Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: scratchnfotraction]
#1046604
08/03/11 04:23 PM
08/03/11 04:23 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826 NY usa
540challenger
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
|
Quote:
I by-pass mine with the pertronix points conversion and their flame thrower coil,it has its own resister built in to it
the pertronix conversion needs the full 12 volts to work correctly.
been like that for 15+ yrs now
That would of been a good way to go however I have moper performance dist. does pertronix work with a mopar dist??????
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: scratchnfotraction]
#1046606
08/03/11 05:48 PM
08/03/11 05:48 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198 Someplace you aren't
SomeCarGuy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
|
I bypassed mine w/ a MSD Blaster 2 and it ran great. Some say it will kill the ECU. I ran mine for hours on end, car running 195 temp constantly, on 90 degree + days with zero issues.
ECU was flush mounted on the firewall. If it was going to overheat and burn up like is claimed, that would have done it. Just a parts store brand ECU, nothing special.
IMO the system worked a little better. A 12 volt coil will like having 12 volts.
I want my fair share
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: SomeCarGuy]
#1046607
08/03/11 06:12 PM
08/03/11 06:12 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154 bethlehem pa
mikemee1331
master
|
master
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
|
Quote:
I bypassed mine w/ a MSD Blaster 2 and it ran great. Some say it will kill the ECU. I ran mine for hours on end, car running 195 temp constantly, on 90 degree + days with zero issues.
actually it's not 'some' who say you need it, it's Mother Mopar.
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: mikemee1331]
#1046609
08/04/11 01:26 AM
08/04/11 01:26 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198 Someplace you aren't
SomeCarGuy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
|
Quote:
Quote:
I bypassed mine w/ a MSD Blaster 2 and it ran great. Some say it will kill the ECU. I ran mine for hours on end, car running 195 temp constantly, on 90 degree + days with zero issues.
actually it's not 'some' who say you need it, it's Mother Mopar.
"they" also tell you to run their junky Purpleshaft cams, junky Stage 6 heads and so on.
If that were going to kill the box, I would have been on foot. Run yours w/ the ballast if you like.
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: SomeCarGuy]
#1046610
08/04/11 01:30 AM
08/04/11 01:30 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439 So Cal
Sinitro
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
|
Quote:
I bypassed mine w/ a MSD Blaster 2 and it ran great. Some say it will kill the ECU. I ran mine for hours on end, car running 195 temp constantly, on 90 degree + days with zero issues.
ECU was flush mounted on the firewall. If it was going to overheat and burn up like is claimed, that would have done it. Just a parts store brand ECU, nothing special.
IMO the system worked a little better. A 12 volt coil will like having 12 volts.
The Blaster II coil should use a 0.25 Ohm ballast resistor with the Mopar chrome box..
Just my $0.02...
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: SomeCarGuy]
#1046612
08/04/11 07:49 AM
08/04/11 07:49 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443 Indiana
YO7_A66
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443
Indiana
|
Years ago, I bought one of the first FBO ignition systems. Last year I removed the ballast and the FBO coil and replaced the coil with a Mallory unit that did not require a ballast. The system seems to be running fine but I emailed FBO about their new box and D said that my existing FBO ECU will burn up without a ballast. I have been running it for about six months or so but I do not put allot of miles on the car. I assume that I am going to see problems so I am thinking of buying the new FBO ECU and coil that does not require a ballast. When I removed the ballast and coil, I cutout the back of the ECU bracket to allow it to cool down just in the case that it creates more heat without the ballast.
I would like to see proof of the temps on an ECU with or without a ballast too.
1970 YO7 A66 [Canadian Export] F8 Challenger 340 (Currently in shop for stroker assy.)
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: BigBlockMopar]
#1046615
08/05/11 04:06 PM
08/05/11 04:06 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826 NY usa
540challenger
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
|
Quote:
I'm running a stock (Heavy Duty 12v) coil in my daily '73 Dart without ballast resistor. If I reconnect the ballast resistor, the car starts to stumble at idle and die when put in Drive. I probably have the wrong resistor, but since I disconnected it everything still seems to work fine. The coil's temp climbs right along with the engine intake's temp.
Today I decided to install a MSD Blaster 2 coil (also without ballast). After starting the engine I let it run for a couple of minutes and used my infrared tempgauge and pointed it at the coil... It was already at 130-140F and climbing. I kept the engine idling for awhile to see where the temp would end up at and it went up to around 176F when I called it quits.
