Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: Telvis] #1642497
07/06/14 03:32 AM
07/06/14 03:32 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
451Mopar Offline
master
451Mopar  Offline
master

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
The cam is a good size for the engine, not too big.
Get the cranking cylinder pressure (all spark plugs removed and carb held wide open while cranking.)
low cranking pressures could point to a problem like low static compression or the cam installed retarded. Inconsistent pressures could show valve or piston sealing issues.
My avenger carbs have been a bit lean in the idle/transition circuit. If there is a good carb tuner in your area you may want to get their help.
More gear and converter will really help too.

Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: 451Mopar] #1642498
07/06/14 03:56 AM
07/06/14 03:56 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
I bought a 74 Duster from a guy in 2007. It wasn't running when I got it.
After fixing it up to sell, I drove it around awhile to sort out the usual squeaks and rattles. The 318 was quiet, didn't smoke and had great oil pressure but was an absolute slug. It wouldn't even peel out in gravel. I tried more ignition timing, different carbs, distributors, coils....THEN I had the idea to pull the timing cover for a look-see. Someone had replaced the timing chain yet installed in T H R E E teeth off the mark, retarded. That is over 24 degrees! The 8.0 compression saved me from valve interference. I clocked the cam sprocket and screwed it all back together. The car easily smoked the peg leg tire after that.
Cam timing really makes a difference.

Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: Kern Dog] #1642499
07/06/14 04:06 AM
07/06/14 04:06 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
451Mopar Offline
master
451Mopar  Offline
master

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
I bet the cranking cylinder pressure was really low.
I could tell right away when the timing chain on a 350 Chevy jumped a few teeth just by the sound of it turning over with no cylinder pressure. I replaced a bunch of those nylon gear timing sets.

Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: Telvis] #1642500
07/06/14 10:41 AM
07/06/14 10:41 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443
Indiana
Y
YO7_A66 Offline
master
YO7_A66  Offline
master
Y

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443
Indiana
""2500 rpm stall TC/3:23 Sure Grip rear/255-60-15 tires in the rear.""

My stock stroke 340 in the last 13 years:
I have swapped out four carbs, two intakes, three cams, HP manifolds to TTi headers, three ignition systems, three torque converters, two different rear tire/rim sets.
For a street car, I have found the combination of the 340/2500/3:23/255 rear tires as your biggest mis-match. The 255's are a big tire to turn but I would keep them because as soon as you change your gear/converter, you will need them!
I believe that if you put your money into a good converter, your 3:23's "might" be ok. But I think that it is the combo of the 2500/3:23's that is keeping your off the line fun down.

Note: I run 3800/3:91/255 rear tires and I get instant tire spin off idle (no holding the brake) and also off of a rolling start. It is a fun street combo.


1970 YO7 A66 [Canadian Export] F8 Challenger
340 (Currently in shop for stroker assy.)
Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: Telvis] #1642501
07/06/14 11:29 AM
07/06/14 11:29 AM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,342
north of coder
moparx Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"
moparx  Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,342
north of coder
Quote:

Quote:

Does it have good throttle response? Are the secondaries opening on the carb?




I don't know... Have no reason to think they aren't. How do you know if they open? The throttle response seems fine. When I say the motor seems sluggish maybe that is the incorrect description. It just doesn't seem to have the torque I expected. It has no hesitation.



even if the secondaries are opening, are they opening the whole way ? as in : is the throttle cable adjusted properly ? you would be amazed at how often this happens.

Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: ScottSmith_Harms] #1642502
07/06/14 11:38 AM
07/06/14 11:38 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
M
MoparforLife Offline
Too Many Posts
MoparforLife  Offline
Too Many Posts
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
Quote:

Problem = 3:23 Sure Grip rear

Try some 3.55's or 3.91's, that'll wake it up


I agree and back the timing down to about 35 degrees. Most small blocks I have been around 35 degrees or less. My 360 in fact ET'd best at 32/34

Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: Telvis] #1642503
07/06/14 11:48 AM
07/06/14 11:48 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,013
Benton, IL.
D
DaveRS23 Offline
Special needs idiot
DaveRS23  Offline
Special needs idiot
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,013
Benton, IL.
Just as a test, you can take a small screw with it's nut and put in the secondary's slot so that the primary lever immediately opens the secondaries with the primaries. This will likely be too much, too soon if you open it up at low engine speed. But you will be able to tell as the engine revs up whether it runs better than before.

