Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
ballast resistor by-pass?? #1046598
08/03/11 01:31 PM
08/03/11 01:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
5
540challenger Offline OP
master
540challenger  Offline OP
master
5

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
Would it be ok to bypass my 4 pin ballast and just run a coil made for a constant 12v?? As far as i know it should be no problem but i just want to double check. I am also running a chrome box if that makes a difference.


Thanks

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: 540challenger] #1046599
08/03/11 01:54 PM
08/03/11 01:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
M
MoparforLife Offline
Too Many Posts
MoparforLife  Offline
Too Many Posts
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
Mopar recommends running the ballast resister but I know guys that have done as you said with no adverse effects although they usually were not run for long periods when run.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: MoparforLife] #1046600
08/03/11 01:56 PM
08/03/11 01:56 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
NachoRT74 Offline
master
NachoRT74  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
Quote:

Mopar recommends running the ballast resister but I know guys that have done as you said with no adverse effects although they usually were not run for long periods when run.






Ballast resistor bypass will work for an emergency but not for regular use.

Multi spark systems can live without ballast because coils are feeded just when triggered, but on regular ignition systems they are constantly positive feeded from ign switch.


With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: 540challenger] #1046601
08/03/11 02:18 PM
08/03/11 02:18 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
5
540challenger Offline OP
master
540challenger  Offline OP
master
5

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
Thanks guys looks like the ballast will stay.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: 540challenger] #1046602
08/03/11 03:58 PM
08/03/11 03:58 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15,487
Florida
S
scratchnfotraction Offline
I Live Here
scratchnfotraction  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15,487
Florida
I by-pass mine with the pertronix points conversion and their flame thrower coil,it has its own resister built in to it

the pertronix conversion needs the full 12 volts to work correctly.

been like that for 15+ yrs now


Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: scratchnfotraction] #1046603
08/03/11 04:22 PM
08/03/11 04:22 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 39
mi
E
ERAT340 Offline
member
ERAT340  Offline
member
E

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 39
mi
How about MSD Blaster II epoxy filled?

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: scratchnfotraction] #1046604
08/03/11 04:23 PM
08/03/11 04:23 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
5
540challenger Offline OP
master
540challenger  Offline OP
master
5

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
Quote:

I by-pass mine with the pertronix points conversion and their flame thrower coil,it has its own resister built in to it

the pertronix conversion needs the full 12 volts to work correctly.

been like that for 15+ yrs now






That would of been a good way to go however I have moper performance dist. does pertronix work with a mopar dist??????

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: 540challenger] #1046605
08/03/11 04:33 PM
08/03/11 04:33 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15,487
Florida
S
scratchnfotraction Offline
I Live Here
scratchnfotraction  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15,487
Florida
I ditch the stock elect mopar dist and grabed a reman unit from auto zone for 30 bux,then used the conversion kit with the coil.

the coil will work with the MP dist & ecu

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: scratchnfotraction] #1046606
08/03/11 05:48 PM
08/03/11 05:48 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
S
SomeCarGuy Offline
I Live Here
SomeCarGuy  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
I bypassed mine w/ a MSD Blaster 2 and it ran great. Some say it will kill the ECU. I ran mine for hours on end, car running 195 temp constantly, on 90 degree + days with zero issues.

ECU was flush mounted on the firewall. If it was going to overheat and burn up like is claimed, that would have done it. Just a parts store brand ECU, nothing special.

IMO the system worked a little better. A 12 volt coil will like having 12 volts.


I want my fair share
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: SomeCarGuy] #1046607
08/03/11 06:12 PM
08/03/11 06:12 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
M
mikemee1331 Offline
master
mikemee1331  Offline
master
M

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
Quote:

I bypassed mine w/ a MSD Blaster 2 and it ran great. Some say it will kill the ECU. I ran mine for hours on end, car running 195 temp constantly, on 90 degree + days with zero issues.



actually it's not 'some' who say you need it, it's Mother Mopar.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: mikemee1331] #1046608
08/03/11 06:22 PM
08/03/11 06:22 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,216
Under My Car
Mopar_Country Offline
pro stock
Mopar_Country  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,216
Under My Car
You can eliminate the ballast if you have a coil with one built in.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: mikemee1331] #1046609
08/04/11 01:26 AM
08/04/11 01:26 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
S
SomeCarGuy Offline
I Live Here
SomeCarGuy  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
Quote:

Quote:

I bypassed mine w/ a MSD Blaster 2 and it ran great. Some say it will kill the ECU. I ran mine for hours on end, car running 195 temp constantly, on 90 degree + days with zero issues.



actually it's not 'some' who say you need it, it's Mother Mopar.




"they" also tell you to run their junky Purpleshaft cams, junky Stage 6 heads and so on.

If that were going to kill the box, I would have been on foot. Run yours w/ the ballast if you like.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: SomeCarGuy] #1046610
08/04/11 01:30 AM
08/04/11 01:30 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Sinitro Offline
master
Sinitro  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Quote:

I bypassed mine w/ a MSD Blaster 2 and it ran great. Some say it will kill the ECU. I ran mine for hours on end, car running 195 temp constantly, on 90 degree + days with zero issues.

ECU was flush mounted on the firewall. If it was going to overheat and burn up like is claimed, that would have done it. Just a parts store brand ECU, nothing special.

IMO the system worked a little better. A 12 volt coil will like having 12 volts.




The Blaster II coil should use a 0.25 Ohm ballast resistor with the Mopar chrome box..

Just my $0.02...

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: Sinitro] #1046611
08/04/11 02:04 AM
08/04/11 02:04 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
S
SomeCarGuy Offline
I Live Here
SomeCarGuy  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
Somebody should do a test and see how long it takes to burn an ECU up. I haven't ever seen a temp given for the amount of heat that no ballast will generate in the ECU. It must not be as much as is believed as 1000's of miles didn't make a difference for my car.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: SomeCarGuy] #1046612
08/04/11 07:49 AM
08/04/11 07:49 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443
Indiana
Y
YO7_A66 Offline
master
YO7_A66  Offline
master
Y

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443
Indiana
Years ago, I bought one of the first FBO ignition systems. Last year I removed the ballast and the FBO coil and replaced the coil with a Mallory unit that did not require a ballast. The system seems to be running fine but I emailed FBO about their new box and D said that my existing FBO ECU will burn up without a ballast. I have been running it for about six months or so but I do not put allot of miles on the car. I assume that I am going to see problems so I am thinking of buying the new FBO ECU and coil that does not require a ballast. When I removed the ballast and coil, I cutout the back of the ECU bracket to allow it to cool down just in the case that it creates more heat without the ballast.