To me it's obvious the Blaster coil really needs a ballast resistor when used in a daily driver.
Has anyone ever measured the temp of a coil here?
I haven't but tomorrow I will, sounds like a fun and easy experiment.
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: mikemee1331]
#1046617
08/06/11 12:31 AM
08/06/11 12:31 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439 So Cal
Sinitro
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
|
Quote:
i believe the Blaster 2 coil is rated at 45,000 volts. your stock 'heavy duty' is considerably less which would explain the amount of heat generated - more windings.
Ding Ding.. We have a winner... The later coils such as the Blaster 2 are capable of handling higher input voltages & current for a longer time..
Just my $0.02....
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: 540challenger]
#1046618
08/06/11 12:35 AM
08/06/11 12:35 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439 So Cal
Sinitro
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm running a stock (Heavy Duty 12v) coil in my daily '73 Dart without ballast resistor. If I reconnect the ballast resistor, the car starts to stumble at idle and die when put in Drive. I probably have the wrong resistor, but since I disconnected it everything still seems to work fine. The coil's temp climbs right along with the engine intake's temp.
Today I decided to install a MSD Blaster 2 coil (also without ballast). After starting the engine I let it run for a couple of minutes and used my infrared tempgauge and pointed it at the coil... It was already at 130-140F and climbing. I kept the engine idling for awhile to see where the temp would end up at and it went up to around 176F when I called it quits.
To me it's obvious the Blaster coil really needs a ballast resistor when used in a daily driver.
Has anyone ever measured the temp of a coil here?
I haven't but tomorrow I will, sounds like a fun and easy experiment.
Thats why Mopar recommends a 0.25 Ohm ballast resistor for the Blaster 2 when used with a Mopar box... Keep in mind the major thing that burns out the coil is the current, thats the major purpose of the ballast resistor..
Just my $0.02...
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: Sinitro]
#1046619
08/06/11 12:40 AM
08/06/11 12:40 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Ditch the stupid ECU and ballast and put in a MSD 6AL box.
Much better spark.
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
#1046620
08/06/11 12:03 PM
08/06/11 12:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439 So Cal
Sinitro
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
|
Quote:
Ditch the stupid ECU and ballast and put in a MSD 6AL box.
Much better spark.
I have the MSD6 with the built-in Mopar connector and can switch out in about 5 minutes with my chrome box.. My built 440 runs actually better with the chrome box..
When I run the MSD I change the ballast resistor to one that I put a straight wire in.. Note my chrome box is about 10 years old, maybe they built them better back then..
Just my $0.02..
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: SomeCarGuy]
#1046623
08/06/11 05:31 PM
08/06/11 05:31 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439 So Cal
Sinitro
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
|
Quote:
The ballast keeps cuts the voltage to the coil. A Blaster 2 can handle 12 volts, as would any 12 volt coil.
The "concern" about not running a ballast is that the transistor in the ECU will heat up and burn out with 12 volts flowing through it. Has nothing to do w/ the coil.
The ballast resistor serves (2) purposes, it drops the voltage but also prevents higher current to the coil as well. Plus as it heats up its resistance increases which drops the input voltage to coil lowering its output voltage.. The coil is capable to handle the higher voltages for short durations OK but since it typically constructed of hundreds of turns of thin 28 gauge wire, sustained cycles of higher voltage along with the current the coil will fail. Think about much like flashlite batteries, a D cell and an AA or both rated @1.5V but the D cell can hold it voltage capability longer as it has the current reserve..
The coil is a voltage step-up transformer, as the coil overheats its efficiency (output voltage) will drop. The ECU is simply a switch triggered by the distributor pickup that turns the coil on/off..
For an MSD box which does multiple switching is able to fire the coil to a higher voltage as it switches on the coil in shorter sequential intervals so the it doesn't heat up as fast...
Just my $0.02..
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: Sinitro]
#1046624
08/06/11 05:39 PM
08/06/11 05:39 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154 bethlehem pa
mikemee1331
master
|
master
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
|
Quote:
Quote:
The ballast keeps cuts the voltage to the coil. A Blaster 2 can handle 12 volts, as would any 12 volt coil.
