Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? #1978014
12/28/15 06:34 PM
12/28/15 06:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,807
North Dakota
Azzkikrcuda Offline OP
top fuel
Azzkikrcuda  Offline OP
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,807
North Dakota
I see they are offering this option for there 4.250 stroke cranks now. Anyone use one yet, or opinion on there strength/quality
http://store.440source.com/Ultralight-Crankshaft/productinfo/44042506800-6-LW/


The only Carbs I care about are under the hood!
Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: Azzkikrcuda] #1978025
12/28/15 06:43 PM
12/28/15 06:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
I hadn't seen that before but I like the idea. I used a SCAT superlight crankshaft in my last 470 build. I really like the idea of taking unnecessary weight off the crankshaft if you can afford it.

DSC_9007 (Large).JPG
Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: Azzkikrcuda] #1978057
12/28/15 07:38 PM
12/28/15 07:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,807
North Dakota
Azzkikrcuda Offline OP
top fuel
Azzkikrcuda  Offline OP
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,807
North Dakota
From the pics it looks nice, Pendulum counter weights, Drilled thru the Mains, Scalloped bolt flange. Just missing knife edged counter weights.


The only Carbs I care about are under the hood!
Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: Azzkikrcuda] #1978067
12/28/15 07:50 PM
12/28/15 07:50 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,383
Taxes & Virus's R-US, NY
Dragula Offline
I Live Here
Dragula  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,383
Taxes & Virus's R-US, NY
Originally Posted By Azzkikrcuda
I see they are offering this option for there 4.250 stroke cranks now. Anyone use one yet, or opinion on there strength/quality
http://store.440source.com/Ultralight-Crankshaft/productinfo/44042506800-6-LW/


Thanks for posting that.....I have a 400 block I was thinking of doing a low deck 512 for next year with....Not sure how much faster I really want to go though....My pump gas RB 512 has already been 6.13 in the 1/8th....And I am not sure what the safety requirements are for going faster.

Last edited by Dragula; 12/28/15 07:51 PM.

'70 Cuda,...605 EFI Hemi Street Car (6.20 best pass, 1.33 60ft)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYw6RA-k5Bk (6.25 at 108.75mph from inside car)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zQEb9uxFng (6.25 at 108mph from outside car)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCvfzsC4NgM (9.9)

'66 Barracuda AWB Stretched nose Blown 440 Car in build stage

'71 Duster Drag Car 400 Low Deck 512 best 6.002 at 115.44mph
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Znuo3jMUXTk
Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: Azzkikrcuda] #1978071
12/28/15 07:57 PM
12/28/15 07:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,647
aotearoa
rebel Offline
master
rebel  Offline
master

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,647
aotearoa
i just got my std 400/512 Source crank back from being balanced. the machinist said he only had to take 40grams off the crank to match my rods n pistons. how do you go with a crank thats 3000 grams less to start with?

Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: AndyF] #1978076
12/28/15 08:02 PM
12/28/15 08:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,395
The Pale Blue Dot
Skeptic Offline
master
Skeptic  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,395
The Pale Blue Dot
Originally Posted By AndyF
I hadn't seen that before but I like the idea. I used a SCAT superlight crankshaft in my last 470 build. I really like the idea of taking unnecessary weight off the crankshaft if you can afford it.
Was that a special order? They only show the RB mains and no 3.91" strokes on the website. Thanks, Steve

Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: rebel] #1978079
12/28/15 08:10 PM
12/28/15 08:10 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Originally Posted By rebel
i just got my std 400/512 Source crank back from being balanced. the machinist said he only had to take 40grams off the crank to match my rods n pistons. how do you go with a crank thats 3000 grams less to start with?


Just depends on WHERE the weight is and where it isnt..
I normally turn down the counter weight a considerable
amount so they spin quicker.. along with a sharper edge
on the leading edge.. I've want to do the same edge on
the trailing side to reduce windage
wave

Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: AndyF] #1978085
12/28/15 08:15 PM
12/28/15 08:15 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Andy... that Scat crank looks pretty nice..what did
it take to balance in on your set up
wave

Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1978128
12/28/15 09:14 PM
12/28/15 09:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
Originally Posted By MR_P_BODY
Andy... that Scat crank looks pretty nice..what did
it take to balance in on your set up
wave


Well the crank came balanced for the stroker kit but the pistons ended up being lighter than advertised so we had to re-balance the crank. It took a little work to do the re-balance. Had the crank come un-balanced the job would've been easier.

Final bobweight on this crank was 2222 grams so it is fairly light for a big block.