I would like to see proof of the temps on an ECU with or without a ballast too.

6762387-cutout.jpg (366 downloads)

1970 YO7 A66 [Canadian Export] F8 Challenger
340 (Currently in shop for stroker assy.)
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: YO7_A66] #1046613
08/04/11 09:35 AM
08/04/11 09:35 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
M
MoparforLife Offline
Too Many Posts
MoparforLife  Offline
Too Many Posts
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
Many coils are internally resisted and there fore an external ballast is not required.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: MoparforLife] #1046614
08/05/11 02:46 PM
08/05/11 02:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
The Netherlands
BigBlockMopar Offline
master
BigBlockMopar  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
The Netherlands
I'm running a stock (Heavy Duty 12v) coil in my daily '73 Dart without ballast resistor.
If I reconnect the ballast resistor, the car starts to stumble at idle and die when put in Drive. I probably have the wrong resistor, but since I disconnected it everything still seems to work fine.
The coil's temp climbs right along with the engine intake's temp.

Today I decided to install a MSD Blaster 2 coil (also without ballast).
After starting the engine I let it run for a couple of minutes and used my infrared tempgauge and pointed it at the coil... It was already at 130-140F and climbing. I kept the engine idling for awhile to see where the temp would end up at and it went up to around 176F when I called it quits.

To me it's obvious the Blaster coil really needs a ballast resistor when used in a daily driver.


Has anyone ever measured the temp of a coil here?

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: BigBlockMopar] #1046615
08/05/11 04:06 PM
08/05/11 04:06 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
5
540challenger Offline OP
master
540challenger  Offline OP
master
5

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
Quote:

I'm running a stock (Heavy Duty 12v) coil in my daily '73 Dart without ballast resistor.
If I reconnect the ballast resistor, the car starts to stumble at idle and die when put in Drive. I probably have the wrong resistor, but since I disconnected it everything still seems to work fine.
The coil's temp climbs right along with the engine intake's temp.

Today I decided to install a MSD Blaster 2 coil (also without ballast).
After starting the engine I let it run for a couple of minutes and used my infrared tempgauge and pointed it at the coil... It was already at 130-140F and climbing. I kept the engine idling for awhile to see where the temp would end up at and it went up to around 176F when I called it quits.

To me it's obvious the Blaster coil really needs a ballast resistor when used in a daily driver.


Has anyone ever measured the temp of a coil here?




I haven't but tomorrow I will, sounds like a fun and easy experiment.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: 540challenger] #1046616
08/05/11 06:31 PM
08/05/11 06:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
M
mikemee1331 Offline
master
mikemee1331  Offline
master
M

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
i believe the Blaster 2 coil is rated at 45,000 volts. your stock 'heavy duty' is considerably less which would explain the amount of heat generated - more windings.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: mikemee1331] #1046617
08/06/11 12:31 AM
08/06/11 12:31 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Sinitro Offline
master
Sinitro  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Quote:

i believe the Blaster 2 coil is rated at 45,000 volts. your stock 'heavy duty' is considerably less which would explain the amount of heat generated - more windings.




Ding Ding..
We have a winner...
The later coils such as the Blaster 2 are capable of handling higher input voltages & current for a longer time..

Just my $0.02....

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: 540challenger] #1046618
08/06/11 12:35 AM
08/06/11 12:35 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Sinitro Offline
master
Sinitro  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Quote:

Quote:

I'm running a stock (Heavy Duty 12v) coil in my daily '73 Dart without ballast resistor.
If I reconnect the ballast resistor, the car starts to stumble at idle and die when put in Drive. I probably have the wrong resistor, but since I disconnected it everything still seems to work fine.
The coil's temp climbs right along with the engine intake's temp.

Today I decided to install a MSD Blaster 2 coil (also without ballast).
After starting the engine I let it run for a couple of minutes and used my infrared tempgauge and pointed it at the coil... It was already at 130-140F and climbing. I kept the engine idling for awhile to see where the temp would end up at and it went up to around 176F when I called it quits.

To me it's obvious the Blaster coil really needs a ballast resistor when used in a daily driver.


Has anyone ever measured the temp of a coil here?




I haven't but tomorrow I will, sounds like a fun and easy experiment.




Thats why Mopar recommends a 0.25 Ohm ballast resistor for the Blaster 2 when used with a Mopar box...
Keep in mind the major thing that burns out the coil is the current, thats the major purpose of the ballast resistor..

Just my $0.02...

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: Sinitro] #1046619
08/06/11 12:40 AM
08/06/11 12:40 AM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Ditch the stupid ECU and ballast and put in a MSD 6AL box.

Much better spark.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? #1046620
08/06/11 12:03 PM
08/06/11 12:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Sinitro Offline
master
Sinitro  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Quote:

Ditch the stupid ECU and ballast and put in a MSD 6AL box.

Much better spark.




I have the MSD6 with the built-in Mopar connector and can switch out in about 5 minutes with my chrome box..
My built 440 runs actually better with the chrome box..

When I run the MSD I change the ballast resistor to one that I put a straight wire in..
Note my chrome box is about 10 years old, maybe they built them better back then..

Just my $0.02..

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: Sinitro] #1046621
08/06/11 12:14 PM
08/06/11 12:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
S
SomeCarGuy Offline
I Live Here
SomeCarGuy  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
The ballast keeps cuts the voltage to the coil. A Blaster 2 can handle 12 volts, as would any 12 volt coil.

The "concern" about not running a ballast is that the transistor in the ECU will heat up and burn out with 12 volts flowing through it. Has nothing to do w/ the coil.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: SomeCarGuy] #1046622
08/06/11 05:17 PM
08/06/11 05:17 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
M
mikemee1331 Offline
master
mikemee1331  Offline
master
M

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
we are again confusing 'current' with 'voltage'.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: SomeCarGuy] #1046623
08/06/11 05:31 PM
08/06/11 05:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Sinitro Offline
master
Sinitro  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Quote:

The ballast keeps cuts the voltage to the coil. A Blaster 2 can handle 12 volts, as would any 12 volt coil.