The "concern" about not running a ballast is that the transistor in the ECU will heat up and burn out with 12 volts flowing through it. Has nothing to do w/ the coil.
The ballast resistor serves (2) purposes, it drops the voltage but also prevents higher current to the coil as well. Plus as it heats up its resistance increases which drops the input voltage to coil lowering its output voltage.. The coil is capable to handle the higher voltages for short durations OK but since it typically constructed of hundreds of turns of thin 28 gauge wire, sustained cycles of higher voltage along with the current the coil will fail. Think about much like flashlite batteries, a D cell and an AA or both rated @1.5V but the D cell can hold it voltage capability longer as it has the current reserve..
The coil is a voltage step-up transformer, as the coil overheats its efficiency (output voltage) will drop. The ECU is simply a switch triggered by the distributor pickup that turns the coil on/off..
For an MSD box which does multiple switching is able to fire the coil to a higher voltage as it switches on the coil in shorter sequential intervals so the it doesn't heat up as fast...
Just my $0.02..
BINGO - as you so schooled me a few weeks ago! i need to save this in my favorites for when it comes up again.
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: mikemee1331]
#1046625
08/06/11 05:55 PM
08/06/11 05:55 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443 Indiana
YO7_A66
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443
Indiana
|
""The ECU is simply a switch triggered by the distributor pickup that turns the coil on/off."" Can a standard ECU handle a non ballast setup or does an ECU have to be designed for a non ballast setup? Thanks
1970 YO7 A66 [Canadian Export] F8 Challenger 340 (Currently in shop for stroker assy.)
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: mikemee1331]
#1046630
08/07/11 01:12 AM
08/07/11 01:12 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439 So Cal
Sinitro
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
|
Quote:
i'll try my best here at the risk of getting flammed it is my understanding that the ballast has no relationship to the ECU. it is the coil and ballast that must be matched. a 'standard' ECU requires the use of a ballast because there is only one firing of the coil. this makes the amount of time the coil is storing voltage longer and cause the coil to get hot at lower rpms. so, if you are using a standard ECU with an oil filled coil then yes, you need to use the ballast recommended by the coil manufacture. in the case of a Blaster2 i believe the recommendation is a .5. a stock coil i think is a .2. you need to use a .5 with the Blaster because it has way more and smaller windings inside to increase the output and it will burn out. with a multi-spark ECU the ballast is not needed because at low rpms, the unit it causing the coil to fire multiple times and NOT storing it.
The ignition system consists of matched components, one cannot just start swapping piece for piece and expect reliable performance...
The Blaster coils (#P3690560 or #P4876832/33) uses a 0.25 Ohm ballast resistor (#P2444641) normally used with the Chrome box (#P4120534). The standard Mopar OE coils (#P4120889 or #P02495531) uses a 1 Ohm ballast resistor (#P5206436) used with the Orange box (#P4120505). It is not recommended to mix or match components, the ignition system should work but How well? and How long?..
All of these Mopar part #s were taken from the Mopar 2009 performance catalog.
Just my $0.02...
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: BigBlockMopar]
#1046632
08/07/11 09:00 AM
08/07/11 09:00 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439 So Cal
Sinitro
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
|
Quote:
And yet MSd advises to use a 0.8 Ohm resistor with their Blaster 2 coils. Now what to do?
Your choice.. With my MSD box and Blaster coil MSD says to bypass the ballast resistor.. Looks like MSD is advising some confusing info..
A good starting point is to follow the brand's advise..
Just my $0.02...
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: BigBlockMopar]
#1046633
08/07/11 09:23 AM
08/07/11 09:23 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154 bethlehem pa
mikemee1331
master
|
master
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
|
use the ballast that is matched to the coil. here is an excellent Q/A on what the ballast is for. kinda long though. http://www.imperialclub.com/Repair/Electrical/coil.htmthe bottom line is if you match the componets together the way they are recommended, they will last longer. the numbers i posted are probably wrong as i was going from memory but the amount of CURRENT reduction is minimal between my post and Sinitro's. will it work without a ballast? yes, but for how long?
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: Sinitro]
#1046634
08/07/11 10:56 AM
08/07/11 10:56 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198 Someplace you aren't
SomeCarGuy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
|
Quote:
Quote:
And yet MSd advises to use a 0.8 Ohm resistor with their Blaster 2 coils. Now what to do?
