Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
39-47 dodge pickup frame #1956163
11/22/15 11:14 PM
11/22/15 11:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,192
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline OP
master
cudaman1969  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,192
fredericksburg,va
Not sure what year the frame is but like to hear opinions on whether to buy? What's there is frame and front end, no rear, not sure if it has original steering box. $200, is it worth that?

Re: 39-47 dodge pickup frame [Re: cudaman1969] #1956167
11/22/15 11:29 PM
11/22/15 11:29 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,118
85086
moparpollack Offline
Lil Herman
moparpollack  Offline
Lil Herman

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,118
85086

Do you needs one? My frame was hacked so I had no choice but to swap to a 94 Dakota frame.

Even if I got the frame I would of mustang II it for the steering.


56 Plaza 63 D100 step side 67 Coronet, 68 Roadrunner, 69 Super Bees, 69 Coronet 500 convertible, 70 Roadrunner Post, 79 D150 360, and a severe case of Mopar a,d,d
Re: 39-47 dodge pickup frame [Re: cudaman1969] #1956833
11/24/15 12:15 AM
11/24/15 12:15 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,486
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,486
Freeport IL USA
Might be worth $200 to someone that needs and wants it, but I sure would want to look it over really good. Lots of things could be wrong with it from being around for 75 or so years. Bent, loose rivets, hacked up crossmembers or rails, rust, and how things were originally removed would be very real concerns. I think I'd also want to be sure it was the correct frame that I would need. 1/2 ton, 3/4 ton, and 1 ton were different frames back then. There were also long box and short box frames. Also, I think it would have to be pristine for that kind of money, because the stuff missing would cost a fortune to replace, personally, I'd pass.

You need to put that into the proper perspective, I would update the chassis to something more modern without batting an eye. 39-47 Mopar stuff was good stuff in 39-47, and probably as good or better then anything else ((except the updated Dodge trucks) well into the early 60s, but its not the early 60s anymore. Guess it depends on what you want to do with your truck. Parades get boring after a few years, I like to drive my stuff. Gene

Re: 39-47 dodge pickup frame [Re: poorboy] #1958504
11/26/15 09:04 PM
11/26/15 09:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,192
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline OP
master
cudaman1969  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,192
fredericksburg,va
Originally Posted By poorboy
Might be worth $200 to someone that needs and wants it, but I sure would want to look it over really good. Lots of things could be wrong with it from being around for 75 or so years. Bent, loose rivets, hacked up crossmembers or rails, rust, and how things were originally removed would be very real concerns. I think I'd also want to be sure it was the correct frame that I would need. 1/2 ton, 3/4 ton, and 1 ton were different frames back then. There were also long box and short box frames. Also, I think it would have to be pristine for that kind of money, because the stuff missing would cost a fortune to replace, personally, I'd pass.

You need to put that into the proper perspective, I would update the chassis to something more modern without batting an eye. 39-47 Mopar stuff was good stuff in 39-47, and probably as good or better then anything else ((except the updated Dodge trucks) well into the early 60s, but its not the early 60s anymore. Guess it depends on what you want to do with your truck. Parades get boring after a few years, I like to drive my stuff. Gene

Good points, I'm looking at a few trucks rite now so it can wait. What is the limit for mph with stock frame and suspension before going with modern stuff?

Re: 39-47 dodge pickup frame [Re: cudaman1969] #1958519
11/26/15 09:40 PM
11/26/15 09:40 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,281
WI
W
wannadrag Offline
pro stock
wannadrag  Offline
pro stock
W

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,281
WI
There are guys running stock frames in gassers going 10s in the 1/4.Nothing wrong with them as long as there not all rust and pits. Personally I hate the old stuff with a modern ifs front. Traditional hot rodders put thousands of miles on solid axle frontends and a stock chassis,so don't believe everything you read on here.

Re: 39-47 dodge pickup frame [Re: cudaman1969] #1958802
11/27/15 03:48 PM
11/27/15 03:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,486
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,486
Freeport IL USA
Like most things, there are limitations to what ever you are doing with something.
The original frame was designed with a lot of flex built into them, because they were designed to be low speed work trucks. They worked great if you loaded them up, and took the seed corn into the field at 15 mph, or made deliveries around town at 30 mph. Because they were built and designed to haul heavy loads, an occasional trip from the farm into the city wasn't much of an issue, but with the gearing, it was a 45-50 mph trip. High speed just wasn't on the radar for the truck designers of the day, they were work trucks geared and designed to move heavy loads from point A to point B.

I'm sure there were some guys using the truck frames in Gassers and going in the 10s (I'm betting they used the early 60s trucks rather then the early 40s trucks, design changes between the early 40s and the early 60s was huge). They did a lot of other stupid stuff back then as well! They got by because the Gassers were very light weight cars, using frames designed for heavy loads. I suspect the guys that were really running in the 10s were not using the original springs or the original spring mounts. Most of the frames were either reinforced with tubing (roll bars) or were so light weight the flex in the frame wasn't an issue, or they just dealt with it (or maybe they didn't know it was costing them speed). It was a time of innovation, some stuff worked well, some stuff didn't work so well. To assume just because the frames looked like an original unmodified truck frames from the 40s in pictures, that that's what they were, may be a huge assumption.