DSC_8998 (Large).JPG
Last edited by AndyF; 12/28/15 09:24 PM.
Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: Skeptic] #1978136
12/28/15 09:20 PM
12/28/15 09:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
Originally Posted By Skeptic
Originally Posted By AndyF
I hadn't seen that before but I like the idea. I used a SCAT superlight crankshaft in my last 470 build. I really like the idea of taking unnecessary weight off the crankshaft if you can afford it.
Was that a special order? They only show the RB mains and no 3.91" strokes on the website. Thanks, Steve


Kind of a semi-custom order. SCAT has raw forgings on hand and they can machine up most anything. They make a lot of NHRA Super Stock cranks with Honda journals and stuff like that that isn't in the catalog. You just have to tell them what you want and wait a few weeks for it to show up.

SCAT has the CAD files on hand to produce fully machined lightweight Mopar cranks but they don't really advertise it. You just have to call them and talk it over with the engineer.

The nice thing about working with SCAT is they have the ability to do all of the machine work and heat treating and finish work in the USA. Some of the other crank vendors are just box movers. So if it isn't in the catalog they can't make it. SCAT imports raw forgings and then does the rest on shore so they can move things around if you want.

Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: AndyF] #1978155
12/28/15 09:50 PM
12/28/15 09:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,395
The Pale Blue Dot
Skeptic Offline
master
Skeptic  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,395
The Pale Blue Dot
Originally Posted By AndyF

Kind of a semi-custom order. SCAT has raw forgings on hand and they can machine up most anything. They make a lot of NHRA Super Stock cranks with Honda journals and stuff like that that isn't in the catalog. You just have to tell them what you want and wait a few weeks for it to show up.

SCAT has the CAD files on hand to produce fully machined lightweight Mopar cranks but they don't really advertise it. You just have to call them and talk it over with the engineer.

The nice thing about working with SCAT is they have the ability to do all of the machine work and heat treating and finish work in the USA. Some of the other crank vendors are just box movers. So if it isn't in the catalog they can't make it. SCAT imports raw forgings and then does the rest on shore so they can move things around if you want.
Nice! punkrocka Thanks for the info. up So....How much $$$?

Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: Azzkikrcuda] #1978186
12/28/15 10:50 PM
12/28/15 10:50 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,505
TN
S
SCATPACK 1 Offline
pro stock
SCATPACK 1  Offline
pro stock
S

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,505
TN
Originally Posted By Azzkikrcuda
I see they are offering this option for there 4.250 stroke cranks now. Anyone use one yet, or opinion on there strength/quality
http://store.440source.com/Ultralight-Crankshaft/productinfo/44042506800-6-LW/


440 source offered the lightened cranks about 10 or so years ago. Remember they blew them out at a really low price to get rid of them. Not sure if it was an issue with the cranks or just no demand. I wanted one at that time but they were sold out when I finally placed my order. But we ran their regular crank for many years with zero issues in a drag only motor.
Good luck with it.


Old Geezer Racing
Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: Azzkikrcuda] #1978220
12/28/15 11:26 PM
12/28/15 11:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Is pendulum cuting really worth anything or just good for advertising? Seems that as close to the centerline as that weight is they could remove smaller weight farther out and be just the same inertia to accelerate it? Seems like it would make the crank a tiny bit more flexible as well where turning down the outer diameter of the counter weight would remove unwanted stress.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: HotRodDave] #1979103
12/30/15 01:32 AM
12/30/15 01:32 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
Taking the weight off the crank is primarily to remove weight from the front of the car, not to reduce rotating inertia. My SCAT crank is 54 lbs which is 13 lbs lighter than a factory 383 crank. So that is 13 lbs off the nose of the car. My pistons and rods are also lighter than stock by roughly 1 lb each so that is another 8 lbs off the nose of the car.

It probably doesn't matter on a bracket car but on a competitive class car there is a huge advantage to taking 20 lbs off the nose of the car and putting it in the trunk.

You should see some of the circle track cranks, especially the sprint car stuff. They take a ton of weight off of those cranks, mostly to get the car as light as possible.

Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: SCATPACK 1] #1983526
01/04/16 04:49 PM
01/04/16 04:49 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
440sourcedotcom Offline
super stock
440sourcedotcom  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 741
Carson City, NV
Originally Posted By SCATPACK 1
Originally Posted By Azzkikrcuda
I see they are offering this option for there 4.250 stroke cranks now. Anyone use one yet, or opinion on there strength/quality
http://store.440source.com/Ultralight-Crankshaft/productinfo/44042506800-6-LW/


440 source offered the lightened cranks about 10 or so years ago. Remember they blew them out at a really low price to get rid of them. Not sure if it was an issue with the cranks or just no demand. I wanted one at that time but they were sold out when I finally placed my order. But we ran their regular crank for many years with zero issues in a drag only motor.
Good luck with it.


That is correct. We offered these lightweight crankshafts from 2006-2008, but discontinued them due to low demand. We never had any problems with them. Over the last year or two, we noticed that we had an increase in people asking for them again, so we decided to bring them back.