Your choice.. With my MSD box and Blaster coil MSD says to bypass the ballast resistor.. Looks like MSD is advising some confusing info..
A good starting point is to follow the brand's advise..
Just my $0.02...
Yep. That is why I bypassed mine. MSD info said it is a 12 volt coil. Then I see people on here saying not to do that. MA says don't do that. Since I already did and it worked, I know differently. It would seem some "theory" was employed about the ECU overheating and others just parrotted that over and over.
A 12 volt coil will be fine running on 12 volts.
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: SomeCarGuy]
#1046635
08/07/11 11:08 AM
08/07/11 11:08 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443 Indiana
YO7_A66
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443
Indiana
|
The reason that I asked if an ECU can handle a non ballast setup is because when I called FBO and told D that I was using his ECU without a ballast and with a Mallory 12v coil, he said that the ECU will burn up. This bothers me because I have the manufacturer saying that it will burn up but so far it has not. D knows his ignitions!! I only drive the car about 30-45 minutes at a time so maybe it would on a longer drive. I am cosidering his new ECU/12v coil and keep my existing items as a backup.
1970 YO7 A66 [Canadian Export] F8 Challenger 340 (Currently in shop for stroker assy.)
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: YO7_A66]
#1046636
08/07/11 01:10 PM
08/07/11 01:10 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
I guess it could burn because ECU closes the coil circuit when hooking the - lead of coil, wire what runs to ECU.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: NachoRT74]
#1046637
08/07/11 01:17 PM
08/07/11 01:17 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
Guys... it look some of you are worried about bypass the resistor and then if some emergency how went back to the stock assembly with resistor on a quick change.
THATS EASY... get a ballast resistor, remove the filler on back, remove the resistor from ceramic, keep the prongs ( prongs have retining tabs so you can remove the prongs too ), sold a jumper wire ( 14 or 12 gauge ) between prongs and insert it again into the ceramic piece... wire the harness as usually you'd do.
the day you need to hook back again the stock system, simply mount an untouched ballast and voila! wiring kept untouched at least on that part
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: YO7_A66]
#1046638
08/07/11 02:12 PM
08/07/11 02:12 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198 Someplace you aren't
SomeCarGuy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
|
Quote:
The reason that I asked if an ECU can handle a non ballast setup is because when I called FBO and told D that I was using his ECU without a ballast and with a Mallory 12v coil, he said that the ECU will burn up. This bothers me because I have the manufacturer saying that it will burn up but so far it has not. D knows his ignitions!! I only drive the car about 30-45 minutes at a time so maybe it would on a longer drive. I am cosidering his new ECU/12v coil and keep my existing items as a backup.
That is exactly what I have seen. People put out information and real world use doesn't support it. I lean towards some engineer looked at the drawings and thought it "could be an issue". Then everybody has ran with it.
When I discovered the MSD instructions for the coil in my glovebox, I also noted that it said that the coil MUST not be mounted horizontal, unless it is epoxy filled. Mine wasn't and had been mounted horizontal long before I got the car. I left it that way and I'd say it had over 10 years and countless miles on it when it left a couple of months ago. Car left here on a hot day and was driven for at least two hours to the guy's home. I got word a month later he was still very happy with the car. Folklore says that he should be pretty mad
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: YO7_A66]
#1046639
08/07/11 02:22 PM
08/07/11 02:22 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439 So Cal
Sinitro
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
|
Quote:
The reason that I asked if an ECU can handle a non ballast setup is because when I called FBO and told D that I was using his ECU without a ballast and with a Mallory 12v coil, he said that the ECU will burn up. This bothers me because I have the manufacturer saying that it will burn up but so far it has not. D knows his ignitions!! I only drive the car about 30-45 minutes at a time so maybe it would on a longer drive. I am cosidering his new ECU/12v coil and keep my existing items as a backup.
Keep in mind that the brand will take a conservative approach.. The reason is that if something fails people will come back and complain/bad mouth things about their products on the internet..
A short drive of 30-45 minutes is not a real test but take a 2 hour drive down in Phoenix in 112 degree heat, now guess what the temperature of the ballast resistor is...
IMHO... The bottom line is that the quality brand ignition parts available today are more capable of handling 12V compared to previous generations.. As long as one avoids the Chinese junker line called P** C**p, or one of the later Orange boxes..
Just my $0.02...