In answer to the original poster's question: What is the limit for mph with stock frame and suspension before going to modern stuff?
That is a good question! To be honest, that probably depends on how you feel about it. Assuming the frame is good and solid:

On the highway and streets, I doubt the frame itself is going to be an issue. Its when you want to start doing the hard, fast cornering (or fast drag racing) that the flex in the frame may become an issue, and that would be a limiting factor on how hard it will corner (or how fast it will leave the line), rather then will it be safe.

The suspension on the original trucks is leaf springs on all 4 corners. Though there are drawbacks to the ultimate performance capabilities to this design, it is a solid design. The issues in my mind are that 1) The springs are more narrow then modern springs, which could allow more side to side flex. 2) The springs were designed for hauling heavy loads, not ride quality. As such, the ride was stiff (understatement). You can remove leafs from the spring pack to aid in a softer ride, but that amplifies the narrow spring issue. 3) Since the springs are designed to carry heavy loads, the center bolt is nearly centered on the leaf spring. Leaf springs with the center bolt shifted more towards the front of the spring give better ride and have better control of spring windup on acceleration, both things were of little concern for the original purpose of the truck springs. 4) The shackles that attached the springs to the frame are single side pivot bars. They worked well when they were greased regularly, but the modern double shear spring mounting is much more stable and much more durable.

The rear axle had the tapered shaft brake drums. That alone is reason enough to replace it in my mind. Finding reasonable highway gearing is a very good second reason to replace it. Then you need to deal with antiquated brake design and finding replacement parts.

The front axle is a reasonably usable item. Its pretty simple. All it needs are good king pins (which may be hard to find) and modern brakes (disc or late 60s-71 drums) I prefer disc brakes. Sway bars can be added.

The manual steering box will require a big steering wheel or strong arms.

In my opinion: Modern brakes, a modern rear axle, and modern spring shackles should be present before an original frame gets a cab reinstalled. Unless the springs are really nice, modern springs would be present before it was on the road as well. I could live with a beam axle with good king pins & modern disc brakes.

Past that, if I think I want power steering or independent suspension, I'm building the truck with a modern frame that those things are already present on! Also, It the truck is getting big HP, the flex that was built into the original frame becomes a real concern for me. The last thing I want is to dump the clutch on a blown Hemi and have the frame twist into a pretzel! That may not have been a concern with the 60s Gasser guys, but I'm not one of them! Give me a frame that will transfer the power rather then one that will bow and twist in the middle. Gene

Re: 39-47 dodge pickup frame [Re: cudaman1969] #1959448
11/28/15 10:12 PM
11/28/15 10:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,192
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline OP
master
cudaman1969  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,192
fredericksburg,va
The one I'm lookin at is a 3/4 ton with floating axels so new stuff is manditory now, just basically a street driver with occasional freeway time. Not sure what " newer" frame would be the right size to fit body-fenders back on or make work being narrow in front.

Re: 39-47 dodge pickup frame [Re: cudaman1969] #1960023
11/30/15 12:28 AM
11/30/15 12:28 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,486
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,486
Freeport IL USA
39-47 Dodge trucks fit nicely on Dakota frames up to at least 1999 (or when ever the 97 cab was updated, after that, I don't know how the Dakota frame may have changed). Modern everything, choice of factory drive trains, can still use as a truck if the desire/need arises, pretty much add (or move) the frame body mount ears to the locations needed to bolt the old cab on the new frame.

You may have to shorten (or lengthen, easier to shorten one) the wheel base to match your trucks wheel base, but that pretty easy to do on a Dakota frame. With the standard Dakota wheels, the width is just about perfect. The wheel openings on the 3/4 ton fenders may be a little big, but that can be taken care of as well. Also, the frame under the Dakota box is about 6" higher then what the floor on the 39-47 box floor would be. You can move the box floor on the 39-47 higher, but it will reduce the inside height of the older box on the inside of the box. Gene

Re: 39-47 dodge pickup frame [Re: poorboy] #1960277
11/30/15 03:55 PM
11/30/15 03:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,192
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline OP
master
cudaman1969  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,192
fredericksburg,va
Originally Posted By poorboy
39-47 Dodge trucks fit nicely on Dakota frames up to at least 1999 (or when ever the 97 cab was updated, after that, I don't know how the Dakota frame may have changed). Modern everything, choice of factory drive trains, can still use as a truck if the desire/need arises, pretty much add (or move) the frame body mount ears to the locations needed to bolt the old cab on the new frame.

You may have to shorten (or lengthen, easier to shorten one) the wheel base to match your trucks wheel base, but that pretty easy to do on a Dakota frame. With the standard Dakota wheels, the width is just about perfect. The wheel openings on the 3/4 ton fenders may be a little big, but that can be taken care of as well. Also, the frame under the Dakota box is about 6" higher then what the floor on the 39-47 box floor would be. You can move the box floor on the 39-47 higher, but it will reduce the inside height of the older box on the inside of the box. Gene

The guys next door used a S10 Chevy frame, all the steering is in the front, but a lot of hacking still.

Re: 39-47 dodge pickup frame [Re: cudaman1969] #1960464
11/30/15 09:42 PM
11/30/15 09:42 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,445
N.Wilkesboro,NC
D
DusterKrazy Offline
master
DusterKrazy  Offline
master
D

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,445
N.Wilkesboro,NC
The '46 I built used a '72-80 D100 Frame. I did channel the cab over the frame and it seemed to work ok.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1