Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust #1223219
04/27/12 08:55 PM
04/27/12 08:55 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
DARTH V8Я Offline OP
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!
DARTH V8Я  Offline OP
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
So, which would make more horsepower/torque in both peak and 'under the curve' in a typical NA smallblock? Right now I'm leaning towards a single 3" in my application, but if need be I could squeeze in a dual 2.5" exhaust. Thanks.


When it takes more than a sweet mullet to prove you rule at the trailer park..
Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: DARTH V8Я] #1223220
04/27/12 10:43 PM
04/27/12 10:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,254
Canada
WO23Coronet Offline
master
WO23Coronet  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,254
Canada
Depends. Are you talking about a 11:1, big cam, NA small block, or a stock 5.2 Magnum? Sounds like you're dealing with a truck since you're even considering a single exhaust. BUT the dual 2.5" will give you more HP potential over a single 3", it definitely won't hurt performance, even in a mild application. So if you can squeeze the duals in I say do it

Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: WO23Coronet] #1223221
04/27/12 11:12 PM
04/27/12 11:12 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383 Offline
Too Many Posts
70Cuda383  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
the dual system will give you the best of both worlds. your pipes will be small enough to keep velocity/scavenging up at lower RPM for better torque, but by having 2 pipes, you can still get high RPM flow out of them.

2 2.5" pipes have a lot more cross sectional area and flow potential than a single 3" pipe.


but, for a truck (assuming that's what this is on since your asking about duals vs single) it can sometimes be tricky routing a true dual system, especially if it's a newer truck where the tank hangs inside the frame rail, in front of the rear axle, forcing your driver side exhaust to cross over to the passenger side.

how "big" is your engine? a single 3" system will still support a TON of Hp. my engine is only lightly modded, and put down 300 hp to the wheels, I do not feel like my exhaust is the limiting factor, or anywhere near choking me down yet. my exhaust will flow more than my heads will


**Photobucket sucks**
Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: 70Cuda383] #1223222
04/28/12 12:04 AM
04/28/12 12:04 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
DARTH V8Я Offline OP
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!
DARTH V8Я  Offline OP
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
The motor is about 331 cubic inches. The problem is that the spare tire well drops down in the trunk, and the gas tank occupies the space beside it. I could put dual 2.5's that exit in front of the rear fenderwells, with a couple 'bullet' style mufflers side by side. I know for sure a 3" pipe will route the like original exhaust did, and I can use a sideways mounted flowmaster 3" in/out muffler. Shooting for about 400hp @ the flywheel.


When it takes more than a sweet mullet to prove you rule at the trailer park..
Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: DARTH V8Я] #1223223
04/28/12 01:02 AM
04/28/12 01:02 AM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,168
Vancouver, WA
MoparMarq Offline
super stock
MoparMarq  Offline
super stock

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,168
Vancouver, WA
What's the vehicle? That might get you some better answers by folks who've been there, done that...

Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: DARTH V8Я] #1223224
04/28/12 09:32 AM
04/28/12 09:32 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383 Offline
Too Many Posts
70Cuda383  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
with properly sized headers that go into a single 3" system, you'll easilly make 400 crank hp. My Dakota has the worst headers on the market on them. $120 "shortys" that bolt to the factory down pipes...they are marginally better than the stock manifolds, especially since they are about as compact as the factory manifolds. it then flow through some 2" pipe that dumps into a 3" single run that's about 5 feet long.

I put 295 hp and 330 tq to the wheels, so that's up around the 375-400 ball-park on crank hp, and Like I said, my heads are what's holding me back now, not my exhaust.


**Photobucket sucks**
Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: 70Cuda383] #1223225
04/28/12 10:17 AM
04/28/12 10:17 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 773
Crofton, Ky.
R
rattler Offline
super stock
rattler  Offline
super stock
R

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 773
Crofton, Ky.
I'll give you the numbers to compare. A set of dual 2 1/2 pipes have a combined surface area of 9.8175 inches, while a single 3 inch pipe has a surface area of 7.0686 inches. Thats quite a bit of difference.