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: Sinitro]
#1046640
08/07/11 08:57 PM
08/07/11 08:57 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,359 Buzzard County, FL
IronWolf
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,359
Buzzard County, FL
|
It's always a good idea to get advice from this board, then go ahead and experiment with your own ideas. There's always some bad advice (Mopar Myths) though. I've been ranting about ballast resistors for years. But, I believe in the "Scientific Method".
My experimental results :
I run a chrome box with a .25 ohm resistor , and a MSD Blaster 2 coil. Nary a problem. I have run the .25 resistor with an orange box with no problems , either.
The fact is, the parts houses sell these crap 1.5 ohm resistors ( and maybe 1 ohm, I don't recall). Want to be less than optimal, then run those. Granny loves them.
My Mopar ECU is mounted on a standoff. No melting of the potting material. I have been informed that steel is not a good conductor, but the air flow behind my standoff appears to help.
During the heat of a race ? Think about it - those high values will retain heat and resistance , and deliver less current to the coil.
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: charger_dart]
#1046642
08/25/11 11:48 AM
08/25/11 11:48 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,810 Sobieski Wi
bee1971
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,810
Sobieski Wi
|
Man there is alot of conflicting answers here
First things first
1) You guys do realize the MSD Blaster 2 Coils that most of us buy (8200-8202-8203)coil already has .7 ohms of resistance built into the primary side 2) You guys do realize the (8200-8203)coil that has the supplied ballast resistor of .8 ohms is to bee used only with POINTS STYLE IGNITION SYSTEMS
BALLAST RESISTOR IS NOT NEEDED WITH THE MOPAR ELECTRONIC IGNITION because the coil already has a .7 ohm resistance built in !!!
So adding the Mopar .25 ohm resistor to this or the supplied .8 ohm ballast resistor = Total of .95 ohms or 1.5 ohms of resistance to the positive side of coil
Note: This Blaster Coil is supplied with a ballast resistor. If your application uses a points distributor, the ballast must be used. Late model ELECTRONIC IGNITIONS or an MSD Ignition DO NOT REQUIRE the ballast resistor. Note: The Blaster Coil will mount in most factory canister coil mounts. MSD also offers a Chrome Bracket, PN 8213. It is recommended to mount the coil in an upright position. STOCK POINTS IGNITION If you are installing the Blaster Coil with the STOCK POINTS IGNITION (Figure 1), MSD Blaster Ignition or an MSD 5 Ignition Control (Figure 2), the supplied 0.8 ohm ballast resistor must be installed on the coil positive (+) wire.
1971 Dodge Charger Superbee 2011 Ram Sport 1500 Quad Cab Deep Water Blue Loaded Siberian Huskies
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: charger_dart]
#1046643
08/25/11 01:36 PM
08/25/11 01:36 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198 Someplace you aren't
SomeCarGuy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm running a stock (Heavy Duty 12v) coil in my daily '73 Dart without ballast resistor. If I reconnect the ballast resistor, the car starts to stumble at idle and die when put in Drive. I probably have the wrong resistor, but since I disconnected it everything still seems to work fine. The coil's temp climbs right along with the engine intake's temp.
Today I decided to install a MSD Blaster 2 coil (also without ballast). After starting the engine I let it run for a couple of minutes and used my infrared tempgauge and pointed it at the coil... It was already at 130-140F and climbing. I kept the engine idling for awhile to see where the temp would end up at and it went up to around 176F when I called it quits.
To me it's obvious the Blaster coil really needs a ballast resistor when used in a daily driver.
Has anyone ever measured the temp of a coil here?
I decided to try to run my MP electronic ignition with the BR shorted as an experiment. The BB engine seemed to run better to me. It was smoother and seemed more responsive. I used a IR temp unit to measure the 12V coil's temp and it ranged from 210 on the bottom to 245 at the top. Its mounted on the intake which measured 175. I searched the net, but could not find a spec for coil temps - anybody have a clue on what is considered too hot?
Check the temp of the ECU both w/ and w/o the ballast. The ECU is "suppose" to overheat and die shortly w/o a ballast. Nothing has seemed to prove that. The temp gun may shed some light on this.
What coil are you running?
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: charger_dart]
#1046645
08/25/11 03:41 PM
08/25/11 03:41 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443 Indiana
YO7_A66
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443
Indiana
|
""I am currently running a 12v coil from Don at FBO.""
