Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Cam timing and piston to valve #196396
01/17/09 07:50 PM
01/17/09 07:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 124
louisiana
S
sixty9bee Offline OP
member
sixty9bee  Offline OP
member
S

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 124
louisiana
How much effect does cam timing effect piston to valve clearence?
subject engine is:
0 deck ross flattop 4.15 stroke 400
277 at 0.050 roller cam 700 lift
110 centerline installed at 110
edelbrock heads

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: sixty9bee] #196397
01/17/09 07:54 PM
01/17/09 07:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 124
louisiana
S
sixty9bee Offline OP
member
sixty9bee  Offline OP
member
S

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 124
louisiana
exhaust valve with no head gasket and 0 lash has contact with piston.
What suggestions to get the minimum clearance? quench is already set for .039 gasket?

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: sixty9bee] #196398
01/17/09 08:05 PM
01/17/09 08:05 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,505
TN
S
SCATPACK 1 Offline
pro stock
SCATPACK 1  Offline
pro stock
S

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,505
TN
You could advance the cam some to get clearance. But if you are hitting, I would flycut valve relief notches into the pistons. I do not feel safe with less than .100 thou on the exhaust to piston.
I know it is more time consuming but do it any way and never have to worry about it.


Old Geezer Racing
Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: sixty9bee] #196399
01/17/09 08:05 PM
01/17/09 08:05 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Whats the intake at. Advance it 4* and check it again.
I prefer to check it with the head gasket but thats
me. Use a pushrod length checker with 0 lash then
you can figure your lash in

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: sixty9bee] #196400
01/17/09 08:10 PM
01/17/09 08:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,923
NC
440Jim Offline
I Live Here
440Jim  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,923
NC
Double check when you change the cam installed position. But as I recall, advancing the cam (going from an intake lobe installed position of 110 ATC to 106 ATC) will reduce intake piston to valve clearance, but increase the exhaust P2V clearance. If you are running 1.5 ratio rockers, it should be around 0.023" change. But the lobe profile can be different than what I am used to.

Let us know what numbers you measure.

I check this when I "map" a cam. And I see around 0.015" lobe lift change with 4 degree advance, measured atg +/- 8 degrees of TDC (that is where min piston to valve usually occurs).

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: 440Jim] #196401
01/17/09 08:21 PM
01/17/09 08:21 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,165
Central Ohio, USA
Bigbeep Offline
super stock
Bigbeep  Offline
super stock

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,165
Central Ohio, USA
Good stuff here. I am in the process of chosing a new cam and will be doing this soon, I hope. Beep

4954823-09-111(2).JPG (66 downloads)
Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: Bigbeep] #196402
01/17/09 09:02 PM
01/17/09 09:02 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,119
sc
T
tjmarcus1 Offline
top fuel
tjmarcus1  Offline
top fuel
T

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,119
sc
if he has contact with 0 lash and no headgasket, he has problems! the question is how much interference is there? also are you sure the cam is in at 110? if you factor .040 for gasket,.020 lash that's still only .060 minus the exact amount of interference. advancing to 106 might help, but not fix the prob.

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: tjmarcus1] #196403
01/17/09 10:24 PM
01/17/09 10:24 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
L
lewtot184 Offline
master
lewtot184  Offline
master
L

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
going from a 110 installed centerline to 106 will probably only net .015" additional clearance. recheck installed centerline and true rocker ratio. if the centerline is correctly installed and the rocker ratio isn't way off then the pistons will need work.

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: sixty9bee] #196404
01/17/09 11:06 PM
01/17/09 11:06 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



before you go any further, check your intake valve clearance. if you have more clearance there you might be able to advance the cam and get enough for both. if not, you'll be flycustting pistons. most shelf ross pistons will not handle .700 lift safely.

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve #196405
01/17/09 11:28 PM
01/17/09 11:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 124
louisiana
S
sixty9bee Offline OP
member
sixty9bee  Offline OP
member
S

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 124
louisiana
the rocker ratio is 1.5 the lash was at 0 and the interference was minimal, as a matter of fact was not noticable until a dial indicator was used to check exact clearance. the intake was checked and has more than enough room through entire range. we could have 60-80 thou removed from the intake clearance and still be around 90 through the cycle.

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: sixty9bee] #196406
01/17/09 11:47 PM
01/17/09 11:47 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,119
sc
T
tjmarcus1 Offline
top fuel
tjmarcus1  Offline
top fuel
T

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,119
sc
Quote:

the rocker ratio is 1.5 the lash was at 0 and the interference was minimal, as a matter of fact was not noticable until a dial indicator was used to check exact clearance. the intake was checked and has more than enough room through entire range. we could have 60-80 thou removed from the intake clearance and still be around 90 through the cycle.


with that much int. clearance, are you sure the cam is in right?