The "concern" about not running a ballast is that the transistor in the ECU will heat up and burn out with 12 volts flowing through it. Has nothing to do w/ the coil.




The ballast resistor serves (2) purposes, it drops the voltage but also prevents higher current to the coil as well. Plus as it heats up its resistance increases which drops the input voltage to coil lowering its output voltage..

The coil is capable to handle the higher voltages for short durations OK but since it typically constructed of hundreds of turns of thin 28 gauge wire, sustained cycles of higher voltage along with the current the coil will fail. Think about much like flashlite batteries, a D cell and an AA or both rated @1.5V but the D cell can hold it voltage capability longer as it has the current reserve..

The coil is a voltage step-up transformer, as the coil overheats its efficiency (output voltage) will drop. The ECU is simply a switch triggered by the distributor pickup that turns the coil on/off..

For an MSD box which does multiple switching is able to fire the coil to a higher voltage as it switches on the coil in shorter sequential intervals so the it doesn't heat up as fast...

Just my $0.02..

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: Sinitro] #1046624
08/06/11 05:39 PM
08/06/11 05:39 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
M
mikemee1331 Offline
master
mikemee1331  Offline
master
M

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
Quote:

Quote:

The ballast keeps cuts the voltage to the coil. A Blaster 2 can handle 12 volts, as would any 12 volt coil.

The "concern" about not running a ballast is that the transistor in the ECU will heat up and burn out with 12 volts flowing through it. Has nothing to do w/ the coil.




The ballast resistor serves (2) purposes, it drops the voltage but also prevents higher current to the coil as well. Plus as it heats up its resistance increases which drops the input voltage to coil lowering its output voltage..

The coil is capable to handle the higher voltages for short durations OK but since it typically constructed of hundreds of turns of thin 28 gauge wire, sustained cycles of higher voltage along with the current the coil will fail. Think about much like flashlite batteries, a D cell and an AA or both rated @1.5V but the D cell can hold it voltage capability longer as it has the current reserve..

The coil is a voltage step-up transformer, as the coil overheats its efficiency (output voltage) will drop. The ECU is simply a switch triggered by the distributor pickup that turns the coil on/off..

For an MSD box which does multiple switching is able to fire the coil to a higher voltage as it switches on the coil in shorter sequential intervals so the it doesn't heat up as fast...

Just my $0.02..




BINGO - as you so schooled me a few weeks ago! i need to save this in my favorites for when it comes up again.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: mikemee1331] #1046625
08/06/11 05:55 PM
08/06/11 05:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443
Indiana
Y
YO7_A66 Offline
master
YO7_A66  Offline
master
Y

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443
Indiana
""The ECU is simply a switch triggered by the distributor pickup that turns the coil on/off.""

Can a standard ECU handle a non ballast setup or does an ECU have to be designed for a non ballast setup?

Thanks


1970 YO7 A66 [Canadian Export] F8 Challenger
340 (Currently in shop for stroker assy.)
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: YO7_A66] #1046626
08/06/11 07:04 PM
08/06/11 07:04 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
M
mikemee1331 Offline
master
mikemee1331  Offline
master
M

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
i'll try my best here at the risk of getting flammed it is my understanding that the ballast has no relationship to the ECU. it is the coil and ballast that must be matched. a 'standard' ECU requires the use of a ballast because there is only one firing of the coil. this makes the amount of time the coil is storing voltage longer and cause the coil to get hot at lower rpms. so, if you are using a standard ECU with an oil filled coil then yes, you need to use the ballast recommended by the coil manufacture. in the case of a Blaster2 i believe the recommendation is a .5. a stock coil i think is a .2. you need to use a .5 with the Blaster because it has way more and smaller windings inside to increase the output and it will burn out. with a multi-spark ECU the ballast is not needed because at low rpms, the unit it causing the coil to fire multiple times and NOT storing it.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: mikemee1331] #1046627
08/06/11 08:00 PM
08/06/11 08:00 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
S
SomeCarGuy Offline
I Live Here
SomeCarGuy  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
The ballast effects what the ECU sees.

Page 90 of the Oct 11 Mopar Action discusses this.

What I have been saying is that the "problem" is overblown. The ECU is suppose to overheat w/o a ballast and that is not the case from my personal experience. I don't know what the tipping point is, but near endless use in high temps with no added provisiosn for airflow didn't do it. The car ran better IMO and I used the crap out of it that way.

A 12 volt coil will not see diminished output by sending 12 volts to it. It is not going to overheat.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: SomeCarGuy] #1046628
08/06/11 08:53 PM
08/06/11 08:53 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
M
mikemee1331 Offline
master
mikemee1331  Offline
master
M

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
Done.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: mikemee1331] #1046629
08/06/11 09:32 PM
08/06/11 09:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
S
SomeCarGuy Offline
I Live Here
SomeCarGuy  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
Huh?

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: mikemee1331] #1046630
08/07/11 01:12 AM
08/07/11 01:12 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Sinitro Offline
master
Sinitro  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Quote:

i'll try my best here at the risk of getting flammed it is my understanding that the ballast has no relationship to the ECU. it is the coil and ballast that must be matched. a 'standard' ECU requires the use of a ballast because there is only one firing of the coil. this makes the amount of time the coil is storing voltage longer and cause the coil to get hot at lower rpms. so, if you are using a standard ECU with an oil filled coil then yes, you need to use the ballast recommended by the coil manufacture. in the case of a Blaster2 i believe the recommendation is a .5. a stock coil i think is a .2. you need to use a .5 with the Blaster because it has way more and smaller windings inside to increase the output and it will burn out. with a multi-spark ECU the ballast is not needed because at low rpms, the unit it causing the coil to fire multiple times and NOT storing it.




The ignition system consists of matched components, one cannot just start swapping piece for piece and expect reliable performance...

The Blaster coils (#P3690560 or #P4876832/33) uses a 0.25 Ohm ballast resistor (#P2444641) normally used with the Chrome box (#P4120534). The standard Mopar OE coils (#P4120889 or #P02495531) uses a 1 Ohm ballast resistor (#P5206436) used with the Orange box (#P4120505). It is not recommended to mix or match components, the ignition system should work but How well? and How long?..

