/16 10:59 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493 Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog
Striving for excellence
|
Striving for excellence
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
|
Your dart looks great, but I'm surprised you weren't cast out of your local mopar club for running modern wheels instead of rallyes or steelies! Blaspheme! No kidding. I have heard remarks from a couple of fossilized members in our Sacramento club.
|
|
|
Re: larger cars and basic handling
[Re: Kern Dog]
#2175406
10/15/16 07:37 PM
10/15/16 07:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,344 Central TX
roe
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,344
Central TX
|
There were quite a few cars with 16" wheels. Should be able to find a decent tire to work for him. For what he wants to do he doesn't need a low profile tire, just a good radial with the sidewall he likes. He wants a cruiser for the daily highway commute that responds when he steers. A little bigger on the torsion bars, good factory type shocks (no need for high $$ stuff) front and rear sway bars, rims and tires of his liking, moog offset UCA bushings, and a firm feel box and he will have exactly what he wants, a well handling and responsive cruiser. I would recommend at least 10.89 discs over drums but 11.75 would be better if not already on the ride he picks. He won't be on road courses, just normal driving. He would be more than happy with what I outlined I would think. I am no expert but that what it sounds like.
1971 Plymouth Satellite 408/904 8 3/4 3.23 SG
|
|
|
Re: larger cars and basic handling
[Re: RMCHRGR]
#2175426
10/15/16 08:07 PM
10/15/16 08:07 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,042 colorado
savoy64
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,042
colorado
|
when my son bought his new challenger he got a ride on a chrysler test track---he went down to louisiana and got to drive the srt challenger/jeep and the chrysler 300----he drove down in his new car and told me he really took a pounding from the suspension----he said he broke the lap record of the chrysler driver which kind of PO'd him----he said the 300 had great speed and was very competent on the track even with a soft suspension---he said if he was picking out a commuting car he would go with the 300 over the challenger-----if there is a chrysler track near you maybe you can get a ride and get a feel for performance and comfort----also there is a car tv show out there that features the same 3 cars in germany running the autobahn--the last part a female race car driver drives the jeep on her home track---they told her what it would feel like (top heavy may feel like it will roll--just push through it) she went on to run the jeep on the course and beat her lap record in her race car---which astounded her----there are some big cars out there that run good---i wouldn't sweat all the tire hype-- 15's arent so narrow unless you are into running trailer tires....
Last edited by savoy64; 10/15/16 11:45 PM.
|
|
|
Re: larger cars and basic handling
[Re: savoy64]
#2175449
10/15/16 08:44 PM
10/15/16 08:44 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,386 Pikes Peak Country
TC@HP2
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,386
Pikes Peak Country
|
-he said he broke the lap record of the chrysler driver which kind of PO'd him---- I did that at one of their travelling road show tracks. One segment had a radar gun with a check speed immediately before a hard braking right hand turn. I asked what their fastest speed was for the day and told them I'd top it. I stayed in it so long before hitting the binders that the factory supplied co-driver was white knuckling it and putting his feet through the floor trying to slow us down. His sigh of relief as we made the corner was clear audible and made me laugh.
|
|
|
Re: larger cars and basic handling
[Re: roe]
#2175463
10/15/16 09:02 PM
10/15/16 09:02 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890 Spahn Ranch
RMCHRGR
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890
Spahn Ranch
|
There were quite a few cars with 16" wheels. Should be able to find a decent tire to work for him. For what he wants to do he doesn't need a low profile tire, just a good radial with the sidewall he likes. He wants a cruiser for the daily highway commute that responds when he steers. A little bigger on the torsion bars, good factory type shocks (no need for high $$ stuff) front and rear sway bars, rims and tires of his liking, moog offset UCA bushings, and a firm feel box and he will have exactly what he wants, a well handling and responsive cruiser. I would recommend at least 10.89 discs over drums but 11.75 would be better if not already on the ride he picks. He won't be on road courses, just normal driving. He would be more than happy with what I outlined I would think. I am no expert but that what it sounds like. That's pretty much it in a nutshell. I see that Firm Feel has suspension 'packages'. Not cheap but it looks like everything you would need. Appears to be based off factory parts except for the tubular UCAs, so no wild aftermarket parts that require this or that to work. Again, not sure what I will end up with, just doing some preliminary research. Winter is coming soon which means old car season is winding down so this will likely be something that happens next year. Thanks again for the input.
