Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
#1399978
03/10/13 03:43 AM
03/10/13 03:43 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
Went and ran my 440 Dakota for the first time today. 59 Degree 4.125 bore/stroke, W9 heads worked by Ryan at SDSS. CR is only 9:1, was supposed to be a turbo motor, but was stationed in Italy so went away from that. Took it to Cecil today and went 11.25 at 118. 60 ft was 1.578, and 1.589 on the good runs. Running 26x10x16 slicks. A video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AZEXKCcUDQ
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: ADakotaRTGuy]
#1399981
03/10/13 03:57 AM
03/10/13 03:57 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,501 Gainesville,FL
goldmember
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,501
Gainesville,FL
|
I hope you need more gear converter and tune? Not enough info to make a good guess. Are you happy with it? Add the correct turbo 15lbs and make 1000hp or so.
Last edited by goldmember; 03/10/13 03:59 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: ADakotaRTGuy]
#1399984
03/10/13 04:05 AM
03/10/13 04:05 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,501 Gainesville,FL
goldmember
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,501
Gainesville,FL
|
It looks to be making a little over 500fwhp,sounds low but if its got a turbo cam,low comp,tight converter etc there's more in it.A 250 shot would wake it up.
Last edited by goldmember; 03/10/13 04:06 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: MPerry]
#1399988
03/10/13 01:26 PM
03/10/13 01:26 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
Quote:
Is that the 11.25 run? It sounded like you were hitting a rev limiter at :39-:40. If so it should have almost another second in it.
No, that was not the 11.25 run. I think that one was 11.91.
That is part of the issue, not shift lift. Hopefully get that remedied and I am able to shift at 7k. Possibly take it a little higher.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: TheOtherDodge]
#1399989
03/10/13 01:38 PM
03/10/13 01:38 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: ADakotaRTGuy]
#1399990
03/10/13 03:31 PM
03/10/13 03:31 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,254 Canada
WO23Coronet
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,254
Canada
|
What did your engine dyno? (On the pump not RWHP, just out of curiosity) Also, what did your 59 degree W9's flow? There's been a couple of posts on here lately about how they're a waste of time and to go with 48 degree W9's, so I'm curious what kind of flow you got out of them. Your truck's 1/4 mile time seems pretty impressive, it's running LOW 11's (possible high 10's) with the aerogynamics of a brick, low compression, and an unoptimized set up (not saying your set up isn't good, but it probably could use more gear and convertor if you were going for an all out time, but I'm guessing in the name of streetability you made a compromise on the gearing and converter, as most of us would on a street car). Lots of 440 wedge and Hemi cars running slower than you are. I think people see "W9" and expect 9 second 1/4 mile times
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: 383man]
#1399993
03/10/13 03:47 PM
03/10/13 03:47 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
Quote:
Wow wish I could have made it to Cecil today. Such a nice day. I guess you did not do bad for the first time out on that eng. Ron
Track was perfect, you could go and make a run whenever you wanted, surprised it was not busy.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: ADakotaRTGuy]
#1399994
03/10/13 03:56 PM
03/10/13 03:56 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,657 Fitchburg,Massachusetts
MPerry
Mopahts memba'
|
Mopahts memba'
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,657
Fitchburg,Massachusetts
|
Quote:
Track was perfect, you could go and make a run whenever you wanted, surprised it was not busy.
Really wish I could move south. Can't tell much on that video except it may be the same camera guy that filmed The Blair Witch Project.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: ADakotaRTGuy]
#1399996
03/10/13 04:07 PM
03/10/13 04:07 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: Adobedude]
#1399998
03/10/13 07:38 PM
03/10/13 07:38 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
Quote:
Truck is the wrong color...
We will agree to disagree, haha.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: ADakotaRTGuy]
#1399999
03/10/13 07:50 PM
03/10/13 07:50 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978 Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
|
Nice passes for being able to run on 87 gas. Lol I think if you changed a few thing it would really pick up.( more gear, some nitrous, bigger conv)
Brett Miller W9 cnc'd heads STR Chassis fabraction
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: 1967dartgt]
#1400000
03/10/13 07:52 PM
03/10/13 07:52 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
Quote:
Nice passes for being able to run on 87 gas. Lol I think if you changed a few thing it would really pick up.( more gear, some nitrous, bigger conv)
Have the Nitrous system installed, think we had a solenoid fail or would of had some times with that yesterday.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: ADakotaRTGuy]
#1400003
03/10/13 08:59 PM
03/10/13 08:59 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978 Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
|
Looks good, want to sell your valve covers? Plate or fogger?