All of these Mopar part #s were taken from the Mopar 2009 performance catalog.

Just my $0.02...

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: Sinitro] #1046631
08/07/11 06:48 AM
08/07/11 06:48 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
The Netherlands
BigBlockMopar Offline
master
BigBlockMopar  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
The Netherlands
And yet MSd advises to use a 0.8 Ohm resistor with their Blaster 2 coils. Now what to do?

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: BigBlockMopar] #1046632
08/07/11 09:00 AM
08/07/11 09:00 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Sinitro Offline
master
Sinitro  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Quote:

And yet MSd advises to use a 0.8 Ohm resistor with their Blaster 2 coils. Now what to do?




Your choice..
With my MSD box and Blaster coil MSD says to bypass the ballast resistor..
Looks like MSD is advising some confusing info..

A good starting point is to follow the brand's advise..

Just my $0.02...

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: BigBlockMopar] #1046633
08/07/11 09:23 AM
08/07/11 09:23 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
M
mikemee1331 Offline
master
mikemee1331  Offline
master
M

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
use the ballast that is matched to the coil. here is an excellent Q/A on what the ballast is for. kinda long though.
http://www.imperialclub.com/Repair/Electrical/coil.htm

the bottom line is if you match the componets together the way they are recommended, they will last longer. the numbers i posted are probably wrong as i was going from memory but the amount of CURRENT reduction is minimal between my post and Sinitro's. will it work without a ballast? yes, but for how long?

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: Sinitro] #1046634
08/07/11 10:56 AM
08/07/11 10:56 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
S
SomeCarGuy Offline
I Live Here
SomeCarGuy  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
Quote:

Quote:

And yet MSd advises to use a 0.8 Ohm resistor with their Blaster 2 coils. Now what to do?




Your choice..
With my MSD box and Blaster coil MSD says to bypass the ballast resistor..
Looks like MSD is advising some confusing info..

A good starting point is to follow the brand's advise..

Just my $0.02...





Yep. That is why I bypassed mine. MSD info said it is a 12 volt coil. Then I see people on here saying not to do that. MA says don't do that. Since I already did and it worked, I know differently. It would seem some "theory" was employed about the ECU overheating and others just parrotted that over and over.

A 12 volt coil will be fine running on 12 volts.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: SomeCarGuy] #1046635
08/07/11 11:08 AM
08/07/11 11:08 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443
Indiana
Y
YO7_A66 Offline
master
YO7_A66  Offline
master
Y

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443
Indiana
The reason that I asked if an ECU can handle a non ballast setup is because when I called FBO and told D that I was using his ECU without a ballast and with a Mallory 12v coil, he said that the ECU will burn up.
This bothers me because I have the manufacturer saying that it will burn up but so far it has not. D knows his ignitions!! I only drive the car about 30-45 minutes at a time so maybe it would on a longer drive.
I am cosidering his new ECU/12v coil and keep my existing items as a backup.


1970 YO7 A66 [Canadian Export] F8 Challenger
340 (Currently in shop for stroker assy.)
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: YO7_A66] #1046636
08/07/11 01:10 PM
08/07/11 01:10 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
NachoRT74 Offline
master
NachoRT74  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
I guess it could burn because ECU closes the coil circuit when hooking the - lead of coil, wire what runs to ECU.


With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: NachoRT74] #1046637
08/07/11 01:17 PM
08/07/11 01:17 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
NachoRT74 Offline
master
NachoRT74  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
Guys... it look some of you are worried about bypass the resistor and then if some emergency how went back to the stock assembly with resistor on a quick change.

THATS EASY... get a ballast resistor, remove the filler on back, remove the resistor from ceramic, keep the prongs ( prongs have retining tabs so you can remove the prongs too ), sold a jumper wire ( 14 or 12 gauge ) between prongs and insert it again into the ceramic piece... wire the harness as usually you'd do.

the day you need to hook back again the stock system, simply mount an untouched ballast and voila! wiring kept untouched at least on that part


With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: YO7_A66] #1046638
08/07/11 02:12 PM
08/07/11 02:12 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
S
SomeCarGuy Offline
I Live Here
SomeCarGuy  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
Quote:

The reason that I asked if an ECU can handle a non ballast setup is because when I called FBO and told D that I was using his ECU without a ballast and with a Mallory 12v coil, he said that the ECU will burn up.
This bothers me because I have the manufacturer saying that it will burn up but so far it has not. D knows his ignitions!! I only drive the car about 30-45 minutes at a time so maybe it would on a longer drive.
I am cosidering his new ECU/12v coil and keep my existing items as a backup.





That is exactly what I have seen. People put out information and real world use doesn't support it. I lean towards some engineer looked at the drawings and thought it "could be an issue". Then everybody has ran with it.

When I discovered the MSD instructions for the coil in my glovebox, I also noted that it said that the coil MUST not be mounted horizontal, unless it is epoxy filled. Mine wasn't and had been mounted horizontal long before I got the car. I left it that way and I'd say it had over 10 years and countless miles on it when it left a couple of months ago. Car left here on a hot day and was driven for at least two hours to the guy's home. I got word a month later he was still very happy with the car. Folklore says that he should be pretty mad

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: YO7_A66] #1046639
08/07/11 02:22 PM
08/07/11 02:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Sinitro Offline
master
Sinitro  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Quote:

The reason that I asked if an ECU can handle a non ballast setup is because when I called FBO and told D that I was using his ECU without a ballast and with a Mallory 12v coil, he said that the ECU will burn up.
This bothers me because I have the manufacturer saying that it will burn up but so far it has not. D knows his ignitions!! I only drive the car about 30-45 minutes at a time so maybe it would on a longer drive.
I am cosidering his new ECU/12v coil and keep my existing items as a backup.




Keep in mind that the brand will take a conservative approach.. The reason is that if something fails people will come back and complain/bad mouth things about their products on the internet..

A short drive of 30-45 minutes is not a real test but take a 2 hour drive down in Phoenix in 112 degree heat,
now guess what the temperature of the ballast resistor is...

IMHO...
The bottom line is that the quality brand ignition parts available today are more capable of handling 12V compared to previous generations.. As long as one avoids the Chinese junker line called P** C**p, or one of the later Orange boxes..

Just my $0.02...