Is that the new #HR COIL that he just released?
1970 YO7 A66 [Canadian Export] F8 Challenger 340 (Currently in shop for stroker assy.)
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: dnd0001]
#1046649
07/05/12 03:19 AM
07/05/12 03:19 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421 Balt. Md
383man
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
|
You know Mopars electronic ign was designed by Mopar to use a ballast. They all came from the factory with one that was one or two row ballast. They went to the single ballast and took out the auxilury circuit that was ign feed thru the 5 ohm ballast and just use the one ballast to the coil. I have always run mine with the ballast because thats what Mopars eng book said.
Will it work without the ballast ?? Sure but how long will it work as they did say it can burn the ECU up. But I never tried it to see if the ECU will hold up. All I can tell you is I run the orange MP ECU with a .75 ballast and it works great. Starts good and runs 10's without ever missing a beat. If you run it without the ballast I would keep extra in the trunk just incase it would burn up. Maybe it wont but its good to be prepared. Ron
Last edited by 383man; 07/05/12 03:20 AM.
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: 383man]
#1046650
07/05/12 02:26 PM
07/05/12 02:26 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,097 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,097
Bend,OR USA
|
As already said, coils are voltage transformers, there are two different uses of them, step up and step down. Our cars use step up transformers for DC low voltage, high current, (check out Ohms law )DC = direct current. They are made of solid small gauge wires wound around a piece of conductor materail to make them work,they are filled with oil to help keep them cool Cool being relative Coils usually fail because a of a broken wire, not a burnt up wire Coils designed for multi spark ignitions have a different ratio(numbers ) windings internally than standard coils do Different loads need different parts The ballast resitor is a solid wire resitor used to reduce the voltage input into the coil, the only time it is not working is when a ground is applied to that circuit for the current to flow through the coil, once for each firing stroke, 8 times per cycle (RPM) on V8 motors Are you confused yet
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: dnd0001]
#1046651
07/06/12 02:31 AM
07/06/12 02:31 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,230 State of retirement
52savoy
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,230
State of retirement
|
Quote:
Nacho
What did you use to remove the filler on the back of the ceramic resistor? The stuff is as hard as a rock.
Thanks
Use small side-cuts to break it up. Crimp and then solder a 12g wire in and reassemble..
I run an old 70's Direct Connection dist.(race-tach drive) in my '64 max wedge without a chrome box. I also use the MSD-6 and hide it behind the dash, electronic regulator and the modified ballast.
An old picture but the ignition hasn't changed..
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: charger_dart]
#1046652
10/01/14 07:28 PM
10/01/14 07:28 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575 The Netherlands
BigBlockMopar
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
The Netherlands
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm running a stock (Heavy Duty 12v) coil in my daily '73 Dart without ballast resistor. If I reconnect the ballast resistor, the car starts to stumble at idle and die when put in Drive. I probably have the wrong resistor, but since I disconnected it everything still seems to work fine. The coil's temp climbs right along with the engine intake's temp.
Today I decided to install a MSD Blaster 2 coil (also without ballast). After starting the engine I let it run for a couple of minutes and used my infrared tempgauge and pointed it at the coil... It was already at 130-140F and climbing. I kept the engine idling for awhile to see where the temp would end up at and it went up to around 176F when I called it quits.
To me it's obvious the Blaster coil really needs a ballast resistor when used in a daily driver.
Has anyone ever measured the temp of a coil here?
I decided to try to run my MP electronic ignition with the BR shorted as an experiment. The BB engine seemed to run better to me. It was smoother and seemed more responsive. I used a IR temp unit to measure the 12V coil's temp and it ranged from 210 on the bottom to 245 at the top. Its mounted on the intake which measured 175. I searched the net, but could not find a spec for coil temps - anybody have a clue on what is considered too hot?
Bringing this topic up from the basement where I found it again;
I've been running my Blaster 2 coil for a good while now with a 1 Ohm ballast, but recently I started noticing the engine missing a cylinder once in a while while idling. Plugs were near perfect, so checking up on the voltage at the coil I noticed it was just around a mere 5 volts.
Decided to try running the coil without a BR again but found it's temp climbing fast again while idling with an open hood. At 185° coiltemp I found that was high enough. I installed an older, stock, but 12v rated coil, running without a BR for the time being.