Brett Miller W9 cnc'd heads STR Chassis fabraction
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: 1967dartgt]
#1400004
03/10/13 09:01 PM
03/10/13 09:01 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
Quote:
Looks good, want to sell your valve covers? Plate or fogger?
Na, I like the valve covers, they are heavy though. Wasn't someone on here selling a set?
I am using a perimeter plate.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: 1967dartgt]
#1400005
03/10/13 09:07 PM
03/10/13 09:07 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,330 Lynchburg, VA
Leon441
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,330
Lynchburg, VA
|
Your heads are misleading. Guys hear W9 and start thinking of heads that flow a minimum of 350. Problem arrives when you are porting and having to allow for the pushrod on a 59 degree block.
Those dakotas are heavy no doubt. 11.25 is probably a decent number for that combo.
If I can help you with your nitrous problems let me know. That is what it needs.
Leon
Career best 8.02 @ 169 at 3050# and 10" tires small block power.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: ADakotaRTGuy]
#1400007
03/10/13 09:16 PM
03/10/13 09:16 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 935 Deland, Florida
biff426
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 935
Deland, Florida
|
Quote:
Went and ran my 440 Dakota for the first time today. 59 Degree 4.125 bore/stroke, W9 heads worked by Ryan at SDSS. CR is only 9:1, was supposed to be a turbo motor, but was stationed in Italy so went away from that. Took it to Cecil today and went 11.25 at 118. 60 ft was 1.578, and 1.589 on the good runs. Running 26x10x16 slicks.
A video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AZEXKCcUDQ
No credit to Chris at PIE?
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: biff426]
#1400008
03/10/13 09:18 PM
03/10/13 09:18 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
Quote:
Quote:
Went and ran my 440 Dakota for the first time today. 59 Degree 4.125 bore/stroke, W9 heads worked by Ryan at SDSS. CR is only 9:1, was supposed to be a turbo motor, but was stationed in Italy so went away from that. Took it to Cecil today and went 11.25 at 118. 60 ft was 1.578, and 1.589 on the good runs. Running 26x10x16 slicks.
A video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AZEXKCcUDQ
No credit to Chris at PIE?
I did on the other site. But yea, Chris at Performance Injection Equipment built it and brought it to the track for me. Good builder to work with.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: biff426]
#1400009
03/10/13 09:39 PM
03/10/13 09:39 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978 Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
|
I would ditch the perimeter plate. Spray bars work much better.
Brett Miller W9 cnc'd heads STR Chassis fabraction
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: Streetwize]
#1400014
03/11/13 05:17 PM
03/11/13 05:17 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
Quote:
Lower compression might want higher RPM to squeeze some cylinder pressure out of it. You have the head flow to support it
Looks like a good app for spray if your not gonna spool it or pull the heads for more CR.
Already have the system in there.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: 1967dartgt]
#1400015
03/11/13 05:30 PM
03/11/13 05:30 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,395 Pa
Hot 340
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,395
Pa
|
Quote:
Nice passes for being able to run on 87 gas.
My thought exactly. That combo is the definition of mild and heavy. I think it works pretty good for not being ironed out yet.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: ADakotaRTGuy]
#1400029
03/12/13 12:18 PM
03/12/13 12:18 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 901 oh
julian2007
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 901
oh
|
anyone who says your dakota is not bad fast for what it is does not race.make no mistake that ting is fast for what you have in it.I am the frist to call bull $hit on someont when they start with 3900 lb race cars but I know what those dakotas weigh.440 small block+3900 lbs running 11.20's = FAST
God made cold beer,good friends,hot ladies and race cars don't spit in his face by pi$$ing and moaning about how life sucks!!!