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: Sinitro] #1046640
08/07/11 08:57 PM
08/07/11 08:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,359
Buzzard County, FL
IronWolf Offline
pro stock
IronWolf  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,359
Buzzard County, FL
It's always a good idea to get advice from this board, then go ahead and experiment with your own ideas. There's always some bad advice (Mopar Myths) though. I've been ranting about ballast resistors for years. But, I believe in the "Scientific Method".

My experimental results :

I run a chrome box with a .25 ohm resistor , and a MSD Blaster 2 coil. Nary a problem. I have run the .25 resistor with an orange box with no problems , either.

The fact is, the parts houses sell these crap 1.5 ohm resistors ( and maybe 1 ohm, I don't recall). Want to be less than optimal, then run those. Granny loves them.

My Mopar ECU is mounted on a standoff. No melting of the potting material. I have been informed that steel is not a good conductor, but the air flow behind my standoff appears to help.

During the heat of a race ? Think about it - those high values will retain heat and resistance , and deliver less current to the coil.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: BigBlockMopar] #1046641
08/25/11 09:58 AM
08/25/11 09:58 AM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Mass.
charger_dart Offline
member
charger_dart  Offline
member

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Mass.
Quote:



I'm running a stock (Heavy Duty 12v) coil in my daily '73 Dart without ballast resistor.
If I reconnect the ballast resistor, the car starts to stumble at idle and die when put in Drive. I probably have the wrong resistor, but since I disconnected it everything still seems to work fine.
The coil's temp climbs right along with the engine intake's temp.


Today I decided to install a MSD Blaster 2 coil (also without ballast).
After starting the engine I let it run for a couple of minutes and used my infrared tempgauge and pointed it at the coil... It was already at 130-140F and climbing. I kept the engine idling for awhile to see where the temp would end up at and it went up to around 176F when I called it quits.

To me it's obvious the Blaster coil really needs a ballast resistor when used in a daily driver.


Has anyone ever measured the temp of a coil here?





I decided to try to run my MP electronic ignition with the BR shorted as an experiment. The BB engine seemed to run better to me. It was smoother and seemed more responsive. I used a IR temp unit to measure the 12V coil's temp and it ranged from 210 on the bottom to 245 at the top. Its mounted on the intake which measured 175. I searched the net, but could not find a spec for coil temps - anybody have a clue on what is considered too hot?


68 Charger R/T 68 Dart G/T Convert 11 Challenger SRT
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: charger_dart] #1046642
08/25/11 11:48 AM
08/25/11 11:48 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,810
Sobieski Wi
B
bee1971 Offline
master
bee1971  Offline
master
B

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,810
Sobieski Wi
Man there is alot of conflicting answers here

First things first

1) You guys do realize the MSD Blaster 2 Coils that most of us buy (8200-8202-8203)coil already has .7 ohms of resistance built into the primary side
2) You guys do realize the (8200-8203)coil that has the supplied ballast resistor of .8 ohms is to bee used only with POINTS STYLE IGNITION SYSTEMS

BALLAST RESISTOR IS NOT NEEDED WITH THE MOPAR ELECTRONIC IGNITION because the coil already has a .7 ohm resistance built in !!!

So adding the Mopar .25 ohm resistor to this or the supplied .8 ohm ballast resistor = Total of .95 ohms or 1.5 ohms of resistance to the positive side of coil




Note: This Blaster Coil is supplied with a ballast resistor. If your application uses a points
distributor, the ballast must be used. Late model ELECTRONIC IGNITIONS or an MSD
Ignition DO NOT REQUIRE the ballast resistor.

Note: The Blaster Coil will mount in most factory canister coil mounts. MSD also offers a Chrome Bracket, PN 8213. It is recommended to mount the coil in an upright position.
STOCK POINTS IGNITION
If you are installing the Blaster Coil with the STOCK POINTS IGNITION (Figure 1), MSD Blaster Ignition or an MSD 5 Ignition Control (Figure 2), the supplied 0.8 ohm ballast resistor must be installed on the coil positive (+) wire.


1971 Dodge Charger Superbee
2011 Ram Sport 1500 Quad Cab Deep Water Blue Loaded
Siberian Huskies
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: charger_dart] #1046643
08/25/11 01:36 PM
08/25/11 01:36 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
S
SomeCarGuy Offline
I Live Here
SomeCarGuy  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,198
Someplace you aren't
Quote:

Quote:



I'm running a stock (Heavy Duty 12v) coil in my daily '73 Dart without ballast resistor.
If I reconnect the ballast resistor, the car starts to stumble at idle and die when put in Drive. I probably have the wrong resistor, but since I disconnected it everything still seems to work fine.
The coil's temp climbs right along with the engine intake's temp.


Today I decided to install a MSD Blaster 2 coil (also without ballast).
After starting the engine I let it run for a couple of minutes and used my infrared tempgauge and pointed it at the coil... It was already at 130-140F and climbing. I kept the engine idling for awhile to see where the temp would end up at and it went up to around 176F when I called it quits.

To me it's obvious the Blaster coil really needs a ballast resistor when used in a daily driver.


Has anyone ever measured the temp of a coil here?





I decided to try to run my MP electronic ignition with the BR shorted as an experiment. The BB engine seemed to run better to me. It was smoother and seemed more responsive. I used a IR temp unit to measure the 12V coil's temp and it ranged from 210 on the bottom to 245 at the top. Its mounted on the intake which measured 175. I searched the net, but could not find a spec for coil temps - anybody have a clue on what is considered too hot?






Check the temp of the ECU both w/ and w/o the ballast. The ECU is "suppose" to overheat and die shortly w/o a ballast. Nothing has seemed to prove that. The temp gun may shed some light on this.

What coil are you running?

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: SomeCarGuy] #1046644
08/25/11 03:29 PM
08/25/11 03:29 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Mass.
charger_dart Offline
member
charger_dart  Offline
member

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Mass.
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:



I'm running a stock (Heavy Duty 12v) coil in my daily '73 Dart without ballast resistor.
If I reconnect the ballast resistor, the car starts to stumble at idle and die when put in Drive. I probably have the wrong resistor, but since I disconnected it everything still seems to work fine.
The coil's temp climbs right along with the engine intake's temp.


