Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM #1496962
09/06/13 10:14 AM
09/06/13 10:14 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
I'm thinking about swapping cams in the Imperial.
Quickie rundown:

5300 lbs dry
255/70-15 tires (29" tall)
3.23 gears
440 engine
Edelbrock heads
iron manifolds (maybe switch to HP pieces)
wonderful 1972 low compression (8:1 if I'm lucky)
a518 transmission (.69 OD)
port fuel injection

The intent is to build a highway cruiser.

In stock form, the engine is sufficient at best. The car will cruise nicely but it's burdened a bit by the 1960s cam laziness.

I will not pull the engine so I'm stuck with the low compression.

So, what kind of cam does this thing need?

I was eyeing the Hughes HEH1019BL but doubt I have the cylinder pressure to make it work well.

Intake Valve Lift 1.5 .461"
Exhaust Valve Lift 1.5 .489"

Intake Duration at .050" 210°
Exhaust Duration at .050" 219°

Lobe Separation Angle 112º

Intake Opening at .050" -4° BTC
Exhaust Opening at .050" 44.5° BBC
Intake Closing at .050" 34° ABC
Exhaust Closing at .050" -5.5° ATC

Min. Suggested Cylinder PSI 150
Sweet Spot RPM IDLE - 4600


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: feets] #1496963
09/06/13 11:51 AM
09/06/13 11:51 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
Happy Birthday HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Advance it 4 degrees. I would run some 1.6 rockers to get even more lift without significant increase in duration.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: HotRodDave] #1496964
09/06/13 11:54 AM
09/06/13 11:54 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Quote:

Advance it 4 degrees. I would run some 1.6 rockers to get even more lift without significant increase in duration.




I thought about the rockers but if I'm going to start dropping a bunch of money on the engine it'll get swapped for something more powerful/efficient.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: feets] #1496965
09/06/13 01:16 PM
09/06/13 01:16 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
L
lewtot184 Offline
master
lewtot184  Offline
master
L

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
the torqueist cam i've stuck in a 440 was comp cams magnum replacement. i had one in a 9:1 compression 440 and thought it made too much torque.

Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: feets] #1496966
09/06/13 02:21 PM
09/06/13 02:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
T
Triple Threat Offline
master
Triple Threat  Offline
master
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
Quote:


255/60-15 tires (29" tall)
3.23 gears





255/60 tires are only 27" tall in my experience


-Dustin
67 Dart, 9 second, 392" G3 Hemi
68 Barracuda 340 F/SA
Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: feets] #1496967
09/06/13 02:35 PM
09/06/13 02:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
How about this Voodoo Lunati cam?

"""Hydraulic. Best mild performance cam. Works excellent in fuel injection applications with performance chip. Makes approximately 19 vacuum at idle. Great for performance oriented marine applications and heavy towing applications. Perfect Street Rod cam. Has slightly noticeable idle.

•Advertised Duration (Int/Exh): 256/262
•Duration @ .050 (Int/Exh): 213/220
•Gross Valve Lift (Int/Exh): .454/.475
•LSA/ICL: 112/108
•Valve Lash (Int/Exh): Hyd/Hyd
•RPM Range: 1000-5500
•Includes: Cam Only

Part Number: 10230701
Previoius Part Number: 60301

Jobber Price: $143.73"""

OR,
A few years ago, Dwayne Porter had talked to Comp and they had cam lobes developed in the XE HL Chrysler-specific line that were smaller than the XE275HL. They didn't put them into production, but any cam lobe they have designed is available to be ground onto a cam for not much over the regular price. I'd suggest giving them a call, you want to talk to someone about a custom grind.

But it looks to me that the Lunati is slightly better than the 112 LSA Hughes. The Hughes, tightened up to 109 degrees would be even better.

Also, let's not forget Bullet Cams!

R.

Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: Triple Threat] #1496968
09/06/13 02:55 PM
09/06/13 02:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Quote:

Quote:


255/60-15 tires (29" tall)
3.23 gears





255/60 tires are only 27" tall in my experience





OOPS!

255/70-15 General Grabber ATS. It's 29" tall.