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: ADakotaRTGuy]
#1400030
03/12/13 12:25 PM
03/12/13 12:25 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266 Renton Washington
Triple Threat
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
|
I agree that truck is fast, using the old rule of thumb 100# = .10, subtract 1000 pounds and its a low 10 second ride.
That's fast with low compression, not a ton of camshaft, and mild gears. Especially on the first day out, it will go faster with tuning i'm sure.
Be proud of what you have there, it is a nice piece.
-Dustin 67 Dart, 9 second, 392" G3 Hemi 68 Barracuda 340 F/SA
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: Triple Threat]
#1400031
03/12/13 04:05 PM
03/12/13 04:05 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,953 Houston, Texas
TheOtherDodge
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,953
Houston, Texas
|
Generally power adders (depending on what type of power adder) will use a much different gear, converter, compression ratio, cam...
For instance, mine is 3.55 geared w/30" tall tire, 3000 converter, 9:1 compression, cam with 0 overlap, shifting at 6000 rpm. This is all because it is set up for turbo and would probably run 12.0 on motor only.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: julian2007]
#1400032
03/12/13 04:10 PM
03/12/13 04:10 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
Quote:
anyone who says your dakota is not bad fast for what it is does not race.make no mistake that ting is fast for what you have in it.I am the frist to call bull $hit on someont when they start with 3900 lb race cars but I know what those dakotas weigh.440 small block+3900 lbs running 11.20's = FAST
Julian, that is a nice truck. What is done to yours?
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: ADakotaRTGuy]
#1400033
03/12/13 07:03 PM
03/12/13 07:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,635 Oakland, MI
dizuster
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,635
Oakland, MI
|
I'm not trying to knock what you've done. I hope that doesn't come off that way. I'm just telling you that you should figure out what's wrong so you can get the most out of your combo. If this one made 470hp to the tire, it probably makes 550~575 at the crank. Just look at some other combo's. Here is a 340" with unported w9's that made 602hp on pump gas. http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/techarticles/engine/mopp_0310_340_engine_600_hp/viewall.htmlThere is no reason why your's shouldn't make more power then this. Even if this one has more compression, your heads are MUCH better then an unported w9. Like I said... sorry if it came off like I was knocking you. I was just trying to help.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: dizuster]
#1400034
03/12/13 07:08 PM
03/12/13 07:08 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
Quote:
I'm not trying to knock what you've done. I hope that doesn't come off that way. I'm just telling you that you should figure out what's wrong so you can get the most out of your combo.
If this one made 470hp to the tire, it probably makes 550~575 at the crank.
Just look at some other combo's. Here is a 340" with unported w9's that made 602hp on pump gas.
http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/techarticles/engine/mopp_0310_340_engine_600_hp/viewall.html
There is no reason why your's shouldn't make more power then this. Even if this one has more compression, your heads are MUCH better then an unported w9.
Like I said... sorry if it came off like I was knocking you. I was just trying to help.
That is all great, but you are missing one important part. Those are 48 degree heads. They flow as much as mine out of the box and can go much much higher.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: dizuster]
#1400039
03/12/13 08:21 PM
03/12/13 08:21 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
Quote:
I'm not trying to knock what you've done. I hope that doesn't come off that way. I'm just telling you that you should figure out what's wrong so you can get the most out of your combo.
If this one made 470hp to the tire, it probably makes 550~575 at the crank.
Just look at some other combo's. Here is a 340" with unported w9's that made 602hp on pump gas.
http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/techarticles/engine/mopp_0310_340_engine_600_hp/viewall.html
There is no reason why your's shouldn't make more power then this. Even if this one has more compression, your heads are MUCH better then an unported w9.
Like I said... sorry if it came off like I was knocking you. I was just trying to help.
Here is the side to side comparison. You can see mine has TQ, theirs has RPM, two different motors. I had to hand jam it and convert it all, so might have some errors, but it makes sense. used 18% powertrain loss.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#1400040
03/12/13 08:22 PM
03/12/13 08:22 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
Quote:
By the way, thank-you for your service of serving our Country. Its because of guys like you that we can close our eyes at night and fall asleep.
