Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: 9:1 Compression ratio 440 Camshaft [Re: Mr.Yuck] #1020809
06/29/11 07:21 PM
06/29/11 07:21 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
L
lewtot184 Offline
master
lewtot184  Offline
master
L

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
Quote:

looks like a decent choice. I went 12.90 in a 67 coronet with a almost 9:1 set-up like yours. I used the summit 488 cam, stock 906 heads, headers, 750DP, RPM intake, 2600 stall and 3.91's, Maybe you could use a steel shim gasket and bring up the compression some?


i thought about suggesting that summit cam. i don't think it would be a bad choice.

Re: 9:1 Compression ratio 440 Camshaft [Re: Coke] #1020810
06/30/11 10:43 AM
06/30/11 10:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Quote:

Call 'em...believe me, you won't be disappointed. Prompt and courteous...and very knowledgeable.

The other cam looks a touch small....not horrid though, but small for a manual trans cruiser.




Well,i will try it...I say this because i,m a lost man out of the E-mails ,i,m very bad speaking English ,more by phone,but i will try it

Mr yuck,when i was using the compression calculator i was checking it with the .020 gaskets and the result was 9.31 :1 or so.
You´re right,could be another option .
Did you Dyno test that Coronet?

Regards




never dyno'd it. Car weighed 3850 w/ me and gas. Ran Consistant 12.90-99 depending on weather. I'm guessing it was at the 450hp range.

Re: 9:1 Compression ratio 440 Camshaft [Re: Mr.Yuck] #1020811
06/30/11 10:08 PM
06/30/11 10:08 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 565
IA
L
landon1 Offline
mopar
landon1  Offline
mopar
L

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 565
IA
i heard about the "clatter" associated with the XE cams on this forum when i was building my 440. however, after having it done for almost 2 years now, i still don't hear any noise - sounds about like a stock motor with a little more lope...big deal


'71 Satellite Sebring 440
Re: 9:1 Compression ratio 440 Camshaft [Re: landon1] #1020812
06/30/11 10:57 PM
06/30/11 10:57 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 777
Washougal,Wa
D
Dodge Offline
super stock
Dodge  Offline
super stock
D

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 777
Washougal,Wa
My buddy and I both used the XE274H, but I used Mopar lifters and he used Napa lifters. No noise.


Stand behind your word
Re: 9:1 Compression ratio 440 Camshaft [Re: Dodge] #1020813
07/12/11 07:59 AM
07/12/11 07:59 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 340
Vitoria, Spain
C
Coke Offline OP
enthusiast
Coke  Offline OP
enthusiast
C

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 340
Vitoria, Spain
Thanks,
Then the noise trouble will be only with the lifters..

However,the last week i received a reply from Hughes:

Jorge,

Your compression ratio is extremely low for aluminum heads. Normally I don’t sell cams for an engine with low compression. We now have our Whiplash cams for low compression engines. They have very good low end and mid-range power, very aggressive idle characteristics, vacuum about 9”-11”. Cam P/N HMC3245BL ? Lifters P/N 5001,Springs P/N 1106. Check the cams out on our web site.


http://www.hughesengines.com/Index/produ...mp;partid=25116
Thanks

Dave


What i did then was to took my time and measure the deck again ,using feeler gauges an a dial indicator with a magnetic base.(I was using a vernier caliper,wich is not so accurate).
I noticed that the deck distances went from 0.074" in the 1&2 cyls to
0.068 and 0.065 in other cylinders.
Then the comp .ratio will be more around 9.30:1 with a 0.039" gasket.
Using a 0.020" gasket it could go between 9.65-9.70:1.

I have sent another mail to hughes just for asking them if that cam could be still correct for this engine.

thanks again for any input

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1