The main difference since last time I tried this is that the car now has a way better charging system, which is actually putting out 14 - 14.4 volts.
I'm now looking locally for a 0,25 Ohm BR to install as I don't feel comfortable running the car with a 'glowing' hot Blaster coil under the hood.
Anyone know if you can use an E-core coil with a Mopar Chrome ECU?
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: RapidRobert]
#1046655
10/01/14 09:29 PM
10/01/14 09:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,482 Lake Orion, MI
goldduster318
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,482
Lake Orion, MI
|
I ran a Wells replacement 4-pin ECU and an Accel Super Stock Street coil with no ballast for 6k miles and never had an issue. I currently have the FBO ECU and the FBO coil without a ballast (when I re-wired the car there isn't even a place to connect it), and 2k miles later, still perfect.
The voltage going to the ECU is always full battery voltage on a 4-pin car. Cars with the dual ballast have one side for the 5-pin ECU. I doubt the switching of the coil at 12V vs 5 by the ECU will have any effect on the life of the ECU, as it's not a high current draw there (check out the small wires).
Plenty of coils out there that can take 12V. As people have said, you don't use a ballast with pertronix, or with MSD, or with an HEI conversion.
'70 Duster 470hp 340/T56 Magnum/8 3/4 3.23 Sure-Grip
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: 540challenger]
#1046658
10/02/14 02:03 PM
10/02/14 02:03 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,688 Marlboro, NY, USA
Rick_Ehrenberg
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,688
Marlboro, NY, USA
|
This question has been around for decades in various forms. I'll try to clarify the fog surrounding it.
When cranking an engine, especially at lower temperatures, the starter imposes so much load on the battery that the voltage drops (as low as 8 to 9 volts). This reduced potential (voltage, E), would reduce the ignition system's spark output and make cold starting difficult. In a nutshell, what the factory did was to design the ignition system (breaker points and electronic) to produce full output at this reduced cranking voltage. Then, under normal running conditions, a resistor is used to reduce the voltage to the design point. This is why there's two different ignition wires (and switch terminals), "start" and "run" (or "ign 1" and "ign 2").
Bypassing the ballast resistor will overtax all ignition components: ECU / breaker points and ignition coil), increasing the spark energy (output) while reducing their reliability markedly.
Factory hi-po ECUs ("gold box", etc.) were designed for race use and used lower-resistance ballasts, their internal components and heat sinking were designed for this, still, they were never recommended for street use / idle.
Little, if any, of the above applies to aftermarket ignition systems and/or components. Many are designed to run on full battery potential; they have either internal regulators or dc-to-dc converters. Even with a factory OEM ECU, if your replacement coil has higher internal resistance than the OEM 1.4 to 1.8 ohm value, you might be able to safely reduce the ballast's value.
Do not lose sight of this fact: If there's no misfiring (at any useable RPM) in your present configuration, no ignition system swap or upgrade will increase output. EG: I witnessed a factory engine dyno session (Chrys.) where the subject engine produced over 150 HP/L on dead-stock wasted-spark ignition (even wires, coil, etc.). All aftermarket systems tried produced zero gains.
Hope this helps,
Rick E.
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: Rick_Ehrenberg]
#1046660
10/03/14 02:07 PM
10/03/14 02:07 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,822 Colorado
denfireguy
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,822
Colorado
|
Quote:
This question has been around for decades in various forms. I'll try to clarify the fog surrounding it.
When cranking an engine, especially at lower temperatures, the starter imposes so much load on the battery that the voltage drops (as low as 8 to 9 volts). This reduced potential (voltage, E), would reduce the ignition system's spark output and make cold starting difficult. In a nutshell, what the factory did was to design the ignition system (breaker points and electronic) to produce full output at this reduced cranking voltage. Then, under normal running conditions, a resistor is used to reduce the voltage to the design point. This is why there's two different ignition wires (and switch terminals), "start" and "run" (or "ign 1" and "ign 2").
Bypassing the ballast resistor will overtax all ignition components: ECU / breaker points and ignition coil), increasing the spark energy (output) while reducing their reliability markedly.
Factory hi-po ECUs ("gold box", etc.) were designed for race use and used lower-resistance ballasts, their internal components and heat sinking were designed for this, still, they were never recommended for street use / idle.