1957 Dodge truck, Snakeskin Green with a little stroker motor. 1964 Plymouth Savoy wagon ( my new project)
Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: 70Cuda383] #1223226
04/28/12 11:03 AM
04/28/12 11:03 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
DARTH V8Я Offline OP
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!
DARTH V8Я  Offline OP
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
Thanks guys, and thanks 70Cuda383 for the real world info.Headers are Sanderson Shorty Headers which will utillize a 3" Y-pipe into a 3" single with Hi-flow cat & muffler to the back. I think thats the route I'll go. Thanks again guys.


When it takes more than a sweet mullet to prove you rule at the trailer park..
Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: DARTH V8Я] #1223227
04/28/12 12:03 PM
04/28/12 12:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,254
Canada
WO23Coronet Offline
master
WO23Coronet  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,254
Canada
BTW, what vehicle is this? Just out of curiosity, always like to hear what people are working on.

Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: rattler] #1223228
04/28/12 12:14 PM
04/28/12 12:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Quote:

I'll give you the numbers to compare. A set of dual 2 1/2 pipes have a combined surface area of 9.8175 inches, while a single 3 inch pipe has a surface area of 7.0686 inches. Thats quite a bit of difference.




I think you mean cross sectional area not surface area. Those duals have a ton more surface area in the pipes to create friction witch resists flow. Also because the cross section is so much higher in the duals it loses velocity. If you had two exhaust systems of equal cross section then the single would make more power. The single would also be more balanced and scavenge better, sort of like an X pipe but it don't seperate back appart. A single exhaust with an equal cross section will have more velocity, flow and HP. Your examples are not equal though.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: DARTH V8Я] #1223229
04/28/12 01:37 PM
04/28/12 01:37 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
451Mopar Offline
master
451Mopar  Offline
master

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
Not sure if this would help in your application, but I put dual 2-1/4" from the manifolds into a dual inlet / single 3" out IMCO (Flomaster type) muffler on my '86 Ram W150. It sounds really nice too.

Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: HotRodDave] #1223230
04/28/12 04:43 PM
04/28/12 04:43 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383 Offline
Too Many Posts
70Cuda383  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
Quote:

Quote:

I'll give you the numbers to compare. A set of dual 2 1/2 pipes have a combined surface area of 9.8175 inches, while a single 3 inch pipe has a surface area of 7.0686 inches. Thats quite a bit of difference.




I think you mean cross sectional area not surface area. Those duals have a ton more surface area in the pipes to create friction witch resists flow. Also because the cross section is so much higher in the duals it loses velocity. If you had two exhaust systems of equal cross section then the single would make more power. The single would also be more balanced and scavenge better, sort of like an X pipe but it don't seperate back appart. A single exhaust with an equal cross section will have more velocity, flow and HP. Your examples are not equal though.




All that is true. dual pipes will have MUCH more surface area inside the pipe, creating more boundary layer turbulance/friction and resistance to flow.

a dual 2 1/8" pipe is about equal in cross sectional area to a single 3" pipe.

I would think the dual 2.125" system would have more low end torque, and still maintain the same higher RPM hp of the single 3" system.

I've always read that smaller pipes will have more velocity, more torque, but will not support high RPM flow requirements. Especially with header primary sizes.

if a smaller primary size gives more low end torque/scavenging because of the increased velocity of the flow, but will become "stuffed up" and not support high RPM hp, then why would that not apply to the full system?


**Photobucket sucks**
Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: 70Cuda383] #1223231
04/28/12 11:57 PM
04/28/12 11:57 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
DARTH V8Я Offline OP
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!
DARTH V8Я  Offline OP
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
I think the reason is becouse fluids follow a different set of rules then gasses in terms of flow. By that I mean fluids produce more friction then gasses.