'71 Duster '17 Ram 1500
|
|
|
Re: larger cars and basic handling
[Re: RMCHRGR]
#2176514
10/16/16 11:15 PM
10/16/16 11:15 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,323 NY NY
340duster340
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,323
NY NY
|
i wouldn't talk you out of buying another mopar, but no matter how you shake it -- with that driving your going to probably double your fuel costs of commuting.
given that fact -- it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, to embark on this endeavor for a daily driver @ 33K+ miles a year of commuting, especially with the awful NYC/long island traffic.
now if you just want to get another car and build it, well that makes a crap ton of sense.
1966 Dart GT
...down to only 1 mopar for the first time in 15 years!
|
|
|
Re: larger cars and basic handling
[Re: 340duster340]
#2176586
10/17/16 12:40 AM
10/17/16 12:40 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890 Spahn Ranch
RMCHRGR
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890
Spahn Ranch
|
i wouldn't talk you out of buying another mopar, but no matter how you shake it -- with that driving your going to probably double your fuel costs of commuting.
given that fact -- it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, to embark on this endeavor for a daily driver @ 33K+ miles a year of commuting, especially with the awful NYC/long island traffic.
now if you just want to get another car and build it, well that makes a crap ton of sense. Hey Mike. Sense and I are not real great friends... It won't be an 'every day' driver, like day-in-day-out, 700 miles a week like I do with my Mazda. And no way it's coming out after the roads are salted. But, if it's nice enough out, I'd rather torture myself in style. I live like a monk anyway, gas is probably the only thing I spend money on. When I insured my D100 last year the insurance company asked if I would be using it to offset some of the mileage I put on the Mazda. I said no initially because it sounded like an odd question but I thought about it later and decided maybe it's not such a good idea to put so many miles on any one car every year. So I guess the answer to that question is actually yes. Fuel injection and overdrive are definitely part of the equation so there is a nod towards some level of economy. I know the initial investment on those things is probably such that you would never make your money back but it's fun to try at least. But just to give a comparison - my Mazda 'requires' 93 octane gas which is normally 30-70 cents more depending on where you get it. I use my Stop N Shop rewards card sometimes which helps. On average, that little 4 cylinder FWD car gets about 325 miles per tank, sometimes more (rarely), sometimes less (often). I drive a minimum of 120 miles a day while getting pounded by a sport-tuned suspension. I had an '01 Cherokee a few years ago that thing got like 16 mpg on a good day and that was an MPI 6 cylinder with an OD trans. My wife's Subaru with the V6 probably gets about 23-25 mpg as well on the highway, way less around town. My D100 gets about 13 mpg if it's all highway driving. I drive it all the time too, including back and forth to work. I figure I can do a little better than that with a car. If I was able to get 16 mpg with a big block equipped B body, I'd be pretty happy. My Duster is probably the most impractical but I've driven that back and forth to ETown a few times, wasn't crazy bad, probably about the same as the truck. It's all relative. If it runs, I'm gonna drive it. Got a couple of potential candidates I am looking at right now, we'll see what shakes out.
