Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies #1084088
09/27/11 11:37 PM
09/27/11 11:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
sjs64polara Offline OP
mopar
sjs64polara  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
Who uses them with stock location frame rails and mini tubs? How long are they 32”? What size tire and rim width fits without cutting outside wheel tub (closest to fender skin).What is your car weight and rear weight percent? et range? Did they make an improvement over leafs and or Caltracs? Any input would be appreciated

Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: sjs64polara] #1084089
09/28/11 01:09 AM
09/28/11 01:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,985
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart Offline
master
gregsdart  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,985
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
A lot of improvement over leafs or caltracs would mean those two types of set ups were not very optimized if the car is slower than about 11.00, and caltracs should be good at better ETs than that. But I definitely recommend going to ladderbars over either. They will work well for you down into the eights. They are the lightest of the three I believe. Also very easy to adjust. I run ladder bars and at 8.90s can run several passes in a row with 60 fts all within .005.


8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: sjs64polara] #1084090
09/28/11 06:14 AM
09/28/11 06:14 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,021
MN
J
JERICOGTX Offline
I Live Here
JERICOGTX  Offline
I Live Here
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,021
MN
Chassis Engieering 32" bars, with single adjustable Strange coilovers. Car weighs 3500lbs. M/T 29.5x10.5W's on a 10" rim. Best 60" was a 1.34 at INDY last weekend. 10.04 at 134mph.

6845950-5115.jpg (144 downloads)
Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: gregsdart] #1084091
09/28/11 10:34 AM
09/28/11 10:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
sjs64polara Offline OP
mopar
sjs64polara  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
Quote:

A lot of improvement over leafs or caltracs would mean those two types of set ups were not very optimized if the car is slower than about 11.00, and caltracs should be good at better ETs than that. But I definitely recommend going to ladderbars over either. They will work well for you down into the eights. They are the lightest of the three I believe. Also very easy to adjust. I run ladder bars and at 8.90s can run several passes in a row with 60 fts all within .005.





Couple of facts about the current car from this past year.
3670 lbs 46.5% rear weight. (no weight in trunk)
Caltracs running .05 gap. Rancho shocks work best at 3-5. Have to hit the tire HARD
Front end travel is 5.5 inches and it’s very loose.
30x9 Hoosier DO5 slick on an 8” rim. Have 1/4-3/8 clearance each side before rubbing. Tire psi works best at 12.5 no tubes.
505 cubes, 640 roller .272 @ .050 with Rick Allison cross ram
Low gear set with 4.10 gears.
On a new good tire it 60 foots 1.44 /1.47 – that goes away after about 35 runs
Car runs 10.5’s
Work all season on wheel spin and the RacePak still shows an excessive amount.

Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: sjs64polara] #1084092
09/28/11 05:59 PM
09/28/11 05:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
sjs64polara Offline OP
mopar
sjs64polara  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
Can I rack anyone else’s brain on this? I’m trying to do some real world fact finding
thanks again

Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: sjs64polara] #1084093
09/28/11 08:59 PM
09/28/11 08:59 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,824
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,824
MI, usa
I will first qualify that I have not run my new car yet. I did run a 63 Polara (10 teens)with 32" bars in the past. Car repeated pretty well,but not as well as thought it could. I spent a lot of time researching before building the new car. With a longer wheelbase and an anticipated higher horsepower level 36" bars were chosen. I agree at your E.T. level that Cal tracks should work. If building from scratch I would have gone with ladder bars. Cheaper,lighter,easy adjustment. In my opinion more consistent. The key as always are good shocks. Double adjustable could be your answer without the expense of changing rear suspension. Weight and power play a major role in 60 ft as well.
Doug

Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: dvw] #1084094
09/30/11 09:31 AM
09/30/11 09:31 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
sjs64polara Offline OP
mopar
sjs64polara  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
Ok, let me ask this. Anyone running M/T 31 x 10.5 W with a 10 or 12 inch wheel just with mini tubs? Did you have to cut the outside wheel tub (closest to quarter panel skin)?

Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: sjs64polara] #1084095
09/30/11 09:38 AM
09/30/11 09:38 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,400
Wi.
old_racer Offline
pro stock
old_racer  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,400
Wi.
Hi
this car ( a friends) has the tires you described with mini tubs. http://www.moparmax.com/events/2011/vi_9-superstocks/cordova-8-29-11-337.jpg
Russ

Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: sjs64polara] #1084096
09/30/11 09:43 AM
09/30/11 09:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,350
Aurora, Oh.
M
max_maniac Offline
master
max_maniac  Offline
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,350
Aurora, Oh.
Quote:

Ok, let me ask this. Anyone running M/T 31 x 10.5 W with a 10 or 12 inch wheel just with mini tubs? Did you have to cut the outside wheel tub (closest to quarter panel skin)?





Yes I run a 63 with the 31x10.5W and a mini tub. On mine I have a 5.5 bs rim and use spacers and the inside tire rubs. I will change to a 4.5bs rim and they will fit inside and out with no issues using a 10" rim.