Quote:

I think you mean cross sectional area not surface area. Those duals have a ton more surface area in the pipes to create friction witch resists flow. Also because the cross section is so much higher in the duals it loses velocity. If you had two exhaust systems of equal cross section then the single would make more power. The single would also be more balanced and scavenge better, sort of like an X pipe but it don't seperate back appart. A single exhaust with an equal cross section will have more velocity, flow and HP. Your examples are not equal though



This is a very reasonable explanation. I would like to see a dyno test between a dual 2.5" vs a 3" system, but I cant find any examples.

Car in question is a 73 Vega, but I'm sure this theory has universal applications


When it takes more than a sweet mullet to prove you rule at the trailer park..
Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: DARTH V8Я] #1223232
04/29/12 12:40 AM
04/29/12 12:40 AM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,168
Vancouver, WA
MoparMarq Offline
super stock
MoparMarq  Offline
super stock

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,168
Vancouver, WA
Quote:

I think the reason is becouse fluids follow a different set of rules then gasses in terms of flow. By that I mean fluids produce more friction then gasses.




False. As far as the engineering is concerned, the same equations apply for fluid mechanics. Fluid in these terms can be a liquid or a gas.
The difference in this case was touched on by HotRodDave in his use of the term "surface area".
All other things being equal, two pipes of the same "cross section area" would be sized at about 71% of the diameter of a single pipe (1 / square root of 2). Nearest real world comparo is single 3" vs. dual 2-1/4". In theoretical terms, the dual exhaust (at 71% diameter, or 2.14") will have 1.4 times the "surface area" (the outside of the pipe) for heat loss to the atmosphere prior to exiting the tailpipe. Heat loss slows velocity. This makes the comparison between given cross section area size pipes a comparison between apples and oranges.

Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: MoparMarq] #1223233
04/29/12 01:09 AM
04/29/12 01:09 AM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 240
fredericksburg virginia
M
mopwrd340 Offline
enthusiast
mopwrd340  Offline
enthusiast
M

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 240
fredericksburg virginia
If you can still find them my friend had a vega with headers and sidepipes made for a vega . he bought it as a kit sounded good to i beleive it was 2 and a half inch pipes ,

Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: mopwrd340] #1223234
04/29/12 10:25 AM
04/29/12 10:25 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 271
MO, USA
Tom Hand Offline
enthusiast
Tom Hand  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 271
MO, USA
Here are my thoughts and theories on this.

Don't forget that with all the cylinders tied together, any reversion is going to be worse, in other words if you install a relatively restrictive chambered style muffler, the feedback (reversion) from the single exhaust that tends to restrict the intake will be worse than if you have an isolated, dual-pipe system because now you have all 8 cylinders acting on the one that happens to be exhausting at the time. A higher flowing muffler will likely not hurt as much but the location of the junction may be more important.

Granted crossovers tend to tie both sides together but not in the same way at the manifolds as a larger single large pipe.

I think if you keep the pipes split all the way to the back then combine them, it may act differently than if you tie them together at the front and run one single all the way. Plus with dual mufflers you can lower (quiet) the exhaust sound level even more due to the added volume of the two muffler bodies. Always remember, you want volume in the mufflers to get the most sound control. If you have multiple pipes feeding/traversing through a muffler, that takes away volume you can depend on for noise/sound absorption.

Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: Tom Hand] #1223235
04/29/12 01:20 PM
04/29/12 01:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Then why not run 8 single exhaust systems