Thanks Pitt, its a pleasure.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: ADakotaRTGuy]
#1400041
03/12/13 09:08 PM
03/12/13 09:08 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,041 michigan woods
imfixinmopars426
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,041
michigan woods
|
Quote:
Quote:
By the way, thank-you for your service of serving our Country. Its because of guys like you that we can close our eyes at night and fall asleep.
Thanks Pitt, its a pleasure.
i think you have a very neat truck,and its fast! and i also thank you for your service to our country! save up for a turbo,and blow everyones mind!
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: dizuster]
#1400044
03/12/13 10:49 PM
03/12/13 10:49 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
Quote:
Ok... sorry... you guys got it all figured out. Us racer/engineer types that want to use experience and data must be wrong. If the keyboard experts of moparts want to make you feel better about spending $10k on a motor to run 11.20's, then who am I to tell you different.
Good luck...
So what do you think is the issue? Saying something is wrong does not help anyone. It has quality components. Optimum set up? No, but it is what it is right now. Only thing I could think of is the Intake. That is a straight out of the box 772 intake. What do those flow?
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#1400049
03/13/13 01:20 PM
03/13/13 01:20 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
Fixed the issue with the lean spots at the track last time. That time was a run, but unsure of the shift points.
Last edited by ADakotaRTGuy; 03/13/13 01:20 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: Duner]
#1400051
03/13/13 01:30 PM
03/13/13 01:30 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
Quote:
How much does your truck weigh now?
3898 with my 160 in it.
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: ADakotaRTGuy]
#1400052
03/13/13 01:51 PM
03/13/13 01:51 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 928 NC
SLOW67
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 928
NC
|
Quote:
You build it and pay for it Duner, I will put it on, haha. I will even give you a set of W9 Dakota headers in return.
Come off your current headers and y into a single and bring it back up in the engine compartment, through on a flange, add a cheap ebay turbo (they sell cheapo 88's now) and your in business. I probably have less than $800 in my actual turbo setup, my biggest cost was fuel system and bits and pieces. It's very pretty but my cheap turbo has been through a good amount of abuse and still works great. I bet I ran it two weeks driving it every day with the drain 3/4 stopped up. It puked alot of oil out of the seals but recovered fine after I fixed the drain
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: ADakotaRTGuy]
#1400053
03/13/13 02:24 PM
03/13/13 02:24 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 901 oh
julian2007
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 901
oh
|
Quote:
Quote:
anyone who says your dakota is not bad fast for what it is does not race.make no mistake that ting is fast for what you have in it.I am the frist to call bull $hit on someont when they start with 3900 lb race cars but I know what those dakotas weigh.440 small block+3900 lbs running 11.20's = FAST
Julian, that is a nice truck. What is done to yours?
I was a 446 with b1 bs heads no port work to speak of a 600 lift flat tappet 10.5 to 1 comp two 750 eddys, hooker super comp headers 10 inch converter,456 gears, 14 32 tires power,windows,power stearing,cd,ac,all working lights e-brake.I weighed 3770 lbs with me in it but I had allot of it cut away,like alum fire wall,glass nose,no rear seat,race buckets,alum bed floor.but it had a eu 2000 generator in the bed to run the a/c and to charge the battery between rounds.It went 10.70's it dynoed 575 hp at Bob Kammers in dayton oh
Also people in the armed forces are first class all the way
God made cold beer,good friends,hot ladies and race cars don't spit in his face by pi$$ing and moaning about how life sucks!!!
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: julian2007]
#1400054
03/13/13 02:53 PM
03/13/13 02:53 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: TheOtherDodge]
#1400058
03/13/13 05:32 PM
03/13/13 05:32 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193 MD
ADakotaRTGuy
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
MD
|
|
|
|
Re: Ran the 440 small block Dakota - Thoughts?
[Re: ADakotaRTGuy]
#1400061
03/16/13 09:45 AM
03/16/13 09:45 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 426 Cairns Queensland Australia. T...
vc360
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 426
Cairns Queensland Australia. T...
|
Quote:
Second opinion on what aspect?
Have someone familiar with the w9 take a look, if your a little dissapointed in the performance start there, and give the manifold some love while its off. Maybe see w5dart66 and get him to look at them.
|
|
|
|
|