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: tjmarcus1] #196407
01/18/09 12:00 AM
01/18/09 12:00 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Quote:

the rocker ratio is 1.5 the lash was at 0 and the interference was minimal, as a matter of fact was not noticable until a dial indicator was used to check exact clearance. the intake was checked and has more than enough room through entire range. we could have 60-80 thou removed from the intake clearance and still be around 90 through the cycle.


with that much int. clearance, are you sure the cam is in right?




The cam does sound like its installed retarted more
than straight up

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: sixty9bee] #196408
01/18/09 12:03 AM
01/18/09 12:03 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
S
Sport440 Offline
master
Sport440  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
Quote:

How much effect does cam timing effect piston to valve clearence?




On the intake side a 1* at the crank is equal to around .003 to .004 lift at the lobe times rocker ratio.

Now if the exhaust lobe profile is similer you should see the same. It may be less since its Landing the valve.

But, requardless, your probably looking at around a extra .020 exhaust P/V clearence, with a 4* advance.

mike

Last edited by Sport440; 01/18/09 12:06 AM.
Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: Sport440] #196409
01/18/09 12:14 AM
01/18/09 12:14 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 124
louisiana
S
sixty9bee Offline OP
member
sixty9bee  Offline OP
member
S

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 124
louisiana
I know, it sounds like its in retarded. that was my first thought. checked and started over checked again. the valve relief is deeper on intake side. the only question on install is the cam is ground on 110 but my understanding is comp puts 4 degrees advance into the grind. if that is correct, it should probably not be installed at 110 right? by the way thanks for all the replies

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: sixty9bee] #196410
01/18/09 12:28 AM
01/18/09 12:28 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

I know, it sounds like its in retarded. that was my first thought. checked and started over checked again. the valve relief is deeper on intake side. the only question on install is the cam is ground on 110 but my understanding is comp puts 4 degrees advance into the grind. if that is correct, it should probably not be installed at 110 right? by the way thanks for all the replies




Yes they grind in advance but you still start at 110
for 0 then advance it from there if you want advance

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: MR_P_BODY] #196411
01/18/09 01:43 AM
01/18/09 01:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
S
Sport440 Offline
master
Sport440  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
Quote:

Quote:

I know, it sounds like its in retarded. that was my first thought. checked and started over checked again. the valve relief is deeper on intake side. the only question on install is the cam is ground on 110 but my understanding is comp puts 4 degrees advance into the grind. if that is correct, it should probably not be installed at 110 right? by the way thanks for all the replies




Yes they grind in advance but you still start at 110
for 0 then advance it from there if you want advance







Where your cam is installed now at a 110* ICL with a 110* LS you are neither advanced or retarded. Your at 0* Even if the cam had 4* advance ground into it.

mike

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: sixty9bee] #196412
01/18/09 12:26 PM
01/18/09 12:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,923
NC
440Jim Offline
I Live Here
440Jim  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,923
NC
The best solution is the machine the exhaust valve reliefs in the pistons. But with a 110 LSA cam, I would not be afraid to install it with the intake lobe centerline at 104 ATC if needed, and you are willing to accept the trade offs.

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: sixty9bee] #196413
01/18/09 12:54 PM
01/18/09 12:54 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
If comp cams says 106 on a 110 lobe center cam they install the dowel pin to try and have straight up be at 106 everything being equal. but the crank keyway , gear set and drilling the dowel in the pin is not an exact science With the exhaust being that

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: Dodgem] #196414
01/18/09 01:01 PM
01/18/09 01:01 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
With the exhaust being that close and the intake that loose I'd say something is way out of whack and that cam is severly retarded? The intake valve is usually the issue. Check and re check your marks rolling over but at this point I would suggest a true cam degree job
Just my thoughts have degreed lots and lots of cams
Lost some in my copy and past?? LOL???

Re: Cam timing and piston to valve [Re: Dodgem] #196415
01/18/09 01:08 PM
01/18/09 01:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 124
louisiana
S
sixty9bee Offline OP
member
sixty9bee  Offline OP
member
S

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 124
louisiana
probably should have also stated its split duration 277 intake 285 exhaust. degree'ed several but not an expert by any means. does the procedure change any for split duration? the only explanation i can come up with is that the valve pockets are deeper on the intake side (according to the paperwork on the pistons) and the longer exhaust duration is the culprit. is this logical or am i grasping straws? the pistons have no additional fly cutting only the ross factory reliefs

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1