Russ

Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: max_maniac] #1084097
10/26/11 10:47 PM
10/26/11 10:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
sjs64polara Offline OP
mopar
sjs64polara  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
What length shock are you guys running in those B body ladder bar cars? I currently have 8 inch Afco’s with Caltracs. I wanted to reuse the 8 inchers but I’m not sure if they will be to long. Afco told be I could use a 14 inch coils on those shocks………. What do you think

Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: sjs64polara] #1084098
10/27/11 12:05 PM
10/27/11 12:05 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,377
Ohio
Todd Offline
pro stock
Todd  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,377
Ohio
I'm running 6" Bilsteins with 32" ladder bars and leaf springs. The shocks can be converted over to coil overs if I ever decide to get rid of the leafs. Its been mini tubbed and has 31x13 tires on a 12" rim. The car weighs 3300 with me and 1600 lbs on the rear.

6890794-1020011940.JPG (141 downloads)
Last edited by Todd; 10/27/11 09:17 PM.
Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: Todd] #1084099
10/27/11 01:58 PM
10/27/11 01:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,771
Cedar Lake IN
CRT Offline
master
CRT  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,771
Cedar Lake IN
I have 32" bars stock wheel tubes MT 10.5W tire

6890938-johnmark1.JPG (58 downloads)
Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: CRT] #1084100
10/27/11 02:46 PM
10/27/11 02:46 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,627
in a cattle trailer down by th...
G
Guitar Jones Offline
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
Guitar Jones  Offline
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
G

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,627
in a cattle trailer down by th...
I can't argue with the results you guys get with ladder bars but to me, and this is only my opinion, if you are going to go through the work and expense of putting in ladder bars why not just four link it? It's only a few hundred dollars more and you have an infinitely adjustable suspension.

I mulled this over for many months, talked to a few chassis builders, and most of them said the CalTracs would be preffered just because of the adjustability. I put CalTracs on my Duster only because it's an original 340 4 speed car with rare and few options so I didn't want to cut it up. So when I decided to get serious I built a 4 link car out of a mundane run of the mill 318 car I got out of a junk yard.

Again just my YMMV.


"Follow me the wise man said, but he walked behind"


'92 D250 Club Cab CTD, 47RH conversion, pump tweaks, injectors, rear disc and hydroboost conversion.
'74 W200 Crew Cab 360, NV4500, D44, D60 and NP205 divorced transfer case. Rear disc and hydroboost coming soon!
2019 1500 Long Horn Crew Cab 4WD, 5.7 Hemi.
Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: sjs64polara] #1084101
10/27/11 05:57 PM
10/27/11 05:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,852
KENTUCKY
69CHARGERMD Offline
master
69CHARGERMD  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,852
KENTUCKY
Quote:

Couple of facts about the current car from this past year.
3670 lbs 46.5% rear weight. (no weight in trunk)
Caltracs running .05 gap. Rancho shocks work best at 3-5. Have to hit the tire HARD
Front end travel is 5.5 inches and it’s very loose.
30x9 Hoosier DO5 slick on an 8” rim. Have 1/4-3/8 clearance each side before rubbing. Tire psi works best at 12.5 no tubes.
505 cubes, 640 roller .272 @ .050 with Rick Allison cross ram
Low gear set with 4.10 gears.
On a new good tire it 60 foots 1.44 /1.47 – that goes away after about 35 runs
Car runs 10.5’s




Using the Wallace calculator,,,for your car,,running 10.50's,,it predicts a 60' of 1.44-45 ( seems close to what you posted )

http://www.wallaceracing.com/calc60ft.php

The calculator is pretty spot on for my car ,,,and ET.

I run Caltrac's ,,, and keep chipping away at my ET with weight loss, shocks, convertor adjustment, carb squirters, timing, tire pressure, etc,,,and have been able to get from a 10.26 down to a 10.04,,,and the 60' improves as my ET improves,,,1.43-44,,,down to a 1.39-1.41
(451, solid cam, Edelbrock RPM heads, dominator, 456 Dana, 31 x 10.5 tire/tubes, caltracs, ranchos, etc)

good luck with the car,,,ps,,,GREAT pic in the original post,,,wheels up,,,





Doug

Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: 69CHARGERMD] #1084102
10/27/11 06:21 PM
10/27/11 06:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,893
United Socialist States of Ame...
T
tboomer Offline
Too Many Posts
tboomer  Offline
Too Many Posts
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,893
United Socialist States of Ame...
I love the Alston ladder bars on mine..Best 60' was 1.385...It is usually around 1.40-1.41. Just don't have a top end charge!!


Need your rear end checked out? Contact Grizzly!!
Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: Guitar Jones] #1084103
10/27/11 09:40 PM
10/27/11 09:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
sjs64polara Offline OP
mopar
sjs64polara  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
Quote:

I can't argue with the results you guys get with ladder bars but to me, and this is only my opinion, if you are going to go through the work and expense of putting in ladder bars why not just four link it? It's only a few hundred dollars more and you have an infinitely adjustable suspension.

