Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hooker vs. T.T.I. headers #179058
12/30/08 08:06 PM
12/30/08 08:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 755
Rochester, PA (near Pittsburgh...
1
1974 474 Duster Offline OP
super stock
1974 474 Duster  Offline OP
super stock
1

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 755
Rochester, PA (near Pittsburgh...
My Duster currently has Hooker fenderwell headers on it (2") Looking to see if anyone has gone from this style header to a T.T.I. underchassis header. I have a set of them here as well. Just curious if there would be a gain or a loss. Im thinking of going to a coil over front end as well. So getting the headers in woyuld be a ton easier. I run the T.T.I.'s in the past, but never on this car. The car is a 74 Duster w/a 474 and runs in the 10.30-50 range. Just curious of what others think. Not worried about the header capturing the starter, I always see that as a problem with the T.T.I. header. hope someone out there has some good advice for me!! See ya, Ken Michalik

4911331-MVC-006Sf.JPG (88 downloads)
Re: Hooker vs. T.T.I. headers [Re: 1974 474 Duster] #179059
12/30/08 08:29 PM
12/30/08 08:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,476
3
340dart4spd Offline
Parts Problem
340dart4spd  Offline
Parts Problem
3

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,476
Quote:

My Duster currently has Hooker fenderwell headers on it (2") Looking to see if anyone has gone from this style header to a T.T.I. underchassis header. I have a set of them here as well. Just curious if there would be a gain or a loss. Im thinking of going to a coil over front end as well. So getting the headers in woyuld be a ton easier. I run the T.T.I.'s in the past, but never on this car. The car is a 74 Duster w/a 474 and runs in the 10.30-50 range. Just curious of what others think. Not worried about the header capturing the starter, I always see that as a problem with the T.T.I. header. hope someone out there has some good advice for me!! See ya, Ken Michalik





Headmen by far







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1