Today I decided to install a MSD Blaster 2 coil (also without ballast).
After starting the engine I let it run for a couple of minutes and used my infrared tempgauge and pointed it at the coil... It was already at 130-140F and climbing. I kept the engine idling for awhile to see where the temp would end up at and it went up to around 176F when I called it quits.

To me it's obvious the Blaster coil really needs a ballast resistor when used in a daily driver.


Has anyone ever measured the temp of a coil here?





I decided to try to run my MP electronic ignition with the BR shorted as an experiment. The BB engine seemed to run better to me. It was smoother and seemed more responsive. I used a IR temp unit to measure the 12V coil's temp and it ranged from 210 on the bottom to 245 at the top. Its mounted on the intake which measured 175. I searched the net, but could not find a spec for coil temps - anybody have a clue on what is considered too hot?






Check the temp of the ECU both w/ and w/o the ballast. The ECU is "suppose" to overheat and die shortly w/o a ballast. Nothing has seemed to prove that. The temp gun may shed some light on this.

What coil are you running?




I am currently running a 12v coil from Don at FBO. Not sure who makes it.....
I have my ECU mounted in the forward frame rail just behind the bumper where it can stay cool. The temp was 110 when I check ed in on a 80 degree day.


68 Charger R/T 68 Dart G/T Convert 11 Challenger SRT
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: charger_dart] #1046645
08/25/11 03:41 PM
08/25/11 03:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443
Indiana
Y
YO7_A66 Offline
master
YO7_A66  Offline
master
Y

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,443
Indiana
""I am currently running a 12v coil from Don at FBO.""

Is that the new #HR COIL that he just released?


1970 YO7 A66 [Canadian Export] F8 Challenger
340 (Currently in shop for stroker assy.)
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: YO7_A66] #1046646
08/25/11 03:52 PM
08/25/11 03:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Mass.
charger_dart Offline
member
charger_dart  Offline
member

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Mass.
Quote:

""I am currently running a 12v coil from Don at FBO.""

Is that the new #HR COIL that he just released?



Yes, it is. Just got it a couple weeks ago to replace the Blaster II. No noticeable difference between the two coils that I can see.


68 Charger R/T 68 Dart G/T Convert 11 Challenger SRT
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: scratchnfotraction] #1046647
08/25/11 04:00 PM
08/25/11 04:00 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 95
Idaho, USA
W
White440 Offline
member
White440  Offline
member
W

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 95
Idaho, USA
Quote:

I by-pass mine with the pertronix points conversion and their flame thrower coil,it has its own resister built in to it

the pertronix conversion needs the full 12 volts to work correctly.

been like that for 15+ yrs now






My

If you are running a "full" MSD system fallow there recommendations they put there systems together to run that way.

I opted to run MP Orange Box conversion kit on my tbi swap and wanted to eliminate the BR so I looked into Blaster2 and as stated it a .8 ohm and scrachen recommended the Pertronix Flame-Thrower so I looked it up. Internally regulated, 1.5 ohm with 40,000 volts.

Now my Mopar engines 9th edition says I need 1.25 min. I bought the Part#40011 Flam-Thrower.

The instructions in the box say "1.5 Ohm Coils 8 cyl all applications Remove resistor."

It's up to you but the math adds up for me but look at your system and deiced for yourself because as you can see there are ALLOT of different opinions on this subject and only a little research along with trial and error will tell.

Just my good luck

Last edited by White440; 08/25/11 04:42 PM.

"Full throttle until you see GOD then brake!" <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/drive.gif" alt="" /> Life's to short to ride the brakes!
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: NachoRT74] #1046648
07/05/12 12:01 AM
07/05/12 12:01 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 88
Minnesota, USA
D
dnd0001 Offline
member
dnd0001  Offline
member
D

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 88
Minnesota, USA
Nacho

What did you use to remove the filler on the back of the ceramic resistor? The stuff is as hard as a rock.

Thanks

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: dnd0001] #1046649
07/05/12 03:19 AM
07/05/12 03:19 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
You know Mopars electronic ign was designed by Mopar to use a ballast. They all came from the factory with one that was one or two row ballast. They went to the single ballast and took out the auxilury circuit that was ign feed thru the 5 ohm ballast and just use the one ballast to the coil. I have always run mine with the ballast because thats what Mopars eng book said.

Will it work without the ballast ?? Sure but how long will it work as they did say it can burn the ECU up. But I never tried it to see if the ECU will hold up.
All I can tell you is I run the orange MP ECU with a .75 ballast and it works great. Starts good and runs 10's without ever missing a beat. If you run it without the ballast I would keep extra in the trunk just incase it would burn up. Maybe it wont but its good to be prepared. Ron

Last edited by 383man; 07/05/12 03:20 AM.
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: 383man] #1046650
07/05/12 02:26 PM
07/05/12 02:26 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,097
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,097
Bend,OR USA
As already said, coils are voltage transformers, there are two different uses of them, step up and step down. Our cars use step up transformers for DC low voltage, high current, (check out Ohms law )DC = direct current. They are made of solid small gauge wires wound around a piece of conductor materail to make them work,they are filled with oil to help keep them cool Cool being relative Coils usually fail because a of a broken wire, not a burnt up wire Coils designed for multi spark ignitions have a different ratio(numbers ) windings internally than standard coils do Different loads need different parts The ballast resitor is a solid wire resitor used to reduce the voltage input into the coil, the only time it is not working is when a ground is applied to that circuit for the current to flow through the coil, once for each firing stroke, 8 times per cycle (RPM) on V8 motors Are you confused yet


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: dnd0001] #1046651
07/06/12 02:31 AM
07/06/12 02:31 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,230
State of retirement
5
52savoy Offline
master
52savoy  Offline
master
5

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,230
State of retirement
Quote:

Nacho

What did you use to remove the filler on the back of the ceramic resistor? The stuff is as hard as a rock.

Thanks




Use small side-cuts to break it up. Crimp and then solder a 12g wire in and reassemble..

I run an old 70's Direct Connection dist.(race-tach drive) in my '64 max wedge without a chrome box. I also use the MSD-6 and hide it behind the dash, electronic regulator and the modified ballast.

An old picture but the ignition hasn't changed..


Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: charger_dart] #1046652
10/01/14 07:28 PM
10/01/14 07:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
The Netherlands
BigBlockMopar Offline
master
BigBlockMopar  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
The Netherlands
Quote:

Quote:



I'm running a stock (Heavy Duty 12v) coil in my daily '73 Dart without ballast resistor.
If I reconnect the ballast resistor, the car starts to stumble at idle and die when put in Drive. I probably have the wrong resistor, but since I disconnected it everything still seems to work fine.
The coil's temp climbs right along with the engine intake's temp.


Today I decided to install a MSD Blaster 2 coil (also without ballast).
After starting the engine I let it run for a couple of minutes and used my infrared tempgauge and pointed it at the coil... It was already at 130-140F and climbing. I kept the engine idling for awhile to see where the temp would end up at and it went up to around 176F when I called it quits.

To me it's obvious the Blaster coil really needs a ballast resistor when used in a daily driver.


Has anyone ever measured the temp of a coil here?





I decided to try to run my MP electronic ignition with the BR shorted as an experiment. The BB engine seemed to run better to me. It was smoother and seemed more responsive. I used a IR temp unit to measure the 12V coil's temp and it ranged from 210 on the bottom to 245 at the top. Its mounted on the intake which measured 175. I searched the net, but could not find a spec for coil temps - anybody have a clue on what is considered too hot?






Bringing this topic up from the basement where I found it again;

I've been running my Blaster 2 coil for a good while now with a 1 Ohm ballast, but recently I started noticing the engine missing a cylinder once in a while while idling.
Plugs were near perfect, so checking up on the voltage at the coil I noticed it was just around a mere 5 volts.

Decided to try running the coil without a BR again but found it's temp climbing fast again while idling with an open hood. At 185° coiltemp I found that was high enough.
I installed an older, stock, but 12v rated coil, running without a BR for the time being.

The main difference since last time I tried this is that the car now has a way better charging system, which is actually putting out 14 - 14.4 volts.

I'm now looking locally for a 0,25 Ohm BR to install as I don't feel comfortable running the car with a 'glowing' hot Blaster coil under the hood.


Anyone know if you can use an E-core coil with a Mopar Chrome ECU?

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: BigBlockMopar] #1046653
10/01/14 08:22 PM
10/01/14 08:22 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
Quote:

I'm now looking locally for a 0,25 Ohm BR to install


An option if you dont have the exact ohm 2 terminal "single" ballast is to use the OE 4 terminal "dual ballast connectors (2 white pieces with a blue loop on one end & solder em in and add a blue loop on the other end to make a parallel circuit & then mix and match (2) 2 terminal "single" ballasts side by side (they fit) till you get the ohms you want or very close to it (you do have alot of leeway as already covered). the coil sees the total reduction thru the parallel circuit & ohm each combo end with the blue loops till you get a combo (ohms) you are OK with


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: RapidRobert] #1046654
10/01/14 09:07 PM
10/01/14 09:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
The Netherlands
BigBlockMopar Offline
master
BigBlockMopar  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
The Netherlands
I've never really worked with resistors but after reading into it indeed a pair or number of parallel resistors might get me close enough.
I have a fair number of 4-pin and some 2-pin resistors to choose from.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: RapidRobert] #1046655
10/01/14 09:29 PM
10/01/14 09:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,482
Lake Orion, MI
goldduster318 Offline
pro stock
goldduster318  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,482
Lake Orion, MI
I ran a Wells replacement 4-pin ECU and an Accel Super Stock Street coil with no ballast for 6k miles and never had an issue. I currently have the FBO ECU and the FBO coil without a ballast (when I re-wired the car there isn't even a place to connect it), and 2k miles later, still perfect.

The voltage going to the ECU is always full battery voltage on a 4-pin car. Cars with the dual ballast have one side for the 5-pin ECU. I doubt the switching of the coil at 12V vs 5 by the ECU will have any effect on the life of the ECU, as it's not a high current draw there (check out the small wires).

Plenty of coils out there that can take 12V. As people have said, you don't use a ballast with pertronix, or with MSD, or with an HEI conversion.


'70 Duster 470hp 340/T56 Magnum/8 3/4 3.23 Sure-Grip
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: goldduster318] #1046656
10/02/14 01:27 AM
10/02/14 01:27 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
NachoRT74 Offline
master
NachoRT74  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
4 pins ECUs got the resistor built in inside the unit.


With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: NachoRT74] #1046657
10/02/14 12:26 PM
10/02/14 12:26 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 892
Illinois
StrkrDart69 Offline
super stock
StrkrDart69  Offline
super stock

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 892
Illinois
Points = resistor
Electronic Ign = No resistor needed.
I have always run my electronic ign. mopars with no resistor. No problems at all. Yes I do run MSD coil. No hot ECU, and normal coil temps. ECUs are not "supposed" to burn up without a ballast resistor.
http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/techa...last_blast_off/

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: 540challenger] #1046658
10/02/14 02:03 PM
10/02/14 02:03 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,688
Marlboro, NY, USA
R
Rick_Ehrenberg Offline
top fuel
Rick_Ehrenberg  Offline
top fuel
R

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,688
Marlboro, NY, USA
This question has been around for decades in various forms. I'll try to clarify the fog surrounding it.

When cranking an engine, especially at lower temperatures, the starter imposes so much load on the battery that the voltage drops (as low as 8 to 9 volts). This reduced potential (voltage, E), would reduce the ignition system's spark output and make cold starting difficult. In a nutshell, what the factory did was to design the ignition system (breaker points and electronic) to produce full output at this reduced cranking voltage. Then, under normal running conditions, a resistor is used to reduce the voltage to the design point. This is why there's two different ignition wires (and switch terminals), "start" and "run" (or "ign 1" and "ign 2").

Bypassing the ballast resistor will overtax all ignition components: ECU / breaker points and ignition coil), increasing the spark energy (output) while reducing their reliability markedly.

Factory hi-po ECUs ("gold box", etc.) were designed for race use and used lower-resistance ballasts, their internal components and heat sinking were designed for this, still, they were never recommended for street use / idle.

Little, if any, of the above applies to aftermarket ignition systems and/or components. Many are designed to run on full battery potential; they have either internal regulators or dc-to-dc converters. Even with a factory OEM ECU, if your replacement coil has higher internal resistance than the OEM 1.4 to 1.8 ohm value, you might be able to safely reduce the ballast's value.