I mulled this over for many months, talked to a few chassis builders, and most of them said the CalTracs would be preffered just because of the adjustability. I put CalTracs on my Duster only because it's an original 340 4 speed car with
rare and few options so I didn't want to cut it up. So when I decided to get serious I built a 4 link car out of a mundane run of the mill 318 car I got out of a junk yard.

Again just my YMMV.




I couldn't keep the back seat with a 4 link. I still love driving my kids around on street cruzes. Wife said do what you want as long as we can still go for ice cream on nice summer nights with the family. LONG STORY.

Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: 69CHARGERMD] #1084104
10/27/11 10:16 PM
10/27/11 10:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
sjs64polara Offline OP
mopar
sjs64polara  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
Quote:

Quote:

Couple of facts about the current car from this past year.
3670 lbs 46.5% rear weight. (no weight in trunk)
Caltracs running .05 gap. Rancho shocks work best at 3-5. Have to hit the tire HARD
Front end travel is 5.5 inches and it’s very loose.
30x9 Hoosier DO5 slick on an 8” rim. Have 1/4-3/8 clearance each side before rubbing. Tire psi works best at 12.5 no tubes.
505 cubes, 640 roller .272 @ .050 with Rick Allison cross ram
Low gear set with 4.10 gears.
On a new good tire it 60 foots 1.44 /1.47 – that goes away after about 35 runs
Car runs 10.5’s




Using the Wallace calculator,,,for your car,,running 10.50's,,it predicts a 60' of 1.44-45 ( seems close to what you posted )

http://www.wallaceracing.com/calc60ft.php

The calculator is pretty spot on for my car ,,,and ET.

I run Caltrac's ,,, and keep chipping away at my ET with weight loss, shocks, convertor adjustment, carb squirters, timing, tire pressure, etc,,,and have been able to get from a 10.26 down to a 10.04,,,and the 60' improves as my ET improves,,,1.43-44,,,down to a 1.39-1.41
(451, solid cam, Edelbrock RPM heads, dominator, 456 Dana, 31 x 10.5 tire/tubes, caltracs, ranchos, etc)

good luck with the car,,,ps,,,GREAT pic in the original post,,,wheels up,,,





Doug






I agree about the Wallace calculator , should be close.
I put a RacePak in the car mid year and the G forces and drive shaft speed show a considerable amount of wheel spin on my 9inch Hoosiers. Been trying to reduce the vertical lines for months…….. The 60s only last 30-35 passes then drop to high 40s to low 50s. I think those Hoosiers are taking a beaten with my weight etc….

I’m planning on mini tubing it anyway this winter and the ladders wouldn’t be all that much more work. I have a very good friend that is a chassis builder and my brother also has built his fair share.

Thanks for all your input on the HHR fan and water pump, works great!

thanks to all for the input

Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: sjs64polara] #1084105
10/27/11 10:28 PM
10/27/11 10:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,852
KENTUCKY
69CHARGERMD Offline
master
69CHARGERMD  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,852
KENTUCKY
Spencer,
I am not too familiar with the RacePak,,but might do some research on it,,,do you find it helpful for dialing in the car,,,and diagnosing some issues ? Might pm you sometime and ask some questions on it if you dont mind.

Which system do you use ???

I dont know anyone locally that uses it,,,but am always looking for stuff to get my car working better...

Glad the fan and pump worked out....

Doug


Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: 69CHARGERMD] #1084106
10/27/11 11:29 PM
10/27/11 11:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
sjs64polara Offline OP
mopar
sjs64polara  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 449
Wisconsin
Quote:

Spencer,
I am not too familiar with the RacePak,,but might do some research on it,,,do you find it helpful for dialing in the car,,,and diagnosing some issues ? Might pm you sometime and ask some questions on it if you dont mind.

Which system do you use ???

I dont know anyone locally that uses it,,,but am always looking for stuff to get my car working better...

Glad the fan and pump worked out....

Doug






Its GREAT. I use the RacePak Sportsman data acquisition system. Yellow Bullet forum has some really good info and help with the RacePak stuff.
No more guessing on what the car or I am doing. I’ve learned a lot from it. It really helps me understand changes and their effects. Some of the best $ I’ve ever spent on the car.
PM me if you want to discuss more


thought it was just us Wisconsin guys

6891664-2011engine.JPG (47 downloads)
Re: Ladder bars for 62-65 B bodies [Re: sjs64polara] #1084107
10/28/11 12:50 AM
10/28/11 12:50 AM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 417
reynoldsburg,ohio
poppaj Offline
mopar
poppaj  Offline
mopar

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 417
reynoldsburg,ohio
We run 32" ladder bars and Strange shocks untubbed with 12" wheels and 10.5x29.5 slicks
We have been 1.2800 in the 60' and average 1.29-1.33. You must also get the front end setup correctly to get the best performance. poppaj

6891807-IMG_1807.jpg (47 downloads)

AA/NSS 65'Coronet "Whompin Wedge"
Pop & Son Performance 557" B-1 power
John Holt Chassis






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1