Headers are takeing advantage of tuneing, collectors are also needed for this tuneing, the rest of the exhaust system is primarily dealing with just flow. If you understand what is really going on with a tuned length header/collector you will understand why they are run together... the piston forces exhaust out in one big "lump" really fast, this "lump" goes flying past the end of the pipe of the next pipe in the firing order, as that mass of exhaust flies past the other pipe the inertia it has pulls a vaccume on the adjacent pipe, if that pipe is just about to dump the exhaust then the first lump will help pull it out of that pipe, it is the venturi effect. In a normal V8 there is an un even firing order from side to side so you get two lumps really close together, this is where the X pipe comes in, or the old fashioned less effective H pipe. It allows that big supper lump to bleed from one side to the other and allows scavenging from one side to the other, now the ultimate exhaust would be to join the two pipes into one at just the right time for the two big lumps to help pull each other out the entire length of the pipe in a single exhaust configuration. After a certain point in the system there is gonna be no significant tuneing effect and simply raw flow numbers are gonna make the most HP and a single pipe with the same cross section as a dual system will flow more, then it becomes a matter of packageing the system and most cars will have a hard time fitting a single 3.5 inch pipe with out dragging the ground or bending it too tight, this is the only reason dual exhaust became popular for high power machines. A dual system has more heat loss due to surface area than an equal cross section single and heat loss costs HP also.


Now there is gonna come a point where simply raw flow rules supreme even over scavenging but that is top fuel territory (not even nascar or F1) where 8 single exhaust pipes rule but even then they still tune with the primary lengths instead of just running the exhaust right out of the head.

Here is how scavenging works

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzhM9e5ZpbA

See how he lets his breath pull more air to fill the bag with one breath instead of the 6 or 8 individual breaths, that is like how one exhaust "breath" from one cylinder pulls on the next one to better empty the cylinder and if you can get the cylinder more empty then you can pull in more A/F on the intake stroke and make more power. The pipes by them self would never make as much power if they were not able to pull their neighbors exhaust and by running duals you are limiting there ability to help there neighbor.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: HotRodDave] #1223236
04/29/12 01:54 PM
04/29/12 01:54 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 271
MO, USA
Tom Hand Offline
enthusiast
Tom Hand  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 271
MO, USA
For sure HotRod Dave you are right on about the tuning but in fact, at the muffler, heat loss gains power. Heat loss brings with it a loss of gas volume and that helps the muffler work a bit easier and this is what you want for good silencing.

Obviously, we are both talking about different ends of the system and I agree about scavenging. Headers and good exhaust systems depend upon it to get fresh air in after getting exhausted air out.

If any others want to see what new cars have on them to get good silencing and performance, check out new Honda and Toyotas. These have split pipes after the axle and run two very large volume mufflers.

Exhaust is such cool science.
Tom

Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: DARTH V8Я] #1223237
04/29/12 02:27 PM
04/29/12 02:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,886
Lost and Spaced
B
bboogieart Offline
master
bboogieart  Offline
master
B

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,886
Lost and Spaced
Quote:

The motor is about 331 cubic inches. The problem is that the spare tire well drops down in the trunk, and the gas tank occupies the space beside it. I could put dual 2.5's that exit in front of the rear fenderwells, with a couple 'bullet' style mufflers side by side. I know for sure a 3" pipe will route the like original exhaust did, and I can use a sideways mounted flowmaster 3" in/out muffler. Shooting for about 400hp @ the flywheel.



I know with c-bodies the pipes are run over the axle and under the rear frame rails with no problems. Make sure they go past the bumper or your gonna hear em in the car. (droan) Unless that vega is realy low this should still work. As for the newer cars mentioned above, I always thought the split or "Y" pipe after the axle was just a marketing gimick because we like duals so much. Thats why we see them on pickups, no?


I have mechanical Aptitude.
I can screw up anything.
Re: Dual 2.5" vs Single 3" exhaust [Re: DARTH V8Я] #1223238
04/29/12 04:02 PM
04/29/12 04:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,886
Lost and Spaced
B
bboogieart Offline
master
bboogieart  Offline
master
B

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,886
Lost and Spaced
Quote:

Car in question is a 73 Vega,




(another quote)Think I'll just keep the original engine for now. (quote)

Tee hee guess that's changed huh?


I have mechanical Aptitude.
I can screw up anything.
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1