Little, if any, of the above applies to aftermarket ignition systems and/or components. Many are designed to run on full battery potential; they have either internal regulators or dc-to-dc converters. Even with a factory OEM ECU, if your replacement coil has higher internal resistance than the OEM 1.4 to 1.8 ohm value, you might be able to safely reduce the ballast's value.
Do not lose sight of this fact: If there's no misfiring (at any useable RPM) in your present configuration, no ignition system swap or upgrade will increase output. EG: I witnessed a factory engine dyno session (Chrys.) where the subject engine produced over 150 HP/L on dead-stock wasted-spark ignition (even wires, coil, etc.). All aftermarket systems tried produced zero gains.
Hope this helps,
Rick E.
There are two other things that a ballast resistor does: First, it limits current in the circuit protecting the coil and other components in series with it. The second is more obscure but just as important. It dampens the "ringing" in the coil when it fires. When the magnetic field collapses in the secondary firing the plug, eddy currents from the secondary are induced into the primary which in turn goes back into the secondary again, at a much lower level but still there and measurable. Meanwhile, the distributor has moved away from that plug wire and the voltage has no where to go but be dissipated in heat, mainly in the coil unless the ballast resistor takes some of it. The ballast resistor is also a damper resistor to keep the ringing to a minimum. The bypass capacitor on the coils positive terminal also aids in stopping the ringing but more importantly filters the energy dissipation to lower radio frequency interference.
2014 Ram 1500 Laramie, 73 Cuda Previous mopars: 62 Valiant, 65 Fury III, 68 Fury III, 72 Satellite, 74 Satellite, 89 Acclaim, 98 Caravan, 2003 Durango Only previous Non-Mopar: Schwinn Tornado
|
|
|
Re: ballast resistor by-pass??
[Re: denfireguy]
#1046662
10/04/14 02:31 AM
10/04/14 02:31 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 892 Illinois
StrkrDart69
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 892
Illinois
|
Quote:
Quote:
This question has been around for decades in various forms. I'll try to clarify the fog surrounding it.
When cranking an engine, especially at lower temperatures, the starter imposes so much load on the battery that the voltage drops (as low as 8 to 9 volts). This reduced potential (voltage, E), would reduce the ignition system's spark output and make cold starting difficult. In a nutshell, what the factory did was to design the ignition system (breaker points and electronic) to produce full output at this reduced cranking voltage. Then, under normal running conditions, a resistor is used to reduce the voltage to the design point. This is why there's two different ignition wires (and switch terminals), "start" and "run" (or "ign 1" and "ign 2").
Bypassing the ballast resistor will overtax all ignition components: ECU / breaker points and ignition coil), increasing the spark energy (output) while reducing their reliability markedly.
Factory hi-po ECUs ("gold box", etc.) were designed for race use and used lower-resistance ballasts, their internal components and heat sinking were designed for this, still, they were never recommended for street use / idle.
Little, if any, of the above applies to aftermarket ignition systems and/or components. Many are designed to run on full battery potential; they have either internal regulators or dc-to-dc converters. Even with a factory OEM ECU, if your replacement coil has higher internal resistance than the OEM 1.4 to 1.8 ohm value, you might be able to safely reduce the ballast's value.
Do not lose sight of this fact: If there's no misfiring (at any useable RPM) in your present configuration, no ignition system swap or upgrade will increase output. EG: I witnessed a factory engine dyno session (Chrys.) where the subject engine produced over 150 HP/L on dead-stock wasted-spark ignition (even wires, coil, etc.). All aftermarket systems tried produced zero gains.
Hope this helps,
Rick E.
There are two other things that a ballast resistor does: First, it limits current in the circuit protecting the coil and other components in series with it. The second is more obscure but just as important. It dampens the "ringing" in the coil when it fires. When the magnetic field collapses in the secondary firing the plug, eddy currents from the secondary are induced into the primary which in turn goes back into the secondary again, at a much lower level but still there and measurable. Meanwhile, the distributor has moved away from that plug wire and the voltage has no where to go but be dissipated in heat, mainly in the coil unless the ballast resistor takes some of it. The ballast resistor is also a damper resistor to keep the ringing to a minimum. The bypass capacitor on the coils positive terminal also aids in stopping the ringing but more importantly filters the energy dissipation to lower radio frequency interference.
Wow
|
|
|
|
|