'71 Duster '17 Ram 1500
|
|
|
Re: larger cars and basic handling
[Re: RMCHRGR]
#2176972
10/17/16 03:34 PM
10/17/16 03:34 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 68 USA MO
cdoublejj
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 68
USA MO
|
If it were me in your position and I was doing up a C-body or an older Fury, I'd just go to FirmFeel and buy front and rear sway bars, Bilstein shocks, no smaller than 1.12" T-bars, Stage 3 PS box, and a suspension rebuild kit. I'd redo the brakes and install 17" wheels with a good modern tire on it. Heck, the C-bodies have so much room and such a tall tire, you may be able to get away with a modern SUV tire. Does Dr Diff have C-body brake kits front and rear? It doesn't need to be crazy. I'd imagine the 11.75" rotors would do, but a 13" kit with the Cobra calipers up front should help stop the big boy down a lot easier. I think all that sounds reasonable. I'll have to look at some of the larger wheels some more, most of them don't really appeal to me at all. Was at Lebanon Valley Dragway for Mopar Day yesterday. Getting gas on the way home a guy in a '69 Charger with those 17" Magnums pulled in net to me. Didn't look too bad I guess. Guess I might have to get over it at some point. http://www.forbbodiesonly.com/moparforum/threads/b-bodies-with-17-wheels-post-your-photos.50869/
|
|
|
Re: larger cars and basic handling
[Re: RMCHRGR]
#2177119
10/17/16 06:59 PM
10/17/16 06:59 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
That thread would have been real helpful if most of them would have said what rim they had. Saw a couple I thought looked good, but I dunno what they are.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: larger cars and basic handling
[Re: RMCHRGR]
#2178013
10/18/16 07:22 PM
10/18/16 07:22 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 757 Toronto, Ont, Canada
boydsdodge
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 757
Toronto, Ont, Canada
|
I have a ton of miles in my wagon, I need stopping and handling. I used all Firm feel parts to get what I needed for a regular use car, I stayed with 15" wheels and tires, used the Maxiss Marauder tires that have a good speed rating and stiff side wall. I would do it all again. For what you are asking this is good build and it stops. I live in urban Toronto and I have driven in all types of traffic, I have driven it to Carlisle and the Nats for about 4 years now. 2:94 rear gears 727, 383 4 bbl dual exhaust. Next thing that I think would be a big big improvement is good driving seats, the bench is getting old, it's old and it's getting old on me. It really is a Keep It Simple Stupid build. I removed the stock disc system and installed the later 12" with slider callipers and aluminum master on a power brake booster, also installed 70s dodge pick up rear wheel cylinders. 1.25" front sway bar, .75" rear, (I don't think I would have used a rear bar if it was a coupe) 1" torsion bars, all 4 Bilstein shocks. (that really feel great on this build) 15x7 cop wheels with front 245/60/15, Rear 15x8 with 275/60/15 rear. I have caught many imports on off ramps and haven't noticed I was blocking anyone. It certainly is not a track car, but it drives better then our 300c 1967 Dodge Coronet 440 wagon.
Last edited by boydsdodge; 10/18/16 07:25 PM.
|
|
|
Re: larger cars and basic handling
[Re: Supercuda]
#2178650
10/19/16 04:01 PM
10/19/16 04:01 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 68 USA MO
cdoublejj
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 68
USA MO
|
That thread would have been real helpful if most of them would have said what rim they had. Saw a couple I thought looked good, but I dunno what they are. I created an account on those forums so i could quote their posts and ask and or PM them to find out.
Last edited by cdoublejj; 10/19/16 04:01 PM.
|
|
|
Re: larger cars and basic handling
[Re: RMCHRGR]
#2179674
10/21/16 12:22 PM
10/21/16 12:22 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
Propane doesn't have a large following around here.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: larger cars and basic handling
[Re: RMCHRGR]
#2180174
10/22/16 07:39 AM
10/22/16 07:39 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,749 ohio
ruderunner
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,749
ohio
|
For a good torquey drivetrain with fi and od, think Magnum and a518 trans. Should fit the c body without too much hassle. Running donor truck or van can be found cheap.
Should be able to get mid teens in a c body.
Personally, I think most folks short change the abilities of most late 60s through 70's cars. They are actually pretty competent drivers. No not as razor sharp as some newer stuff but at normal speeds they do just fine. Sway bars and good shocks are the minimum but also the maximum.
Angry white pureblood male
|
|
|
|
|