Again, this is just a test to see if you can tell a difference with the secondaries known to be opening.

Last edited by DaveRS23; 07/06/14 11:51 AM.

Master, again and still
Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: DaveRS23] #1642504
07/06/14 08:53 PM
07/06/14 08:53 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 464
KY
Telvis Offline OP
mopar
Telvis  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 464
KY
I can get a 3:91 gear for a good deal. I just figured it would be no fun to drive above 50 mph. I don't a do a lot of interstate driving but I do drive at 60 or so quite a bit when I cruise. Is that going to be too low a gear?


That's King Weenie to you!
Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: Telvis] #1642505
07/06/14 09:04 PM
07/06/14 09:04 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
I don't recall your rear tire height. I run a 3.91 with a 27.5 tire and in direct drive, I'm at 3100 at 65. Thats why I added a Gear Vendors overdrive.

Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: Telvis] #1642506
07/06/14 09:10 PM
07/06/14 09:10 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
Quote:

Is that going to be too low a gear?


I would be inclined to think it is a bit too low for your app


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: RapidRobert] #1642507
07/06/14 10:47 PM
07/06/14 10:47 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,138
Central NC
gch Offline
master
gch  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,138
Central NC
With a 3.23 gear and a low gear set in the tranny the gear isn't the problem.Look elsewhere.Having the cam degreed would be a start.Making sure the secondaries are opening is another.Take some timing out and see if it runs differently.
A better converter would be on my list but I think something else is off as well.

Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: gch] #1642508
07/06/14 10:58 PM
07/06/14 10:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,695
Bitopia
J
jcc Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
jcc  Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
J

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,695
Bitopia
I'm surprised with all the 255/3.23 theorists. I got a similiar mild built 360 with 3.55 and 305's and a tighter converter can't keep the rear tires stuck. Something in the OP's tune is off, I don't see a drive train issue, except the 255's are too narrow.


Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: jcc] #1642509
07/06/14 11:43 PM
07/06/14 11:43 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,706
Florida
BDW Offline
master
BDW  Offline
master

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,706
Florida
Quote:

I'm surprised with all the 255/3.23 theorists. I got a similiar mild built 360 with 3.55 and 305's and a tighter converter can't keep the rear tires stuck. Something in the OP's tune is off, I don't see a drive train issue, except the 255's are too narrow.




Same here, pretty stock 340, had 3.55s, now have 3.73 and no problems spinning the tires from a dead stop, and still spinning as car is shifted into 2nd.
Auto with RMVB.

Something else going on, gears or TQ isn't your problem.

Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: BDW] #1642510
07/07/14 12:38 AM
07/07/14 12:38 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,754
Windsor, ON, Canada
D
Diplomat360 Offline
top fuel
Diplomat360  Offline
top fuel
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,754
Windsor, ON, Canada
Quote:

Quote:

I'm surprised with all the 255/3.23 theorists. I got a similiar mild built 360 with 3.55 and 305's and a tighter converter can't keep the rear tires stuck. Something in the OP's tune is off, I don't see a drive train issue, except the 255's are too narrow.




Same here, pretty stock 340, had 3.55s, now have 3.73 and no problems spinning the tires from a dead stop, and still spinning as car is shifted into 2nd.
Auto with RMVB.

Something else going on, gears or TQ isn't your problem.




Well, for what it's worth, I am a bit on the other side of this 'argument'...360 build here, 165 PSI static compression, Hughes HE3834AL hydraulic flat tappet cam (238/244 dur, .536/.540 lift, 108 LSA), Perfomer RPM intake, ported heads, 2800 stall converter, 3.91 SG rear end and Nitto 275-60-15 tires...no tire spin AT ALL...well, sometimes maybe, but the Nittos grab like crazy...felt the motor was a tad weak in the lower RPM...moved to a Dynamic 3800 stall converter over the winter...in the car now, haven't tested it yet as I'm finishing up the sub-frame connectors install. All converter shops I talked to unanimously stated I had way too little converter for that cam...

Your cam is smaller, and depending on what tire you are running it should spin the wheels at least a tad...but ultimately it's about the combination.

Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: Diplomat360] #1642511
07/07/14 01:57 AM
07/07/14 01:57 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline
master
ademon  Offline
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I'm surprised with all the 255/3.23 theorists. I got a similiar mild built 360 with 3.55 and 305's and a tighter converter can't keep the rear tires stuck. Something in the OP's tune is off, I don't see a drive train issue, except the 255's are too narrow.




Same here, pretty stock 340, had 3.55s, now have 3.73 and no problems spinning the tires from a dead stop, and still spinning as car is shifted into 2nd.
Auto with RMVB.

Something else going on, gears or TQ isn't your problem.




Well, for what it's worth, I am a bit on the other side of this 'argument'...360 build here, 165 PSI static compression, Hughes HE3834AL hydraulic flat tappet cam (238/244 dur, .536/.540 lift, 108 LSA), Perfomer RPM intake, ported heads, 2800 stall converter, 3.91 SG rear end and Nitto 275-60-15 tires...no tire spin AT ALL...well, sometimes maybe, but the Nittos grab like crazy...felt the motor was a tad weak in the lower RPM...moved to a Dynamic 3800 stall converter over the winter...in the car now, haven't tested it yet as I'm finishing up the sub-frame connectors install. All converter shops I talked to unanimously stated I had way too little converter for that cam...

Your cam is smaller, and depending on what tire you are running it should spin the wheels at least a tad...but ultimately it's about the combination.


my 360 is close to yours but running a mechanical 6 pack , 3.55, with the same nitto tires. 4,400 dynamic stall. On blacktop bringing it to 3,000 then flooring it roasts the tires all the way to the rev limit and all the way through first into second, on concrete it will lay a good 25' patch.

Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: YO7_A66] #1642512
07/07/14 12:12 PM
07/07/14 12:12 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,100
Western Md.
skicker Offline
"The Champ"
skicker  Offline
"The Champ"

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,100
Western Md.
I have been struggling with a similar issue with mine. What kind of distributor are you running? I bought a new MSD set-up and installed it straight out of the box. I wasn't getting full centrifugal advance on the timing until almost 3800 RPM. $%@%^ Barn Door Springs!!!
You should be able to soften the springs and get full advance timing at a lower RPM. The difference should be significant. Mine just seemed a little lazy on the bottom and the further out I went the harder it pulled. I would check into it...


...FAFO...
Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: skicker] #1642513
07/07/14 02:51 PM
07/07/14 02:51 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 295
Vallejo, CA
D
ditchdrift Offline
enthusiast
ditchdrift  Offline
enthusiast
D

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 295
Vallejo, CA
what balancer are you using? you sure about the timing? That engine should boil the tires off through 2nd. My 340 in my b-body will obliterate the tires all through 3rd even.

Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: ditchdrift] #1642514
07/07/14 09:44 PM
07/07/14 09:44 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 464
KY
Telvis Offline OP
mopar
Telvis  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 464
KY
Quote:

what balancer are you using? you sure about the timing? That engine should boil the tires off through 2nd. My 340 in my b-body will obliterate the tires all through 3rd even.




I'm using a dial back timing light.

I ordered a Turbo Action TC today. Should give me more stall. I will give it a shot to see if that helps.

What rear end gears are you running?


That's King Weenie to you!
Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: Telvis] #1642515
07/07/14 10:56 PM
07/07/14 10:56 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 461
Detroit Michigan
stinger Offline
mopar
stinger  Offline
mopar

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 461
Detroit Michigan
I had a 340 6 pack with 3:91,scary fast after 4 grand,bottom end not so much. if you want low end grunt do a BB. I would set it up for high rpm thrashing and not worry so much about the burnouts.

Re: 340 not what I thought it would be...Any ideas? [Re: Telvis] #1642516
07/08/14 12:33 PM
07/08/14 12:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,931
P
Paul_Fancsali Offline
master
Paul_Fancsali  Offline
master
P

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,931
You have mismatch of parts but it can work 3.91s I have run 4.56's Forget the crap about the rev's it will go or blow.Timing get it as high as you can total near to 38-40 degree's as possible I think your comp is lower then you think if not and it talks, back it off. Under the carb run a 4 hole spacer Jet wise use 70s in the frt and no more then 76-77 in rear with a heavy yellow or purple spring to start DO NOT over jet.A 650 dbl pumper would work great. Air gap is good manifold but too much for combo you have you can crutch it or go to good dual plane

Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1