Also, on the question about 3000 grams being taken off the crank, bobweight is being confused with total weight of the crankshaft. The 3000 grams is being removed from the total weight of the crankshaft (as if it was being weighed on a standard scale.) The bobweight, which is related to how the crankshaft is balanced, (essentially the "difference" between the crankpin side of the crank and the counterweight side, if you were to split the crank in "half") remains unchanged.

Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: 440sourcedotcom] #1983994
01/05/16 05:35 AM
01/05/16 05:35 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,277
West Coast, USA
jbc426 Offline
master
jbc426  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,277
West Coast, USA
I have one of the lightened 440 Source stroker cranks in my 493". It's swinging a set of max-lightened & coated Ross forged flat tops in a zero-decked block and fed by a set of ported Indy EZ's and an aluminum Eddy sixpack intake. It's a high quench motor with those little heart shaped chambers on the Indys. The crank was beautiful.

The motor spins up almost instantly, and even with a McLeod steel flywheel and street twin clutch hanging on the back of it, it takes a little extra attention to pull away from a stop from an idle without all the normal inertia. I can feel the difference in reciprocating weight when I drive my buddies 440 manual trans car. I forget what the bob weight came out to.

It's got around 6000 something miles on it, and is still going strong. Hopefully it will live a long healthy life. The car it's in puts people right in shock on a regular basis.

Last edited by jbc426; 01/05/16 05:38 AM.

1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's
1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: AndyF] #2454016
02/19/18 05:19 PM
02/19/18 05:19 PM
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 68
USA MO
C
cdoublejj Offline
member
cdoublejj  Offline
member
C

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 68
USA MO
Originally Posted By AndyF
Originally Posted By Skeptic
Originally Posted By AndyF
I hadn't seen that before but I like the idea. I used a SCAT superlight crankshaft in my last 470 build. I really like the idea of taking unnecessary weight off the crankshaft if you can afford it.
Was that a special order? They only show the RB mains and no 3.91" strokes on the website. Thanks, Steve


Kind of a semi-custom order. SCAT has raw forgings on hand and they can machine up most anything. They make a lot of NHRA Super Stock cranks with Honda journals and stuff like that that isn't in the catalog. You just have to tell them what you want and wait a few weeks for it to show up.

SCAT has the CAD files on hand to produce fully machined lightweight Mopar cranks but they don't really advertise it. You just have to call them and talk it over with the engineer.

The nice thing about working with SCAT is they have the ability to do all of the machine work and heat treating and finish work in the USA. Some of the other crank vendors are just box movers. So if it isn't in the catalog they can't make it. SCAT imports raw forgings and then does the rest on shore so they can move things around if you want.
so are the SCAT cranks similar to 440 source cranks? I guess that means I could order a stock stroke super light by the sounds of it

Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: 440sourcedotcom] #2454019
02/19/18 05:26 PM
02/19/18 05:26 PM
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 68
USA MO
C
cdoublejj Offline
member
cdoublejj  Offline
member
C

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 68
USA MO
Originally Posted By 440sourcedotcom
Originally Posted By SCATPACK 1
Originally Posted By Azzkikrcuda
I see they are offering this option for there 4.250 stroke cranks now. Anyone use one yet, or opinion on there strength/quality
http://store.440source.com/Ultralight-Crankshaft/productinfo/44042506800-6-LW/


440 source offered the lightened cranks about 10 or so years ago. Remember they blew them out at a really low price to get rid of them. Not sure if it was an issue with the cranks or just no demand. I wanted one at that time but they were sold out when I finally placed my order. But we ran their regular crank for many years with zero issues in a drag only motor.
Good luck with it.


That is correct. We offered these lightweight crankshafts from 2006-2008, but discontinued them due to low demand. We never had any problems with them. Over the last year or two, we noticed that we had an increase in people asking for them again, so we decided to bring them back.

Also, on the question about 3000 grams being taken off the crank, bobweight is being confused with total weight of the crankshaft. The 3000 grams is being removed from the total weight of the crankshaft (as if it was being weighed on a standard scale.) The bobweight, which is related to how the crankshaft is balanced, (essentially the "difference" between the crankpin side of the crank and the counterweight side, if you were to split the crank in "half") remains unchanged.


I'd like to be able to get a forged hardened super light stock stroke crank for the rb 440

Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: cdoublejj] #2454024
02/19/18 05:30 PM
02/19/18 05:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,355
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,355
Las Vegas
Call Scat they can make one.

crank.jpg

"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Re: Anyone use 440 Source Ultralight stroker crank yet? [Re: Azzkikrcuda] #2454025
02/19/18 05:30 PM
02/19/18 05:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,355
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,355
Las Vegas
Crower can do it as well. Don't have a picture of my Crower crank handy though


"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1