Re: E-body rear defroster option wiring
[Re: gtx6970]
#1040617
07/27/11 12:39 AM
07/27/11 12:39 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,796 minnarusta
TX9H6E4CUDA
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,796
minnarusta
|
If you send me a pm I have a complete assembly out of 71 charger I can take some pics of the harness and everything if you want.
For the absolute best powder coating go to J.I.T powder coating, contact infomation is in my personal profile..
|
|
|
Re: E-body rear defroster option wiring
[Re: PhillyRag]
#1040619
07/28/11 08:42 AM
07/28/11 08:42 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 21,397 It's a dry heat
gtx6970
OP
Too Many Posts
|
OP
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 21,397
It's a dry heat
|
Quote:
They were all 2speed, varied how that was acheived. Earlier year cars 1 of the wires going to motor was a resistance wire (low speed), other was full voltage (high). Therefore no resistor at motor. Later, that wire become non-resistance & resistor mounted at motor gave low speed. Because it becomes hot, it was placed in the air-flow to cool it., not the air.
If you don't have the resistance-type wiring, you will need to mount a resistor.
That makes sense. I do not have the original wiring . so it looks like I'll have to make it in house.
Gotta hit radio shack I guess
|
|
|
Re: E-body rear defroster option wiring
[Re: TX9H6E4CUDA]
#1040622
07/29/11 10:20 AM
07/29/11 10:20 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 21,397 It's a dry heat
gtx6970
OP
Too Many Posts
|
OP
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 21,397
It's a dry heat
|
Quote:
If you send me a pm I have a complete assembly out of 71 charger I can take some pics of the harness and everything if you want.
pm sent Thanks
|
|
|
Re: E-body rear defroster option wiring
[Re: jvike]
#1816966
05/02/15 11:17 AM
05/02/15 11:17 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 403 Pittsburgh, PA
Slotts
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 403
Pittsburgh, PA
|
I'm making my own wiring, does anyone know if the resistance wire is something special or is it just a standard 20 guage copper wire? Depending on the type of defogger motor assembly you have, there will either be a single wire to the motor or a circuit board resistor mounted on the air plenum. Here is a picture of one defogger motor assembly with the circuit board resistor. All of the wiring mentioned below was stranded, not solid copper. The single cable versions used an overall cable length of 12â 6â with a male T connector to plug into the dash harness adapter that Vlad (Hey Vlad!) is showing plugged in at the kick panel. A black 18 gauge wire on the â T and white 20 gauge wire on the | T. That taped two wire harness ran for 8â 9â and then were crimped together with a black 16 gauge wire that was 3â 7â running to a single female terminal to the single wire male wire from the defogger motor. The dual cable version used the same length, but was a Siamese cable with both the black and black w/ white stripe being 18 gauge with T connectors on both ends. A male T at the kick panel and female T at the defogger motor assembly. The solid black wire was on the â T and the black w/ white stripe on the | T male connector at the kick panel. On the motor side the wiring was inverted and the Black w/ White Stripe was connected on the â T and the Black was connected on the | T female connector. Jim
|
|
|
Re: E-body rear defroster option wiring
[Re: jvike]
#1818306
05/04/15 10:24 AM
05/04/15 10:24 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 403 Pittsburgh, PA
Slotts
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 403
Pittsburgh, PA
|
I've made the wireing like described today (single contector at the motor). Could not hear any significant difference in speed between the two speeds. Can anybody confirm that there should be/should not be much difference? Yes, there is not as much of a fan speed difference with the single wire defogger motor as compared to the resistor mounted on the plenum housing. Attached is the only occurrence that is shown in a 70 Plymouth service manual that details the wiring for the single wire version. The wiring gauge sizes are correct. When testing the impedance difference on the single wire motor end harness, setting an analog meter to read 0 Ohms between black and the motor end will show a -3 Ohm loss reading between the white wire and the motor end. With the "improved" version defogger using the resistor mounted on the plenum housing, the circuit board shows a -10 Ohm difference for the low speed compared to 0 Ohms for the high speed. It is much more apparent that there is a speed change. This same resistor cicuit board is what was used for the two speed fan positions on non A/C E body heater boxes. Jim
|
|
|
|
|