We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: feets] #1496969
09/06/13 07:09 PM
09/06/13 07:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,988
Warren, MI
J
Jerry Offline
master
Jerry  Offline
master
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,988
Warren, MI
hughes whiplash cam
Camshaft Technical Details
Intake Valve Lift 1.5
Exhaust Valve Lift 1.5 .518"
.518"

Intake Valve Lift 1.6
Exhaust Valve Lift 1.6 .552"
.552"

Intake Duration at .050"
Exhaust Duration at .050" 232°
245°

Lobe Separation Angle 107º

Intake Opening at .050"
Exhaust Opening at .050" 14° BTC
54.5° BBC

Intake Closing at .050"
Exhaust Closing at .050" 38° ABC
10.5° ATC


Sweet Spot RPM 1800-5200


Superior Design Concepts
2574 Elliott Dr
Troy MI 48083
jerry@sdconcepts.com
www.sdconcepts.com
Facebook page: Superior Design Concepts
www.bcrproducts.com
Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: feets] #1496970
09/06/13 08:03 PM
09/06/13 08:03 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,501
Gainesville,FL
G
goldmember Offline
master
goldmember  Offline
master
G

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,501
Gainesville,FL
NO reason to put a larger exhaust lobe on anything for LOW RPM torque. I'd go old UD hyd flat 266/211@.050 .440 108 lsa in @103-104icl.

Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: Jerry] #1496971
09/07/13 02:15 AM
09/07/13 02:15 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Quote:

hughes whiplash cam
Camshaft Technical Details
Intake Valve Lift 1.5
Exhaust Valve Lift 1.5 .518"
.518"



Sweet Spot RPM 1800-5200




That sweet spot is already above the cruise rpm with the OD transmission.
I'm thinking that one will be a little too frisky for me.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: feets] #1496972
09/07/13 02:27 AM
09/07/13 02:27 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,501
Gainesville,FL
G
goldmember Offline
master
goldmember  Offline
master
G

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,501
Gainesville,FL
You'd find the combo would run better with 3.91 gears even with the stock cam. Put the mild cam and better gear in it and you'd be happy.You have the gearing as if it's a freakin Cummin's LOL It's far from it.

Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: goldmember] #1496973
09/07/13 10:46 AM
09/07/13 10:46 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Quote:

You'd find the combo would run better with 3.91 gears even with the stock cam. Put the mild cam and better gear in it and you'd be happy.You have the gearing as if it's a freakin Cummin's LOL It's far from it.




How would 3.91 gears help me cruise the highway?

I'm thinking the 3.23 should do fine.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: feets] #1496974
09/07/13 11:36 AM
09/07/13 11:36 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
Seems like the taller than OE tires and OD are getting that 440 out of its sweet spot at cruise. Agree a faster ramp low duration cam could help. Also, is there any opportunity to speed up ignition advance (mechanical and vacuum) w/o ping? That would help. Higher numerical gearing would help also with (maybe) some fuel consumption penalty. If the gearing gets the engine out of lug mode it could even help fuel consumption.

A really low duration fast ramp cam would help it run well in OD cruise but when you stomp it it would run out of breath pretty fast.

Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: goldmember] #1496975
09/07/13 01:06 PM
09/07/13 01:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,988
Warren, MI
J
Jerry Offline
master
Jerry  Offline
master
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,988
Warren, MI
feets you'd be happy with the whiplash cam and then add a little gear maybe a 3.55 or 3.73 or get some shorter tires.


Superior Design Concepts
2574 Elliott Dr
Troy MI 48083
jerry@sdconcepts.com
www.sdconcepts.com
Facebook page: Superior Design Concepts
www.bcrproducts.com
Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: HotRodDave] #1496976
09/07/13 01:10 PM
09/07/13 01:10 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
R
rbstroker Offline
super stock
rbstroker  Offline
super stock
R

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
Like HotRodDave said. just advance your stock cam 4*. That will increase your dynamic compression ratio, by closing the intake valve sooner, increasing lower RPM power with little loss of top end. Your stock cam should be about 268* intake valve duration seat to seat. Exactly what you want.


This is the land of the free because of the brave
Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: goldmember] #1496977
09/07/13 01:23 PM
09/07/13 01:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698
NE Oklahoma
V
Von Offline
master
Von  Offline
master
V

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698
NE Oklahoma
Quote:

NO reason to put a larger exhaust lobe on anything for LOW RPM torque.







72 RR, Pump gas 440, 452s, 3800 lbs, Corked, ET Radials,. 11.33@117.72. Same car, bone stock 346s, 9.5 comp, baby solid. 12.24@110.
Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: rbstroker] #1496978
09/07/13 03:27 PM
09/07/13 03:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
Happy Birthday HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
I was not thinking the stock cam but the one he posted specs for

That is about as good as it's gonna get. The other cams listed give up lift and increase duration, bad things for low RPM The short duration is gonna help it make gobs of TQ at a 1500 cruise and the high lift is gonna give it some air flow for passing gear revs.