Do not lose sight of this fact: If there's no misfiring (at any useable RPM) in your present configuration, no ignition system swap or upgrade will increase output. EG: I witnessed a factory engine dyno session (Chrys.) where the subject engine produced over 150 HP/L on dead-stock wasted-spark ignition (even wires, coil, etc.). All aftermarket systems tried produced zero gains.

Hope this helps,

Rick E.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: Rick_Ehrenberg] #1046659
10/02/14 10:14 PM
10/02/14 10:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Thanks Rick. I had a feeling that once the fire is lit, the ignition systems job is done. A "hotter" spark isn't as beneficial as some think that it is.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: Rick_Ehrenberg] #1046660
10/03/14 02:07 PM
10/03/14 02:07 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,822
Colorado
D
denfireguy Offline
top fuel
denfireguy  Offline
top fuel
D

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,822
Colorado
Quote:

This question has been around for decades in various forms. I'll try to clarify the fog surrounding it.

When cranking an engine, especially at lower temperatures, the starter imposes so much load on the battery that the voltage drops (as low as 8 to 9 volts). This reduced potential (voltage, E), would reduce the ignition system's spark output and make cold starting difficult. In a nutshell, what the factory did was to design the ignition system (breaker points and electronic) to produce full output at this reduced cranking voltage. Then, under normal running conditions, a resistor is used to reduce the voltage to the design point. This is why there's two different ignition wires (and switch terminals), "start" and "run" (or "ign 1" and "ign 2").

Bypassing the ballast resistor will overtax all ignition components: ECU / breaker points and ignition coil), increasing the spark energy (output) while reducing their reliability markedly.

Factory hi-po ECUs ("gold box", etc.) were designed for race use and used lower-resistance ballasts, their internal components and heat sinking were designed for this, still, they were never recommended for street use / idle.

Little, if any, of the above applies to aftermarket ignition systems and/or components. Many are designed to run on full battery potential; they have either internal regulators or dc-to-dc converters. Even with a factory OEM ECU, if your replacement coil has higher internal resistance than the OEM 1.4 to 1.8 ohm value, you might be able to safely reduce the ballast's value.

Do not lose sight of this fact: If there's no misfiring (at any useable RPM) in your present configuration, no ignition system swap or upgrade will increase output. EG: I witnessed a factory engine dyno session (Chrys.) where the subject engine produced over 150 HP/L on dead-stock wasted-spark ignition (even wires, coil, etc.). All aftermarket systems tried produced zero gains.

Hope this helps,

Rick E.


There are two other things that a ballast resistor does:
First, it limits current in the circuit protecting the coil and other components in series with it.
The second is more obscure but just as important. It dampens the "ringing" in the coil when it fires. When the magnetic field collapses in the secondary firing the plug, eddy currents from the secondary are induced into the primary which in turn goes back into the secondary again, at a much lower level but still there and measurable. Meanwhile, the distributor has moved away from that plug wire and the voltage has no where to go but be dissipated in heat, mainly in the coil unless the ballast resistor takes some of it. The ballast resistor is also a damper resistor to keep the ringing to a minimum. The bypass capacitor on the coils positive terminal also aids in stopping the ringing but more importantly filters the energy dissipation to lower radio frequency interference.


2014 Ram 1500 Laramie, 73 Cuda
Previous mopars: 62 Valiant, 65 Fury III, 68 Fury III, 72 Satellite, 74 Satellite, 89 Acclaim, 98 Caravan, 2003 Durango
Only previous Non-Mopar: Schwinn Tornado
Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: denfireguy] #1046661
10/03/14 07:22 PM
10/03/14 07:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
The Netherlands
BigBlockMopar Offline
master
BigBlockMopar  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
The Netherlands
Which would explain the word 'ballast' a bit better indeed.

Re: ballast resistor by-pass?? [Re: denfireguy] #1046662
10/04/14 02:31 AM
10/04/14 02:31 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 892
Illinois
StrkrDart69 Offline
super stock
StrkrDart69  Offline
super stock

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 892
Illinois
Quote:

Quote:

This question has been around for decades in various forms. I'll try to clarify the fog surrounding it.

When cranking an engine, especially at lower temperatures, the starter imposes so much load on the battery that the voltage drops (as low as 8 to 9 volts). This reduced potential (voltage, E), would reduce the ignition system's spark output and make cold starting difficult. In a nutshell, what the factory did was to design the ignition system (breaker points and electronic) to produce full output at this reduced cranking voltage. Then, under normal running conditions, a resistor is used to reduce the voltage to the design point. This is why there's two different ignition wires (and switch terminals), "start" and "run" (or "ign 1" and "ign 2").

Bypassing the ballast resistor will overtax all ignition components: ECU / breaker points and ignition coil), increasing the spark energy (output) while reducing their reliability markedly.

Factory hi-po ECUs ("gold box", etc.) were designed for race use and used lower-resistance ballasts, their internal components and heat sinking were designed for this, still, they were never recommended for street use / idle.

Little, if any, of the above applies to aftermarket ignition systems and/or components. Many are designed to run on full battery potential; they have either internal regulators or dc-to-dc converters. Even with a factory OEM ECU, if your replacement coil has higher internal resistance than the OEM 1.4 to 1.8 ohm value, you might be able to safely reduce the ballast's value.

Do not lose sight of this fact: If there's no misfiring (at any useable RPM) in your present configuration, no ignition system swap or upgrade will increase output. EG: I witnessed a factory engine dyno session (Chrys.) where the subject engine produced over 150 HP/L on dead-stock wasted-spark ignition (even wires, coil, etc.). All aftermarket systems tried produced zero gains.

Hope this helps,

Rick E.


There are two other things that a ballast resistor does:
First, it limits current in the circuit protecting the coil and other components in series with it.
The second is more obscure but just as important. It dampens the "ringing" in the coil when it fires. When the magnetic field collapses in the secondary firing the plug, eddy currents from the secondary are induced into the primary which in turn goes back into the secondary again, at a much lower level but still there and measurable. Meanwhile, the distributor has moved away from that plug wire and the voltage has no where to go but be dissipated in heat, mainly in the coil unless the ballast resistor takes some of it. The ballast resistor is also a damper resistor to keep the ringing to a minimum. The bypass capacitor on the coils positive terminal also aids in stopping the ringing but more importantly filters the energy dissipation to lower radio frequency interference.




Wow

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1