As for the gearing, if my Dakota that weighs nearly as much as the imp can handle 3.55s a 31 inch tire and .69 OD with a 239 V6 than surely a 440 in a slightly more aerodynamic car and shorter tires will be fine with a 3.23 and OD


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: HotRodDave] #1496979
09/07/13 03:51 PM
09/07/13 03:51 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,670
A
Andrewh Offline
master
Andrewh  Offline
master
A

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,670
Quote:

in a slightly more aerodynamic car and shorter tires will be fine with a 3.23 and OD




lol. I bet it has more front end surface area than your dakota.

Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: Andrewh] #1496980
09/08/13 11:52 AM
09/08/13 11:52 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Quote:

Quote:

in a slightly more aerodynamic car and shorter tires will be fine with a 3.23 and OD




lol. I bet it has more front end surface area than your dakota.




If the Dakota is turned sideways and the Imperial is head one they'd be about the same.

I don't have the OD in it yet but I'll probably build it in the next week or two.

If I dump my EFI system on the car I can have any timing arrangement I want.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Pick the cam: Monster torque at low RPM [Re: feets] #1496981
09/09/13 10:12 AM
09/09/13 10:12 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
3
360view Offline
Moparts resident spammer
360view  Offline
Moparts resident spammer
3

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
since you have and use machine tools,
what about trying to machine a tapered flat onto the inner piston of your present hydraulic lifters?

If it does not work,
you will be changing to new hyd lifters with the new cam anyway.....

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5623898.html

sample quote

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The variable duration hydraulic valve lifter described herein is designed to provide favorable characteristics over the entire speed range. At low and intermediate speeds a closely controlled oil leak in the pressure chamber is permitted to prevent pumping up to a wholly solid condition. This is accomplished with uniquely configured grooves in the outer surface of the plunger of the valve lifter. These grooves extend the entire length of the upper portion from its top edge to its bottom edge and also on the bottom portion from its top edge to its bottom edge. Each of these grooves has a greater width at their bottom end than their width at their top end.

The width of the grooves at their top end is in the range of 0.0042-0.0612 inches.
The width of the grooves at their bottom end is in the range of 0.0150-0.0625 inches.

The configuration of these grooves is referred to as a pyramid type cut. Also the depth of the grooves may increase from their top edge to their bottom edge. The depth at the top edge of the grooves is in the range of 0.0075-0.0150 inches. The depth of the grooves at their bottom edge is in the range of 0.0080-0.0180 inches.

Control tests have been conducted on a 1991 Ford pickup truck that was tuned-up to factory specifications. Then it was sent to a California smog station for testing. Once the smog testing was completed, it went to a wheel dyno for horsepower and torque testing. Thus provided with an accurate starting point established, the Ford pickup had the novel variable duration hydraulic valve lifters installed. No modification to the vehicle's engine of any kind was required nor was any retuning of the vehicle necessary following installation of the novel valve lifters. The Ford pickup was tested again at the smog station and on the wheel dyno. The testing revealed that the novel valve lifters made the following improvements: 91% reduction in hydrocarbons at idle, 37.5% reduction in hydrocarbons at 2500 rpm, elimination of deadly carbon dioxide at idle or at 2500 rpm, increased air flow through the engine, and 7.9% increase in horsepower and torque from the engine. The engine's warm-up time was also cut in half. An additional benefit was that there was an increase in gas mileage from 18.6 mpg. to 20.7 mpg.

The use of variable width grooves and/or variable depth grooves in the external surface of the plunger of the variable duration hydraulic valve lifters allows them to be effectively used with multiweight engine oils.

In prior art variable duration valve lifters such as the Rhodes lifters, the external grooves in the plungers had a constant width and depth. It was therefore difficult for the oil in their respective reservoirs to enter the bottom ends of their respective grooves and also insure that there would be a continuous flow of motor oil up the length of the grooves. As a result, spurts of oil would be ejected from the top ends of the grooves instead of a controlled continuous flow and the valve lifters would operate inefficiently at low and mid-range rpm. This produces a lose of horsepower and torque, incomplete combustion causing increased emissions and a decrease in gas mileage.

The use of variable width grooves and/or variable depth grooves in the external surface of the plunger of the variable duration hydraulic valve lifter also decreases the recovery cycle time considerably for the oil to leave the respective reservoir areas at the bottom of the respective upper portion and lower portion of the plunger, pass along their respective external grooves and return to their respective reservoir areas. The recovery time can be reduced by as much as 50 percent or more.

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1